GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Scarlett Johansson Sues Disney Over Black Widow Streaming Release, Disney Responds

After the latest MCU movie, Black Widow was released on Disney+, star Scarlett Johansson has filed a lawsuit against Disney

335 Comments

Update: In response to the lawsuit, Disney has released a statement obtained by Variety. "There is no merit whatsoever to this filing," it reads. "The lawsuit is especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic." Furthermore, the statement says the company has upheld its end of the contract, while noting the actress has already received $20 million for her role in the film, adding that "…the release of Black Widow on Disney+ with Premier Access has significantly enhanced her ability to earn additional compensation on top of the $20M she has received to date." You can read the original story below.

Black Widow isn't done fighting yet. Scarlett Johansson, who reprised her role as Natasha Romanoff in the latest Marvel Cinematic Universe film, has filed a lawsuit against Disney, alleging that the company releasing the movie on the Disney+ streaming service at the same time it did so theatrically was a breach of her contract.

The news comes from The Wall Street Journal, which reports that Johansson's contract not only guaranteed an exclusive theatrical release for the film but that its performance on the big screen would ultimately determine the actress's salary. Of course, Black Widow was originally scheduled to hit theaters in 2020 but was ultimately delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

When a new release date was set, it was announced that the film would hit theaters and Disney+ Premier Access on July 9. According to the suit, "Disney intentionally induced Marvel's breach of the agreement, without justification, in order to prevent Ms. Johansson from realizing the full benefit of her bargain with Marvel."

Per the suit, Johansson's team attempted to renegotiate her contract after the decision to debut the film on Disney+ was made, but Disney and Marvel were not responsive. However, in a copy of the lawsuit, obtained by Deadline, Marvel's chief counsel is quoted as previously saying, "We totally understand that Scarlett's willingness to do the film and her whole deal is based on the premise that the film would be widely theatrically released like our other pictures. We understand that should the plan change, we would need to discuss this with you and come to an understanding as the deal is based on a series of (very large) box office bonuses." According to WSJ, the decision to not renegotiate could end up costing the actress over $50 million.

Black Widow wasn't the only Disney film to get the Premier Access treatment, which allows audiences to watch the film at home for a limited time for a $30 fee. Before Black Widow, Mulan, Raya and the Last Dragon, and Cruella were all released with this model. Mulan was the lone film to initially only be released via Premier Access, as most theaters around the world were closed. Jungle Cruise--due on July 30--will hit theaters and Premier Access simultaneously and is currently the last announced Disney movie to be getting that treatment.

Likewise, Warner Bros. announced that its 2021 movie slate would debut on HBO Max and in theaters on the same day. When the move was announced at the end of 2020, some film creatives were not thrilled with the decision--namely Dune director Denis Villeneuve, who claimed he only learned his movie would be released on streaming through Warner Media's public announcement.

During its opening weekend, Black Widow earned $80 million at the domestic box office--along with an additional $60 million in Premier Access sales. The following week, though, theater revenue dropped 68% to just $26 million, a rather steep drop, especially for a Marvel Cinematic Universe film. Theater owners claimed this was due, in part, to people pirating the film following its digital release--a sentiment echoed in Johansson's lawsuit. "Millions of others who would have watched in the theatres will instead view the Picture on perfect digital pirated copies—-all made possible by Disney's decision to release the Picture 'day-and-date' on Disney+," the legal document reads. "Indeed, Black Widow was the No. 1 pirated title of the July 19 week, per the news site TorrentFreak."

Black Widow remains in theaters and on Disney+ Premier Access for those who have yet to see it. The next Marvel movie, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, hits theaters on September 3. Beyond that, the Hawkeye series debuts on Disney+ on November 24.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 335 comments about this story
335 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for spoochy
Spoochy

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

In Summary:

"$20 million isn't enough, and I'm entitled to more because my bonus pay is determined by the theatrical release, and that's hindered by it being on Disney+"

".....No, and we will most likely not work with you again."

3 • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@spoochy: They killed her character, she's getting as much as she can out of the last hurrah.

3 • 
Avatar image for clockworkengine
clockworkengine

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Thanatos2k: They killed Spiderman too, but he's back. Just a thought.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@clockworkengine: They already used the "fix it with time travel" mulligan. Using it again would be creatively bankrupt, but I wouldn't be surprised.

Also, Spiderman is a popular character.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deth420
deth420

1302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

@clockworkengine: yes with different actors every time.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for fud_sang
Fud_Sang

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Pretty sure that will be the last we see of her in the MCU even if the plan was to bring the character back...somehow.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for therealone717
therealone717

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

poor scarlett. lol I wouldn't have saw it in the theatres anyway. I might watch it later but meh lol hollywood's days are numbered. they are pumping out quantity over quality in a desperate attempt to maintain relevancy and distract the masses at a time when people are already being messed with badly. the backlash can and should be severe if they keep it up.

You're a rich girl, and you've gone too far

'Cause you know it don't matter anyway

You can rely on the old man's money

You can rely on the old man's money

It's a bi**h, girl, but it's gone too far

'Cause you know it don't matter anyway

Say money but it won't get you too far

Get you too far

3 • 
Avatar image for sportjames23
sportjames23

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@therealone717 said:

poor scarlett. lol I wouldn't have saw it in the theatres anyway. I might watch it later but meh lol hollywood's days are numbered. they are pumping out quantity over quality in a desperate attempt to maintain relevancy and distract the masses at a time when people are already being messed with badly. the backlash can and should be severe if they keep it up.

You're a rich girl, and you've gone too far

'Cause you know it don't matter anyway

You can rely on the old man's money

You can rely on the old man's money

It's a bi**h, girl, but it's gone too far

'Cause you know it don't matter anyway

Say money but it won't get you too far

Get you too far

My dude went with some Hall & Oates. 😂😂😂

Upvote • 
Avatar image for monkyby87
monkyby87

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@therealone717: not sure what any of that was about.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

@monkyby87 said:

@therealone717: not sure what any of that was about.

I love Google.

2 • 
Avatar image for therealone717
therealone717

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@monkyby87: of course you aren't your avatar name says it all as to why

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

$50 Million !!! .... Oh yeah I would renegotiate and sue for that, no matter what the base pay was that is to much on the table to give back to the bosses, with a, "Nah that is okay, you can keep the rest."

3 • 
Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

63457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

Edited By uninspiredcup

Hopefully the multi-millionare from this extremely mediocre movie can get some grub from the mutli-billionare.

All our hopes and dreams rest on you, Scarletts overpaid lawyer.

8 • 
Avatar image for monkyby87
monkyby87

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@uninspiredcup: *sigh*

2 • 
Avatar image for johnny0779
johnny0779

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

It would have been cheaper for Disney to honor her contract.

Not only she will get everything she wants but also Disney will be facing a lawsuit during phase 4 of the MCU during a tough time to make more money through the pandemic.

Disney should hire better business closers.

3 • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BDRTFM

Sounds like the contract is pretty cut and dry and that she stands to likely win a settlement. Unfortunately, an actress suing the hand that feeds them probably won't end well as she'll likely not get as many lucrative deals in the future. Hollywood suits tend to stick together and blacklist who they see as troublemakers. Then again, Amber Heard is doing Aquaman 2 despite being absolutely hated by millions of movie fans so, what do I know?

11 • 
Avatar image for spaceme17
Spaceme17

13

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

"Theater owners claimed this was due, in part, to people pirating the film following its digital release--a sentiment echoed in Johansson's lawsuit."

Yeah, its not because the movie sucks.

3 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@spaceme17: It was a good movie, and has good rating. Even so, that is a lot of money to give up and not get paid.

3 • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BDRTFM

@spaceme17: How you personally feel about the quality of the movie is irrelevant as to whether or not they broke the contract. And you can't seriously think that having a pirated copy of the film available shortly after hitting theatres didn't affect ticket sales substantially.

8 • 
Avatar image for moonwatcher99
moonwatcher99

122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bdrtfm: Pirating might indeed hurt ticket sales, but I wouldn't blame that on the streaming service. Just about every movie I know of has been available as soon as it hit theaters, sometimes within 24 hours or less, long before Disney+ was a thing. It might be easier now, but streaming didn't invent the pirating industry.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for WarGreymon77
WarGreymon77

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By WarGreymon77

$30 fee? That's highway robbery. Before my local movie theater went out of business this past year, it was 5 bucks a ticket.

3 • 
Avatar image for monkyby87
monkyby87

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@WarGreymon77: not sure what theater that is, but I haven’t seen a theater that had $5 tickets in a decade.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for boodger
Boodger

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@monkyby87: More than a decade. Even when I was in highschool, it cost 10 bucks to watch a movie, and that was with the student ID discount.

When I went to go see the movie in theaters, my ticket alone cost 22 dollars (including tax). I could easily see how a group of friends might choose to pay the 30 bucks to save money by watching it on Disney+

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@monkyby87: The two theaters by me are like $5.75 for matinee showings. Of course the regular time is like $13+

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Chupert
Chupert

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Chupert

@WarGreymon77: You know you can watch the movie with 10 people in your living room right? So then it would be $3 per person...

3 • 
Avatar image for WarGreymon77
WarGreymon77

782

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Chupert: Disney+ is $8 but whatever

Upvote • 
Avatar image for monkyby87
monkyby87

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@WarGreymon77: but it’s $30 for the premier access, which is needed to watch this movie right now.

2 • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@WarGreymon77: most theaters are over $10 a person during normal hours. Then if you want drinks and snacks its $$$ taking a family of 5 to the theater getting all that can easily get up to $100. So $30 isn't a bad deal.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

@ccgod said:

@WarGreymon77: most theaters are over $10 a person during normal hours. Then if you want drinks and snacks its $$$ taking a family of 5 to the theater getting all that can easily get up to $100. So $30 isn't a bad deal.

It is for a rental period. You might as well just wait for the Blu-Ray so you end up owning it for 30 dollars.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for smcaudata
smcaudata

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@JustPlainLucas: it's not a rental though. You get the movie for repeated viewings. You effectively are buying it. The only reason to buy a BluRay is for the higher quality due to higher bitrate of the film.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ZombieVirolina
ZombieVirolina

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Black Widow didn’t die because she threw herself off a cliff…it’s because she shot herself in the foot. 🙄

3 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@ZombieVirolina: I mean, was it likely she was going to play the character again?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ZombieVirolina
ZombieVirolina

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@mogan: Because they started the multiverse, it became a “never say never” thing. Feige even said they wanted to bring her back, but it was the matter of the right story to get her back. If the demand, writing, and money is there, I think like in the comics, no character truly dies.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dts15
dts15

397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@ZombieVirolina: By demanding they pay the money they promised to in a contract both parties signed and one breached? Idk how much you read but they literally said they would renegotiate if something like this happened and then just ignored the contract language. Imagine your employer had most of your salary in bonuses from your sales and that you would always be doing sales. The partway through the year the move you accounting with no explanation and refuse to honor or renegotiate your terms. When you sue them…you’re the one that looks bad?

2 • 
Avatar image for esqueejy
esqueejy

4974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

If the contract language is that clear, she's going to make a ton of money on a quick settlement.

13 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@esqueejy: I think Disney slow footed this, while negotiations went on for months and months, but once Black Widow made so much via streaming and theatrical - a lawsuit was sure to come.

3 • 
Avatar image for operatorzero
OperatorZero

376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@esqueejy: I've signed studio contracts before, they're pretty much phone-books. I'd be surprised if Disney had vague wording considering the size of their legal department.

2 • 
Avatar image for attirex
attirex

2535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@esqueejy:

This.

4 • 
Avatar image for mooglestar
MoogleStar

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Hello blacklist, it's nice to meet you.

2 • 
Avatar image for esqueejy
esqueejy

4974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By esqueejy

@mooglestar: Nah. People would line up around the block to watch her dance around in a kiddy pool full of pudding for an hour and a half. She's too much star power and sex appeal for the blacklist.

Disney screwed the pooch here if the contract is as clear as this sounds.

5 • 
Avatar image for caiphascain
CaiphasCain

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By CaiphasCain

Naaah man, come ooon. It's still the Pandemic, please don't be this way >.<. It's not like I think Disney is some charming group of people but this ain't the right tiiiime.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for smcaudata
smcaudata

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By smcaudata

@caiphascain: while generally I would agree with you, the pandemic saw large business execs make record money while doing things like paycuts and furloughs for workers claiming they couldn't afford to pay them. The execs absolutely should be raked over he coals here.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Chupert
Chupert

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@caiphascain: lol, Disney got 60 million with it on Disney+ while Theaters and Scarlett got screwed how is that not just plain evil.

3 •