GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Remaster On The Way, But Won't Have Multiplayer - Report

Unfortunate news for quick-scopers and riot-shielders.

76 Comments

Following Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare's remaster a couple of years ago, many fans thought that a Modern Warfare 2 remake would be right around the corner. Although nothing has yet to be officially announced, new reports suggest that a MW2 remaster is finally on the way.

First reported by Call of Duty enthusiast site CharlieIntel, then later independently confirmed by Eurogamer, the Modern Warfare 2 remaster is in development and will be significantly cheaper than Modern Warfare Remastered. Both Eurogamer and CharlieIntel assert that MW2 Remastered will cost around $25 / €20, while Modern Warfare Remastered costs $40.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: GS News Update: Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Remaster Reportedly On The Way, But Won't Have Multiplayer

The reports also assert that the game will not feature multiplayer, which is likely the reason for its lower price point. We do not yet know why Activision wouldn't include multiplayer; one completely speculative reason could be that the publisher hopes to avoid splitting the player base among too many different Call of Duty titles.

The game will apparently launch on April 30, well ahead of Black Ops 4's October release for PS4 and Xbox One. Neither Eurogamer nor CharlieIntel have reported whether or not it'll come to PC. Further, CharlieIntel stated that its sources said that Raven Software, which was responsible for Modern Warfare Remastered, is not working on Modern Warfare 2 Remastered.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 76 comments about this story
76 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for blitxxx1981
blitxxx1981

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

No multiplayer = no buy here too, and why:

I LOVED MWR mainly because it had ALL MP maps and BOT support (which the originals did not)... I was hoping MW2R would come like MW1 was with all maps & bot support AT RELEASE, but I'll have to pass if not... It would also be BS IMO if the MP was available later as a high $ DLC :-\

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tony56723
Tony56723

1334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@blitxxx1981: despends on what you mean by all of the multiplayer maps.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blitxxx1981
blitxxx1981

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

@tony56723: Well yes, it was lousy to release MWR without the original DLC maps, then charge for them later like they did, but it was worth it to me (just $15 for the rest of the maps) & now I can play against the bots 50 years from now (like said; the originals didn't even have bot support)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tony56723
Tony56723

1334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@blitxxx1981: just $15? That’s 5 dollars more expensive than the original release of MWs Variety Map Pack when it first dropped. Not to mention it was a 10 year old remaster that was tacked onto an $80 special epdition for the newest (at the time) CoD. Thing should have been included from the start or at very least given away for free.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pj80
pj80

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The multiplayer add on will be $30 lol. Seriously though, this makes no sense.

11 • 
Avatar image for banhammer
BanHammer

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

COD still has fans?

4 • 
Avatar image for jako998
Jako998

1237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 5

No multiplayer, no buy. I'm not spending $25 for a campaign( while I did enjoy it a lot) that I will complete in about 4-5 hours

2 • 
Avatar image for xenomorphalien
XenomorphAlien

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Knowing Activision, they'll sell the DLC separately for another $20.

Horrible company.

4 • 
Avatar image for Pr0ving4Gr0undz
Pr0ving4Gr0undz

646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Imma miss getting nubetubed at spawn

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-61fe75e5565e2
deactivated-61fe75e5565e2

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"reason could be that the publisher hopes to avoid splitting the player base among too many different Call of Duty titles"

launching a game every year... yeah right....

4 • 
Avatar image for tony56723
Tony56723

1334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@arjcarlos: right?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamertaurus83
gamertaurus83

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

lol that is hilarious. who in there right mind would want to buy a call of duty game without multiplayer. no one buys call of duty, battlefield, battlefront 2, titanfall 2 for only the story.

5 • 
Avatar image for austinp
AustinP

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@gamertaurus83: Not everyone plays multiplayer. I now I didn’t spend $400 on a console to play with other people. When I play with someone I prefer them to be in the same room.

7 • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

7093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

@austinp: right, I pay for single player experiences too lately. Free time is too short lately to let it ruin it by hackers, griefers and kids screaming "oh yeah baby it's triple, ohhh yeahhhh".

4 • 
Avatar image for goku_black96666
Goku_Black96666

329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@santinegrete: lol thelast part upvote

Upvote • 
Avatar image for austinp
AustinP

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@santinegrete: yeah and those are main reasons why I don’t play online and plus I think it’s a rip off to pay $60 a year for something that use to be free. The only games I play 2 player on is mainly sports games and fighting games and I rather call up all my friends and set up a game tonight and have a tournament and have fun and make a little extra $$$.

3 • 
Avatar image for xiricon
Xiricon

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

No multiplayer, why bother?

9 • 
Avatar image for apieceoftoast
aPieceOfToast

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By aPieceOfToast

"Let the fans beg for multiplayer. Then release it as DLC requiring ownership of the base game."

9 • 
Avatar image for blitxxx1981
blitxxx1981

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

@apieceoftoast: Yeps, such a BS tactic imo, very harsh opinion

2 • 
Avatar image for KiriharaZro
KiriharaZro

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Stop remastering games, give us Modern Warfare 4, now with Trump in the White House and Kim Jong-un you have a lot to make a good conflict

3 • 
Avatar image for blitxxx1981
blitxxx1981

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

Edited By blitxxx1981

@KiriharaZro: lmao, Trump would just ask "This is violent, isn't it?" again once he saw the beta, lols...

2 • 
Avatar image for redhedjack
redhedjack

643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

Edited By redhedjack

So we're just getting the 3 hour campaign? Well I'm sure that'll be worth the $25 price tag they'll give it.

3 • 
Avatar image for ebola9717
ebola9717

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ebola9717

@redhedjack: Seriously. This might be the most pointless remaster ever.

6 • 
Avatar image for austinp
AustinP

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By AustinP

@redhedjack: better then paying full price for it when some people don’t use multiplayer.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-617099825b7d8
deactivated-617099825b7d8

594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@austinp: If people buy COD for just the single player. That in it's self is a joke. But what ever, all they doing is making up the lost projections of Destiny 2 failure and now COD WW2 soon to be dead presence.

2 • 
Avatar image for vfighter
VFighter

11031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@austinp: Those 5 people are going to be super excited.

5 • 
  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2