Bad Company Vietnam Official Thread - IGN 9.5

  • 55 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

Release-

PC: 12/18/10

PSN/XBLA: 12/21/10

Price: $15.00

Videos-

If you are still asking yourself if it is worth $15.00, check out this video.

Cao Son Temple Gameplay

Phu Bai Valley Gameplay

Phu Bai Valley Trailer

Flame-thrower Trailer

Hill 137 Trailer

BC2 Vietman PC Gameplay


Reviews-

IGN gives it a 9.5

Anyone who played much Bad Company 2 was likely made quite familiar with the sniper-like accuracy of medics with long-range scopes attached to their machine guns, and I'll admit to being aggressive from across the map as an engineer with the aid of a red dot sight. In the absence of these weapon tweaks, the combat dynamic has changed considerably from Bad Company 2. Fights are closer and more vicious more often, which is assisted by environments and level design that break up most long lines of sight and which provide a ton of hiding places.

Whether you're new to Bad Company 2 or have been repairing, healing, and blowing up other players since March of this year, Bad Company 2 -Vietnam is among the best multiplayer experiences this year. The ability to contribute and succeed and unlock additional levels in ways that don't have to include shooting other players and the reliance on strategy over twitch gameplay clicks just as well in Bad Company 2 - Vietnam. Meanwhile, the re-balancing of character cIasses and level variety might actually trump Bad Company 2 proper. Battlefield fans will probably argue over whether to play Bad Company 2 or its expansion in the months to come. But when it comes to choosing between arguably the best multiplayer game of the year and its excellent expansion, that seems like a good problem to have.

IGN

OXM UK gives it a 9.0

The weapons and vehicles are only half the story, of course. While five maps in the pack is a generous offering, it's the quality and variety of the environments that's the key to whether this is worth the cash. Of the five there's only one genuine dud. Phu Bai Valley is an indistinct, formless and aesthetically muddy mess, made even worse if you play it in Rush mode with its arbitrary barriers.

The other four, however, are some of the best Battlefield maps we've seen. There's the huge bridge bisecting the Operation Hastings map, the scorched earth aftermath of a napalm strike in Hill 137, and the facsimile of the village from the opening of Apocalypse Now in Cao Son Temple.

Add in the squad features from BFBC2 and you have the definitive vehicular combat experience, cIassic levels and an iconic setting all for just over a tenner. Rock and roll.

OXM UK

Miscellaneous:

DICE had a live chat on 12/15/10 where they discussed details from the game.

-About the flamethrower : "It will set fire to some of the enviroment and also damage stuff "
- "Yes, all modes are available on all maps! " (SQ Rush,SQ DM,Rush,Conquest)
- "Hardcore mode too"
- About specact skins "Nope. It's only for BC2 "
- "Yes, Recon still have their mortar strikes :) "
- "Everything you score in Vietnam will count towards your normal progression, so you will still get your ranks and unlocks, regardless if you play vanilla or Vietnam "
- "Yes the flamethrower will replenish if you stand beside a ammo box "
- "There is no specific AA guns in Vietnam but all weapons do damage and RPG and stationary weapons do HEAVY damage "
- "M16 is fully automatic."
- "Flamethrower is a main gun and the thump gun is a secondary for the assault cIass "
- "All kits can use the flamethrower "
- "The flamethrower on the tank replaces the coax gun addon in BC2."
- "Flame dosent hurt metal giants."
- About the music "It will be in the form of a vehicle radio, you flip channels with the DPad "
- "The maps have the same size mixes as BC2 but since it´s in Vietnam there is more forest and trenches to hide in that promotes infantry fighting! "
- "It will have a separate menu, just like Onslaught "

Fersis

Four maps initially, with a fifth to be unlocked after all platforms collectively perform 69,000,000 team actions.

This will easily be the best $15.00 I spend this year.

Avatar image for D1zzyCriminal
D1zzyCriminal

1839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 D1zzyCriminal
Member since 2009 • 1839 Posts

Gonna get me some M$ points for christmas then ;)

This looks awesome.

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#3 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts
Thanks to Microsoft's points promotions from the summer...I think I have enough "free money" to get this Although if it wasn't for your persuasions I wouldn't have gotten RDR right away so I can't be all huffy about it :P
Avatar image for scottahuch
scottahuch

1580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 scottahuch
Member since 2003 • 1580 Posts

I shouldn't have watched that. I might have to buy it now...

Oh, and how do you get the DLC if you don't have the Steam version?

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts
[QUOTE="spazzx625"]Thanks to Microsoft's points promotions from the summer...I think I have enough "free money" to get this Although if it wasn't for your persuasions I wouldn't have gotten RDR right away so I can't be all huffy about it :P

I should be getting kickbacks from these companies.
Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#6 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14491 Posts

I'm starting to regret trading in Bad Company 2. :cry:

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

I shouldn't have watched that. I might have to buy it now...

Oh, and how do you get the DLC if you don't have the Steam version?

scottahuch
I imagine there is an in game store in the PC version's menus somewhere. I know it is there in the console versions anyway.
Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#8 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts
[QUOTE="rragnaar"][QUOTE="spazzx625"]Thanks to Microsoft's points promotions from the summer...I think I have enough "free money" to get this Although if it wasn't for your persuasions I wouldn't have gotten RDR right away so I can't be all huffy about it :P

I should be getting kickbacks from these companies.

You are...In the form of a video game you have to purchase :P
Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#9 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

holy s***, this is $15? i thought this was a full fledged retail game.

Bought.

Day 1.

etc.

BF1942 was one of my favorite games last year and one of my favorite online games of all time. I hope they stick with fewer maps and fewer modes. 1942 had only one mode and it made sure you were always playing in full rooms. BC2 had too many empty or 4 on 4 games for my taste.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

holy s***, this is $15? i thought this was a full fledged retail game.

Bought.

Day 1.

etc.

BF1942 was one of my favorite games last year and one of my favorite online games of all time. I hope they stick with fewer maps and fewer modes. 1942 had only one mode and it made sure you were always playing in full rooms. BC2 had too many empty or 4 on 4 games for my taste.

S0lidSnake
Rad. I know that my friends and I will be on almost every night, so you'll have people to play with. It looks like every mode from BC2 will be in this, but as usual, I think most people will be in Rush or Conquest. DICE has said the maps are designed with Conquest in mind, so I think that is what I'll play the most.
Avatar image for Vexx88
Vexx88

33342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#11 Vexx88
Member since 2006 • 33342 Posts

I shouldn't have watched that. I might have to buy it now...

Oh, and how do you get the DLC if you don't have the Steam version?

scottahuch

EA downloader, from EA's website. That is how I got the game. The DLC is on there as well.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
9.5 for an expansion?
Avatar image for Vexx88
Vexx88

33342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#13 Vexx88
Member since 2006 • 33342 Posts
9.5 for an expansion?dakan45
Thats what got me when I saw the title of this thread. I thought rag typed the wrong number...
Avatar image for Metamania
Metamania

12035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#14 Metamania
Member since 2002 • 12035 Posts

I'm starting to regret trading in Bad Company 2. :cry:

speedfreak48t5p

Do you need Bad Company 2 just to play Bad Company Vietnam?

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"]

I'm starting to regret trading in Bad Company 2. :cry:

Metamania

Do you need Bad Company 2 just to play Bad Company Vietnam?

Sadly yes. They should have gone the standalone route like BF1943. I suspect they made it an expansion so that it wouldn't completely kill off BC2.
Avatar image for GamingBoy2009
GamingBoy2009

1651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#16 GamingBoy2009
Member since 2005 • 1651 Posts

Looks good. Nice to see that fights will be closer than at long range. So does that mean its not as sniper friendly? Either way, I gotta get myself a $20 PSN card so I can download this.

Avatar image for Vexx88
Vexx88

33342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#17 Vexx88
Member since 2006 • 33342 Posts
So lets see. Now I have to make a choice. Deal with snipers or deal with flamethrowers?
Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#18 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts
So lets see. Now I have to make a choice. Deal with snipers or deal with flamethrowers?Vexx88
I think the flamethrowers will be easier to deal with. I really hope that shooting their fuel tank will cause massive explosions. I know I won't be standing next to any teammate using one.:P
Avatar image for True_Chaos_UK
True_Chaos_UK

2570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 True_Chaos_UK
Member since 2010 • 2570 Posts

Really looking forward to this, I like how the thump gun has the tiger stripes, nice nod to Apocolypse Now.

Avatar image for Jbul
Jbul

4838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20 Jbul
Member since 2007 • 4838 Posts

This is really good news. Easily the best multiplayer shooter of 2010 sounds like it just got a rebirth!

Those were some fun games we played.

I think I'll trade in Black Ops so I can buy BFBC2 again, this deserves my support.

Avatar image for AntoineCoyote
AntoineCoyote

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 AntoineCoyote
Member since 2008 • 297 Posts

omg omg thatmap where all the trees are blown down and everything is burning and smoldering omg omg

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#23 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts
[QUOTE="Vexx88"]So lets see. Now I have to make a choice. Deal with snipers or deal with flamethrowers?rragnaar
I think the flamethrowers will be easier to deal with. I really hope that shooting their fuel tank will cause massive explosions. I know I won't be standing next to any teammate using one.:P

Ohhhhhh *drooooool* *wipes mouth* I hope I hope I HOPE they made them explode.
Avatar image for Vexx88
Vexx88

33342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#24 Vexx88
Member since 2006 • 33342 Posts
[QUOTE="Vexx88"]So lets see. Now I have to make a choice. Deal with snipers or deal with flamethrowers?rragnaar
I think the flamethrowers will be easier to deal with. I really hope that shooting their fuel tank will cause massive explosions. I know I won't be standing next to any teammate using one.:P

That would be cool :P. It came out today right? I might get it...I dunno might wait a bit.
Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#25 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts
[QUOTE="rragnaar"][QUOTE="Vexx88"]So lets see. Now I have to make a choice. Deal with snipers or deal with flamethrowers?Vexx88
I think the flamethrowers will be easier to deal with. I really hope that shooting their fuel tank will cause massive explosions. I know I won't be standing next to any teammate using one.:P

That would be cool :P. It came out today right? I might get it...I dunno might wait a bit.

Nah... it will be out on Saturday on the PC and Tuesday for PSN and XBLA.
Avatar image for Metamania
Metamania

12035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#26 Metamania
Member since 2002 • 12035 Posts

[QUOTE="Metamania"]

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"]

I'm starting to regret trading in Bad Company 2. :cry:

rragnaar

Do you need Bad Company 2 just to play Bad Company Vietnam?

Sadly yes. They should have gone the standalone route like BF1943. I suspect they made it an expansion so that it wouldn't completely kill off BC2.

That really sucks. So I have to pay twice the money to have both games in my collection. You're right - they should have gone standalone. If that was the case, I would have ignored Bad Company 2 and just pick up BC Vietnam.

Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

I'll definitely be getting this.

Avatar image for Dracula68
Dracula68

33109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Dracula68
Member since 2002 • 33109 Posts

360 got a 9.5 as well.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#29 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

360 got a 9.5 as well.

Dracula68

I'm hoping we get more reviews for it soon. It isn't so much that I need a review to convince me to buy it. I just want to hear more about the game.

Avatar image for xgraderx
xgraderx

2395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 xgraderx
Member since 2008 • 2395 Posts

Excellent score,it was a day one buy anyways but this really ups the anticipation.

Avatar image for Dracula68
Dracula68

33109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Dracula68
Member since 2002 • 33109 Posts

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]

360 got a 9.5 as well.

rragnaar

I'm hoping we get more reviews for it soon. It isn't so much that I need a review to convince me to buy it. I just want to hear more about the game.

I can't find any more which makes me thing IGN has maybe a day lead start over other sites/mags?
Avatar image for Metamania
Metamania

12035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#32 Metamania
Member since 2002 • 12035 Posts

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]

360 got a 9.5 as well.

rragnaar

I'm hoping we get more reviews for it soon. It isn't so much that I need a review to convince me to buy it. I just want to hear more about the game.

You know, at the end of the day, since FPS's are the rage these days, I think that only a handful of people out there strictly care for the campaign and everyone else just jumps into the multiplayer and don't even bother with the game in itself at all. So why does hearing about the gameplay mechanics and all when it's really the same thing when you boil down to it, just different in the sense that it has different ideas and is made by a different company?

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#33 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

You know, at the end of the day, since FPS's are the rage these days, I think that only a handful of people out there strictly care for the campaign and everyone else just jumps into the multiplayer and don't even bother with the game in itself at all. So why does hearing about the gameplay mechanics and all when it's really the same thing when you boil down to it, just different in the sense that it has different ideas and is made by a different company?

Metamania

I feel the same way about the Battlefield series as I think you feel about fighting games. I'm really interested in the nuts and bolts of how it all plays out. I want to hear from a veteran player just what has changed, and how balanced the maps are. In BC2, from the beta on up until the most recent patch, they've been making changes that drastically effect the balance between defenders and attackers, and I want to hear more about how Rush Mode is in Vietnam from someone who's put in some serious hours into the game. Maybe I'm wrong for expecting that from a reviewer, but those are the kinds of things I want to hear about.

I'm also curious about how changes like regular gunfire damaging helicopters will effect things. I imagine that it means helicopters won't be up in the air for long, which could be a good change for the game, since right now, a good apache pilot can dominate a Conquest round.

Avatar image for yagr_zero
yagr_zero

27850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#34 yagr_zero
Member since 2006 • 27850 Posts
Gosh, I haven't finished Bad Company 2 yet.
Avatar image for Metamania
Metamania

12035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#35 Metamania
Member since 2002 • 12035 Posts

[QUOTE="Metamania"]You know, at the end of the day, since FPS's are the rage these days, I think that only a handful of people out there strictly care for the campaign and everyone else just jumps into the multiplayer and don't even bother with the game in itself at all. So why does hearing about the gameplay mechanics and all when it's really the same thing when you boil down to it, just different in the sense that it has different ideas and is made by a different company?

rragnaar

I feel the same way about the Battlefield series as I think you feel about fighting games. I'm really interested in the nuts and bolts of how it all plays out. I want to hear from a veteran player just what has changed, and how balanced the maps are. In BC2, from the beta on up until the most recent patch, they've been making changes that drastically effect the balance between defenders and attackers, and I want to hear more about how Rush Mode is in Vietnam from someone who's put in some serious hours into the game. Maybe I'm wrong for expecting that from a reviewer, but those are the kinds of things I want to hear about.

I'm also curious about how changes like regular gunfire damaging helicopters will effect things. I imagine that it means helicopters won't be up in the air for long, which could be a good change for the game, since right now, a good apache pilot can dominate a Conquest round.

I can understand that to a degree. In the fighting games that I love and enjoy, I want to find out what's changed for my favorite character, what combos and moves can I still pull off, and what the frames and hitboxes are. But I'm not as technical as some of my other friends that talk that stuff in the SFIV/SSFIV discussion thread. I'm more or less of the guy that loves fighting games and enjoys competition when the opportunity arises, but I don't worry that much about it, just on certain details. So, in your case, I can understand that - you want to know what works and what doesn't work and see how these changes be applied in a positive fashion for your games, like Vietnam.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#36 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

I can understand that to a degree. In the fighting games that I love and enjoy, I want to find out what's changed for my favorite character, what combos and moves can I still pull off, and what the frames and hitboxes are. But I'm not as technical as some of my other friends that talk that stuff in the SFIV/SSFIV discussion thread. I'm more or less of the guy that loves fighting games and enjoys competition when the opportunity arises, but I don't worry that much about it, just on certain details. So, in your case, I can understand that - you want to know what works and what doesn't work and see how these changes be applied in a positive fashion for your games, like Vietnam.

Metamania

For some reason, I'd gotten you confused with the guys that really delve deep into SFIV, but yeah, that is mostly what I'm looking for in a review. It is also a thing that I usually don't get from reviews. I'm hoping to hear from someone who can really go into the differences between Vietnam and BC2, not because I need to be sold on it, but because I'm curious.

One thing I was really happy to see in the IGN review was that removing scopes did balance things out more. I always felt like I could outsnipe most snipers by playing as a Medic with an M60 and a 4x scope. It turned the Medic into a god cIass that was really only vulnerable to tanks. The Engineer is my favorite cIass, and I'm curious to see how it changes. I think I'm going to have to be a lot sneakier, which is fun.

Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#37 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

Sucks that it is an expansion and not a stand alone title.

Sorry rag, i thought this was like BF1942. Dont know why EA would c*** block themselves like this. 1942 sold like crazy, so why limit your audience?

Avatar image for Jbul
Jbul

4838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#38 Jbul
Member since 2007 • 4838 Posts

Sucks that it is an expansion and not a stand alone title.

Sorry rag, i thought this was like BF1942. Dont know why EA would c*** block themselves like this. 1942 sold like crazy, so why limit your audience?

S0lidSnake

Wow.. that would've been cool, actually. Especially since I long-ago traded in my BFBC2... but I can understand why they'd do it this way -- they already have a great engine in place from BFBC2, and they probably couldn't pull off the bells and whistles (not to mention the presentation) in a stand-alone DLC title.

Avatar image for TheGrudge13
TheGrudge13

1198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#39 TheGrudge13
Member since 2009 • 1198 Posts

will i get it for free if i have the VIP pass

Avatar image for MobilechicaneX
MobilechicaneX

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 MobilechicaneX
Member since 2009 • 2863 Posts

The IGN review only marked it down due to a song in the game. In all honesty i see that as a 10 from IGN, it's as if they wanted to find a small flaw in the game.

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#41 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts

will i get it for free if i have the VIP pass

TheGrudge13
No, this isn't a map pack it's an expansion
Avatar image for Jbul
Jbul

4838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 Jbul
Member since 2007 • 4838 Posts

will i get it for free if i have the VIP pass

TheGrudge13

Nope. If you love BFBC2's gameplay, this looks to be worth it though (at least, so far).

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#44 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

Here is the launch trailer. I'm hoping we get some impressions from the PC people soon since it comes out today.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

OXM UK gives it a 9.0

The weapons and vehicles are only half the story, of course. While five maps in the pack is a generous offering, it's the quality and variety of the environments that's the key to whether this is worth the cash. Of the five there's only one genuine dud. Phu Bai Valley is an indistinct, formless and aesthetically muddy mess, made even worse if you play it in Rush mode with its arbitrary barriers.

The other four, however, are some of the best Battlefield maps we've seen. There's the huge bridge bisecting the Operation Hastings map, the scorched earth aftermath of a napalm strike in Hill 137, and the facsimile of the village from the opening of Apocalypse Now in Cao Son Temple.

Add in the squad features from BFBC2 and you have the definitive vehicular combat experience, ****c levels and an iconic setting all for just over a tenner. Rock and roll.

OXM UK

This is good news. I actually have liked the footage I've seen of Phu Bai Valley, so if it is the weakest link, I think we are in for a treat.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#46 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

The maps are absolutely phenomenal. Vantage Point and Hill 147 are my favorites so far. The guns are so much more lethal. The flamethrower doesn't seem as unbalanced as people thought it would be. If you stay aware from them, they aren't a threat. It is a great crowd control weapon for Rush mode. I'll be surprised if anyone uses it regularly in Conquest.

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#47 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

Are there any 500+ marksman headshot maps? All I do is snipe, so if the sniping is close quarters only then I'll pass.

Avatar image for JayQproductions
JayQproductions

1806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 JayQproductions
Member since 2007 • 1806 Posts

what i would like to know is when you go to download it, why is it only 1MB? it would have to already be on the disc to be that small.

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#49 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts

what i would like to know is when you go to download it, why is it only 1MB? it would have to already be on the disc to be that small.

JayQproductions
That is only the unlock code. When you go into the game you will be asked to download a ~1.6gig update
Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#50 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts

The maps are absolutely phenomenal. Vantage Point and Hill 147 are my favorites so far. The guns are so much more lethal. The flamethrower doesn't seem as unbalanced as people thought it would be. If you stay aware from them, they aren't a threat. It is a great crowd control weapon for Rush mode. I'll be surprised if anyone uses it regularly in Conquest.

rragnaar
Yeah, the flamethrower is as useful as throwing sticks at enemies in Conquest. I am really missing my red dot sights too :lol: I've been jumping back and forth between classes a lot more, which I enjoy a lot. My only problem is that most of the maps have a ton of chokepoints where teams can basically just camp with a medic nearby and form a wall. That happened on 5/6 of the rounds I played yesterday. Also, vehicles seem extremely overpowered. I'm so glad that stats are tracked through the regular game, though. That was a huge bummer about Onslaught mode for me...I think it was well worth the $15 but I hope they release a balancing patch soon.