best and worst pokemon game

Fave Silver

Least fave Soul Silver...(your probably thinking WTH???)

Ruby and Diamond came close but maybe its cuz i'm losing interest

Best: Silver/Gold/SoulSilver/HeartGold -they're all the same game-

Worst: Ruby/Saphire. I'm not sure why but I really did not like those two as much as I have with other Pokemon games.

Best: Yellow, I liked the idea of Pikachu followingyou around the game, reminds me of the show :P

Worst: Ruby, I also didn't feel the fun aspect in this game, the pokemon variety was a step backwards IMO :(

best: gold/silver

worst: ruby/sapphire

you guys dont even know whats the worst. ruby and sapphire are masterpieces compared to my pokemon ranch. people claim a 6.3 compared to sapphire of 8.6

theres several pokemon games that are below a 6 so if you say sapphire and ruby or diamond and pearl or any of the main series then you need to learn about the bad games

Best: Red (or Blue) and Gold (or Silver)

Worst: Well I haven't played most of the awful kiddie ones that aren't RPGish, but out of the main ones, probably Ruby/Sapphire.

Best: Gold/Silver

Worst: Sapphire/Ruby

Haven't played any of the DS generation yet. I'm going to pick up Platinum and HeartGold/SoulSilver eventually.

I'll have to tweak the proposed question a bit to the most fun and the least fun Pokemon game.

Most fun: Diamond/Pearl, Ruby/Sapphire

Least fun: Original Pokemon

you guys dont even know whats the worst. ruby and sapphire are masterpieces compared to my pokemon ranch. people claim a 6.3 compared to sapphire of 8.6

theres several pokemon games that are below a 6 so if you say sapphire and ruby or diamond and pearl or any of the main series then you need to learn about the bad games

bigM10231

Im pretty sure we're talkign about the main series dude...most spinoffs are always worse then the actual games :?

[QUOTE="bigM10231"]

you guys dont even know whats the worst. ruby and sapphire are masterpieces compared to my pokemon ranch. people claim a 6.3 compared to sapphire of 8.6

theres several pokemon games that are below a 6 so if you say sapphire and ruby or diamond and pearl or any of the main series then you need to learn about the bad games

dragonfly110

Im pretty sure we're talkign about the main series dude...most spinoffs are always worse then the actual games :?

Yeah... if we were talking about spin offs it wouldn't be a very interesting conversation. :P

Anyways... R/B, G/S, and D/P are all basically a tie to me. The only one I had any problems with was R/S... and I still loved them. :P

(obvious Pokemon fan)

1: Gold and Silver (Crystal)

2: Red and Blue (Yellow)

3: Ruby and Sapphire (Emerald)

4: Fire Red and Leaf Green

5: Diamond and Pearl (Platinum)

6: Heart Gold and Soulsilver

7: Black and White (TBA?)

Gold and Silver are the best because they expanded on Red and Blue and made it twice as good, while still being original, Red and Blue are the first games (Well, Red and Green) and the most innovative, and the most nostalgic, Ruby and Sapphire are amazing but suffer from no phones, day or night, and no going back to regions, which were all present in Gold and Silver, but still amazing music and endlessly fun gameplay. Fire Red and Leaf Green are just solid remakes and add a lot of cool things that aren't obtrusive, Diamond and Pearl show that the formula is getting stale and they aren't adding anything new, but it's still entertaining, although the Pokemon are pretty horrid looking. Heartgold and Soulsilver aren't very good remakes because they alter things that shouldn't have been altered and don't fix flaws. Black and White look terrible with the Pokemon looking ridiculous and triple battles. I mean, seriously? They have run out of ideas.

[QUOTE="bigM10231"]

you guys dont even know whats the worst. ruby and sapphire are masterpieces compared to my pokemon ranch. people claim a 6.3 compared to sapphire of 8.6

theres several pokemon games that are below a 6 so if you say sapphire and ruby or diamond and pearl or any of the main series then you need to learn about the bad games

dragonfly110

Im pretty sure we're talkign about the main series dude...most spinoffs are always worse then the actual games :?

[QUOTE="dragonfly110"]

[QUOTE="bigM10231"]

you guys dont even know whats the worst. ruby and sapphire are masterpieces compared to my pokemon ranch. people claim a 6.3 compared to sapphire of 8.6

theres several pokemon games that are below a 6 so if you say sapphire and ruby or diamond and pearl or any of the main series then you need to learn about the bad games

bigM10231

Im pretty sure we're talkign about the main series dude...most spinoffs are always worse then the actual games :?

who in their right mind would play the cheap spinoffs?....heck why is there even an argument?

Ok hows this...the worst pokemon game you have ever PLAYED. There if you never played a spinoff game then its gonna be a main series game case in point.

who in their right mind would play the cheap spinoffs?....heck why is there even an argument?

bisonfan2010

The spinoffs that I've played (Snap and the Pinball games) have been fairly enjoyable.

I'm also looking forward to that Pokepark game for the Wii. It's actually the first Pokemon game since the red/blue remakes to catch my interest.

1: Gold and Silver (Crystal)

2: Red and Blue (Yellow)

3: Ruby and Sapphire (Emerald)

4: Fire Red and Leaf Green

5: Diamond and Pearl (Platinum)

6: Heart Gold and Soulsilver

7: Black and White (TBA?)

Gold and Silver are the best because they expanded on Red and Blue and made it twice as good, while still being original, Red and Blue are the first games (Well, Red and Green) and the most innovative, and the most nostalgic, Ruby and Sapphire are amazing but suffer from no phones, day or night, and no going back to regions, which were all present in Gold and Silver, but still amazing music and endlessly fun gameplay. Fire Red and Leaf Green are just solid remakes and add a lot of cool things that aren't obtrusive, Diamond and Pearl show that the formula is getting stale and they aren't adding anything new, but it's still entertaining, although the Pokemon are pretty horrid looking. Heartgold and Soulsilver aren't very good remakes because they alter things that shouldn't have been altered and don't fix flaws. Black and White look terrible with the Pokemon looking ridiculous and triple battles. I mean, seriously? They have run out of ideas.

MrSaturn33

to be honest they shoulda quit making games after emerald bcuz the pokemon are looking more and more horrible with every game. all the ds games are horrible in my opinion they all look retarted and like i said the pokemon look horrible expecially black and white wow and triple battles come on next thing you know there goin to have 5 on 5 lol

crashhat69

You see things differently now that you're older. I'd be willing to bet that if the 4th genners were in R/B you'd love them, and the few you didn't like would be forgotten instead of criticized. And that goes for everyone with this opinion.

[QUOTE="bigM10231"][QUOTE="dragonfly110"]

Im pretty sure we're talkign about the main series dude...most spinoffs are always worse then the actual games :?

bisonfan2010

who in their right mind would play the cheap spinoffs?....heck why is there even an argument?

Ok hows this...the worst pokemon game you have ever PLAYED. There if you never played a spinoff game then its gonna be a main series game case in point.

to be fair (despite being stupidly short) snap was a great game, I used to love it when I was younger, I kinda like busting out stadium too whenever i Have friends over, its cool to set up some tournies and have at it since the pokemon are all already pre leveled too 100 so other then some stats and moves everyones pretty much on even footing.

[QUOTE="bisonfan2010"]

[QUOTE="bigM10231"]the thread doesnt say just the main seriesdragonfly110

who in their right mind would play the cheap spinoffs?....heck why is there even an argument?

Ok hows this...the worst pokemon game you have ever PLAYED. There if you never played a spinoff game then its gonna be a main series game case in point.

to be fair (despite being stupidly short) snap was a great game, I used to love it when I was younger,

I second this, Snap is awesome. A Wii Ware Sequel would be awesome. n_n

[QUOTE="dragonfly110"]

[QUOTE="bisonfan2010"]

who in their right mind would play the cheap spinoffs?....heck why is there even an argument?

Ok hows this...the worst pokemon game you have ever PLAYED. There if you never played a spinoff game then its gonna be a main series game case in point.

Pixel-Perfect

to be fair (despite being stupidly short) snap was a great game, I used to love it when I was younger,

I second this, Snap is awesome. A Wii Ware Sequel would be awesome. n_n

Screw that Wii Ware nonesense, hard copy or it doesn't exist.

[QUOTE="Pixel-Perfect"]

[QUOTE="dragonfly110"]

to be fair (despite being stupidly short) snap was a great game, I used to love it when I was younger,

TGM_basic

I second this, Snap is awesome. A Wii Ware Sequel would be awesome. n_n

Screw that Wii Ware nonesense, hard copy or it doesn't exist.

I-I'm soorry! Wah! :cry:

I would give the edge to the gold/silver because of the 16 gyms

Best: Pokemon Red/Blue/Yellow

Worst: Whatever the newest one is.

i think they are all terrible. joking, i was never into pokemon as i never liked turn based games

red/blue = best

rub/saph = worst