Does anyone else feel like the Mac may actually become a viable gaming platform?

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

[QUOTE="GodModeEnabled"]Sometimes. I remember getting a new computer back when millenium edition was the latest and greatest, and great jesus did that thing ever make me swear like a banshee. It had a mind of its own. After that though I never had any problems with XP and now Vista (which ive had since release) its all been smooth sailing for like the last 10 years.... the only times I have problems is from virus from visiting sites I probably shouldnt. So Vista is great, and for the same money you could get likley get twice as good a gaming PC as you could a gaming mac.UpInFlames

Millenium was a trainwreck. Vista--though not nearly as bad--is much like Millenium - a subpar transitional OS. XP was really great. I've moved to Windows 7 about a week ago and it's been awesome so far. Everything Vista was supposed to be and then some.

Windows ME- mistake edition. Hey it only took MS about a decade to finally get their OS right. Better late than never I suppose.

Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts
Because of Steam and Blizzard on Mac, I'm thinking about getting a Mac Book instead of a PC Laptop. Steam makes a huge difference.ASK_Story
I still don't get this line of thinking. Blizzard has been making Mac games for years. And Direct2Drive has been selling Mac versions of games for years. But now all of a sudden it's worth buying a Mac for access to games?
Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#53 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

You seem to be speaking about primary gaming platforms, whereas I'm talking about "viable gaming platforms". For the purpose of this thread let's say that, yes, my 360 is the only thing I play games on but I also own a Mac which I never game on. If I suddenly have the option to game on my Mac, I'm going to. That doesn't mean it will be my primary platform for gaming, but I will still be using it to play games. The same concept carries over for all systems. In reality, I own and play just about every system to some extent...Even my iPhone. I consider that a "viable gaming platform" as well, along with Android phones and even some "lesser" mobile phones that are Java based for gaming. To me, a "viable gaming platform" is merely something that is going to carry a portion of a market share and get steady releases. Considering many people buy Macs for purposes other than gaming, gaming is merely another thing to do on a Mac. If people buy a PC to game, then that's what they buy it for.spazzx625

I would say that in order to be a viable gaming platform, such a platform needs to have the ability, the conditions of being a primary platform. It needs to be self-sustainable, that's pretty much the essence of being viable.

Now, my only concern will it be as flexible as a PC with community mods? I don't know but my Mac seems to work just fine with the user created maps that are in Warcraft III.juradai

Are you playing Warcraft III natively through OSX or bootcamp?

Avatar image for juradai
juradai

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 juradai
Member since 2003 • 2783 Posts

Are you playing Warcraft III natively through OSX or bootcamp?

UpInFlames

Natively. Runs perfect. Of course, the game isn't a graphics hog but I do have the settings turned up all the way.