GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Scarlett Johansson Sues Disney Over Black Widow Streaming Release, Disney Responds

After the latest MCU movie, Black Widow was released on Disney+, star Scarlett Johansson has filed a lawsuit against Disney

335 Comments

Update: In response to the lawsuit, Disney has released a statement obtained by Variety. "There is no merit whatsoever to this filing," it reads. "The lawsuit is especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic." Furthermore, the statement says the company has upheld its end of the contract, while noting the actress has already received $20 million for her role in the film, adding that "…the release of Black Widow on Disney+ with Premier Access has significantly enhanced her ability to earn additional compensation on top of the $20M she has received to date." You can read the original story below.

Black Widow isn't done fighting yet. Scarlett Johansson, who reprised her role as Natasha Romanoff in the latest Marvel Cinematic Universe film, has filed a lawsuit against Disney, alleging that the company releasing the movie on the Disney+ streaming service at the same time it did so theatrically was a breach of her contract.

The news comes from The Wall Street Journal, which reports that Johansson's contract not only guaranteed an exclusive theatrical release for the film but that its performance on the big screen would ultimately determine the actress's salary. Of course, Black Widow was originally scheduled to hit theaters in 2020 but was ultimately delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

When a new release date was set, it was announced that the film would hit theaters and Disney+ Premier Access on July 9. According to the suit, "Disney intentionally induced Marvel's breach of the agreement, without justification, in order to prevent Ms. Johansson from realizing the full benefit of her bargain with Marvel."

Per the suit, Johansson's team attempted to renegotiate her contract after the decision to debut the film on Disney+ was made, but Disney and Marvel were not responsive. However, in a copy of the lawsuit, obtained by Deadline, Marvel's chief counsel is quoted as previously saying, "We totally understand that Scarlett's willingness to do the film and her whole deal is based on the premise that the film would be widely theatrically released like our other pictures. We understand that should the plan change, we would need to discuss this with you and come to an understanding as the deal is based on a series of (very large) box office bonuses." According to WSJ, the decision to not renegotiate could end up costing the actress over $50 million.

Black Widow wasn't the only Disney film to get the Premier Access treatment, which allows audiences to watch the film at home for a limited time for a $30 fee. Before Black Widow, Mulan, Raya and the Last Dragon, and Cruella were all released with this model. Mulan was the lone film to initially only be released via Premier Access, as most theaters around the world were closed. Jungle Cruise--due on July 30--will hit theaters and Premier Access simultaneously and is currently the last announced Disney movie to be getting that treatment.

Likewise, Warner Bros. announced that its 2021 movie slate would debut on HBO Max and in theaters on the same day. When the move was announced at the end of 2020, some film creatives were not thrilled with the decision--namely Dune director Denis Villeneuve, who claimed he only learned his movie would be released on streaming through Warner Media's public announcement.

During its opening weekend, Black Widow earned $80 million at the domestic box office--along with an additional $60 million in Premier Access sales. The following week, though, theater revenue dropped 68% to just $26 million, a rather steep drop, especially for a Marvel Cinematic Universe film. Theater owners claimed this was due, in part, to people pirating the film following its digital release--a sentiment echoed in Johansson's lawsuit. "Millions of others who would have watched in the theatres will instead view the Picture on perfect digital pirated copies—-all made possible by Disney's decision to release the Picture 'day-and-date' on Disney+," the legal document reads. "Indeed, Black Widow was the No. 1 pirated title of the July 19 week, per the news site TorrentFreak."

Black Widow remains in theaters and on Disney+ Premier Access for those who have yet to see it. The next Marvel movie, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, hits theaters on September 3. Beyond that, the Hawkeye series debuts on Disney+ on November 24.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 335 comments about this story
335 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for bloodbornelore
BloodborneLore

1356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Scarlet is basically a GDW now.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-611a8cd6e3c93
deactivated-611a8cd6e3c93

421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

2 • 
Avatar image for DEATHWlSH
DEATHWlSH

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I won't make anywhere close to $20M in my entire life time and I work much harder than Scarlett Johansson so she'll get no sympathy from me.

It's cute that she thinks she can beat Disney's lawyers though.

Also, Disney owns NBC where her husband, Colin Jost, works. It'll be funny to see if anything happens in this regard. Will Jost be fired? Will Jost leave NBC to support his wife? If not, she'll probably divorce him.

2 • 
Avatar image for Addict187
Addict187

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@DEATHWlSH: You are you, and she is she. She thinks she should get more money for something that she is the frontperson for, you think she should be happy with what she got for her part. and you live pay check to pay check and she dose not

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@DEATHWlSH: The House of Mouse will bury her and there will be repercussions for Jost too. They both can kiss their careers goodbye. You don't cross Disney.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@DEATHWlSH: would that not be illegal?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for trayvian
trayvian

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@DEATHWlSH: Disney owns ABC, not NBC. Comcast owns NBC.

3 • 
Avatar image for jizam_kizam
Jizam_Kizam

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Damn only 20mil...what a poor lady.

2 • 
Avatar image for Pyrosa
Pyrosa

10650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

So we can update the headlines to, "In Scarlett Johansen's final film role" and it doesn't have to be specific to Black Widow anymore.

6 • 
Avatar image for returnofthebrotha
ReturnoftheBrotha

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Pyrosa: Well - all the more reason to get paid! She is a small hat, so she will always find work...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zeke_pliskin
zeke_pliskin

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By zeke_pliskin

I think the real problem here was the fallout of the pandemic making people wary of returning to the cinemas. Oh, and more importantly that the movie really sucked, and didn't really make much money compared to other Marvel movies either via streaming or theatrically.

The script was terrible, the story laughable, and the usual problem of "woke"/"progressive" pandering which includes straight white male bashing and/or the men as clueless buffoons who have to bow down to the almighty "strong, diverse female characters" as The Critical Drinker would put it. [WARNING: NSFW/some bad language, but well worth a watch if that doesn't bother you.]

So... less equality-driven than the 90s, then, where strong male and strong female characters could work side-by-side? It's like the 1950s "get back in the kitchen" misogynistic male attitude towards woman, now gender-flipped and applied to male characters of movies of the past 5 years or so. All men being clumsy comic relief while the women do all the work is both insulting and stupid.

I can't wait to see that Bond movie where they try and recast straight white male Bond as a black woman and it flops - I wonder if that'll be the point where Hollywood realises it's gone way too far with the overcompensatory post-#MeToo bias in their movies to try and appease folks, but I doubt it.

4 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@zeke_pliskin: Exactly. Movie was garbage and they couldn't resist ruining another character like they did the Mandarin. Glad it more or less bombed. It's what she gets for defending a pedophile ie Woody Allen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

Heh. If I had a nickel for every time I've seen a company claim a lawsuit had no merit turn out to very much so have merit.

3 • 
Avatar image for Cassius103
Cassius103

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Surprised so many here have sided with Disney. If they have not been true to their word on something legally binding then they should be forced to do so. Just like if she hadn't turned up for work, i'd expect Disney to sue her.

4 • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SebB

@Cassius103: Exactly. But remember this is the comment section of a video game site. Expecting fairness, decency and common sense is too much to ask.

2 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sebb: Wrong website there champ.

2 • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ironhorse89: Corrected. Thanks. Goes to show that on IGN they were just like here, on GameSpot.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sebb: Both tend to veer into TMZ quality at times.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@Cassius103: Not so much Disney as they just love tearing celebrities down which is incredibly sad.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By ironhorse89

@Barighm: Because making 20 million playing make believe all day is so rough and all. Cry me a river.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rodent347
rodent347

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ironhorse89: The alternative is that the money goes to some executives who sit at a desk and masturbate all day, so there's really not much reason to care either way.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@rodent347: True. They both suck.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for phattsao
phattsao

291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If nothing else, this kind of brings to light why Hollywood stars are always pushing the "theatrical experience" line and dogging on streaming.

Turns out it's just because they make more off of the theatrical revenue. Time to update those contracts, folks.

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@phattsao: It's ALWAYS about money. Apparently that's the same reason why the Oscars rag on streaming movies so much.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for makchady
makchady

1303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

There’s nothing quite like being lectured by celebrities about political matters then having them pull stunts like this.

3 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator  Online

@makchady: Suing over a breach of contract isn't really a stunt.

3 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@mogan: Crying about only making 20 million playing dress up is what's sad, pathetic, and downright insensitive giving that this stupid pandemic is still ongoing and all.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By mogan  Moderator  Online

@ironhorse89: It’s not about “crying”, and being rich has nothing to do with it; if the terms of a contract weren’t upheld, suing is how you fix that.

2 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@mogan: Suing will backfire on her considering how powerful Disney is these days in the industry. Hope she didn't plan on having any sort of career after this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator  Online

@ironhorse89: Probably depends on how her contract is worded. My guess is they'll settle out of court and we wont hear a ton more about this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@mogan: Or from her for that matter for awhile.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SebB

@mogan: Exactly. They seem to keep missing that very important point: it's a breach of contract.

3 • 
Avatar image for sebalayo
sebalayo

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

poor woman, she need more money hahahahahhahaha

6 • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SebB

@sebalayo: It's a breach of contract. You'd let it go if your employer only paid you 60% of what your contract said you should be paid?

4 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sebb: Imagine defending overpaid celebrities who play make believe all day when others are actually still suffering due to the pandemic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ironhorse89: The article said Disney did not respond to re-negotiating the contract with her agent. They could have re-negotiated the contract to adjust it, given the circumstances around the pandemic but instead they decided to breach the contract, which is illegal.

2 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sebb: I know what the article said. It still doesn't change the fact that you're defending an overpaid celebrity who's bitching about only making 20 million playing make believe while others are still suffering during a pandemic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ironhorse89: hey do you wanna work for me? I'll give you a contract that says you are entitled to 24000 GBP a year and then pay you 60% of that. You're cool with that, right? So you've been screaming in the comments, so you must be. Let me know when you wanna sign.

4 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sebb: What are you, Scarlett's agent? Could you shill any harder for her? And before you try to come back with some smartass remark about me defending Disney, no, I don't like Disney either as I think they are scum as well for other reasons which have nothing to do with this BS at all. When you're done white knighting let us know.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sebb
SebB

2039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ironhorse89: Since you are a bit thick let me spell it out for you: it's about the principle of it. It's not about Scarlett or how much money she makes. It's only about, and I repeat in case you still don't get it, ONLY(!!) about the fact the contract was breached. Let me give you a clue as to the most important part of what I just typed: THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN BREACHED. And from that sentence, let me isolate the most important word: BREACHED. Got it? If not, I'm sorry because it is impossible to dumb it down further.

2 • 
Avatar image for ironhorse89
ironhorse89

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sebb: No need to be a jackass there. Calm down and breathe. It'll be ok. Drink your juice box.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-6793e8ba0e8bf
deactivated-6793e8ba0e8bf

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Haven't read the contract, but if Disney is 'altering the deal, pray we don't alter it further', then they'll at least have to say that in court, in which case it will depend on how much money Disney is willing to spend to make this go away.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for returnofthebrotha
ReturnoftheBrotha

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@lionheartssj1: Lines like those were not written by Disney. They lack such creativity.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-6793e8ba0e8bf
deactivated-6793e8ba0e8bf

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

@returnofthebrotha: Agreed.

Upvote •