GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

How Much Should Nintendo Switch Cost?--GameSpot Q&A

Below you can find our thoughts on how much Nintendo Switch should cost.

166 Comments

Welcome to GameSpot Q&A, a section where we ask our staff and readers an interesting discussion question about video games. Look at this as a forum where you and others can discuss and compare your opinions of this beloved hobby of ours. Let us know what your answer is to this week's question in the comments below!

This week's question is:

How much should Nintendo Switch cost?

Nintendo's Switch is looking to be one of its most exciting consoles yet. But with the console/handheld hybrid finally announced, the current big question is its price point. Our editors voice their thoughts towards the issue in the answers below.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Justin Haywald, Managing Editor

Right now you can buy an Xbox One or a PS4 for $300. Both companies are introducing pricier options in the near future, but especially as we head into the holidays, $300 hits that console sweet spot--it's not so expensive that it seems outrageous, but it's not so cheap that it seems like a toy.

Of course, we don't actually know much about the system yet. From specs to pack-ins, there are a lot of variables that will have a direct effect on the price of the system. Larger storage space is likely going to come at a premium (though hopefully Nintendo forgoes the multiple SKUs of the Wii U). Will I have access to my catalog of Wii U and Virtual Console (and 3DS!?) games? And what kind of entertainment options will the Switch have? If it can replace my PS4 or XB1 as a media hub, those kinds of options could make it more comparable to the upcoming PS4 Pro or Xbox Scorpio, and people might be more willing to accept a premium $500 price. But, keeping it real, this is how I'm going to play the next Legend of Zelda. I'm preordering as soon as it's available and Nintendo basically has complete access to my bank entire (very tiny) account. I only hope that they'll be gentle and they don't get too greedy.

Chris Pereira, News Reporter

No Caption Provided

While $300 (or less) would obviously be ideal to avoid having the Switch cost more than an Xbox One or PS4, $350 strikes me as a fair price for a system that can seemingly fill the role of home console and handheld. Going much beyond that crosses too far into the price range of mobile phones and iPads, which I think would make for a difficult sales proposition.

Nintendo no doubt wants to recapture the casual audience it lost post-Wii, or as much of it as is still possible in this day and age. It can't possibly compete with the price of games on mobile--which have proven to be sufficiently entertaining for huge swaths of the gaming market. Ensuring the base price of the system is as low as possible will give it a solid start in trying to lure back part of the audience that helped to make Wii and DS the successes they were.

Miguel Concepcion, Contributing Writer

My gut says the Nintendo Switch will be priced at $299, assuming it also includes a mini-game compilation with the same value of Wii Sports or Nintendo Land. If it isn't $299, it will be lower, not higher. I think it should be $249 as symbolic middle ground between the current prices of its current handheld (New 3DS, $199) and home console (Wii U, $299).

As an aside, I'm curious how the successor of the 3DS (assuming there is one) will be positioned alongside the Switch. $249 might be a marketable price point if some parents think that they wouldn't have to buy a separate Nintendo handheld if their children's portable gaming needs are met with the Switch.

No Caption Provided

Tamoor Hussain, Editor

Nintendo has traditionally used older components to drive down the cost of its consoles and handhelds. This, in turn, makes it easier for them to make money of sales.

This time however, it's opted for a custom Tegra processor created by Nvidia and what is described as a "GPU based on the same architecture as the world's top performing GeForce gaming graphics card." While specifics are to be revealed, the combination of those two bespoke pieces of tech could make the Switch more expensive than we're used to seeing Nintendo consoles be.

But, yet again, Nintendo is taking an unexpected approach to gaming consoles. For that to really pay off, they need to make Switch affordable enough that people will buy into the idea of a console/handheld hybrid. After the Wii U, adoption rates need to be high; otherwise it'll be another generation of Nintendo platforms that third-party developers shun. It's going to be tricky to find the price that's cheap enough to draw in consumers, but not so cheap that they're losing money on sales off it. I think the console should come in at around the $300 mark, but in reality it may be a little more expensive.

Eddie Makuch, News Editor

Price is a very important consideration for any console, or piece of technology for that matter. With the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One starting at $300 right now, I would imagine the Nintendo Switch would come in around there. $250 seems too low and $350 is too high, so I'm going with $300.

No Caption Provided

A report claimed the console will use "industry-leading chips," (which presumably wouldn't come cheap) though Nintendo has yet to offer any specifics about the console's guts, other than that it will use Nvidia components. The console/mobile hybrid nature of the console is a new idea in gaming, so there may be extra costs on Nintendo's side that will keep the price from being too low.

The Nintendo Switch is coming out six months from now, in March 2017, and there are still many questions to be answered. One thing has always been certain about the Mario company, however: don't bet against Nintendo.

Scott Butterworth, Editor

I'm just going to attack this logically: currently, a new 3DS costs $200 while a new Wii U will set you back $300. To be a slightly reductive, Switch seems to be a hybrid of the two, so it logically follows that its price will fall somewhere in between as well. Mathematically, that middle point would be $250, but as with all new hardware, we can expect the price to rise slightly to match demand (and cover early production costs). So in my mind, $275 would be a fair price for Switch unless we learn the specs are far stronger than we're expecting--in which case, I'd bump that up to the Wii U's $300.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 166 comments about this story
166 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Reagan2791
Reagan2791

342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

They don't learn. I expect to see it at $349 and include a pack in game.

3 • 
Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

47410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I think they'll launch it at $299 for a base model.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for AyatollaofRnR
AyatollaofRnR

789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

$300 is the sweet spot. If it came with a pack in game that would be great.

Can't see them launching at $250.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Exceed20XX
Exceed20XX

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I'm going to agree that $300 USD is likely going to be their target. If the Switch is to become a possible end all be all for Nintendo in the console AND handheld realm then I can't see them gaining immediate traction with the majority of their supporting base (the handheld market) by marketing a system much more expensive than the 3DS's initial price (which was a major point of contention for them then.)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for adsparky
adsparky

2882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

Depends of the specs, but I say $299 the normal and $399 a deluxe bundle.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for adsparky
adsparky

2882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

Edited By adsparky

@sellingthings: But it's Nintendo brand, so add $100 more.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ChunkyDrawers
ChunkyDrawers

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By ChunkyDrawers

179.99

3 • 
Avatar image for ethanm1834
ethanm1834

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

No more than 299. While its neat and it looks like its got some third party support, I think the main appeal will be its portable factor. Im hoping Nintendo will sell a case you can put the screen in, I'd hate for it to be scratched to kingdom come.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By iandizion713

$299!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for amaneuvering
amaneuvering

4816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By amaneuvering

I do not care about the business practicality of this, I simple could not go above $200 in all good faith for a primarily handheld like that, and ideally I'd want it for something like $150.

3 • 
Avatar image for Ellimem
Ellimem

596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

$250 max. It is a Tegra-powered console for one, but more importantly they need to make themselves relevant to a gaming audience that has been ignoring Nintendo for the past 5-6 years. A cheaper console (that still needs all of the games releasing this holiday and next spring) is a good way to get noticed by the price sensitive market, which just happens to be the largest slice of the game-buying market.

Upvote •