GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

GameSpot's Movie Of 2022: Everything, Everywhere, All At Once

2022 was the year of the multiverse, but one movie stood out from the interdimensional pack.

60 Comments

One of the first big fight scenes in Everything, Everywhere, All At Once involves Ke Huy Quan slinging a fanny pack around like a meteor hammer inside an IRS building, and things only get weirder and more specific from there on out. In fact, about midway through, you realize very clearly that fanny pack-based combat is actually one of the most grounded things the movie has to offer. It follows it up with hot dog fingers, sentient rocks, a protracted Ratatouille joke, and improvised sex toy gags. Yet somehow, despite all of this (or maybe because of it) Everything Everywhere All At Once managed to stick the landing and run away with the title as GameSpot's Movie Of The Year for 2022.

It's strange to think that, in an era of endless big-budget Marvel blockbusters and nonstop franchise building, the idea of a "multiverse" has become as close to old hat as it's ever going to get. The idea itself has become less of a story building technique and more of a way for billion dollar companies to cram as much of their IP into a given release as they can--which, don't get us wrong, can make for some pretty fun opportunities to point at the screen and say "hey, I know what that's from!" But Everything Everywhere took that idea and turned it on its head, not by reinventing the multiversal wheel, but by using the trope itself to craft what amounts to an intimate, personal, and above all original story about a family of extraordinarily regular people.

The Wangs aren't superheroes. They own a struggling laundromat. They're in trouble with the IRS. There's the potential for divorce brewing between mother Evelyn (Michelle Yeoh) and father Waymond (Ke Huy Quan). Their daughter, Joy (Stephanie Hsu), is struggling to get her parents to accept her sexuality and her girlfriend–a problem made all the more apparent with the arrival of Evelyn's father, Gong Gong (James Hong). It's the makings of a family melodrama, not an absurdist comedy or a sci-fi epic. But this all changes when, suddenly, Evelyn is thrust into the middle of an interdimensional plot full of alternate realities and alternate versions of herself and her family trying to track down a cosmic evil that threatens to unmake all reality.

From there, things very rapidly spiral into absurdism and comedy, spliced in with some genuinely incredible martial arts fight scenes and surprising visual effects. Everything Everywhere had a fraction of the budget and the manpower behind one of the major franchise blockbusters that hit theaters this year, and still managed to look and feel polished and immaculately well made. It dips deliberately into meta-references and nods to other movies, but they're not the hallow winks and nudges of Easter Eggs like you'd see in something with corporate IP coming out of its seams, instead they're earnest attempts to flesh out the world and the characters by linking them to both the actors playing them and the movies that inspired them.

In short: It's just plain, good-old-fashioned filmmaking, on top of some truly outstanding acting, and top-tier cinematography. It just also happens to feature an extended scene of Michelle Yeoh making out with Jamie Lee Curtis while they both sensually caress one another with their hot dog hands. It's art, just trust us.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 60 comments about this story
60 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I know many of you doubted me, but I told you it will win Best Picture. ;)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for clockworkengine
clockworkengine

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As much as I enjoyed this movie, and I thoroughly enjoyed it, in my mind the whole time I was saying over and over "Ok, I'll watch it once, but never again". Strange way to feel about a movie I guess, loving the spectacle but never wanting to witness it again. Kinda like a train wreck or a nuclear explosion.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for brxricano
brxricano

1155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By brxricano

Fun and meaningful....where was that? What was it trying to say again? All i learned was that jaime lee can make her chest saggy if she really wanted to, and she has some of the best knockers at her age in the hollywood game. Yyyyuck.

The moral is pay your taxes you stupid chinese immigrant 😂

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DETfaninATL
DETfaninATL

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

Not so sure about this being the best movie of the year, but I'll certainly say I've never seen anything quite like it and it was worth watching at least once. MAYBE twice.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blindbsnake
blindbsnake

1752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The most amazing surprise I had in a long time, by far one of the best movies I ever saw, and in my top 5 movies of all time. That's how good it was for me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for maltnut
maltnut

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"Everything Everywhere All at Once" was great, but I think my favorite of the year was "The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent".

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

People liked this movie? It was just a bad Matrix rip with poor choreography, childish humour that wasn't remotely funny, concepts we've seen before and done much better, and some weird, hazy effect that made it look like the movie was filmed with a dirty camera lens. I kept adjusting the brightness while watching this, but the haze wouldn't go away. I eventually gave up on that, and the movie, after an hour and a half or so.

"It's just plain, good-old-fashioned filmmaking, on top of some truly outstanding acting, and top-tier cinematography"

You think an ugly haze is good cinema...oh, it's Downey.

2 • 
Avatar image for clockworkengine
clockworkengine

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: 1. Values differ. 2. Elitism is the fundamental failure to recognize 1.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for restatbonfire
RestatBonfire

2576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: You're comparing this movie to the matrix? The matrix is a computer simulation, this movie is about parallel universes. It's like apples and oranges. This film is what we needed. Fun, meaningful, quirky. It's my choice for 2022 movie of the year. What's yours?

4 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@restatbonfire: Calling it a Poor Man's Matrix is wildly try-hard and pretentious, and evidence he didn't even pay attention to the movie.

They are two completely different films with stories that have nothing in common whatsoever. They're both trippy sci-fi, but that's pretty much where the comparisons begin and end.

I can accept people not liking the film or if they simply found another film better, but to base opinions over objective fallacies; well I'm no stranger to correcting.

2 • 
Avatar image for blindbsnake
blindbsnake

1752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@restatbonfire: "You're comparing this movie to the matrix?"

And that should tell you everything you need know about his complaint...

2 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: Can you post some stills of this ugly haze you're referring to?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@jaydan: You can't still shot a TV video, and if there is a function I've never tried it, and there's a very high chance a photo would add blur.

Looking at YouTube video, I now think it may have been some kind of bad compression effect as the YouTube shots look way cleaner than what I saw. A scene where they had background blur, for example, is a good comparison except that's what I saw the WHOLE movie.

Still, the movie was pretty blah and certainly can't be said to have great acting or is well made.

2 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jaydan

@Barighm: Yeah I think it might have been the quality of whatever you were watching it from. The film uses depth of field and bokeh, but that's a technical and artistic choice that's common in film and photography, not a technical flaw at all.

While everything else you say about acting or how well it was made is purely subjective opinion, I disagree with everything you are saying. Does not line up with the film I saw.

I dunno. I don't recall The Matrix being a coming-of-age family drama whose main message is acceptance and spreading kindness, but to each their own. Lol

2 • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think this movie will win beat picture of the year

but personally I felt Top Gun was the best film of the year

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

@alastor529: ::facepalm:::

3 • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jenovaschilld: why facepalm. i said you're little artsy fartsy movie probably gonna win best picture of the year because that's what the Oscars are for. the artistic value of the film not the entertainment level.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blindbsnake
blindbsnake

1752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@alastor529: Your first opinion was ok. A matter of personal taste. But the "artsy fartsy movie" just takes away the value of your opinion.

"that's what the Oscars are for. the artistic value of the film not the entertainment level."

Well, Everything, Everywhere, All At Once beats Maverick in all aspects... so...

2 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

All you guys doubting Everything Everywhere All at Once's chances of winning Best Picture at the Oscars LOL I'll see you guys next year to tell you I was right!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Poidad
Poidad

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I get that everyone loved this movie and that its supposed to be a great movie, but I just must have missed something, I didnt get it and thought it was just odd, so much so that I think I still have 15 minutes of the end to watch because I couldnt handle its mindnumbing story and direction.
Craziest thing is I usually enjoy every movie I watch, with the exception of Twilight, that was the first movie I feel asleep to.

2 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jaydan

@Poidad: You not understanding the film sounds like a you-problem; which is fine, the film has complexities that can fly over the heads of those that enjoy Marvel and Avatar movies.

Just don't compare it to Twilight, that reeks with desperation to throw shade at the film.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@jaydan: They didn't compare EEAAO to Twilight. At all. You're in such a hurry to be condescending that you didn't actually even pay attention to what they said.

That very much "sounds like a you-problem", but you should really check yourself.

2 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jaydan

@thecupidstunts: I'm well aware of my words and actions. It's the superbowl of movies to me. Throwing a little crass and snark at the competition is just a part of the game. Instead, fire back at me the competition, if there is any. ;)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8
deactivated-64a3ced8b46b8

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

@jaydan: You're not throwing crass, snark, (and condescension), at the "competition", you're throwing it at users who are just having a friendly conversation about movies.

It's a bad look. Siskel and Ebert would have given it two thumbs down. 👎👎

3 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jaydan

@thecupidstunts: A bad look on Gamespot? Haha been doing this since the early 2000's. I went ahead and liked your comment. You really shot me down telling me what dead people would have thought of this movie. 😘

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ganondorf77
ganondorf77

659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

The Fablemans for me.

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think it will win, maybe. The academy awards gives out, like 24 awards- which means 100+ nominations. Problem is, while they may give best picture award to, (here and there), to a sci -fy, comedy, animated, and superhero--- by far the largest amounts go towards heavy acted character dramas that are favorites in the industry for these super old and out of touch movie industry leaders. Not saying these movies do not deserve it, but there is some amazing movies that go unrecognized just because they are funny, or the actor wears spandex.

For every parasite, you have 100 more movies that are held up high and given valuable recognition. I wish the academy was more like the critics choice awards, and one that also incorporated 100 movie journalists ..... AT RANDOM.

F$%k fan choices, who would nominate Fast and Furious and Expendables for every category including best comedy, and drama. Exclude them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Not even in my top 10. For me, it would be between All Quiet On The Western Front and The Stranger.

2 • 
Avatar image for jaydan
jaydan

9212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mooglestar: You got some good alternative choices here. All Quiet on the Western Front is going to be a big contender for international film; however, I don't think it will win because RRR came out and that's getting most of the buzz. But we shall see.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@jaydan: RRR is another I've been meaning to watch. But like most Bollywood movies it's pretty long. So I need to put aside the time.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DaNexTgEn
DaNexTgEn

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@mooglestar: Silence.

Upvote • 
  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2