Better Game for GC

Avatar image for CrimsonnShadoww
CrimsonnShadoww

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 CrimsonnShadoww
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Best Game for GC.

Whats better Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within, or Prince of Persia: Two Thrones?

Avatar image for KingKoop
KingKoop

4268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 KingKoop
Member since 2005 • 4268 Posts
Personally I preferred Sands Of Time, but the other 2 are great as well, you can't go wrong really, try playing them all in chronological order.
Avatar image for yagr_zero
yagr_zero

27850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3 yagr_zero
Member since 2006 • 27850 Posts
I say Sands of Time.
Avatar image for CrimsonnShadoww
CrimsonnShadoww

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 CrimsonnShadoww
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Two Thrones just looked alot more technically interesting from the combat to the graphics to switching between the dark prince and the normal one.

any comments on that?

Avatar image for CrimsonnShadoww
CrimsonnShadoww

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CrimsonnShadoww
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

I also have another question.

What about the games: Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles, Battalion Wars, or LotR: The Third Age

Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles: is it more of a push button RPG than a menu based RPG where you tell your guys what to do for a list.

Battalion Wars: Dont know much about it --------looks good tho

LotR: The Third Age: Nor this one           --------may be cool

Avatar image for dulmassquirrel
dulmassquirrel

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dulmassquirrel
Member since 2004 • 317 Posts

ff: crystal chronicles : haven't played it either, but majority of people say that you are missing out if you dont play it multiplayer, and most people dont have the multiple gbas and cables to play multi.  also, from what i have read, it is more of an "action rpg" rather than the traditional ff rpg series.

battalion wars: personally i thought it was a very fun and refreshing game to play.  i have never played the advance wars gameboy series, so wasn't really dissapointed, and with it only being less then 10 bucks new at gamestop, you dont have to dish out too much for an entertaining game.  however, i must admit the controls do require a bit of getting used to, and there is a lack of immediate replay value.

lotr: third age: i think this game is pretty fun and entertaining.  it plays like a very traditional turn based rpg, with skill trees and such.  i am not a real big rpg gamer, so i dont really know how it stacks up to the other rpgs, but i liked it.  also some pretty good graphics.  if you only have a gc, then i recommend it, as it is one of the better gc rpgs.  however, the story is a bit cheesy, hehe. 

Avatar image for dulmassquirrel
dulmassquirrel

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dulmassquirrel
Member since 2004 • 317 Posts
oh yea in regards to your first question, i favor warrior within
Avatar image for macrules_640
macrules_640

90033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#8 macrules_640
Member since 2004 • 90033 Posts
I prefer sands of time and two thrones, because warrior within was just to dark and emo for me.
Avatar image for ShadowofTulkas
ShadowofTulkas

1811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ShadowofTulkas
Member since 2007 • 1811 Posts
Truthfully, I only played Warrior Within. It wasn't bad, but the game style was a bit too dark for my liking. By the sounds of things though, Sands Of Time is good.
Avatar image for murlow12
murlow12

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 murlow12
Member since 2005 • 11109 Posts

I haven't played TT yet (I'll start it soon), but I preferred WW over SoT.  SoT was far too short, and WW improved on the combat system. 

As for FF:CC, I absolutely hated.  I tried playing it a couple years back and quit after a couple hours.  I was only playing single player, but I don't see how such a boring game could improve that much with multiplayer.

Avatar image for korn62586
korn62586

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 korn62586
Member since 2007 • 242 Posts
Warrior Within because I like games to have more action