I'll preface this by saying that I'm not going to read the article at the moment as I'm too bored (wow, there's a subtle slip for ya, I'd actually 100% intended to type busy there, but I like the "typo" so I'm leaving it with this comment) studying for a medschool test, but I can probably guess what some of the arguments being put forth are since they are usually the same for such "sensical" arguments.
They say that you see activation of the same centers of the brain when playing games and actually engaging in violent activity. That makes complete sense, but that doesn't mean that they are connected. This just means that they are processing similar stimuli or causing similar effects (eg: raising "adrenaline" levels). For instance: when people claim to hear voices you will actually see the regions of the brain that are usually associated with listening to people speak light up. These people are, in every neurological sense, "hearing people talk" and yet it is clearly not real and a good portion of these people recognize that there is no physical person standing in front of them talking to them.
I think anybody would be hard pressed to say that the sensation of pulling a trigger while face to face with someone is anywhere close to pulling a controller trigger while facing some other player's avatar. Perhaps as the personal nature of it gets detracted (eg: long range sniping) you begin to see more of a similarity, but for anyone with any semblance of a proper social upbringing the difference is still blatantly clear.
Instead of blaming media, etc for making these acts seem so normal we should be looking at what differences there are between the majority of people who were socialized properly and understand the clear distinction between media and real life and those who cannot perceive these things. My gut feels says that we will find people who have somehow clearly bypassed systems of consequence while growing up and cannot sufficiently associate certain outcomes with events, there will be a clear detachment between these 2 wholly reliant systems.
**I apologize if this appears kind of scatterbrained. I've been staring at textbooks for 12hrs straight now so my brain is a bit fried... I hope there's some semblance of a logical thought there.
nosferatu
I completely agree with you Nosferatu.
These "reports" that doctors provide arein actuality just a semblance facts they have garnered whilst trying to find a"link".
They've been looking for this link for several years now, and every now and then a newspaper takes it upon themselves to claim that they ARE linked when in truth theyre just trying to sell papers.
The fact remains whether these reports are true or not it is STILL and always will be a case of teaching our children The Consequence of Action.
9/11 Occured because some people belived themselves to be right, The murder in China over a virtual sword occured because the murderer did not perceive revenge as a wrong deed.
It is not the media causing "game-related"incidents, nor the games themselves. The event occured because the actioner has an impairment. Perhaps he was brought up wrong (parents absconding of responsibility),military training (All Armed Services) or a severe impact on their life, which has caused the actioner to say for example lose their conceptof right and wrong,but on a final note I must say:
Right Or Wrong Is To Be Perceived In The Eyes Of The Beholder.
Log in to comment