GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Spot On: E3 absentees sound off

Many publishers and developers are steering clear of next week's trade show--they explain to GameSpot what's keeping them away.

451 Comments

After months of uncertainty, next week the gaming industry will finally experience the new E3 Media & Business Summit. The event is the dramatically overhauled successor to the Electronic Entertainment Expo, which had been the central event of the North American game industry for the previous 12 years.

E3 at the LACC.
E3 at the LACC.

Though it began as a modest trade show in 1995, E3 had become a deafening spectacle by 2006. Within weeks of the event's doors closing last May, many members of the Entertainment Software Association, E3's organizing body, decided the show had simply become too big, too loud, and too expensive for most exhibitors. "Some companies were frustrated because E3 was such a huge, sweeping event it became increasingly difficult to get their messages out," said former ESA president Doug Lowenstein.

Before he resigned last December, Lowenstein also promised the rechristened E3 Business & Media Summit would be drastically smaller than its predecessor. Whereas E3 2006 boasted more than 400 exhibitors and 60,000 attendees, E3 2007 is expected to draw just 36 participating companies and roughly 5,000 "invited guests."

The show floor has also been downsized, with the cavernous Los Angeles Convention Center abandoned in favor of the much smaller Barker Hangar in nearby Santa Monica. The landscape inside the venue will also be drastically different. Instead of the towering, neon-soaked edifices that dominated the interior of the LACC, Barker Hanger will feature subdued, standardized booths in two sizes--10-by-10 feet and 20-by-20 feet. "The customization options will be really limited both inside and outside [the booths]," a rep for a major exhibitor told GameSpot. "They will pretty much all look the same."

Barker Hangar, site of E3 2007.
Barker Hangar, site of E3 2007.

Also, the E3 conference program--which used to feature leading industry luminaries' keynotes--has been cut entirely. Indeed, much of the real business of the show won't take place at Barker Hangar at all. The vast majority of product previews will be held in private suites rented by publishers, several of which have outsourced staffing of their show-floor booths to external exhibition companies.

So what do these changes mean? Will they help streamline E3 by eliminating the chaos caused by tens of thousands of nonessential attendees stampeding between booths? Or, have they gutted the event, turning it into a hollow proceeding with a dubious raison d'etre?

In the days before E3 2007 unofficially kicks off with Microsoft's press conference next Tuesday night, GameSpot will be running interviews with the heads of several major publishers in attendance. Today, though, we check in with a series of companies who are skipping this year's expo--both voluntarily and involuntarily--to see how they feel about the new E3.

An ersatz Rachel from Ninja Gaiden at Tecmo's E3 booth in 2004.
An ersatz Rachel from Ninja Gaiden at Tecmo's E3 booth in 2004.

One of the biggest publishers absent from this year's event is Tecmo. Though its E3 booths evoke lighthearted memories of its cavalcade of scantily clad "booth babes," the Japanese publisher of the Ninja Gaiden and Dead or Alive series was deadly serious about why it opted out of E3 2007.

"New show management didn't seem to know what they were doing," Tecmo vice president John Inada told GameSpot. "I don't have money to waste on an experimental project. Previously, we were not treated very nicely by the old E3 management, so we didn't feel obligated to cooperate this year. I also heard that a lot of the [retail] buyers weren't coming."

Indeed, retail participation at the event will be a shadow of its former self. A GameStop representative said the company had "limited folks" attending the show, and other retailers have opted out entirely--causing some publishers to follow suit.

"GameStop's not really going to be there, Best Buy's not going to be there," complained a source close to a large publisher not attending E3. "Why should we bother dealing with the ESA's confusion when we can meet with our retail partners separately and then stage our own gamers' day event later on in the year where we set the rules? It just doesn't make any sense."

Those issues aside, the source told GameSpot the main issue was cost. "A standard-size space on the LACC floor costs around $50,000. For us to get a similar amount of space in a Santa Monica hotel would have cost us around $100,000." However, reps for another publisher attending the event claimed that they were saving "a huge amount of money" by renting a hotel suite and renting out one of the smaller Barker booths. "They're quite reasonable," one rep said of the booths.

GameCock's new game Hail to the Chimp.
GameCock's new game Hail to the Chimp.

Cost and retailer presence were also reasons for Gamecock Media Group to balk at the idea of attending, although its participation would have been unexpected at best. After all, the company was only recently founded by Mike Wilson and Harry Miller, former executives at the now-defunct publisher of Max Payne, Gathering of Developers. Gathering of Developers was never an official part of the Los Angeles-based E3 shows, but it always made a spectacle of itself with its carnival-like events featuring pole dancers and transvestites at an empty lot across the street from the LACC.

But to hear Wilson tell it, even that level of spectacle was affordable compared to being in the real E3. "Even at the very biggest, when we had a Jumbotron out there and a stage and bands and dancers and all this stuff, we could give away beer and barbecue to 10,000 people every year, and it still cost a fraction of what a modest booth inside the show would cost," Wilson said.

"At the convention center, the show had become, 'How much money can I spend this year?' which is why the big guys pulled out in the first place. And it was all union labor. You couldn't set up your own booth. You couldn't even plug in your own computers without paying somebody $150 and waiting for them to come plug your computer in for an hour."

(Also driving up the cost was the fact that, once the show started, exhibitors were forced to use the LACC's bland-but-expensive catering services: At E3 06, a cold-sandwich lunch for around 50 people cost upward of $2,000.)

In the tradition of the Gathering of Developers, Gamecock is instead setting up its own operation. The publisher's Expo for Interactive Entertainment, Independent and Original (EIEIO) will showcase Gamecock games like Wideload's Hail to the Chimp and Red Fly Studios' Mushroom Men concurrently with E3 at a hotel nearby the official show venues. Wilson said the publisher had originally intended to hold an event where an array of indie publishers could showcase their games to the press, but things just didn't come together quickly enough.

For some publishers, attending E3 wasn't even an option. Ken Berry, head of sales and marketing at XSEED Games (Brave Story: New Traveler, Wild ARMs 5), said his company was told it needed an invite to the event, just like attendees from the press and industry. And even with an invite, Berry echoed others' issues concerning the cost of the event and communication with show management.

"Assuming we had a chance to participate, the costs of securing a meeting area in one of the hotels, from what I've heard indirectly through third parties, would have been cost-prohibitive for us," Berry told GameSpot. "Setting up a small booth in the hangar may have been an option, but once again we never had all the required information so we couldn't make an informed decision." (NOTE: XSEED will be showing off games live as part of GameSpot's E3 Stage Show.)

Berry said E3 is still likely to be the most important industry event of the year. But nowhere will the old E3 be missed more than at the small game companies that veteran game publicist Tom Ohle has long represented. Despite being relegated to the infamous Kentia Hall last year, Ohle helped the European RPG The Witcher get picked up by Atari for North American publishing. Now director of Evolve PR, Ohle remains sold on the merits of the show's old format.

Kentia Hall--it lives now, only in our memories...
Kentia Hall--it lives now, only in our memories...

"E3 was always the one event you could attend to meet with pretty much every writer, PR and marketing rep, studio exec, et cetera in the industry," Ohle said. "As a developer or publisher, you could show your game to practically everyone who mattered. Plus, it was an awesome place to network and just to hang out with friends you didn't get to see much."

Even though "practically everyone who mattered" only made up a portion of the thousands upon thousands of attendees, Ohle said even the riffraff had its upside.

"I used to complain a lot about all of the EB Games assistant-to-the-assistant store managers running around the show, but fact is, they got a ton of buzz going about the biggest products," he told GameSpot. "I don't think you're going to have people roaming the streets of Santa Monica, yelling, 'You have to head to Nintendo's hotel right now! There's a two-hour lineup!'"

Not everyone has started getting wistful for the old format, however. Though his own Wahoo Studios was not invited to E3 07, Saga producer Jason Faller thinks the new format could fix some serious flaws with the old show.

"Truth be told, E3 has never been that great to us for networking," Faller said. "In fact, everyone's so busy and burnt out at E3 that it's hard to get anyone to be serious at all about any deals or proposals or ideas; it's really just a first contact and a face-to-face opportunity to meet all those people you had phone calls with in prior months. I imagine the new format would be better in this regard: less people, less noise, better business. Who knows? Maybe we've made a mistake in not attending."

So instead of going to E3, Faller said he went to the Game Developers Conference earlier this year and is planning to attend the consumer event GenCon in August.

"I don't think I'm boycotting the 'New E3' because I think it's unimportant," Faller said. "I just don't feel that I belong there. It was made without me in mind...at GDC and GenCon, I can appeal directly to shop owners, press attendees, and publisher reps in a casual environment where my spiked hair and two-day stubble come off as confident, even sometimes intimidating to the white-running-shoed, tucked-logo-embossed-golf-shirted guys that I've dealt with in the past at the shows."

Santa Monica Pier, site of GameSpot's E3 2007 HQ.
Santa Monica Pier, site of GameSpot's E3 2007 HQ.

GDC and GenCon aren't the only possible replacement events. A representative with SNK Playmore (of King of Fighters and Metal Slug fame) said that the publisher is steering clear of this year's E3 because of the cost and layout of the event. Instead, it will look elsewhere for opportunities to show its wares to retail buyers and the press. Specifically, the representative mentioned Sony's retail-only Destination PlayStation event as the most important in the industry when it comes to buyers. However, SNK Playmore believes a second event of some sort is needed.

It isn't just a preference for the old E3 format that has kept some companies from participating in this year's event. Hothead Games CEO Vlad Ceraldi suggested that both iterations of the show could be made irrelevant for those working in the rising field of downloadable games.

"E3 has never been about gamers," Ceraldi said. "The show has historically been about appealing to the needs of traditional retail channels. Hothead's focus is on the opportunities created by digital distribution and the closer relationship a publisher can have with the gamers themselves."

Still, even downloadable game developers need to get the word out somehow, so Hothead Games will be showcasing its episodic PC adventure game Penny Arcade Adventures: On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness at consumer-focused shows like the Penny Arcade Expo (naturally) and San Diego Comic-Con.

While a number of the publishers GameSpot contacted said they would consider participating in next year's E3 (some on the condition that the format is further tweaked), multiple representatives said they didn't believe there would be an E3 at all next year. Gamecock is even referencing that notion in its EIEIO event, which will cap off with a funeral service for the ESA's long-standing trade show.

"We're going to have some fun on the beach and say good-bye to the magical beast of yore that was E3," Wilson said. "I'd say there's a fair chance there won't be a show called E3 anything next year, which is why we're saying farewell to it on the beach. But I can't wait to see what emerges."

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 451 comments about this story
451 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for grassgreener12
grassgreener12

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

from reading this article....its obvious that e3 is an event that costs a ton of money....i mean $2000 freakinnn dollars for cold sandwiches for 50 people.....its cheaper at subway.....i really dont care though.....as long as the major publishers....microsoft game studios, midway, EA, THQ, activision, definitely UBISOFT are there it makes no difference how big it is.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EssaregeeX
EssaregeeX

621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

ThWe should all protest, we will all refuse to go to work, pay taxes, and even send our chelidrehn two schkoole! Wy we do ned edikatuiouin wen wi kan plae wideo ghames alle dae ande live ihn ann inajinarey vorlde! Longe liwe wideo ghames!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bubnux
bubnux

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Nobody is going to miss E3 more than myself. The worst part is, I was going to go to E3 2006 but things came up making that an impossibility so I swore to myself that I would not miss this year, my company was willing to send me as a rep so I would have not only had a pass to the show (no sneaking in) but the conferences for the big three as well. You screwed me ESA, you crushed my hopes and dreams. E3 2007 may take the trade show back to it's roots but it won't matter much since the only things moving booth to booth will be the tumbleweeds.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PSLinux
PSLinux

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

its because EA is just in it for the money, although a few good series have been outstanding

Upvote • 
Avatar image for assassinX01
assassinX01

1473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

Just to let everyone know, EA was the biggest leader in killing off the old E3.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Enterprise-E
Enterprise-E

5322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

I think as long as the announcements and games are good it doesn't matter how many they have or lost. Lets face it out of the 400 exhibitors how many were actually good in terms of games?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ryanstoy91
ryanstoy91

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

We went from 400 exhibitlors to 36? That's going to look like a huge change compared to last year's E3.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dennis8
dennis8

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

"Whereas E3 2006 boasted more than 400 exhibitors and 60,000 attendees, E3 2007 is expected to draw just 36 participating companies and roughly 5,000 "invited guests." ...................... wow, talk about downsized. Im gonna miss the old E3, all the games, the demos, the noise, the booth babes......

Upvote • 
Avatar image for acecs1989
acecs1989

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

I think it is rather appalling that the old way of E3, massive and engaging to the public, has been replaced by a new E3, cramped and boring to even people in the business. I believe that E3 should be open to anyone and be a chance for developers to show off what new things they are offering to the gaming industry. Indeed, I miss the E3 of yester-year.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for NaturalBornGamR
NaturalBornGamR

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

We the gamers should put together our own E3..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Enterprise-E
Enterprise-E

5322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Well lets just give this E3 a chance first. Everyone fears doing something new and it is only logical for the developers who are not attending it feel that way. Even though if some of the Developers that were there previously shouldn't of been there in the first place unless it is new game.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for miketuck3r
miketuck3r

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Leipzig will benefit most from E3's shrinkage, its the biggest public gaming event in the world (numbers atending) and is a lot bigger this year

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ahyumifan
ahyumifan

1396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Now, US Game developers have to go Tokyo, Japan to show their games. Amazing... Thanks to decrease the size drastically.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zamardii12
zamardii12

1245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

E3 officially will suck. In fact, it's pretty stupid to think about cost, when the more you hype your own game, the more money it will make even though it turns out to be even mediocre. I guess i'll never look forward to an E3 again. But like they said, E3 wasn't made with me in mind.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mr17x
mr17x

183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

E3 will never die. It would be like Christmas dying.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DryvBy2
DryvBy2

287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

Really boring stuff. E3 has been a joke for years. It went from being about games to being about who had the hottest booth babes. And needless to say, the booth babes weren't ever that hot (unless you like hentai... you freak). Aside from that, all this next-gen crap they're feeding us aren't even real games. 5 hours per game is like watching an expensive movie. The only thing I'm even looking forward to is hearing about Nintendo/Microsoft/Sony's new product line. After that, my ADD will gladly kick in.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavoyPrime
SavoyPrime

41098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

I'm willing to give this new format a chance. But for some strange reason, I just feel that this E3 will just not be that great. I won't be shocked if this will end up being the last one.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for faithnomore311
faithnomore311

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wow, that was a really boring article. Still, I like E3 cause there are always HUGE announcements made every year. I'm hoping for a Brawl Release Date, maybe something from Blizzard, and ANYTHING for my poor PS3, it's so lonely, only has Motorstorm and Resistance to keep it company.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamer_girl15
gamer_girl15

2534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

I'm just going to have to see how it turns out. E3 has always been something I look forward to every year so it'll be interesting to see how the new changes impact the event. Until I see what the end result is, I'm not going to lay judgement on it. However, less publishers attending isn't exactly a good thing.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think Ceraldi is right and E3 was and is mainly about contacting old retail channels to have their games picked up for retail sales, as opposed to showing off to the general public, which was more like a side note on the event. Keynote events are essential for the big boys to show off their goods and build hype to the gamers. Without gamers, retail is useless because no one will buy a game if it's never been heard of before. The attendies built the buzz and the retailers would check out the product after hearing the buzz about something great at the show. Standardized booths is ok, but making them too small and limiting who attends is a mistake. They should have kept more to the old style of event and tweaked certain things, like adding a larger charge to non retail/developer people who are just attending because it's cool, and use that money to help fund the event in general, while knocking out those who cant afford to go making less people at the show. Standardized booths would be good, but in size only, not on content allowed in the booth. The cost of setting up the booth would fall on the developer, and key notes need to be spread out over the entire week (which it should be a week long event). The only problem with small booths is the amount of people who can see the product at once, and over a week you have to do your skit on the product over and over again with less people seeing it. What they need is a new setup style, where the booths can be views by many people at once while still not being too big in size. Like a theater style for each booth, which of course means a new building needs to be constructed just for this event all together. Mingling is good, gamers are good, retail outlets are good, developers are good, and all need to be at the same place at the same time in an organized fashion that allows developers to show off their goods to as many peopl eas possible at once, while allowing access to demos for gamers, and retail scavenger meetings without a huge repetition. No mingling = no buzz = no sales = E3 failure.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for josephmadde2005
josephmadde2005

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"chargr67" I think that the comment about dividing it into five or so days was a great idea, a day or two just for the media (so they can do their thing without the Gamestop employees third cousin twice removed being in the way) a couple of days just for retailers, and a day for the average Joe to have a look. All the media and retailers could be out of the way and the public could have a day too look around. If they wanted to limit the useless crap(like the massive displays and ridiculous shows) and just focus on the games it would work.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bear1961
bear1961

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

i cant wait for some new ps3 games

Upvote • 
Avatar image for josephmadde2005
josephmadde2005

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Lets face a fact some of this has to do with the big companies wanting to get the little guys out of the way so they could have the media all to themselves. Let's not forget that their games compete with the big three's games too. If the industry really cared about the average gamer they could have simply moved the event to another venue and gotten around much of the crap they were putting up with. They could have also limited the space that the big guys used to put up mindless displays and just focused on the games. There are thousands of venues in the US where it could have been held, and it would have been much cheaper. What about Atlanta where it was first held in 95/96 or even going back to Vegas.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Arcade_Legend
Arcade_Legend

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Microsoft does a great job with E3 no matter what kind of event it is, because Microsoft brings the E3 games, demonstration software, and announcements into the homes of Xbox 360 owners, because the Xbox 360 allows those kinds of downloads to take place, and Microsoft provides the downloads. Last year, we got to play awesome games like Lost Planet, and see awesome announcements for award winning games like Gears of War and Mass Effect. I think it will be awesome to be able to see what games like Mass Effect, Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Bioshock, Ace Combat 6, and the online version of Virtua Fighter 5 will be like.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for GIF
GIF

2978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

Actually, I have been to the old E3 twice and its much better then then it is now because now its spread out, smaller and its going to kill hype and its also not going to provide a central hub where everyone in the game industry can come meet each other, exhcange ideas, provide workshops and look at asipiring artist, programmers, and game designers. Without one place to meet everyone, its going to be an industry event that will dwindle with the years to come. Expect small visitors and low hype. The only thing the old E3 needed for improvement was stricter entrance rules, budget limits for developers, and scale down the venue. I am sure it could have turned into something more professional if the people in charge just tried. Right now this revamped E3 feels like a cheap and lazy attempt at trying to fix a problem.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Proman84
Proman84

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I have a feeling that those who will be skipping E3 this year will be missing out. Long live E3!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sirx
sirx

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I love the smaller E3! I would never go to one of these things myself(don't live in LA), so the only way I hear about it is through websites and TV. With the smaller show they will be able to cover the games and conferences much better instead of having the journalists write down 9 words about each game and then trying to remember enough about it to write a preview a week or 2 later. Sure a lot of developers and publishers won't be there, but that just means that they can have their own cheaper events that give lots of details about THEIR games! I also won't miss the months after E3 when news about games comes to a stand still because every developer announced everything during the one 3 day event.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DSgamer64
DSgamer64

4449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

E3 was way too big, a lot of folks would agree, but now the present idea might be too small. For those familiar with the International Auto Show in Toronto, Ontario, that is a huge show that uses up like 2 buildings, the Metro Toronto Convention Center and the Rogers Center (formerly the SkyDome). You can literally spend about 8-10 hours walking through it all and getting to see all the cars is really cool, but its far too much work really. I dare say its too big. However I have never been to E3 but I hear it was massive in the past, if its too small now then an inbetween needs to be found so that more developers can be there and still afford space at the show. If the cost is too expensive, how are indie developers going to be able to market their games by showing them off?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nemes1s3000
nemes1s3000

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

What Tecmo VP said is absolutely right, E3 should be paying them to show off their good stuff, otherwise the game developers can just stay at their offices and display their games thru sites like GameSpot.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for frogiggy323
frogiggy323

826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Yah, E3 will be dead in a couple years now. From 400 participants to 36, thats real progress.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for chargr67
chargr67

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

theres a really simple anwser to this.. 1. bring back the old E3 in all its glory 2. have it be 3 or 4 days long, 1st day: industry only (Devs, and so forth) 2nd day: industry and press 3rd day: industry, press, retail 4th day: open to the public for $40 (like a concert) this way it gives the industy guys a chance to show off and sell they product to others and not have to deal with the crazyness, then the press gets a day to cover everything and get it on there websites before anyone see's it to drive traffic, then the retail guys(the people who sell the games) gets a look and understands what there selling.. and then on the 4th day you open the doors to anyone thats got $40 and by then the industry guys are gone and got what they needed, the press got there articals and now the gamers get to have fun. even have it open for 5 days and give the gamers 2 days to suck it all in? i donno, it just makes sense to me?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for EssaregeeX
EssaregeeX

621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Old E3 Booth Dashing for free stuff was fun! what is wrong with going home with over 200 Keychains, free t-shirts, music cd's, and arm-bands, (and occasionaly even something big, like a huge blow up doll of Kasumi (DoA Series) The "New" e3 is all about politics; there barely any more spirit in game development, most companies are just trying to pumb out flashy games in record time and make profit, whatever happened to the good 'ol games that we used to play? That said there are still some devs that support the spirit, but essencialy it all revolves around money.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OdiumX
OdiumX

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great article. Its sad to see that so many developers are skipping the event this year.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rkgambill
rkgambill

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I would have to say for those of you wishing for the "old E3" back, you've never been to it. It truly was absolutely horrendous. For most people it was simply a mad dash from booth to botth trying to get as much free stuff as possible and really turned out terribly for those of us going to actually find info. While the downsizing and restructuring of E3 is definitely a good mov,e I think they may have went a bit too far. It's like they're trying to change E3 into another GDC. They truly need to find an equal balance.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DNOMYTE
DNOMYTE

2675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Well i hope they realize their mistakes and bring back all the good stuff in a year or 2. *crosses fingers*

Upvote • 
Avatar image for smashhero
smashhero

1101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

"If it aren't broke, don't fix it." Oh well, at least we going to have E4 later this year. =/

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

It sounds like E3 management were only concerened with the biggest of the big companies this year. Too bad they just couldn't secure their old site better and had the same companies. This really doesn't seem like a trade show anymore; just an advertisement for the big 3 and the giant publishers. How sad.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Karl319
Karl319

4390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sigh, they make it have a limit of 5000 people, invites only, they remove the sexy dressed girls, they don't let smaller time companies or dev's come, they have it in a damn hangar... and they dare call it E3. Years ago I actually wanted to go to E3, kept wishing for it each year.... yeah, great, now when I almost have the chance they go and screw it up... bravo.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Demmi_Argo
Demmi_Argo

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Showgirls were an icon of the videogame industry, and an important part. And now its gone... all gone... *cries and snorts in a corner*

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PacoL250
PacoL250

3266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's funny how stuck-up Tecmo sounds. Then again, they've always this air of "we're better than the other developers" attitude as if they're the best of the best. Sure, they're excellent developers, but be somewhat humble about it. Just my two cents about that... As for the rest of E3, most likely the show will change up for next year mainly because people have to consider this a transition year. They'll take what they learn from this year and apply changes to next year and they'll try to get some of the other developers and retailers back. Also considering it's become more trade show, less consumer oriented, no wonder the retailers stay away; they can have their own meetings and find out directly from developers and publishers. So clearly it's a smaller trade show now and people are just making a big deal about it anyway. I guess booth babes will also become a thing of the past unless I'm missing the fact that they may be at GenCon...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

E3 used to be a Disneyworld for geeks. Now E3 is a waste of hangar space.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ThePhilatron
ThePhilatron

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Good article...too bad there's no E3 anymore (well there is technically but the only thing connecting old and new E3 is the name).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rdo
rdo

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

i think the people that are invited think they are super special now, and that everyone is going to be falling on their every word as to what they seen and heard. it's going to be a huge ego blow when they realize we stopped careing a year ago. "you were at e3 this year? is that so. then maybe you can relate, i was at 7-11 this morning and was the only person in the store. i could get to everything!!! did you know hostess still hace chocolate cup cakes?"

Upvote • 
Avatar image for anarchicgoth
anarchicgoth

496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

there goes my dream of going to E3

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kappareign
kappareign

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

suddenly the biggest event of the year for gamers got turned into a giant business meeting...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for omgcracka
omgcracka

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Good job writing this article, it was probably one of the most informative and well written pieces I've seen on Gamespot; it feels like the writer actually put some emotion into it. It does suck that E3 is so small now though =[

Upvote • 
Avatar image for comelstr
comelstr

677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

percent of not haveing a E3 next year is at 58%

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MuscleCarMan
MuscleCarMan

796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

ever since i was a kid i wanted to go to e3, oh well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Dshenlong
Dshenlong

4613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

The moment they decided that "people werent necessary for the conference" it was dead to me...and I HOPE it'll die off soon because if they dont care about the gamer's well then -shrugs- I dont see why we should care about the conference any more

Upvote •