GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Ghost In The Shell Star Scarlett Johansson Comments On "Whitewashing" Controversy

"I certainly would never presume to play another race of a person."

110 Comments

Ever since the live-action Hollywood adaptation of the classic anime film Ghost in the Shell was announced, it has attracted criticism for the casting of a white American actress in the lead role as cyborg cop The Major, who has previously been portrayed as Japanese. Now star Scarlett Johansson has commented on the "whitewashing" controversy.

No Caption Provided

In an interview with Marie Claire, Johansson suggested that she wasn't actually playing a Japanese character."I certainly would never presume to play another race of a person," she said. "Diversity is important in Hollywood, and I would never want to feel like I was playing a character that was offensive.

"Also, having a franchise with a female protagonist driving it is such a rare opportunity. Certainly, I feel the enormous pressure of that--the weight of such a big property on my shoulders."

Johansson's comments follow those made last year by the publishers of the original Ghost in the Shell manga. Sam Yoshiba, director of Kodansha's international business division, explained that he believed the casting would in fact benefit the film. "Looking at her career so far, I think Scarlett Johansson is well-cast," he said.

"She has the cyberpunk feel. And we never imagined it would be a Japanese actress in the first place. This is a chance for a Japanese property to be seen around the world."

The latest trailer for the movie was revealed during the Super Bowl last weekend--check it out here.

Ghost in the Shell is directed by Rupert Sanders and also stars Pilou Asbæk, Takeshi Kitano, Juliette Binoche, and Michael Pitt. It hits theaters on March 31, 2017.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 110 comments about this story
110 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for cornbredx
cornbredx

1879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

Edited By cornbredx

"Also, having a franchise with a female protagonist driving it is such a rare opportunity."

No it's not. I mean feminists these days with an agenda want you to believe that, but in actuality it's not rare at all anymore. But please. Keep going on about how it's not white washing because you wouldn't be a part of it if it was. As if that explains anything.

2 • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cornbredx: dude, or dudette, you have to learn that "Also, having a franchise with a female protagonist driving it is such a rare opportunity." Is not a feminist statement.... At all. It's just a statement.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By iandizion713

@cornbredx: It is pretty rare for franchises. An overwhelming majority of franchises are male.

3 • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713:

An overwhelming majority of franchises are male.

Source? Because pretty sure there is plenty of movies with female protgonist.

2 • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@x_darksouls_x: moted.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@x_darksouls_x: Here's one source but there are many: http://annenberg.usc.edu/pages/~/media/MDSCI/Inequality%20in%20700%20Popular%20Films%208215%20Final%20for%20Posting.ashx

Of the top 100 films in 2014, only 21 featured a female lead or co-lead. The ratio of males to females in speaking roles is about 2.3:1

2 • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Byshop:

I believe he said "the overwhelming majority of franchises" not the overwhelming majority of the most popular franchises so false argument firstly and additionally that is only a sample for 1 year so would hardly call it comprehensive and givin the source possibly even cherry-picked.

2 • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@x_darksouls_x: Try reading the study. It's a study from 2007 to 2014 and they found that the percentages barely moved from year to year.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By x_DarkSouls_x

@Byshop:

I never denied "the most popular franchises" are mostly male protagonist if that is what iandzion said I would have concurred that is probably true. Am I allowed to say maybe there exist a possibility males are the naturally dominate sex in humans? There are many reasons that anomaly may be so it's presumptuous to assume there is discrimination of some sort going on feminism is not a science is an ideology.

2 • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@x_darksouls_x: ? Weirdo. There's more women than men in the world. And wtf does naturally dominant? Lmao.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

@x_darksouls_x: Were talking franchises, not just random movies mate.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713:

And your proof that the "overwhelming majority of franchises" are ones with male protagonist?

2 • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

@x_darksouls_x: Just check the web mate. You should already know for yourself. Women barely have any. WHile i can name 100+ for currently for men.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713:

IOW you dont have any lol

Upvote • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

@x_darksouls_x: Youve done nothing mate. You havnt countered me with any evidence.

3 • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713: he is getting dumber and dumber with each post. You are right. He doesn't want to believe. It's no point talking at him .

2 • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@iandizion713

It was your assertion that overwhelming majority of franchises are male so its your job to prove it before I should make a counter-argument that called "rational debate."

2 • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

@x_darksouls_x: And that will continue to be my assertion until proven otherwise.

2 • 
Avatar image for x_darksouls_x
x_DarkSouls_x

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By x_DarkSouls_x

@iandizion713

Saying something is true because has not been disproven is a logical fallacy. Unless you have some proof to back your claim "theoverwhelming majority of franchises are male" I have no reason to consider your opinion credible.

2 • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By iandizion713

@x_darksouls_x: Sorry mate, i just go by my common sense until proven otherwise. Your free to believe whatever you want.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Shin_Gallon
Shin_Gallon

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"And we never imagined it would be a Japanese actress in the first place."

Which is why this movie is not getting my money. If I want to watch GitS, I'll pop in my Bluray of the anime.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Shin_Gallon: you are totally allowed to feel that way! And you singled out something I noticed as odd as well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mattcake
mattcake

1475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mattcake

"I certainly would never presume to play another race of a person"

Well yes, no amount of acting changes your skin colour or the shape of your eyes. Concentrate on your acting love, you have enough trouble with that as it is. Let me guess, you'll go for the emotionless blank stare acting face for this film?

Not a fan of Scarlett, except in The Island. Where she plays an adult with a child's mind who just stared blankly at the camera a lot. Perfect. I'd rather they got Milla to do Ghost.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mattcake: when acting, it's good to pull from experiences you can relate to. In order to emotionally convince the audience. LOOKING like a race is NOT ACTING. That's one of the best casually lacking statements I heard all day lol. You be bad at movies .

Upvote • 
Avatar image for straightcur
straightcur

1521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"Whitewashing" is just a term used by racists. It's just the socially acceptable type of racism.

3 • 
Avatar image for jbwzrd213
jbwzrd213

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By jbwzrd213

Major is an android/AI/ghost, is she not? She could look like any ethnicity her creators wanted her to look like. Also, again, her creators could have given her any name they wanted as well. This, frankly, is a nonissue.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dev-raid1
Dev-RAiD1

696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

you want the actress in a movie to be japanese? then make the movie yourself...who cares what the hell her skin color is??

5 • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@dev-raid1: It wouldn't be so much of an issue if Hollywood didn't do this so constantly (sometimes even when a character is a movie is based on a real person) and if everybody didn't lose their minds in the extremely rare instances where they go the opposite direction and cast an ethnic actor as a character who was traditionally white (like Johnny Storm from the latest F4 movie).

2 • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Byshop: you mean Zach Galafanakis won't be playing MLK ? THE HORROR!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@crxuchilbara: I might actually pay to see that.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@Byshop:

Hollywood is beginning to do the inverse rather consistently. Johnny Storm in Fantastic Four, Mary Jane in Spiderman, Roland Deschain in The Dark Tower, Rocky Horror Picture Show (2016), Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, Hannibal, Man of Steel...these movies were all released in the last three years or are future releases in the next year and each one features a major character whose race was changed from white to black (note: I didn't include other races. There are several more movies). Heck, there was a broadway musical where the director refused to hire anyone other than non-whites for the casting of America's Founding Fathers.

The fact of the matter is, when a white person plays a traditionally non-white role it is considered censorship, yet when someone of color plays a traditionally white role it is considered "color-blind casting". I won't argue what happened in the past in regards to racial divides, but why ridicule one for this and praise another? If you want equality, then treat people equally. Simple as that.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@doctor_mg:A couple points there. For one, you're mixing Hollywood, stage plays, and TV and they are not the same thing nor are they the same organizations so one is not responsible for the actions of another. Of all the examples you listed, only four of the eight are actual Hollywood movies. Two are plays and one is a TV show (assuming you're referring to Rutina Wesley's role in the Hannibal TV series).

But even for those examples, fewer are examples where it's the main character. Lawrence Fishburne as Perry White in Man of Steel (portrayed by white actors twice before in film). Zendaya in Spider Man is Mary Jane (and the actress is actually half white and again portrayed by white actors twice before in film). Johnny Storm is one of four main characters (and one who has the least amount of screen time and again portrayed by white actors twice before in film) and of all of these Roland in The Dark Tower is the only Hollywood movie where the main character was legitimately replaced by a non-white character.

By comparison, there are a ton of examples where the lead is replaced by a white actor (and again, even when they were based on a real person). Emma Stone playing Alison Ng in Aloha, Exodus was a nearly all white cast playing biblical figures from the middle east, Noah, Argo, 21, etc. Or when the source material character isn't white like Lone Ranger, The Last Airbender, Prince of Persia, Dragonball Evolution, Wanted, Speed Racer, etc.

And that's not even getting into all the "white savior" storylines where the white guy is the one who saves the natives, is their chosen one, etc, like Avatar, Danced with Wolves, Tarzan, Elysium, District 9, The Last Samurai, Ferngully, Indiana Jones 2, etc.

But your point around equality is valid, however I think it leaves out an important piece of data. The issue here is that casting opportunities (and by extension the characters we see in movies) are already VERY heavily skewed towards Caucasian casting right now. USC did a few studies on this, but they found year over year the total characters cast in Hollywood films each year is about 75% white, with the remaining 25% representing not black, but every other non-Caucasian ethnicity and these percentage needles haven't moved in the last 10 years. If you're an actor and you don't happen to be white, your options for roles are far more limited than if you were. This is why people tend to get upset when the few roles that could have had non-white actors get recast as white.

2 • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@Byshop:


For the Lone Ranger, Johnny Depp actually has Native American roots. There are also movies like Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, The Avengers, Shawshank Redemption, Men in Black, Daredevil (the movie), and Jackie Brown. All of which have either a main character, or a significant character cast as a race different from their source material.

Also, I don't see why you need to mention how many times the character has been portrayed as white. Is that to somehow undermine that they were a white character? Perry white has been white in every comic, as has Johnny Storm and Mary Jane.

"but they found year over year the total characters cast in Hollywood films each year is about 75% white,"

That makes sense, because America is around 75% white (72.6% to be exact). This means they are accurately sampling the diversity of the United States. When there are more white people to choose from, you will see more white people working. Statistics.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@doctor_mg: Zendaya is a hell of a lot more white than Johnny Depp is native (if he even is at all since the claim is unverified) but you used her as an example of them swapping the ethnicity of Mary Jane.

But no, the issue isn't that Hollywood puts out open casting calls and there are just more white people responding. They put out casting calls for white actors often even when the source material has non-white characters. If you're a non-white actor, you're going to have a very hard time finding roles outside of some pretty stereotypical roles (gang member, thug, etc).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Byshop:

Yes, you used Johnny Depp as an example exactly as I used Zendaya as an example. You then countered my example, so I countered yours. Eye for an eye.

There are many casting calls for "non-white" actors, "black" actors, "asian" actors. In fact, the only movie I've found that was considered whitewashed that had a casting call for a white actor/actress was The Hunger Games, whose source materials author even stated herself wasn't whitewashing.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Byshop  Moderator

@doctor_mg: I wouldn't call yet another white guy making an unverified claim of having a non-specific amount of native american heritage the same as being mixed race.

Yes, there are roles but as I said before they are rarely the lead roles. Whether you agree or not is up to you, but I was trying to show you the reason -why- people get a bit irked.

2 • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@Byshop:

He stated that his great-grandmother was raised either Cherokee or Muscogee Native America tribes, and he has never made a conscious effort to look into his geneology. This was said in an interview back in 2002, ten years before he ever played the role of Tonto. His family is from Kentucky, which is rich in both of those tribes.

Similarly, Jimi Hendrix has around the same amount of Cherokee in him, yet no one bats an eye.

Do you have a source showing that there are very few casting calls for lead roles that are asian, black, and other ethnicities? I'm willing to bet that there are a similar amount per percentage of those ethnicities in America in comparison to whites.

People can get irked. People will about everything. But employing a negative view of one action with a positive view on the other is hypocritical. I don't care that they cast Johnny Storm as black, nor do I care that they cast Scarlett Johanson here. As long as their acting is good it shouldn't matter.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By crxuchilbara

@doctor_mg: I care. Because the PRACTICE wasn't an equal casting opportunity. And I know for a fact several Asian Women applied to this role. I don't really care about the race either. But if the selection process was made for only whites. that's the issue.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@crxuchilbara:

See now it seems like you are saying that they should get the role BECAUSE they are Asian. If you say that is true, then you should also understand how people could care about Johnny Storm or Roland? Traditionally white characters...shouldn't white people have received the role?

No, that is preposterous. Saying so is the definition of racism, and so is the inverse. Not to mention, Scarlett Johansson looks quite a bit like Motoko. Even more so than the actors that are portraying Togusa or Saito (both of them are Asian cast)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LouiXIII

@doctor_mg: You're wrong. That's not the definition of racism.

Racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

Now...how is someone saying that they would prefer a actor who is portraying a character with a specific look and background to actually hold true to the character's roots a form of racism? Nobody is claiming that one race is superior to the next...so how is that racism? Please explain my friend...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@louixiii:

Him stating that he knew Asian women who applied for the role I've inferred that he might think that one of those women should have been given the role. Which, isn't valid thinking (if he did think that). Just because they are Asian doesn't mean they should be given the role, any more than anybody who is white shouldn't automatically be given a role because they are white.

If this man believes that someone should have retained the part of Motoko because of their race, and another shouldn't have because of their race...that is racism. Racism is the discrimination of someone based on their race or ethnicity. Not being given something because of your race is discrimination.

Scarlett Johansson is a huge name in the industry, and many believe she is a terrific actress. It is more likely that those are the reasons why she was given the role. Which wouldn't make this whitewashing (not that it is right per se).

Now you have a point there at the end. Saying that you would have preferred the character to be the race that matches their origin...that isn't racism at all. That is perfectly understandable.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LouiXIII

@doctor_mg: You're definition of racism is a half measure. You clearly left out the "based on the belief that one's own race is superior" part which is the other half of that definition my friend. If you're going to be fair or throw a term out there...at least do it correctly.

Granted, I'm mixed with every race known to man so if I was to ever become famous and movie was filmed about me, it would be kind of hard to find another kid mixed with EVERY race to portray me but...let's say we're doing the Dr. Martin Luther King story. Being that his roots and origins are of African American decent...do you really think people wouldn't be offended if let's say...Tom Cruise played the role? Granted, Tom is a pretty good actor but still..he's not African American is he?

And I'm pretty sure that after his 4 year run, there's going to be a movie about Donald Trump...but do you think he'd approve of Ibris Elba portraying him? Allow me to answer that for you...HELL NO!!!

So does stating the obvious make us racist? Does wanting a Japanese actor to play the role of a Japanese character racist? I think not...I take that back...I know it's not.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@louixiii:

The definition of racism doesn't have to be superior. There are multiple definitions of racism if you check out Mirriam-Webster. It just has to be discrimination based upon race, and that is racism at its most fundamental.

I didn't say that wanting a Japanese actor to play the role of a Japanese character was racist. However, the pretense that a Japanese actor can only play Japanese characters, or that no one can play a Japanese character but a Japanese person is, ostensibly, racist.

Also, I can understand having a certain amount of unhappiness for the portrayal of a character. A preference. But that does not make it innately censorship if they were to make a black character white unless you also consider it censorship if a white character is made asian, or mexican, etc.

Also, your analogy is definitely alarming, but there is a difference between Motoko and Martin Luther King Jr. If there was a movie where Martin Luther King Jr was white I would certainly call that censorship/whitewashing. But this has to do with who Martin Luther King was (a prominent leader of the black rights movement). If there was a movie with Donald Trump with Ibris Elba portraying him I would consider it ridiculous, and probably a comedy, honestly (due to irony). If it was Hitler, then you would have a case. I wouldn't want any black man (or jew, or mexican, asian) to portray the role of Hitler BECAUSE of who he was, and what he did. The historical bits of our society I think that we should try to keep as accurate as possible. This movie isn't a representation of a historical documentary, or anything of the like.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for crxuchilbara
crxuchilbara

830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@doctor_mg: wow. You're still pretty off. You choose to omit certain statements to prove your point. Racism is not hard to describe or discern. It's funny so many people lack the ability to understand it. But I believe if you have to look up the definition, you've probably never experienced racism. It's fairly easy to attribute. Racism in this case, is the fact that no other race was given a fair shot. People attribute this to institutionalised racism. Meaning the casting director, the producer and even the actors, go by an unspoken word that no minority be hired. They decided on this before the movie was in production because institutionalised racism has existed in Hollywood for DECADES. They have proven institutionalised racism within several businesses recently in the united States. Businesses that have had a long standing. Not to mention Hollywood has had a sorted past of sleaze and back-$tabbing. Im not Asian, but even I can see the disparity here. In my history of living in the bay area. I find TOO OFTEN, white people trying to define or explain racism. Mostly to their demise, of course. But when I talk to Asian people, Latin people or any other minority in California, they completely understand. You think racism is just calling someone out of their name? Look up videos of blacks and whites applying for the same job.

In all fairness, I did see 1 white person talking about racism this year and he totally nailed the issues. He was about 70+yo. Almost perfect! except he was having the conversation at a bank.... Like, totally embarrassing...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@crxuchilbara:

What statements did I omit to prove my point?

The reasons I use definitions is to argue logically and fairly. Emotions are a powerful thing, and I try to leave that out of arguments.

Also, your assumption that Asians applied for the role and didn't get them therefore it wasn't equal opportunity is absolutely garbage.

IF the selection process was made only for whites that would be an issue, but we know that it wasn't because out of 7 main characters one is American, on is Dutch, one is Australian, two are Japanese, one is Singaporean, and one is African (Black).

So, how do you know that there was a unspoken word to not hire minorities when, in fact, they hired minorities?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LouiXIII

@doctor_mg: Racism: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

That came out of Merriam (e..not i)-Webster bro...yet you called @crxuchilbara preposterous for stating that there were many capable actors that better fit the character's ethnicity than who was chosen and also implied that he or she was racist for stating a fact...now that's wrong.

I feel like this...if you're going to do a live action portrayal of a fictional character...make it as close to that character's ethnicity as possible to remain true to the source material.

And why do you find it alarming? A accurate portrayal is an accurate portrayal no matter if the person or character is real or fictional. Speaking of historical portrayals...how do you feel about how some temples of worship portray Jesus Christ? Many portray him to have white skin, blue eyes and long silky hair....yet in the Bible, he's described as having skin the color of copper with hair like wool...so Jesus has been white washed for generations now in movies and media in general...so am I racist for pointing that out? After all...Jesus is a historical figure if not one of the most historical and iconic figures of all time and I'm sure there have been plenty of actors that were not Caucasian that could have played the role through out the years so what's the excuse?

Once again...real or fictional...an accurate portrayal is an accurate portrayal either way you cut it. The fact that you're not grasping that concept is alarming...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@louixiii:

As I said, there are multiple definitions of racism, and at its most fundamental it regards discrimination or prejudice. Let me ask you something, if I said "You are Mexican, you must be good at cleaning and farming"...would that be considered a racist remark? It would, even though I'm not claiming superiority over them by saying that, it is still racist. If I told a black man "You can't play basketball with us because your kind is really good at basketball" it would also be considered a racist remark, yet none of those things I said had to do with me proclaiming my own superiority.

And you are twisting my words. I've said that preferring the actors race to match that of the source material is one thing. But to say that Asian women applied for the role and should have been given the role on the pretense that they are Asian is wrong. Nobody should be given a role (or not given a role) JUST because of their race. Except in the extenuating circumstance that it is a historical documentary (which should always stay true)

Also, an accurate portrayal is an accurate portrayal. And that is precisely my point. This is called "white washing" and is a form of censorship. If you can get mad at this, then others can get mad at the "color blind casting" that has become rather prevalent in our society. After all, you want to stay true to the source material right?

Your argument is beginning to trail off, and you are beginning to claim things that I never said. I feel like we need to pull back a bit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@doctor_mg: Both of your examples further prove my case as well as the definition I pulled from the Merriam Webster dictionary.

Racism: the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races. (which is the other definition you were looking for but it also points out another race's inferiority or superiority)

Example 1:

[You] "Let me ask you something, if I said "You are Mexican, you must be good at cleaning and farming"...would that be considered a racist remark? It would, even though I'm not claiming superiority over them by saying that, it is still racist."

In this example, you're implying/assuming that all Mexicans are good or superior at cleaning and farming. While you're not proclaiming your own superiority...you're assuming that they are in that area.

Example 2:

[You] "If I told a black man "You can't play basketball with us because your kind is really good at basketball" it would also be considered a racist remark, yet none of those things I said had to do with me proclaiming my own superiority."

In this example, you're implying that all black people are superior or "good" at basketball which is why you said "You can't play basketball with us."

See what I mean?

Meanwhile, I agree that nobody should be given a role based off of their race alone. I also agree with your view on white washing and "color/gender blind casting" that opposes source material. I'm 100% with you on that.

On another note...how have you been bro? Sorry to bust your balls. I haven't seen you on here in a little while xD And did you see John Wick 2 yet?

2 • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@louixiii:

Well you certainly have a point there. My definition is actually definition 3 in Mirriam Webster, and I don't actually believe that it is racist to say an Asian should have been cast for the part. I was merely trying to convey that this example of white washing is no worse than the many examples of color neutral casting. Especially since this cast is actually rather diverse, and has people from Asia, Europe, America, Australia, and Africa playing significant roles. Great debating though. I didn't really think of the superiority going the other way around.

Anyway! No I haven't. I checked out the reviews (just kinda skimmed), and it is getting really great scores. The first John Wick was Keanu Reeves best movie in recent memory (probably since The Matrix), so I'm pretty hyped. Have you seen it yet? Is it as good as they say?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@louixiii:

I didn't get a chance to see John Wick 2 :(

There was a pretty big natural disaster in my area and people had to be evacuated. Hopefully I can see it later though. I am going to check out Man of Taichi tonight though! I'm holding you to your word, it better be good ;)

No, I haven't seen Split. It is so hard to enjoy all of my hobbies at once lol. Between working 60 hours a week, video games, music, and movies I'm so booked! What is Split about?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@doctor_mg: She actually looks just like The Major...plus she has a huge following so the movie is almost guaranteed to do well even if it's not that good but since they're keeping it so close to the anime/manga, I'm pretty sure a lot of people will be pleased..meanwhile, you'll have that group that probably never heard of the movie and may not like it because of the subject matter or atmosphere. I guess it all depends on the pacing of the script. I bet they had to cut a lot of scenes though.

And OMGOSH...you never heard of Man of Taichi? It's the movie he did right before John Wick. That was really the beginning of his comback because Knock Knock and 47 Ronin actually made me think the same thing but my little brother and my dad told me about it so I checked it out and was thoroughly impressed. It's a 9 in my book. The Raid 1&2 are both awesome movies too if you haven't seen them.

And yes..Keanu outdid himself. The best way to describe Wick 2 would be like sitting on a really fast roller coaster and right when you think "that's as good as it gets" they do something even better. The choreography is some of the best I've seen in a good little while. Definitely John Woo worthy.

Matter of fact, I might go to see it again on Monday lol I actually saw Split twice too. Have you seen Split yet?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doctor_mg
Doctor_MG

2366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doctor_MG

@louixiii:

Thank you for the compliment. And no worries! I appreciate debating with you because you a) argue well and b) are understanding. Never hard feelings about me being proven wrong or shown something different.

Ghost in the Shell doesn't look terrible, though I don't think I will see it in theaters (probably netflix too). In my opinion, Scarlett Johansson actually looks quite a bit like the major (minus the whole Japanese thing).

Man of Taichi? No, I've never heard of it. Wow, I'm surprised it passed through my radar. Honestly, I saw 47 ronin and Knock Knock then declared Keanu's acting career dead and stopped paying attention. Then last year I saw John Wick and was just amazed.

If you say John Wick 2 is even better, I think I'm gonna go see it in theaters Monday. That kind of movie deserves to be seen on the big screen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@doctor_mg: Between me and you, you're one of the smartest people I've seen post on here and I mean that. You're one of the few people that actually shut me down and had me feeling alright with it (though I still don't know how you did that...but you did it lol) so it's all love bro. And despite what people are saying, I still have plans to watch Ghost In The Shell. The only thing that would keep me from going to the Regal to see it is extremely bad reviews...then I'll wait for it to hit Netflix xD

Bro...John Wick was INSANE!!! You must watch JW2. It's a 10 in my book. And if you haven't seen Man of Taichi, that's another EXTREMELY good movie that Keanu directed and acted in. It was awesome. It's on Netflix so definitely check it out.

But JW2 is THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ballashotcaller
ballaShotCaller

1393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By ballaShotCaller

"female protagonist driving it is such a rare opportunity" - like that isnt every big movie nowadays. just whitewashing.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By iandizion713

RIP Major Motoko Kusanagi, you will be missed. She even looks like Motoko, its weird.

2 •