GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Does Shadow of Mordor's Crazy Ultra HD Content Pack Make a Real Difference?

See what awaits you if your computer is equipped with a 6 GB graphics card.

542 Comments
No Caption Provided

Gamers with extremely high-end computers can download a special HD content pack for Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor that enables the game's Ultra-level textures. But do they actually make a difference?

In the very likely case that you're unable to take advantage of these yourself, Digital Foundry has provided some impressions of what they're like. You can also check out the video below for a comparison of the PS4 and PC (with Ultra textures) versions.

Expectedly, it's very pretty when running the game at Ultra. However, it's not the kind of leap over High that you might be hoping for, particularly because the most-improved areas are hard to notice while playing the game in a normal manner. "For the most part, we found that the high setting--in itself placing a significant video RAM requirement on the user--offers the bulk of the ultra experience," writes Digital Foundry.

The option for these Ultra textures are built into the game, but in order to actually activate them, you need to download a free DLC pack from Steam. Earlier this week, the pack was only obtainable through an unintuitive process.

Installing the HD content is now easy enough, but you'll need a fairly ridiculous rig in order to take advantage of this if you follow the recommended requirements. In addition to a 64-bit processor, you'll need at least 8 GB of RAM and a DirectX 11-compatible video card with at least 6 GB of memory. That is not a misprint. It is, however, what's making me so sad about having spent a ton of money on a 3 GB video card not so long ago.

Digital Foundry spoke with lead designer Bob Roberts about why this option is even being offered, given how few people have the necessary hardware. Roberts said the game's artists built the game's assets at "an outrageously high fidelity" before then optimizing them "to fit onto [PS4/Xbox One], to fit onto PCs at high-end specs."

"Then obviously there's going to be that boundary where our monster development PCs are running it OK--but why not give people the option to crank it up?" Roberts continued. "It makes sense to get it out into the world there--we have it, we built it that way to look as good as possible. You might as well, right?"

According to Digital Foundry, high-end artwork can actually be run on GPUs with less memory, but you'll run into issues without capping the framerate. Fortunately, the game offers a 30fps cap option if running the game at the highest quality possible is your goal, though you'll still want as much GPU memory as possible for a good experience.

For a comparison of the Xbox One, PS4, and PC (running without the Ultra textures) versions, check out our video below.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 542 comments about this story
542 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for gajbutler
gajbutler

193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This game runs maxed out at 1080p but with high textures on a 750ti at a solid 50FPS.


Find it quite funny that a 6 month old £80 GPU is out performing these new consoles already.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bluefox755
bluefox755

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Part of it might have to do with the fact that you're comparing a 'card' to consoles....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bdiddytampa
bdiddytampa

188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> that 750ti a fantastic little card

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SkyAboveThePort
SkyAboveThePort

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> "next gen" consoles are on par with nvidia gtx 480.. << LINK REMOVED >>

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5fbd0ee14cee1
deactivated-5fbd0ee14cee1

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Yes

Upvote • 
Avatar image for WeWerePirates
WeWerePirates

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

I'm not so bothered about games with super high requirements for ultra. They are ridiculous for current PCs but give it a couple of years and not so much. It's a nice, if minor, incentive to revisit games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for theprismhead
ThePrismHead

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

6GB? W t f? I have 4k textures (which probably look even better) in Skyrim and it runs fine on my laptop!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nbf4548
nbf4548

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Nope, vanilla Shadow of Mordor looks better than modded Skyrim, I've just tried both.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BuBsay
BuBsay

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

You're trying to show off a 4k based texture pack on a Youtube video that doesn't go higher than 1080p and is compressed beyond recognition...


Leave the graphics comparisons to PCGamer now Gamespot, doing it like this is literally useless because you can't actually see any of the differences.

14 • 
Avatar image for gajbutler
gajbutler

193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I watched the Giantbomb play of this with Vinny and they had Ultra textures on with only a 720p video and I could spot the difference easily. They are so much nicer in motion, something that screenshots don't seem to capture.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SingletreeAve
SingletreeAve

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Even if the video was 4K, wouldn't you need a 4K capable monitor to see the actual difference in quality?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for theprismhead
ThePrismHead

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> 4k should be worse than 1080p if your monitor is 1080p native as it has to downscale. Resolution isn't the only thing defining quality. Quality mostly depends on bitrate.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BuBsay
BuBsay

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Not necessarily, if they don't downscale the screenshot it could give you an idea of the graphical fidelity (IE. What PCGamer does for their 4k screenshots, it ends up being about three times as wide as my monitor and so I have to scroll across the single screenshot). Granted it wouldn't give you the full idea of how good it would look, but it's certainly better than this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Gamer_4_Fun
Gamer_4_Fun

3862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> The web players does serious compression that basically takes away every single detail. A good comparison would be a video encoded in 50mb/s in MP4 format.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Gamer_4_Fun
Gamer_4_Fun

3862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> This is GameSpot logic sadly. I believe Digital Foundry does a really good job when it comes to techncial implications of videogames.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for abcdefgabcdefgz
abcdefgabcdefgz

698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

If I had that PC I wouldnt slow it down putting all those extra huge texture files on it

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Flakcon
Flakcon

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's subtle but you can definitely see that the ultra one has sharper texture. Meh,

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MuddVader
MuddVader

6326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

The Xone version has the neck feathering of the Ultra textures.
I wonder if its just the character texture?

I was looking at the character shot at the end though and theres a noticeable loss of detail on the belt on PC HIGH textures compared to PS4 and Xone.

Other than this, I couldn't really tell because of their shite contrast/gamma/brightness.
My game looks much closer to the console versions, not all washed out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Slyster1181
Slyster1181

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I do not see much of a difference and definitely not one that would require such crazy PC to run.. The main difference I saw was some more distinct small rock textures on the ground.

2 • 
Avatar image for joey2010
joey2010

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Aren't you little kids tired of arguing about the SAME THING ALL THE TIME!!! JEEZ


Console A is better then console B blah blah blah ...Just STFU


Really is this all GAMING has become lately?


Articles with many comments ON EVERY GAME SITE are ALWAYS filled with shittt like that.


MOST GAMERS are TOTALLY MISSING THE POINT


AS A MATTER OF FACT BOTH DEVS AND PLAYERS ARE CLUELESS AND LOST!!!


THE FOCUS IS NO LONGER ON THE GAMES AND THE CONTENT THEY COME WITH - IT'S NOW ON CONSOLE WARS, GRAPHICS, MP, FANBOYISM, CASH AND MORE CASH.


HOW UNFORTUNATE

Upvote • 
Avatar image for grenadehh
Grenadehh

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 6

Pretty sure the alleged ultra hd pack isn't actuall hd at all or there would be a very obvious difference in those 2 videos. Go use the 4k textures for skyrim compared to the default, definitely a difference - so this is false advertising.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pops4657
Pops4657

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Wow you people got problems.let me take my magnifing glass because I can't tell the difference between 900p and 1080p on my own.geeks!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jonaadams
jonaadams

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

I don't think you can have a fair comparison through a YouTube video. And I'm not even sure it would make any difference having the resolution content pack at 1080p. 1440p I bet you would.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for moesuir
moesuir

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Once again, another game released with downgraded graphics because of the inferior PS4 hardware!!!!


PS4 Peasants.

2 • 
Avatar image for Lhomity
Lhomity

508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> You realize games like this, with these kinds of budgets, rely on the console market to be feasible at all, right?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sylonious
Sylonious

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@moesuir Lol, it's not downgraded. The Ultra textures are meant for 4k downsampling or 4k gaming. It's not meant for 1080p. If they did these comparisons correctly there would be a noticeable difference.

2 • 
Avatar image for naryanrobinson
naryanrobinson

1272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Definitely not as significant as I would have thought, but it's certainly nice to have the option.

I've only got a 4GB card right now but I'll absolutely be giving it a shot nonetheless.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bigruss51
bigruss51

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Where next gen consoles should be at

Upvote • 
Avatar image for skipper847
skipper847

7334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> They will be in 10 years time :P

Upvote • 
Avatar image for C-THREE
C-THREE

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

see now that is forward thinking. mad respect goes to them.

Upvote •