• 70 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for NeoGen85
NeoGen85

4270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 NeoGen85
Member since 2003 • 4270 Posts

With the release of Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children we've seen that Square Enix can create some intense action sequences through film. We all know the first attempt in the movie industry with Final Fantasy: Spirits Within was some what disappointing for many. But! Could Square Enix do it again if creating a film that was just called Final Fantasy? I believe that a good script and storyline would improve on the success of such a movie. I would definitely like to see Final Fantasy on the big screen again.

There are several videogame[and comic] film adaptations in production. When it comes to both 2D and 3D animation on the big screen we've seen more "wholesome" forms of entertainment for all ages. Surprisingly the influence of animation overseas hasn't grasp Hollywood. You look at anime such as Cowboy Bebop which has broken a lot of cultural barriers in terms of artistic and musical concept.

And then here comes Blizzard Entertainment. If you have seen the opening sequences to World of Warcraft(Seasons of War), and the Burning Crusade you know what the company could be capable of regarding the upcoming film adaptation of the Warcraft universe(it's not been revealed about the direction they will be taking regarding 3D animation or live-action). I personally believe that Square Enix should step up to the plate again and try another swing at a film with Hollywood in mind.

Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much better
Avatar image for -Phaz-
-Phaz-

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 -Phaz-
Member since 2006 • 927 Posts

Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much betterfs_metal

your the first person i've heard of that liked spirt within more than advent children. :shock:

but in anwser to the topic, im not to sure about another FF film??? it could be good or poor it depends on what story they give it.

Avatar image for zero_cool098
zero_cool098

1886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 zero_cool098
Member since 2006 • 1886 Posts
advent children is not a good movie if you judge it by itself........if you do, its a freakin confusing story with characters suddenly popping out of no where for no reason...the movie is recommended only for those who are fans of the series......spirits within is much better!
Avatar image for NeoGen85
NeoGen85

4270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 NeoGen85
Member since 2003 • 4270 Posts
Haha. I never commented on Advent Children's script and storyline. I said it had good action sequences.
Avatar image for JustQuest
JustQuest

597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 JustQuest
Member since 2007 • 597 Posts
I actually liked both but yes even for me it took me a couple of views to understand what advent was about and I played FF7 like too many times to mention, Spirit Within had a better storyline tho in my opinion but these two movies cannot really be compared, they are both very different genres.
Avatar image for cloudstrife145
cloudstrife145

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 61

User Lists: 0

#7 cloudstrife145
Member since 2006 • 1051 Posts
Spirits Within is very very very very boring......I really hated it. Like the worst movie I have ever watched.
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much better-Phaz-

your the first person i've heard of that liked spirt within more than advent children. :shock:

but in anwser to the topic, im not to sure about another FF film??? it could be good or poor it depends on what story they give it.

Advent Children had a disappointing story that was, basically, just a rehash. The new characters had no personality really. The action scenes are just....bad. Poor choreography. Absolutely no respect for natures laws.

The Spirit Within does have a good story that makes you think. It was revolutionary. Its action had much better choreography and thney had respect for the laws of nature. It is a better movie
Avatar image for NeoGen85
NeoGen85

4270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 NeoGen85
Member since 2003 • 4270 Posts
So...no one thinks that there should be another Final Fantasy movie in Hollywood. Ok....HAIL WARCRAFT!
Avatar image for PenguinPaladin
PenguinPaladin

3529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PenguinPaladin
Member since 2005 • 3529 Posts
Maybe they should just take a FF from the game to movie.. done properly I think it could be good. BTW I thought AC was a good movie, but it takes a couple views to understand, and is really for those who have played VII
Avatar image for -Phaz-
-Phaz-

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 -Phaz-
Member since 2006 • 927 Posts

people say Advent Children is only for those who have played FF7, well i doubt many other people would actually watch it if you havent played FFVII. its why i found it better than Spirts Within because you straight away knew all the characters (except kudaj ect.) which made it easier to grab the story.

Spirts Within, i personally found boring (dont flame me) just my opinion.

Avatar image for frostbourne
frostbourne

2773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 frostbourne
Member since 2005 • 2773 Posts

I really would savor upon the idea that Advent Children could hit the big sceen in the nearby future. It will appeal mostly to those those who have appreciated the FF series and in particular FFVII, and will enthusiast those who are yet to realize the beauty of the final fantasy universe.

Agree with Phaz on that one: that Spirits within is just plain boring. :) Well just my opinion!

Avatar image for dragonlou
dragonlou

1717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 dragonlou
Member since 2004 • 1717 Posts
I never watch either one but they both look good.
Avatar image for ZeroWingEvil91
ZeroWingEvil91

740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 ZeroWingEvil91
Member since 2005 • 740 Posts
No. Originality is pretty much dead in Hollywood(hence all the videogame adaptions). I don't want to see another FF movie. I want to see something original with good characters and a good story. I don't want to see another movie based on a book, videogame, or telivision show, I just want something original. Have I made my point clear enough?
Avatar image for Calebman
Calebman

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Calebman
Member since 2003 • 518 Posts

No. Originality is pretty much dead in Hollywood(hence all the videogame adaptions). I don't want to see another FF movie. I want to see something original with good characters and a good story. I don't want to see another movie based on a book, videogame, or telivision show, I just want something original. Have I made my point clear enough?ZeroWingEvil91

Wow, really? You want an original movie? You must be the only one in the whole world. I bet if you made movies, they'd all be tottaly original and creative and everyone would love your movies. I think reading your post has changed my life for the better. Thank you, for being such a great person. I'm rolling on the floor, crying in joy. Such revelations.

Anyway, I thought Spirits Within was to boring to hold my attention. AC story was weak, but it was a movie I'm glad I watched.

Avatar image for tabian00
tabian00

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 tabian00
Member since 2004 • 157 Posts

I don't feel that they should do another movie based on the same universe as Final Fantasy (or anything in the past). I agree completely with Zero that an original story should be the possible focus of another movie if they (SquareEnix) were to try again. Completely independent from their franchises. However I did find Spirits Within very enjoyable to watch...I wouldn't say it was a good movie but it was enjoyable.

For the people who found it AC confusing and slow...Advent Children was a movie made SOLELY for fans of the francshise and not as a project that would be produced and distributed for the entire movie going population (that's what Spirits Within was for and it didn't do all that well). ALL aspects of the movie (AC) were based on the prediction that you had played and understood the storyline, characters, and abilities of the characters of Final Fantasy VII.

I also have a question to the people who were complaining about the lack of realism in Advent Children. Firstly it's called "suspension of disbelief".You knew it was a movie based on a video game with the word "Fantasy" in it? I'm pretty sure that if you didn't like the movie due to the lack of realism than you must really not like the game(s). Fireballs coming out of a person's hands, lasers shooting out of swords, huge meteors being stopped by glowing green lights, and talking red dogs aren't exactly within the realm of modern physics either. It surprises me that members of a Union dedicated to the Fans of Final Fantasy are commenting on the realism of anything.

Avatar image for kryu88
kryu88

9301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#17 kryu88
Member since 2006 • 9301 Posts

I also agree on the originality angle, movies are getting very uncreative nowadays, its all adaptations or spinoffs or an exact copy of a book, game, or whatever.  If another FF movie were to come out I would want it to be an original, which is why I respect what they did with Spirits Within, a completely new storyline and characters.  It didn't do well because there was no real reference to FF in it......it just seemed like another Fantasy/Sci-Fi movie with Final Fantasy slapped on it. 

AC had characters that people could refer and relate to, and it was based on one of the most popular video games of all time.  So, it did better in sales and overall appeal, its been years since I watched Spirits Within, I'm sure if I watched it now I would appreciate it more.  Back when I first watched it I was expecting something more related to FF, which it wasn't really from what I recall.  I would have to watch it again to choose a winner between the two, for myself, right now I like AC more.

Avatar image for redman100111
redman100111

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 redman100111
Member since 2006 • 533 Posts

Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much betterfs_metal

Im sorry I have to disagree with you I think "Spirits Within" Sucked

I like Advent children way more :)

Avatar image for dragonlou
dragonlou

1717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 dragonlou
Member since 2004 • 1717 Posts

[QUOTE="ZeroWingEvil91"]No. Originality is pretty much dead in Hollywood(hence all the videogame adaptions). I don't want to see another FF movie. I want to see something original with good characters and a good story. I don't want to see another movie based on a book, videogame, or telivision show, I just want something original. Have I made my point clear enough?Calebman

Wow, really? You want an original movie? You must be the only one in the whole world. I bet if you made movies, they'd all be tottaly original and creative and everyone would love your movies. I think reading your post has changed my life for the better. Thank you, for being such a great person. I'm rolling on the floor, crying in joy. Such revelations.

Anyway, I thought Spirits Within was to boring to hold my attention. AC story was weak, but it was a movie I'm glad I watched.

Then the irony is they do a video game based on the movie
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much betterredman100111

Im sorry I have to disagree with you I think "Spirits Within" Sucked

I like Advent children way more :)

HEre is why AC is, from a technical standpoint, not a good movie:

One of hte biggest and most important rules of film maning is to know that you can only suspend peoples disbelief so far. That means that, when doing a story, you cannot make it too far fetched that it's unbelievable, and when doing something like an action sequence, you have to atleast make it plausible by obeying atleast some of natures laws. Where the movie fails is in it's action sequences. They don't seem to obey any of the laws of nature of physics or anything, thus they mean that it is not plausable. Take the Matrix as an example. IT had similar fast paced graviuty defying action scenes, but it had a good explanation as to why those scenes could be pulled off by the characters. Advent Children did not. Besides that, even The Matrix followed natures laws to some extent. The highway scene in that movie...they didn't pull off the kind of things that that they did in AC. With the cars on the street, they kept their wheels down,. They didn't spen in unexplainable circles or anything like this. The end result of this is that the action scenes in AC suffer extremely poor choreography. This is why it is not a good movie
Avatar image for cloudstrife145
cloudstrife145

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 61

User Lists: 0

#21 cloudstrife145
Member since 2006 • 1051 Posts
[QUOTE="-Phaz-"]

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much betterfs_metal

your the first person i've heard of that liked spirt within more than advent children. :shock:

but in anwser to the topic, im not to sure about another FF film??? it could be good or poor it depends on what story they give it.

Advent Children had a disappointing story that was, basically, just a rehash. The new characters had no personality really. The action scenes are just....bad. Poor choreography. Absolutely no respect for natures laws.

The Spirit Within does have a good story that makes you think. It was revolutionary. Its action had much better choreography and thney had respect for the laws of nature. It is a better movie

Spirit Within had too much story in it, while Advent Children had more fighting scenes in it. Spirit Within had too much, 'robots' into it. boring....

Avatar image for StillB0RED
StillB0RED

383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 StillB0RED
Member since 2006 • 383 Posts
I actually liked both but yes even for me it took me a couple of views to understand what advent was about and I played FF7 like too many times to mention, Spirit Within had a better storyline tho in my opinion but these two movies cannot really be compared, they are both very different genres.JustQuest
Same here. I don't see why people don't like Spirits (at least, the people I know). I've talked to people in school and they've never even played FF7 and they say they love it and I ask them about Spirits Within and they don't. That just confuses me.
Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
I liked Advent Children but it wasn't AMAZING... It was more like good. It would only make sense to a person who knows the FFVII story like me.
Avatar image for ZeroWingEvil91
ZeroWingEvil91

740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 ZeroWingEvil91
Member since 2005 • 740 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"]

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much bettercloudstrife145

your the first person i've heard of that liked spirt within more than advent children. :shock:

but in anwser to the topic, im not to sure about another FF film??? it could be good or poor it depends on what story they give it.

Advent Children had a disappointing story that was, basically, just a rehash. The new characters had no personality really. The action scenes are just....bad. Poor choreography. Absolutely no respect for natures laws.

The Spirit Within does have a good story that makes you think. It was revolutionary. Its action had much better choreography and thney had respect for the laws of nature. It is a better movie

Spirit Within had too much story in it, while Advent Children had more fighting scenes in it. Spirit Within had too much, 'robots' into it. boring....



So you dislike Spirit Within because it had a story? Yet Advent Children, the story of which really was a rehash, is acceptable because it had action? Oy....
Avatar image for omega235
omega235

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 omega235
Member since 2006 • 5922 Posts

I also agree on the originality angle, movies are getting very uncreative nowadays, its all adaptations or spinoffs or an exact copy of a book, game, or whatever.  If another FF movie were to come out I would want it to be an original, which is why I respect what they did with Spirits Within, a completely new storyline and characters.  It didn't do well because there was no real reference to FF in it......it just seemed like another Fantasy/Sci-Fi movie with Final Fantasy slapped on it. 

AC had characters that people could refer and relate to, and it was based on one of the most popular video games of all time.  So, it did better in sales and overall appeal, its been years since I watched Spirits Within, I'm sure if I watched it now I would appreciate it more.  Back when I first watched it I was expecting something more related to FF, which it wasn't really from what I recall.  I would have to watch it again to choose a winner between the two, for myself, right now I like AC more.

kryu88
v for vendetta is original, so is hitchhikers guide to the galaxy
Avatar image for cloudstrife145
cloudstrife145

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 61

User Lists: 0

#26 cloudstrife145
Member since 2006 • 1051 Posts
[QUOTE="cloudstrife145"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"]

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much betterZeroWingEvil91

your the first person i've heard of that liked spirt within more than advent children. :shock:

but in anwser to the topic, im not to sure about another FF film??? it could be good or poor it depends on what story they give it.

Advent Children had a disappointing story that was, basically, just a rehash. The new characters had no personality really. The action scenes are just....bad. Poor choreography. Absolutely no respect for natures laws.

The Spirit Within does have a good story that makes you think. It was revolutionary. Its action had much better choreography and thney had respect for the laws of nature. It is a better movie

Spirit Within had too much story in it, while Advent Children had more fighting scenes in it. Spirit Within had too much, 'robots' into it. boring....



So you dislike Spirit Within because it had a story? Yet Advent Children, the story of which really was a rehash, is acceptable because it had action? Oy....

they both had a story, but a good FF movie will have tons of fighting scenes in it!

Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"]

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]Advent Children is not a good movie. The Spirit Within was much bettercloudstrife145

your the first person i've heard of that liked spirt within more than advent children. :shock:

but in anwser to the topic, im not to sure about another FF film??? it could be good or poor it depends on what story they give it.

Advent Children had a disappointing story that was, basically, just a rehash. The new characters had no personality really. The action scenes are just....bad. Poor choreography. Absolutely no respect for natures laws.

The Spirit Within does have a good story that makes you think. It was revolutionary. Its action had much better choreography and thney had respect for the laws of nature. It is a better movie

Spirit Within had too much story in it, while Advent Children had more fighting scenes in it. Spirit Within had too much, 'robots' into it. boring....

No. AC had too little storyu. Spirit Within had a good ammount. It certainly isn't as complex as something like 2001: A Space Odyssey. It isn't hard to understand like that, but it is still enthralling and very good.

Robots? What robots?
Avatar image for ZeroWingEvil91
ZeroWingEvil91

740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 ZeroWingEvil91
Member since 2005 • 740 Posts
[QUOTE="kryu88"]

I also agree on the originality angle, movies are getting very uncreative nowadays, its all adaptations or spinoffs or an exact copy of a book, game, or whatever. If another FF movie were to come out I would want it to be an original, which is why I respect what they did with Spirits Within, a completely new storyline and characters. It didn't do well because there was no real reference to FF in it......it just seemed like another Fantasy/Sci-Fi movie with Final Fantasy slapped on it.

AC had characters that people could refer and relate to, and it was based on one of the most popular video games of all time. So, it did better in sales and overall appeal, its been years since I watched Spirits Within, I'm sure if I watched it now I would appreciate it more. Back when I first watched it I was expecting something more related to FF, which it wasn't really from what I recall. I would have to watch it again to choose a winner between the two, for myself, right now I like AC more.

omega235
v for vendetta is original, so is hitchhikers guide to the galaxy



Well actually when you consider one is based on a comic and the other a book which was in turn based on a radio-play, then the only thing original about them were the occasional story differeneces between them and the original books.
Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
[QUOTE="omega235"][QUOTE="kryu88"]

I also agree on the originality angle, movies are getting very uncreative nowadays, its all adaptations or spinoffs or an exact copy of a book, game, or whatever. If another FF movie were to come out I would want it to be an original, which is why I respect what they did with Spirits Within, a completely new storyline and characters. It didn't do well because there was no real reference to FF in it......it just seemed like another Fantasy/Sci-Fi movie with Final Fantasy slapped on it.

AC had characters that people could refer and relate to, and it was based on one of the most popular video games of all time. So, it did better in sales and overall appeal, its been years since I watched Spirits Within, I'm sure if I watched it now I would appreciate it more. Back when I first watched it I was expecting something more related to FF, which it wasn't really from what I recall. I would have to watch it again to choose a winner between the two, for myself, right now I like AC more.

ZeroWingEvil91
v for vendetta is original, so is hitchhikers guide to the galaxy



Well actually when you consider one is based on a comic and the other a book which was in turn based on a radio-play, then the only thing original about them were the occasional story differeneces between them and the original books.

Oh yeah. V was a graphic novel and hitchhiker's was a book. But I still like AC better than SW because it was cool. the story is okay. But the Action was the best
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
No. The action is not even plausable, so it is just absurd
Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#31 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
No. The action is not even plausable, so it is just absurdfs_metal
... If you say so. But that's your opinion. I actually somewhat enjoyed AC. And If you disagree, I'm fine with that.
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#32 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
I explained earlier why the battles are not good ones, from a technical standpoint.
Avatar image for -Phaz-
-Phaz-

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 -Phaz-
Member since 2006 • 927 Posts

I explained earlier why the battles are not good ones, from a technical standpoint.fs_metal

if you want a film that obeys the laws of nature (physics) as you stated earlier why did you even bother watching AC? you most likely have played FFVII, so you know they cast fire from their hands or summon dragons. one of the spells they can do also being Gravity

I believe the reason you didnt like it because they jump ridiculous heights and the ect. but then you also drawn to the main title of Final Fantasy, Fantasy meaning something that is not true or make believe which counts towards their possible weaker gravity.

and as Fantasy goes, SW wasnt that realistic, possible mre realistic than AC.

I'm not having a go at you liking SW more i'm just stating the facts.

Avatar image for ThreeVo
ThreeVo

595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 ThreeVo
Member since 2007 • 595 Posts

Well part of me has to agree completley with that statement, I for one did not like AC either, even though its final fantasy, its seemed far far fetched, to the point were u say to yourself "bah.. alright comon man are u serious" lol the only example i can think in comparison with another movie wuold have to be The Transoprter flicks lol, i think that by far the bahamut fight was just way to exaggerated.

On another note,  The story in AC wasent that great either, it felt like a sloped up after story made quickly just so the "ff 7 CGI Move" would have sumthing to hold it together, it was purley made to cater to the ff7 junkies who dont know crap about film making, and are easily pleased by "Asome effects" i for one was not satisfied, and personaly, sephiroth was just a cameo in my opinon and the very end, with a lowsly finish.

Im not going to go as far as saying Spirits within was WAY better... however at least sprirts within had proper film making qualities... to this day i still say that the obnly reason it wasent successful (aside from the slight bore it had wich could have easily been fixed) was the simple fact that it had Final Fantasy tagged on it, and that created an expectation from all the fans, and they smashed it to peices just because they werent given what they wanted and expected, the movie had a very interessting concept and the CGI/RealPerson fusion had never been done b4 and was quite revolutionary in cinematogrophy to say the least.

:the statement i was reffering to was fs metals eirler page

Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]I explained earlier why the battles are not good ones, from a technical standpoint.-Phaz-

if you want a film that obeys the laws of nature (physics) as you stated earlier why did you even bother watching AC? you most likely have played FFVII, so you know they cast fire from their hands or summon dragons. one of the spells they can do also being Gravity

I believe the reason you didnt like it because they jump ridiculous heights and the ect. but then you also drawn to the main title of Final Fantasy, Fantasy meaning something that is not true or make believe which counts towards their possible weaker gravity.

and as Fantasy goes, SW wasnt that realistic, possible mre realistic than AC.

I'm not having a go at you liking SW more i'm just stating the facts.

I watched AC because I like Final Fantasy? I was disappointed in it because it's not even plausable.

FFVII is not fantasy. IT is sci fi. Even then, it is exceedingly far fetched for a fantasy por a sci fi movie. Did you see any of that "laws of inertia do not apply" crap in Lord of the Rings? Didn't think so.
Avatar image for omega235
omega235

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 omega235
Member since 2006 • 5922 Posts
[QUOTE="omega235"][QUOTE="kryu88"]

I also agree on the originality angle, movies are getting very uncreative nowadays, its all adaptations or spinoffs or an exact copy of a book, game, or whatever. If another FF movie were to come out I would want it to be an original, which is why I respect what they did with Spirits Within, a completely new storyline and characters. It didn't do well because there was no real reference to FF in it......it just seemed like another Fantasy/Sci-Fi movie with Final Fantasy slapped on it.

AC had characters that people could refer and relate to, and it was based on one of the most popular video games of all time. So, it did better in sales and overall appeal, its been years since I watched Spirits Within, I'm sure if I watched it now I would appreciate it more. Back when I first watched it I was expecting something more related to FF, which it wasn't really from what I recall. I would have to watch it again to choose a winner between the two, for myself, right now I like AC more.

ZeroWingEvil91
v for vendetta is original, so is hitchhikers guide to the galaxy



Well actually when you consider one is based on a comic and the other a book which was in turn based on a radio-play, then the only thing original about them were the occasional story differeneces between them and the original books.

they are both completely original, nothing has anything in common with v for vendertta except for minor things and hitchhikers is the same
Avatar image for -Phaz-
-Phaz-

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 -Phaz-
Member since 2006 • 927 Posts
[QUOTE="-Phaz-"]

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]I explained earlier why the battles are not good ones, from a technical standpoint.fs_metal

if you want a film that obeys the laws of nature (physics) as you stated earlier why did you even bother watching AC? you most likely have played FFVII, so you know they cast fire from their hands or summon dragons. one of the spells they can do also being Gravity

I believe the reason you didnt like it because they jump ridiculous heights and the ect. but then you also drawn to the main title of Final Fantasy, Fantasy meaning something that is not true or make believe which counts towards their possible weaker gravity.

and as Fantasy goes, SW wasnt that realistic, possible mre realistic than AC.

I'm not having a go at you liking SW more i'm just stating the facts.

I watched AC because I like Final Fantasy? I was disappointed in it because it's not even plausable.

FFVII is not fantasy. IT is sci fi. Even then, it is exceedingly far fetched for a fantasy por a sci fi movie. Did you see any of that "laws of inertia do not apply" crap in Lord of the Rings? Didn't think so.

ok well this is getting tiresome, Science Fiction (Sci-Fi) other names are Make Believe & Fantasy. Yes they do obey the laws of physics in LotR, but that is only example, true i can not think of any other films that disobey the law of physics. but that just makes it more one of a kind.

As for being far-fetched for a Sci-Fi, most Sci-Fi films are far-fetched, its part of what makes them Sci-fi.

Avatar image for Calebman
Calebman

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 Calebman
Member since 2003 • 518 Posts

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

Avatar image for omega235
omega235

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 omega235
Member since 2006 • 5922 Posts

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

Calebman
im talking about that the book hitchhiker's is i already i knew it weas based on a book same for v for vendetta based on a comic
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"]

[QUOTE="fs_metal"]I explained earlier why the battles are not good ones, from a technical standpoint.-Phaz-

if you want a film that obeys the laws of nature (physics) as you stated earlier why did you even bother watching AC? you most likely have played FFVII, so you know they cast fire from their hands or summon dragons. one of the spells they can do also being Gravity

I believe the reason you didnt like it because they jump ridiculous heights and the ect. but then you also drawn to the main title of Final Fantasy, Fantasy meaning something that is not true or make believe which counts towards their possible weaker gravity.

and as Fantasy goes, SW wasnt that realistic, possible mre realistic than AC.

I'm not having a go at you liking SW more i'm just stating the facts.

I watched AC because I like Final Fantasy? I was disappointed in it because it's not even plausable.

FFVII is not fantasy. IT is sci fi. Even then, it is exceedingly far fetched for a fantasy por a sci fi movie. Did you see any of that "laws of inertia do not apply" crap in Lord of the Rings? Didn't think so.

ok well this is getting tiresome, Science Fiction (Sci-Fi) other names are Make Believe & Fantasy. Yes they do obey the laws of physics in LotR, but that is only example, true i can not think of any other films that disobey the law of physics. but that just makes it more one of a kind.

As for being far-fetched for a Sci-Fi, most Sci-Fi films are far-fetched, its part of what makes them Sci-fi.

Alot of sci fi is far fetched, yes, but it's the theorys it presents that are far fetched. AC does not present any theories that were not introduced long before FFVII ever came out. It's action scenes are extremely far fetched, and they make it stretch your believability to the breaking point

Fantasy and sci fi are not one and hte same. There are similarities between the 2, but they are not the same thing.

None of those movies (or atleast none of hte good ones) will have a total disregard for natures laws like AC does.

AC is not a good movie
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#41 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

Calebman
The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense
Avatar image for -Phaz-
-Phaz-

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 -Phaz-
Member since 2006 • 927 Posts
[QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

fs_metal

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#43 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
[QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

fs_metal
The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

well you have a point. The movie was okay. And I'm glad I didn't buy it and I streamed it online. It's not worth watching again though.
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#44 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

-Phaz-

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Cloud died dude. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. He got sent back
Avatar image for Rizhall456
Rizhall456

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Rizhall456
Member since 2005 • 4045 Posts
[QUOTE="-Phaz-"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

fs_metal

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Cloud died dude. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. He got sent back

he was in dirge mang
Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#46 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

Rizhall456

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Cloud died dude. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. He got sent back

he was in dirge mang

I don't think Dirge should count. Dirge sucks.
Avatar image for Rizhall456
Rizhall456

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Rizhall456
Member since 2005 • 4045 Posts
[QUOTE="Rizhall456"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

WhiteFlame-XIII

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Cloud died dude. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. He got sent back

he was in dirge mang

I don't think Dirge should count. Dirge sucks.

the gamepaly sucked, but the stand-alone story for vincent was good
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#48 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

Rizhall456

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Cloud died dude. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. He got sent back

he was in dirge mang

Did you read everything I said?

I repeat. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. HE GOT SENT BACK
Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#49 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
[QUOTE="Rizhall456"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="-Phaz-"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="Calebman"]

Hey, you know what my favorite part of AC was? The motorcycle fight. Damn that was cool.

Anyway, Hitchhikers guide is not an orginal movie as I believe someone else stated. It's based on a book. Although I did like the movie.

fs_metal

The motorcycle fights were the worst part of the movie. It is impossible to spin arround in circles like they did. It is way too far fetched. That, as well as the fight with Bahamaut, is when I shook my head and went "Oh my God. This is absurd." That Bahamaut fight was just downright stupid. Cloud got hit in the face with Megaflare and was unphased, but him getting stabbed in the shoulder at the end sure brought things to a screeching halt, and he ultimately died by an explosion with significantly less power than Megaflare has. Think about that. It is a HUGE plot hole. It makes no sense

he didnt die? you see him at the end in the church, and aslong as the action sequences are good (which i believe they are) then i dont care if they do stuff that you might say is inpossible.

Cloud died dude. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. He got sent back

he was in dirge mang

Did you read everything I said?

I repeat. He died. He went to the life stream. He met Zack and Aerith. HE GOT SENT BACK

And then that was really impossible in a retarded way... :? but I kind of like it anyways... :?
Avatar image for fs_metal
fs_metal

25711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#50 fs_metal
Member since 2005 • 25711 Posts
There was maybe 2% of that movie that was even plausable. IT was way too far fetched.