Do you think Square has made better games than Final Fantasy? Because...

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 2x2towers
2x2towers

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 2x2towers
Member since 2012 • 26 Posts
I recently played the followng games, a-, Chrono Tiger, Chrono Cross, Infinite undiscovery, Saga Frontier1-2, Secret of Evermore, Kings Knight, Einhander, Parasite Eve, Front Mission 3, Thread of Fate, unlimited Saga, Vagrant Story(tried), Radiata Stories, Romancing Saga, Nier, 3rd birthday, Last Remnant, and a few others and with the exception of Vagrant Story all are much better than the Final Fantasy Series, which I played along side (Including Kingdom hearts, I put that game in the FF UV because it pretty much is.) Do you think Square has made much better games than Final Fantasy and should make more unique, or sequels to some of their other IPS and focus less on FF? he way they are going now, it will be the only franchise that will keep them a float (Eidos can't protect them forever) and the series is going down quite a bit over the last few games.
Avatar image for Blueresident87
Blueresident87

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 8

#2 Blueresident87
Member since 2007 • 5994 Posts

There are plenty of games Square has made that are better than FF, but until people stop buying the garbage they sell labelled 'Final Fantasy' Square will continue releasing them.

Avatar image for 2x2towers
2x2towers

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 2x2towers
Member since 2012 • 26 Posts

There are of games Square has made that are better than FF, but until people stop buying the garbage they sell labelled 'Final Fantasy' Square will continue releasing them.

Blueresident87
Did you know that Xiii, Xii, Xi, Tactics, and CC were not even supposed to be FF games but they slapped the name on near the last of the development time? They have games that sell (SAGA series is an example), at this rate they might as well just slap FF on Dragon Quest and call it Final Fantasy Quest Monsters, or Final Fantasy Quest X, the twilight Saga.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing Saga, Unlimited Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

Avatar image for Blueresident87
Blueresident87

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 8

#5 Blueresident87
Member since 2007 • 5994 Posts
Yes I knew that, but it doesn't matter. Some of those games are pretty good, but the fact remains that they still put the FF name on them because that is their biggest draw, whether they were supposed to be FF games at the start or not. If Square thought people would buy a game called 'Final Fantasy Racing' they would probably make it. It's sad really, because Square used to be truly great.
Avatar image for 2x2towers
2x2towers

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 2x2towers
Member since 2012 • 26 Posts
Yes I knew that, but it doesn't matter. Some of those games are good, but the fact remains that they still put the FF name on them because that is their biggest draw, whether they were supposed to be FF games at the start or not. If Square thought people would buy a game called 'Final Fantasy Racing' they would probably make it. It's sad really, because Square used to be truly great. Blueresident87
Didn't see this, yes, now they barealy make more than one series, they used to throw around many games whether they made them or not, and having both types of variety was refreshing. Pretty much all this and a large chunk of last gen outside of KH, which is basically final fantasy, they have only been slapping things with FF.
Avatar image for Blueresident87
Blueresident87

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 8

#9 Blueresident87
Member since 2007 • 5994 Posts

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing Saga, Unlimited Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

Ragnarok1051

Wow, super-opinionated you are...and SquareEnix puts their name on the IU box, at the end of the day it's their product.

What I'm taking away from this thread is that FF games are not the best that Square has made, which is the truth.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing , Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

2x2towers

So is your butthurt DC strategy to take some of what i listed and then act like those were the only games I was talking about? Square had input on IU BTW, thus even if not too much, they id help Tri-ace with the game.

There is no need for me to damage control a list that has this much crap in it. Unlimited Saga alone says you have no clue what you're talking about.

Square has made games that are better than some of their Final Fantasy entries. Chrono Trigger is one of my favorite games of all time. The Mana games which were very enjoyable and Brave Fencer Musashi was pretty fun to play back in the day . So yeah Square was able to make some games that topped Final Fantasy.

You listed 3rd Birthday as well? Man what Final Fantasy games are you comparing these games to? Final Fantasy 13-2 or something?

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing Saga, Unlimited Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

Blueresident87

Wow, super-opinionated you are...and SquareEnix puts their name on the IU box, at the end of the day it's their product.

What I'm taking away from this thread is that FF games are not the best that Square has made, which is the truth.

Of course Square has made better games that don't include the Final Fantasy label. However to include the games TC has mentioned is a joke. Vagrant Story, Xenogears, and hell Kingdom Hearts are very good games. Kingdom Hearts I include because cameos don't make it a Final Fantasy game.
Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts

[QUOTE="2x2towers"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing , Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

Ragnarok1051

So is your butthurt DC strategy to take some of what i listed and then act like those were the only games I was talking about? Square had input on IU BTW, thus even if not too much, they id help Tri-ace with the game.

There is no need for me to damage control a list that has this much crap in it. Unlimited Saga alone says you have no clue what you're talking about.

Square has made games that are better than some of their Final Fantasy entries. Chrono Trigger is one of my favorite games of all time. The Mana games which were very enjoyable and Brave Fencer Musashi was pretty fun to play back in the day . So yeah Square was able to make some games that topped Final Fantasy.

You listed 3rd Birthday as well? Man what Final Fantasy games are you comparing these games to? Final Fantasy 13-2 or something?

You think 13-2 is bad? No taste in games I see.
Avatar image for Blueresident87
Blueresident87

5994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 8

#14 Blueresident87
Member since 2007 • 5994 Posts

[QUOTE="2x2towers"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing , Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

Ragnarok1051

So is your butthurt DC strategy to take some of what i listed and then act like those were the only games I was talking about? Square had input on IU BTW, thus even if not too much, they id help Tri-ace with the game.

There is no need for me to damage control a list that has this much crap in it. Unlimited Saga alone says you have no clue what you're talking about.

Square has made games that are better than some of their Final Fantasy entries. Chrono Trigger is one of my favorite games of all time. The Mana games which were very enjoyable and Brave Fencer Musashi was pretty fun to play back in the day . So yeah Square was able to make some games that topped Final Fantasy.

You listed 3rd Birthday as well? Man what Final Fantasy games are you comparing these games to? Final Fantasy 13-2 or something?

I believe that's his whole point, that Square(Enix) got away from some of their better franchises through the years so they could do nothing but run FF into the ground. There are some great Final Fantasy games, and VI is one of my favorite all time games. But the quality is not there anymore, Final Fantasy games or otherwise. It is completely justified to say SquareEnix could/should spend their resources on something other than numerous mediocre FF games.

Avatar image for 2x2towers
2x2towers

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 2x2towers
Member since 2012 • 26 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

[QUOTE="2x2towers"] So is your butthurt DC strategy to take some of what i listed and then act like those were the only games I was talking about? Square had input on IU BTW, thus even if not too much, they id help Tri-ace with the game.Blueresident87

There is no need for me to damage control a that has this much crap in it. alone says you have no clue what you're talking about.

Square has made games that are better than some of their Final Fantasy entries. Chrono Trigger is one of my favorite games of all time. The Mana games which were very enjoyable and Brave Fencer Musashi was pretty fun to play back in the day . So yeah Square was able to make some games that topped Final Fantasy.

You listed 3rd Birthday as well? Man what Final Fantasy games are you comparing these games to? Final Fantasy 13-2 or something?

I believe that's his whole point, that Square(Enix) got away from some of their better franchises through the years so they could do nothing but run FF into the ground. There are some great Final Fantasy games, and VI is one of my favorite all time games. But the quality is not there anymore, Final Fantasy games or otherwise. It is completely justified to say SquareEnix could/should spend their resources on something other than numerous mediocre FF games.

Or slapping their brand name on all games they make. Because that can even further damage the FF brand quality. What if the kayne and Lynch series was called Final Fantasy Dog Days? That already would have screwed the franchise before the Xiii fan hate
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

[QUOTE="2x2towers"] So is your butthurt DC strategy to take some of what i listed and then act like those were the only games I was talking about? Square had input on IU BTW, thus even if not too much, they id help Tri-ace with the game.StatusShuffle

There is no need for me to damage control a list that has this much crap in it. Unlimited Saga alone says you have no clue what you're talking about.

Square has made games that are better than some of their Final Fantasy entries. Chrono Trigger is one of my favorite games of all time. The Mana games which were very enjoyable and Brave Fencer Musashi was pretty fun to play back in the day . So yeah Square was able to make some games that topped Final Fantasy.

You listed 3rd Birthday as well? Man what Final Fantasy games are you comparing these games to? Final Fantasy 13-2 or something?

You think 13-2 is bad? No taste in games I see.

13-2 was awful. That game shows just how far SE has fallen.
Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

There is no need for me to damage control a list that has this much crap in it. Unlimited Saga alone says you have no clue what you're talking about.

Square has made games that are better than some of their Final Fantasy entries. Chrono Trigger is one of my favorite games of all time. The Mana games which were very enjoyable and Brave Fencer Musashi was pretty fun to play back in the day . So yeah Square was able to make some games that topped Final Fantasy.

You listed 3rd Birthday as well? Man what Final Fantasy games are you comparing these games to? Final Fantasy 13-2 or something?

Ragnarok1051
You think 13-2 is bad? No taste in games I see.

13-2 was awful. That game shows just how far SE has fallen.

Explain yourself.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

Because this IS DAMAGE CONTROL. Obviously i made the whole list as a comparison, that would mean that if you take my list and put them next to FF1-Xii-2, then obviously in general FF is inferior to most of their products.2x2towers

They have not released anything that is better than Final Fantasy 9, 7, or 6, 9 being my favorite game of all time. 13-2 is one of the worst FF games I've ever played but it still beats Unlimited Saga, which I usually use as a gauge for terrible games. To me Final Fantasy will always be their best franchise. Not because of name but because of the quality the series used to have. and I feel there are few games that rival their Final Fantasy SNES and PS1 entries.

Square used to be a damn good developer though. Everything they used to touch turned into gold. Now they just release crap after crap and have no clue what the fans really want. I wish they would revisit old franchises but I'm afraid of what the damage would be to some of my favorites. If Final Fantasy isn't safe what is?

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

Explain yourself.

StatusShuffle

The fact that Snow was in it. He has to be the worst character to ever be in any game.

I found the story to be awful, none of the characters were enjoyable or likable, too much traveling through time to make sense out of a terrible plot. Battle system was enjoyable but I'd have preferred a third main character instead of a monster. Can't say I was a big fan of the character enhancement system but it got the job done I guess.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

[QUOTE="2x2towers"] Because this IS DAMAGE CONTROL. Obviously i made the whole as a comparison, that would mean that if you take my and put them next to FF1-Xii-2, then obviously in general FF is inferior to most of their products.2x2towers

They have not released anything that is better than Final Fantasy 9, 7, or 6, 9 being my favorite game of all time. 13-2 is one of the worst FF games I've ever played but it still beats Unlimited Saga, which I usually use as a gauge for terrible games. To me Final Fantasy will always be their best franchise. Not because of name but because of the quality the series used to have. and I feel there are few games that rival their Final Fantasy SNES and PS1 entries.

Square used to be a damn good developer though. Everything they used to touch turned into gold. Now they just release crap after crap and have no clue what the fans really want. I wish they would revisit old franchises but I'm afraid of what the damage would be to some of my favorites. If Final Fantasy isn't safe what is?

So instead of having things like Musashi, Thread of, Chrono Trigger, etc. you would rather them go in the direction "NOW" which is safe and have KANE AND LYNCH and MINDJACK along with FF instead? Lol FF fans make no sense to me. ROFL

Square used to be a damn good developer though. Everything they used to touch turned into gold. Now they just release crap after crap and have no clue what the fans really want. I wish they would revisit old franchises but I'm afraid of what the damage would be to some of my favorites. If Final Fantasy isn't safe what is?

Did you skip over that last part? I don't like the direction Square is going and I would love for them to revisit their old franchises. I just don't think they have it in them to do any franchise they have any justice.

Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="StatusShuffle"] Explain yourself.

The fact that Snow was in it. He has to be the worst character to ever be in any game.

Xiii-2 had him in the game for less than 12 minutes of screen time pretty much total of all the times he showed up. Looks like you are reaching here, I think you will like 13-2, complex battle system, more exploration, variety of items and secrets, detailed maps, lots of sidequests, less repetition, more likable characters, Atlas, etc.
Avatar image for 2x2towers
2x2towers

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 2x2towers
Member since 2012 • 26 Posts

[QUOTE="2x2towers"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

They have not released anything that is better than Final Fantasy 9, 7, or 6, 9 being my favorite game of all time. 13-2 is one of the worst FF games I've ever played but it still beats Unlimited Saga, which I usually use as a gauge for terrible games. To me Final Fantasy will always be their best franchise. Not because of name but because of the quality the series used to have. and I feel there are few games that rival their Final Fantasy SNES and PS1 entries.

Square used to be a damn good developer though. Everything they used to touch turned into gold. Now they just release crap after crap and have no clue what the fans really want. I wish they would revisit old franchises but I'm afraid of what the damage would be to some of my favorites. If Final Fantasy isn't safe what is?

Ragnarok1051

So instead of having things like Musashi, Thread of, Chrono Trigger, etc. you would rather them go in the direction "NOW" which is safe and have KANE AND LYNCH and MINDJACK along with FF instead? Lol FF fans make no sense to me. ROFL

Square used to be a damn good developer though. Everything they used to touch turned into gold. Now they just release crap after crap and have no clue what the fans really want. I wish they would revisit old franchises but I'm afraid of what the damage would be to some of my favorites. If Final Fantasy isn't safe what is?

Did you skip over that last part? I 't like the direction Square is going and I would for them to revisit their old franchises. I just don't think they have it in them to do any franchise they have any justice.

There's the problem, you last batch of sentences. it's because of fans that are confused like you, and Square hearing what YOU just said, is why they decided to bring in Kanelynch/Mindjack instead of going back and revisiting. THAT'S the reason. It's also the reason they keep testing the market with KH side games instead of KH3. They need to make more than the budget they are using to make it.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="2x2towers"] There's the problem, you last batch of sentences. it's because of fans that are confused like you, and Square hearing what YOU just said, is why they decided to bring in Kanelynch/Mindjack instead of going back and revisiting. THAT'S the reason. It's also the reason they keep testing the market with KH side games instead of KH3. They need to make more than the budget they are using to make it.

How am I confused if I know they're making crap games?
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="StatusShuffle"] Explain yourself.

The fact that Snow was in it. He has to be the worst character to ever be in any game.

Xiii-2 had him in the game for less than 12 minutes of screen time pretty much total of all the times he showed up. Looks like you are reaching here, I think you will like 13-2, complex battle system, more exploration, variety of items and secrets, detailed maps, lots of sidequests, less repetition, more likable characters, Atlas, etc.

Did you skip over the rest of my post? I also own 13-2 and have had it since release day. I had to quit after 15 hours of playing because I just couldn't force myself through it anymore. I was really excited for this game too because they promised a lot of improvements over 13.
Avatar image for 2x2towers
2x2towers

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 2x2towers
Member since 2012 • 26 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="2x2towers"] There's the problem, you last batch of sentences. it's because of fans that are confused like you, and Square hearing what YOU just said, is why they decided to bring in Kanelynch/Mindjack instead of going back and revisiting. THAT'S the reason. It's also the reason they keep testing the market with KH side games instead of KH3. They need to make more than the budget they are using to make it.

How am I confused if I know they're making crap games?

You're confused because Square is hearing you and others say they may not be capable to bring back franchises and instead result into making half-arseed franchises, or trying to appeal to the COD demographic or whatever other games are popular and mixing things together to produce messes.
Avatar image for Apathetic_Prick
Apathetic_Prick

4789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Apathetic_Prick
Member since 2003 • 4789 Posts

This thread has to be a joke. Infinite Undiscovery isn't even made by SE. Romancing Saga, Unlimited Saga, and Last Remnant better than Final Fantasy games? That is a joke.

Ragnarok1051

It's not nearly as hilarious as your statement. Of all of the Final Fantasy games, few are actually very good and fewer still are actually incredible; the rest are failed experiments or successful rehashes. Final Fantasy doesn't begin or end with VI or VII; you also have to deal with the turd nuggets that were 2, 3, 7(imo) 8, 10 and 13, the good attempts that were 5 and 9, the genuinely good titles that were 1, 4 and 12, and the awesome 6. That's not an incredible series.

That said, I haven't played a JRPG since Ogre Battle 64 since FF VII almost singlehandedly turned me off of the genre, so I've been gingerly making my way back in through Final Fantasy. If it weren't for the fact that I actually want to play 12, 10 would have scared me off again with its linearity and shallowness. That's how bad some of those games are.

Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"] The fact that Snow was in it. He has to be the worst character to ever be in any game.

Xiii-2 had him in the game for less than 12 minutes of screen time pretty much total of all the times he showed up. Looks like you are reaching here, I think you will like 13-2, complex battle system, more exploration, variety of items and secrets, detailed maps, lots of sidequests, less repetition, more likable characters, Atlas, etc.

Did you skip over the rest of my post? I also own 13-2 and have had it since release day. I had to quit after 15 hours of playing because I just couldn't force myself through it anymore. I was really excited for this game too because they promised a lot of improvements over 13.

You're whole post was" The fact that Snow was in it. He has to be the worst character to ever be in any game." what rest of the post? I'll just wait until your current conversation is over since you are having mixed messages here.
Avatar image for elbert_b_23
elbert_b_23

8247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 elbert_b_23
Member since 2003 • 8247 Posts
square soft made a ton of great games besides FF are they better that depends on the player's feelings about the games
Avatar image for Bubble_Man
Bubble_Man

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 Bubble_Man
Member since 2006 • 3100 Posts

For me, Final Fantasies 6 - 9 were the pinnacle of Square's games. A game being better than the newest Final Fantasies really isn't saying much.

Avatar image for Legendarycr8ter
Legendarycr8ter

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Legendarycr8ter
Member since 2012 • 354 Posts
I don't know Final Fantasy V is a masterpiece. Other than Modern games and god forbid FF3, which most don't even know exist, everythings good. Even dissidia and let's not forget Crisis Core which is so much better than FF7 i have no idea how it didn't super boost the PSP past the DS.
Avatar image for FeiYenKen
FeiYenKen

247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 FeiYenKen
Member since 2010 • 247 Posts

yes deus ex 3(human revolution) is beteeeer

Avatar image for ThePerro
ThePerro

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#33 ThePerro
Member since 2006 • 3105 Posts

Yes, Xenogears and Chrono Trigger.

Avatar image for riou7
riou7

10842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#34 riou7  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 10842 Posts

Chrono trigger is better than Final fantasy. That's about it

Avatar image for frannkzappa
frannkzappa

3003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 frannkzappa
Member since 2012 • 3003 Posts

well, i like saga frontier and chrono cross infinitely better then the ff series... so yes i do think they should but less emphasis on ff.

Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

Yes, Xenogears and Chrono Trigger.

ThePerro

This, my favorite console RPG ever created.

Avatar image for SlykReviewin
SlykReviewin

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#37 SlykReviewin
Member since 2009 • 138 Posts
Meh. I've only played Parasite Eve. Vagrant Story, Xenogears, and such, but none of them has come close to capturing the RPG magic that the older classic Final Fantasy game had unless someone could prove me which Square game is better than FF 1-IX combined.
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#38 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
Enix made better games than FF. =P
Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts
Enix made better games than FF. =PAllicrombie
The President has spoken.
Avatar image for TheKungFool
TheKungFool

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#40 TheKungFool
Member since 2006 • 5384 Posts

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"] The fact that Snow was in it. He has to be the worst character to ever be in any game. Ragnarok1051
Xiii-2 had him in the game for less than 12 minutes of screen time pretty much total of all the times he showed up. Looks like you are reaching here, I think you will like 13-2, complex battle system, more exploration, variety of items and secrets, detailed maps, lots of sidequests, less repetition, more likable characters, Atlas, etc.

Did you skip over the rest of my post? I also own 13-2 and have had it since release day. I had to quit after 15 hours of playing because I just couldn't force myself through it anymore. I was really excited for this game too because they promised a lot of improvements over 13.



I'm with you on this RAGNAROK old chum, don't waste too much time with these guys, especially the "status shuffle" guy.

anyhow, I had the same experience you did with both FF13 and FF13-2.

as for the original question, I'd say yes, SquareSoft (as in pre-Enix merger) made plenty of games that I liked just as much if not better than SOME of the final fantasies.
that said, "Final Fantasy VII" remains one of my all-time favorite games. rpg or otherwise.

Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="StatusShuffle"] Xiii-2 had him in the game for less than 12 minutes of screen time pretty much total of all the times he showed up. Looks like you are reaching here, I think you will like 13-2, complex battle system, more exploration, variety of items and secrets, detailed maps, lots of sidequests, less repetition, more likable characters, Atlas, etc.TheKungFool

Did you skip over the rest of my post? I also own 13-2 and have had it since release day. I had to quit after 15 hours of playing because I just couldn't force myself through it anymore. I was really excited for this game too because they promised a lot of improvements over 13.



I'm with you on this RAGNAROK old chum, don't waste too much time with these guys, especially the "status shuffle" guy.

anyhow, I had the same experience you did with both FF13 and FF13-2.

as for the original question, I'd say yes, SquareSoft (as in pre-Enix merger) made plenty of games that I liked just as much if not better than SOME of the final fantasies.
that said, "Final Fantasy VII" remains one of my all-time favorite games. rpg or otherwise.

I like how both of you don't even at least give your opinion on how 13-2 was bad.
Avatar image for TheKungFool
TheKungFool

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#42 TheKungFool
Member since 2006 • 5384 Posts

[QUOTE="TheKungFool"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"] Did you skip over the rest of my post? I also own 13-2 and have had it since release day. I had to quit after 15 hours of playing because I just couldn't force myself through it anymore. I was really excited for this game too because they promised a lot of improvements over 13. StatusShuffle



I'm with you on this RAGNAROK old chum, don't waste too much time with these guys, especially the "status shuffle" guy.

anyhow, I had the same experience you did with both FF13 and FF13-2.

as for the original question, I'd say yes, SquareSoft (as in pre-Enix merger) made plenty of games that I liked just as much if not better than SOME of the final fantasies.
that said, "Final Fantasy VII" remains one of my all-time favorite games. rpg or otherwise.

I like how both of you don't even at least give your opinion on how 13-2 was bad.



after experiencing several conversations with you on other threads, I don't feel the need to defend my opinion to you, because you're generally next to impossible to talk with, to be quite honest.

In terms of BOTH final fantasy XIII and XIII-2, I didn't much care for the story or characters, and I generally dislike the battle system.
(I really couldn't care less if you disagree, so if you're going to try to tell me those aspects were good, don't bother)

Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="TheKungFool"]

I'm with you on this RAGNAROK old chum, don't waste too much time with these guys, especially the "status shuffle" guy.

anyhow, I had the same experience you did with both FF13 and FF13-2.

as for the original question, I'd say yes, SquareSoft (as in pre-Enix merger) made plenty of games that I liked just as much if not better than SOME of the final fantasies.
that said, "Final Fantasy VII" remains one of my all-time favorite games. rpg or otherwise.

TheKungFool

I like how both of you don't even at least give your opinion on how 13-2 was bad.



after experiencing several conversations with you on other threads, I don't feel the need to defend my opinion to you, because you're generally next to impossible to talk with, to be quite honest.

In terms of BOTH final fantasy XIII and XIII-2, I didn't much care for the story or characters, and I generally dislike the battle system.
(I really couldn't care less if you disagree, so if you're going to try to tell me those aspects were good, don't bother)

I wanted an actual opinion, not you trying to be insulting. If you could do that, it would be nice.
Avatar image for TheKungFool
TheKungFool

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#44 TheKungFool
Member since 2006 • 5384 Posts

[QUOTE="TheKungFool"]

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"] I like how both of you don't even at least give your opinion on how 13-2 was bad. StatusShuffle



after experiencing several conversations with you on other threads, I don't feel the need to defend my opinion to you, because you're generally next to impossible to talk with, to be quite honest.

In terms of BOTH final fantasy XIII and XIII-2, I didn't much care for the story or characters, and I generally dislike the battle system.
(I really couldn't care less if you disagree, so if you're going to try to tell me those aspects were good, don't bother)

I wanted an actual opinion, not you trying to be insulting. If you could do that, it would be nice.



1) you got an actual opinion, I told you exactly what aspects I disliked.
2) was not "trying to be insulting", I was just being honest.





Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="TheKungFool"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"] Did you skip over the rest of my post? I also own 13-2 and have had it since release day. I had to quit after 15 hours of playing because I just couldn't force myself through it anymore. I was really excited for this game too because they promised a lot of improvements over 13. StatusShuffle



I'm with you on this RAGNAROK old chum, don't waste too much time with these guys, especially the "status shuffle" guy.

anyhow, I had the same experience you did with both FF13 and FF13-2.

as for the original question, I'd say yes, SquareSoft (as in pre-Enix merger) made plenty of games that I liked just as much if not better than SOME of the final fantasies.
that said, "Final Fantasy VII" remains one of my all-time favorite games. rpg or otherwise.

I like how both of you don't even at least give your opinion on how 13-2 was bad.

I've given you my opinion of the game. I'm not sure why you haven't gone back to page 1 to read it.
Avatar image for StatusShuffle
StatusShuffle

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 StatusShuffle
Member since 2012 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="TheKungFool"]

I'm with you on this RAGNAROK old chum, don't waste too much time with these guys, especially the "status shuffle" guy.

anyhow, I had the same experience you did with both FF13 and FF13-2.

as for the original question, I'd say yes, SquareSoft (as in pre-Enix merger) made plenty of games that I liked just as much if not better than SOME of the final fantasies.
that said, "Final Fantasy VII" remains one of my all-time favorite games. rpg or otherwise.Ragnarok1051
I like how both of you don't even at least give your opinion on how 13-2 was bad.

I've given you my opinion of the game. I'm not sure why you haven't gone back to page 1 to read it.

Because you never told me you edited past the first sentence later on. Neither did anyone else.

I found the story to be awful, none of the characters were enjoyable or likable, too much traveling through time to make sense out of a terrible plot. Battle system was enjoyable but I'd have preferred a third main character instead of a monster. Can't say I was a big fan of the character enhancement system but it got the job done I guess.

Gosh you and IGN, is the story really matter that much when everything ELSE was better than Xiii-1 and 12? Well ok, I just don't approach FF games with the story being the first though but that's just me I guess, the game other than Story seemed great in ever other piece and I myself did not give much of the story, although there are some funny responces in it. You can also get Sazh in your party through DLC that allows you to have 3 characters, but it should have been available without being DLC so I ill give you that. Ok then.
Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#47 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts

IMO: For sure. The shining examples being Chrono Trigger, Einhander, Brave Fencer Musashi, and Parasite Eve.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

I think the only square game I have ever legitimately liked is Chrono Trigger.

Avatar image for TheKungFool
TheKungFool

5384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#49 TheKungFool
Member since 2006 • 5384 Posts

Gosh you and IGN, is the story really matter that much when everything ELSE was better than Xiii-1 and 12? StatusShuffle


1) yes, the story matters that much.

2) "everything else being better than XIII-1" isn't saying much, XIII was horrible.

3) as for being better than FF12, I disagree completely. FF12 >>>>>>>> FF13 & FF13-2

Avatar image for zaku101
zaku101

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 zaku101
Member since 2005 • 4641 Posts

They died after FFX, and stabbed themselves in the heart with FF13, FF12 was better but the story was so ZZZz. Everything went totally down hill once they became squar enix. Most of their games now are a joke compared to their older games and western rpgs. I mean come on we've got more advanced technology now and they can't even come close to their ps1 games. Right now all they're doing is riding the name. For any hardcore gamers this is clearly visible.