People that advertise unions with invite only in signatures should be punished

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

its should be against the terms of use or the content should be deleted imo. It makes completely no sense to have an advertising about something you dont want to be involved by everybody, let alone that you choose the right persons in the end anyways. The servers are not for free and these signatures cost lot of space or work to show them on the site, thats money that gamespot is wasting.

Avatar image for msudude211
msudude211

44517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 msudude211
Member since 2006 • 44517 Posts
[size=11]Er... what? It's their signature - they can put in it what they want as long as it abides by the ToU. Plus, I fail to see how having a signature for an invite-only union has anything to do with Gamespot wasting money... [/size]
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#3 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. What you see as advertising may be a user merely showing the rest of GS that they are part of a certain union, they may be proud of the fact that they are part of this union and wish to show everyone with their signature. I think its fine and there's no need for people to get punished for this.