I keep hearing people complain that there are no games this gen that are classics. That old games were so much better. I like some old games a lot but I also love some of the games this gen. Anyways name a game this gen that u think was a classic
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Super Mario GalaxyRocky32189ew how about Fallout3 or bioshock edit:No More Heroes that was a classic that sadly not alot of people payed attention too
You really need to understand what the word 'classic' means before you label it on something that doesn't deserve it. A definition would be: "a creation of the highest excellence." SF IV, is definitely not of the highest excellence, nor is it revolutionary, so it never will be a classic. =/Deffinately Super Mario Galaxy. Also i thinkStreet Fighter 4 is a classic. :)
adjetey01
[QUOTE="adjetey01"]You really need to understand what the word 'classic' means before you label it on something that doesn't deserve it. A definition would be: "a creation of the highest excellence." SF IV, is definitely not of the highest excellence, nor is it revolutionary, so it never will be a classic. =/Deffinately Super Mario Galaxy. Also i thinkStreet Fighter 4 is a classic. :)
MadVybz
Agree'd simply because its a step backwards, still great.
Honestly The closest thing to classic this gen has goto be fallout 3.
You really need to understand what the word 'classic' means before you label it on something that doesn't deserve it. A definition would be: "a creation of the highest excellence." SF IV, is definitely not of the highest excellence, nor is it revolutionary, so it never will be a classic. =/[QUOTE="MadVybz"][QUOTE="adjetey01"]
Deffinately Super Mario Galaxy. Also i thinkStreet Fighter 4 is a classic. :)
psyball
Agree'd simply because its a step backwards, still great.
Honestly The closest thing to classic this gen has goto be fallout 3.
What about Gears Of War? There's nothing else like it out there. It made a revolutionary step in 3rd person shooting, and it is indeed one HELL of a series.[QUOTE="psyball"][QUOTE="MadVybz"] You really need to understand what the word 'classic' means before you label it on something that doesn't deserve it. A definition would be: "a creation of the highest excellence." SF IV, is definitely not of the highest excellence, nor is it revolutionary, so it never will be a classic. =/MadVybz
Agree'd simply because its a step backwards, still great.
Honestly The closest thing to classic this gen has goto be fallout 3.
What about Gears Of War? There's nothing else like it out there. It made a revolutionary step in 3rd person shooting, and it is indeed one HELL of a series. Gears took what made Resident Evil 4 a classic and added a cover system it sadly, in the rules, cannot be a classicPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment