First Fallout New Vegas Review.

http://attackofthefanboy.com/news/fallout-vegas-review/

Here's the first review of New Vegas and I have to say...it's wonderfully vague.

It's the kind of review that one can do while watching preview videos. It fails to mentionanything about plot, side quests, characters or anything important.

maybe they haven't actually played it.

I could've written that review and I havent been following this game at all lol

This doesn't look like an authentic review to me. At least not of the official game, maybe of a pirated version.

If that is true, I can't believe that they didn't fix the problems wih the aiming system of the third/first person view, it was the only thing I would want them to fix.

At this point I don't know if I'm buying the game or not, I'll wait for more reviews.

when he said that fallout 3's story pulled him in as opposed to NV i realized he has not played the game and probably didnt play 3 either seeing as its story was crap, worse review i have ever read

I think many reviewers will use "more of the same" as one of it's main flaws, but the graphics & controls I never had problem with

I think it's got to be pretty bad for me not to like it

i wonder will they fault cod BO for looking identical to MW2? short answer no whereas this game will probably lose 1.5-2 points for it here anyway

i presume the story and characters are much better than 3 seeing as obsidian are devs