Gamers against locking out single player content!!!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kerrman
kerrman

2904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#151 kerrman
Member since 2003 • 2904 Posts

So buy the game new and stop being so bloody cheap.

Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

[QUOTE="Warhawk_"]

Now if we don't buy their games and we make it clear to them that they should end this online pass once and for all, well I'm pretty sure that it will give them the message that online passes is hurting their sales and it's time to remove once and for all so they can make more sales again.

Grammaton-Cleric

Arkham City will sell through the proverbial roof and easily outpace Arkham Asylum. That reality is inevitable.

Your revolution will not be televised, which is why I would consider going another route.

Oh I know that and I know for sure that me not buying the game will not make their sales drop. This game will be amazing and will sell tons of copies but I will pass on it still because I will not support WB. I know that I and many other people who have the same idea as me will not stop online passes but I don't care I will just play other good games instead.

Avatar image for Invisible_Kid2
Invisible_Kid2

6330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#153 Invisible_Kid2
Member since 2003 • 6330 Posts

[QUOTE="kaealy"]

No thank you, I like when money end up in the devs hands so they can continue making great games instead of the pockets of Gamestop and their kind.

Cataclism

Why does everyone assume everyone buys used games on gamestop? What about direct sale like through ebay?

Oh and by the way, this already happened before. See Dragon age Origins and the Shale DLC.

Exactly. People forget that Best Buy has a trade in program. And so does this site. Let's not forget basic yard selling, or selling/trading with a friend.

What if we called places, and said why we're not. It works for anon in certain situations. Call random Gamestops, hell, call or email WB or Rocksteady. The more it's spread, the more they'll know.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#154 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17968 Posts
TRULY UNBELIEVABLE. Just got the game. So I'm all ready to play, but I figure I'll download Catwoman's stuff before I do. So I enter the code, get this message: "error, your download cannot be completed at this time. Try again later" (I assume due to their servers being swamped). I re-enter the code to try again and am greeted with, "you've already downloaded this content. Enter another code." So I guess I'm SoL. Nice WB, real nice. Here I pay for a NEW copy expecting to be able to play as Catwoman, and am screwed over due to a technical issue. Yea, who would of thought of that, WB?? Thanks a lot guys! This is unbelievable. Now I'm going to have to go through all the hassle of contacting WB and MS, who probably won't believe me anyway (or make me send in a copy of my receipt which will take forever to confirm) and have to end up paying $10 to re-buy what I already own. I'm not even going to play tonight I'm so pissed, I want to play this while in a good mood. Yea, these passes aren't so bad eh? Only affect those who buy it used? Think again. I hope this doesn't happen to you guys, just FYI. Apologies for the tone but this is simply inexcusable.
Avatar image for Grammaton-Cleric
Grammaton-Cleric

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 Grammaton-Cleric
Member since 2002 • 7515 Posts

TRULY UNBELIEVABLE. Just got the game. So I'm all ready to play, but I figure I'll download Catwoman's stuff before I do. So I enter the code, get this message: "error, your download cannot be completed at this time. Try again later" (I assume due to their servers being swamped). I re-enter the code to try again and am greeted with, "you've already downloaded this content. Enter another code." So I guess I'm SoL. Nice WB, real nice. Here I pay for a NEW copy expecting to be able to play as Catwoman, and am screwed over due to a technical issue. Yea, who would of thought of that, WB?? Thanks a lot guys! This is unbelievable. Now I'm going to have to go through all the hassle of contacting WB and MS, who probably won't believe me anyway (or make me send in a copy of my receipt which will take forever to confirm) and have to end up paying $10 to re-buy what I already own. I'm not even going to play tonight I'm so pissed, I want to play this while in a good mood. Yea, these passes aren't so bad eh? Only affect those who buy it used? Think again. I hope this doesn't happen to you guys, just FYI. Apologies for the tone but this is simply inexcusable.MirkoS77

That actually sounds like an issue with the WB servers so I'd give it a few hours.

I entirely understand your annoyance however.

Avatar image for Vickman178
Vickman178

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Vickman178
Member since 2011 • 866 Posts

Ok guys, this is about single player passes not batman, I know batman is good game and I really want to play it too, but I don't want to live in a future where every game has this even the CRAPPY games, it destroys your rights to fully own what you buy and thats that!

I can wait to play this game and I may very well still end up buying it eventually but right now I think its important that we make them know that we don't like this.

and I gotta sit down and make that dam twitter account so we can get some publicity instead of having it just sit here on these boards.So busy with school...aaahhgg!!

Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

Ok guys, this is about single player passes not batman, I know batman is good game and I really want to play it too, but I don't want to live in a future where every game has this even the CRAPPY games, it destroys your rights to fully own what you buy and thats that!

I can wait to play this game and I may very well still end up buying it eventually but right now I think its important that we make them know that we don't like this.

and I gotta sit down and make that dam twitter account so we can get some publicity instead of having it just sit here on these boards.So busy with school...aaahhgg!!

Vickman178

I'm with you man. This game will be good but enough with this garbage online passes for these gamesonce and for all.

Avatar image for supernator13
supernator13

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#158 supernator13
Member since 2011 • 41 Posts

You know I understand when Publisher/Devs say they need the extra money for online passes because servers cost money to run, but this is just the last straw locking out single player content?There taking away your very right as a consumer to fully own what you purchase and are destroying your ability to completely sell what you bought.

We have to stop this now people, before they take it too far we have to show those dam publishers that we don't like this and we won't stand for it because how much longer is it before every game does this?How long will it be before even MORE content is locked out?I don't know how any right minded person can defend these greedy business tactics.

Vickman178

It has nothing to do with online server costs.

It has everything to do with the fact that they make 0 dollars when you buy a game used. So really by buying the game used, you haven't supported the publishers or developers in any way.

And now you're demanding they cater to you. Sorry, but that's kinda dumb.

It's not "locking out" content, anymore then when they release an add-on that costs money. Are they "locking you out" of the add on because it's not free? No.

The growth of the used-game market has been one of the biggest gouges to the game industry lately. So... in order to combat the used-game dragon, they are offering bonuses to gamers who actually support the developers and buy the game new.

If you don't want to pay 60 bones on a game, then wait til the MSRP drops or it becomes a classic for 30 or 20 bucks, and then buy it new. Thats what I do.

If you insist on buying used games then your complaints really don't matter to the publishers, because you aren't supporting them anyway.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#159 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
my point in all of this is (to those defending new game passes) if I rightfully buy the game new, am I not entitled to share my game with my friends/relatives?doubalfa
no , sharing games is as bad as piracy
Avatar image for spawnassasin
spawnassasin

18702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#160 spawnassasin
Member since 2006 • 18702 Posts

[QUOTE="Vickman178"]

You know I understand when Publisher/Devs say they need the extra money for online passes because servers cost money to run, but this is just the last straw locking out single player content?There taking away your very right as a consumer to fully own what you purchase and are destroying your ability to completely sell what you bought.

We have to stop this now people, before they take it too far we have to show those dam publishers that we don't like this and we won't stand for it because how much longer is it before every game does this?How long will it be before even MORE content is locked out?I don't know how any right minded person can defend these greedy business tactics.

supernator13

It has nothing to do with online server costs.

It has everything to do with the fact that they make 0 dollars when you buy a game used. So really by buying the game used, you haven't supported the publishers or developers in any way.

And now you're demanding they cater to you. Sorry, but that's kinda dumb.

It's not "locking out" content, anymore then when they release an add-on that costs money. Are they "locking you out" of the add on because it's not free? No.

The growth of the used-game market has been one of the biggest gouges to the game industry lately. So... in order to combat the used-game dragon, they are offering bonuses to gamers who actually support the developers and buy the game new.

If you don't want to pay 60 bones on a game, then wait til the MSRP drops or it becomes a classic for 30 or 20 bucks, and then buy it new. Thats what I do.

If you insist on buying used games then your complaints really don't matter to the publishers, because you aren't supporting them anyway.

bonus no this isnt a bonus this i single player content that they had been advertising for a year now
and what about the people that dont have an online connection and they buy the game new how do they redeem their code
what about down the road in 10 years how will we redeem a code or acess content thats being locked out because of online pass if the servers are shut down and the games no longer supported
what if psn or xbl and it takes another 2 months to bring them back up goes down for some unforseen reason how do we redeem our code if we bought it new

Avatar image for rjparkin
rjparkin

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 rjparkin
Member since 2004 • 372 Posts

People need to understand the reason they are doing this.

Avatar image for Smileyvirus
Smileyvirus

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Smileyvirus
Member since 2010 • 232 Posts
Developers have every right to do whatever they please with their software - I don't have a problem with it. I do forsee that in the next 2 generations physical media with be obsolete anyway and all this is going to be a moot point. All it comes down to is: as a consumer do you feel you're getting value for money? if not don't buy it. Nobody likes getting ripped off, and if its that bad you can guarantee that other gamers will be doing the same thing. Not trying to derail your train OP, you've got a right to express your unhappiness.
Avatar image for supernator13
supernator13

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#163 supernator13
Member since 2011 • 41 Posts

TRULY UNBELIEVABLE. Just got the game. So I'm all ready to play, but I figure I'll download Catwoman's stuff before I do. So I enter the code, get this message: "error, your download cannot be completed at this time. Try again later" (I assume due to their servers being swamped). I re-enter the code to try again and am greeted with, "you've already downloaded this content. Enter another code." So I guess I'm SoL. Nice WB, real nice. Here I pay for a NEW copy expecting to be able to play as Catwoman, and am screwed over due to a technical issue. MirkoS77

Um.. if you've redeemed the code... then you never have to repay on that account.

You just have to download the content as soon as the servers are actually updated. Just go to you download list on psn or download history on xbl and it'll be there for free re-download.

The content may not even be available til the afternoon... and when it is available, if everyone tries to download it at the same time, then of course it's going to go slow or error out.

Come on people... use some common sense.

Avatar image for supernator13
supernator13

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#164 supernator13
Member since 2011 • 41 Posts

bonus no this isnt a bonus this i single player content that they had been advertising for a year now
and what about the people that dont have an online connection and they buy the game new how do they redeem their code
what about down the road in 10 years how will we redeem a code or acess content thats being locked out because of online pass if the servers are shut down and the games no longer supported
what if psn or xbl and it takes another 2 months to bring them back up goes down for some unforseen reason how do we redeem our code if we bought it new

spawnassasin

You make a point in there.

Of course everyone would prefer having everything included on the game disc, without extra online redeeming. But the fault actually falls back to the used game market. If the used games market wasn't so huge and taking so much of the game-makers business, then they wouldn't need to come up with these strategies.

So this call to arms against the developers in counter-productive. If you really want to put an end to online passes and original content that requires redeem codes, then start supporting the developers and buy the games new, and help kill the used game market.

If we protest by refusing to buy new, then the game developers and publishers lose. Then they have to reduce prices to compete with the 2nd hand market, ***edit that*** dropping prices does nothing, because used will always sell for less than new*** so then they're forced to scale back in other ways... leading to crappier games, smaller production teams, rushed deadlines. All because we want game developers to compete with people who do nothing but buy our games for a couple bucks and then resell them for 5 bucks less then the publisher.

Last I checked, stores like Gamestop and Play and Trade don't develop or publish games. Hence, buying used games does nothing for the game industry.

They lose and Gamestop wins... and you save a couple bucks.

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#165 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
But people that buy used are not customers :> atleast not in your eyes sure gamestop and stores like that are happy to accept all of the money you spend :>. They are only locking content for people that buy used i see no problems with it.
Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#166 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17968 Posts

[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]TRULY UNBELIEVABLE. Just got the game. So I'm all ready to play, but I figure I'll download Catwoman's stuff before I do. So I enter the code, get this message: "error, your download cannot be completed at this time. Try again later" (I assume due to their servers being swamped). I re-enter the code to try again and am greeted with, "you've already downloaded this content. Enter another code." So I guess I'm SoL. Nice WB, real nice. Here I pay for a NEW copy expecting to be able to play as Catwoman, and am screwed over due to a technical issue. supernator13

Um.. if you've redeemed the code... then you never have to repay on that account.

You just have to download the content as soon as the servers are actually updated. Just go to you download list on psn or download history on xbl and it'll be there for free re-download.

The content may not even be available til the afternoon... and when it is available, if everyone tries to download it at the same time, then of course it's going to go slow or error out.

Come on people... use some common sense.

Problem is, it's not on my download list. Anywhere.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#167 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17968 Posts

[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]TRULY UNBELIEVABLE. Just got the game. So I'm all ready to play, but I figure I'll download Catwoman's stuff before I do. So I enter the code, get this message: "error, your download cannot be completed at this time. Try again later" (I assume due to their servers being swamped). I re-enter the code to try again and am greeted with, "you've already downloaded this content. Enter another code." So I guess I'm SoL. Nice WB, real nice. Here I pay for a NEW copy expecting to be able to play as Catwoman, and am screwed over due to a technical issue. Yea, who would of thought of that, WB?? Thanks a lot guys! This is unbelievable. Now I'm going to have to go through all the hassle of contacting WB and MS, who probably won't believe me anyway (or make me send in a copy of my receipt which will take forever to confirm) and have to end up paying $10 to re-buy what I already own. I'm not even going to play tonight I'm so pissed, I want to play this while in a good mood. Yea, these passes aren't so bad eh? Only affect those who buy it used? Think again. I hope this doesn't happen to you guys, just FYI. Apologies for the tone but this is simply inexcusable.Grammaton-Cleric

That actually sounds like an issue with the WB servers so I'd give it a few hours.

I entirely understand your annoyance however.

Well on a positive note, the CE is one of the better I've seen. The statue doesn't feel like a cheap $10 figure, it's fairly solid, and the artbook is great. It also comes with a soundtrack which I haven't listened to yet. Kind of makes up for the absence of Catwoman.... :?

Avatar image for supernator13
supernator13

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#168 supernator13
Member since 2011 • 41 Posts

Problem is, it's not on my download list. Anywhere.

MirkoS77
It's probably just not online yet. Probably by the late afternoon or this evening.
Avatar image for Phantom_Leo
Phantom_Leo

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#169 Phantom_Leo
Member since 2002 • 7090 Posts

Problem is, it's not on my download list. Anywhere.

MirkoS77

Then go back into Account Maintenance, or whatever the section of PSN is called where you can redeem codes and check on subscriptions and such. The same thing happened when everyone tried to redeem their free games after the whole Hacking episode earlier this year. You should see it in there. Nothing was lost; you just have to find it. It's in there.

Avatar image for Vickman178
Vickman178

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Vickman178
Member since 2011 • 866 Posts

People need to understand the reason they are doing this.

rjparkin

For the bonus $$$

Avatar image for ambitiond
ambitiond

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 ambitiond
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
It makes sense, but I feel it'll soon fade away. For instance, netflix did the same thing. We're all getting long, exciting games for only 50 dollars, and never complained, it seems a fair price, not that expensive, when they could truthfully be sold for more. Now, with netflix (charged 9 bucks a month for dvds and unlimited streaming) raised their prices to 15 bucks a month for the same deal. Everyone was incredibly mad, when they would be happy with how low the price was if it was always 15. Just like us, we are getting a great game with a lot of content, and when something they could've made a DLC, but decided to include it for those buying it new, is not included in a used copy, we revolt, because since it's not *technically* a DLC, we all feel were getting robbed of something that were not really being robbed of. However, this whole "free with new copy" thing will soon fade, just like netflix when they lowered their prices again, because America hates change, and we take everything as something against us. In truth, a company/companies with a fantastic product, be it games or movies, simply wants to make more profit so it can support its growing business, but being America, our first reaction is "corporate greed". Conclusion: The lack of "non-dlc" content included is a bit annoying to those buying used, but if you think about it, it's really just an add-on, and it's almost like complaining over buying a game instead of the GOTY Edition, and saying you deserve the extra content.
Avatar image for Phantom_Leo
Phantom_Leo

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#172 Phantom_Leo
Member since 2002 • 7090 Posts

[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]

Problem is, it's not on my download list. Anywhere.

Phantom_Leo

Then go back into Account Maintenance, or whatever the section of PSN is called where you can redeem codes and check on subscriptions and such. The same thing happened when everyone tried to redeem their free games after the whole Hacking episode earlier this year. You should see it in there. Nothing was lost; you just have to find it. It's in there.

Just checked my Download List "Batman Arkham City - Catwoman Bundle" sits right at the top. This means two things: (1)If your system should break, you can DL it as many times as necessary, as it is attached to your PSN account; just like any other game or DLC you may have purchased in the past. (2)You should check your Shopping Cart, if it is not in your Download History. If you redeemed the code and it worked, but just failed to download, it MUST be somewhere.

Avatar image for skooks
skooks

1411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 skooks
Member since 2006 • 1411 Posts

People need to understand the reason they are doing this.

rjparkin
For bigger profit margins.
Avatar image for MLBknights58
MLBknights58

5016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 MLBknights58
Member since 2006 • 5016 Posts

I don't understand all the hate. Businesses just want to make more money. Is that crazy to understand or something? If I could make more money by doing something as simple as a code, I would be all over it.Not only that, since it is, you know, their product; don't they reserve the right do whatever the hell they want with it?

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#175 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17968 Posts

[QUOTE="Phantom_Leo"]

[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]

Problem is, it's not on my download list. Anywhere.

Phantom_Leo

Then go back into Account Maintenance, or whatever the section of PSN is called where you can redeem codes and check on subscriptions and such. The same thing happened when everyone tried to redeem their free games after the whole Hacking episode earlier this year. You should see it in there. Nothing was lost; you just have to find it. It's in there.

Just checked my Download List "Batman Arkham City - Catwoman Bundle" sits right at the top. This means two things: (1)If your system should break, you can DL it as many times as necessary, as it is attached to your PSN account; just like any other game or DLC you may have purchased in the past. (2)You should check your Shopping Cart, if it is not in your Download History. If you redeemed the code and it worked, but just failed to download, it MUST be somewhere.

I'm playing on the 360. Still can't find it. I've had this same problem before so I know where to look, and for some reason it's just not there. Bug maybe? Guess I'll just wait like someone suggested, and I've also emailed WB so hopefully they know what's going on. Apparently others are having trouble as well.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
People need to understand the reason they are doing this.rjparkin
They are doing this because gamers have sent the message that this type of ridiculous behavior is acceptable.
Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

People need to understand the reason they are doing this.

rjparkin

Yeah to make more money by milking the gamers.

Avatar image for yomanjdf
yomanjdf

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#178 yomanjdf
Member since 2003 • 1166 Posts

other the the ps3 -xbox and pc content are getting hacked all the time

what is the problem now?

Avatar image for Invisible_Kid2
Invisible_Kid2

6330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#179 Invisible_Kid2
Member since 2003 • 6330 Posts

[QUOTE="rjparkin"]People need to understand the reason they are doing this.savebattery
They are doing this because gamers have sent the message that this type of ridiculous behavior is acceptable.

EXACTLY! It's always "Well, I don't like online pass, but I'll stop supporting it when they start with offline content". Now that they're taking out offline content people are saying "well, it's for a good cause. The developers are literally eating toothpaste sandwiches. They need the money" Every time I've asked this, no one has given me an answer. Why is it that media that's been around longer than video games (music, movies, books, magazines, pretty much every thing ever) aren't raising a huge stink over used sales? You don't see movie companies tanking because of used sales or dealing out one time use codes for new copies to access bonus features. Don't video games and movies cost roughly the same amount to make? Why does a $60 game with replay ability need an extra $10 for content, when a DVD or Blue-Ray costs roughly half of a game and doesn't have nearly as much replay ability an very seldom costs extra for bonus features (counting in that if you have a standard edition, then a few weeks/months/years later they come out with a new edition. Like the Star Wars Blue-Rays).

Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="rjparkin"]People need to understand the reason they are doing this.Invisible_Kid2

They are doing this because gamers have sent the message that this type of ridiculous behavior is acceptable.

EXACTLY! It's always "Well, I don't like online pass, but I'll stop supporting it when they start with offline content". Now that they're taking out offline content people are saying "well, it's for a good cause. The developers are literally eating toothpaste sandwiches. They need the money" Every time I've asked this, no one has given me an answer. Why is it that media that's been around longer than video games (music, movies, books, magazines, pretty much every thing ever) aren't raising a huge stink over used sales? You don't see movie companies tanking because of used sales or dealing out one time use codes for new copies to access bonus features. Don't video games and movies cost roughly the same amount to make? Why does a $60 game with replay ability need an extra $10 for content, when a DVD or Blue-Ray costs roughly half of a game and doesn't have nearly as much replay ability an very seldom costs extra for bonus features (counting in that if you have a standard edition, then a few weeks/months/years later they come out with a new edition. Like the Star Wars Blue-Rays).

What you just said is 100% true. No matter how many times you try to explain to them about this bs, they still want to believe in it.

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
I could care less. If you legitimately purchase the game, you get the full experience. If you jerk over the developer and pay them $0 for a game you allegedly love, you can only access 90% of the content according to the OP. I agree that the arrangement is unfair, but it's the devs that are getting the unfair part of the arrangement. If it was equal it would be a case where if you pay $0 for a game then you get access to 0% of the content, not 90%.
Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#182 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
I could care less. If you legitimately purchase the game, you get the full experience. If you jerk over the developer and pay them $0 for a game you allegedly love, you can only access 90% of the content according to the OP. I agree that the arrangement is unfair, but it's the devs that are getting the unfair part of the arrangement. If it was equal it would be a case where if you pay $0 for a game then you get access to 0% of the content, not 90%.Senor_Kami
thats not true , since my country doesnt support psn store i cant download online passes and dlc , i buy all my games new but it is punishing me as well , this is the biggest BS in gaming since DRM , also those without a internet connection are screwed the same way
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#183 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
If you jerk over the developer and pay them $0 for a game you allegedly loveSenor_Kami
That copy of the game was already paid for. That money already went to the developer. The developer/publisher shouldn't care what people do with it after that first purchase.
Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]If you jerk over the developer and pay them $0 for a game you allegedly lovefoxhound_fox
That copy of the game was already paid for. That money already went to the developer. The developer/publisher shouldn't care what people do with it after that first purchase.

They should care. It loses them money. The same thing with pirating. The goal is for everyone who plays the game to contribute.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="savebattery"][QUOTE="rjparkin"]People need to understand the reason they are doing this.Invisible_Kid2

They are doing this because gamers have sent the message that this type of ridiculous behavior is acceptable.

EXACTLY! It's always "Well, I don't like online pass, but I'll stop supporting it when they start with offline content". Now that they're taking out offline content people are saying "well, it's for a good cause. The developers are literally eating toothpaste sandwiches. They need the money" Every time I've asked this, no one has given me an answer. Why is it that media that's been around longer than video games (music, movies, books, magazines, pretty much every thing ever) aren't raising a huge stink over used sales? You don't see movie companies tanking because of used sales or dealing out one time use codes for new copies to access bonus features. Don't video games and movies cost roughly the same amount to make? Why does a $60 game with replay ability need an extra $10 for content, when a DVD or Blue-Ray costs roughly half of a game and doesn't have nearly as much replay ability an very seldom costs extra for bonus features (counting in that if you have a standard edition, then a few weeks/months/years later they come out with a new edition. Like the Star Wars Blue-Rays).

The difference between books, movies, music and magazines is that none of them are sold used right next to new ones or for just a few bills under the price of a new one either. I answered your questions by quoting a developer earlier in this thread.

Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#186 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts

Codes etc = CONTROL over the product AFTER purchase.

Video game devs have the opportunity to be crooked, so they are doing it.

All the law says is "Devs have all rights and can do anything they want."

Just remember YOU control the money.

Don't fall for hype and bullshots.

9 out of 10 games are trash.

Be selective, be stingy, be informed.

How many times have you fallen for an ad campaign that make the game seem so exciting. Then you bring it home, 2 hours later you're like "This game isn't even that good." 60 bucks down the toilet, wah wah wah wah.

I've played pretty much every major series of the last 25 years.

I could count the number of "must have" games on my two hands.

Right now my library is about 30 games.

Guess how many are in my "to sell" box in the closet. About 20.

I spent 2 nights playing Halo 3, it was not only waste of money but also waste of my valuable time. I would have got more entertainment watching an episode of CSI.

Remember this next time someone posts up a hype thread of "rawr game of the year."

Who are you kidding. Gamespot will give it 8.5 and I'll be struggling to stay awake as usual.

Most of you are too young to remember the gaming crash of the 1980's.

Dozens of companies were trying to sell games for Atari 2600 for $30-$40, and nobody was buying.

Eventually the market crashed and they started burying overstock cartridges in Arizona.

That's basically what's happening now except people are alot more gullible or the marketing is alot better, because most of this stuff belongs in a landfill somewhere.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

Fine by me if developer chooses this course of action. I have the right to withhold purchase of this game until it becomes a $10 holiday/seasonal/daily special on Steam.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="garland51"]

I'm with you. It just boggles the mind of how these "gamers" defend garbage like this & continue to defend it like there's no tomorrow & acts like it's not a big deal.

Elann2008

It boggles me why YOU keep buying used games and it's certainly not going to help get us a new Batman game or whatever Rocksteady decides to venture into... That boggles me more than anything.. but keep leeching off me and my fellow gamers that buy new... so YOU get to play games. Just go buy it new... It's a big deal what you're doing...

I rarely buy used games, sir. But when publishers/developers keep on pushing ugly practices on what they're doing, that's when they cross the line. Unlike you, I don't support anti-consumer practices. They screw us, we screw them.

People need to understand the reason they are doing this.rjparkin

To rip tons more money off of gullible people that still stick up for awful practices like DLC, Online & Season Passes.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#190 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
It loses them money. dkdk999
Prove the person buying used would have bought new had they had the option.
Avatar image for _Tobli_
_Tobli_

5733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 _Tobli_
Member since 2007 • 5733 Posts

To rip tons more money off of gullible people that still stick up for awful practices like DLC, Online & Season Passes.garland51

DLC: On disc DLC is bad , but not proper DLC

Season Passes: Discount for consumers, and assured sales for upcoming DLC for the publisher. I don't see a problem here.

Online passes: This one is actually awful.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#193 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17968 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]It loses them money. foxhound_fox
Prove the person buying used would have bought new had they had the option.

If people did not have the option to buy used, I guarantee you there would be many more new sales.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]It loses them money. foxhound_fox
Prove the person buying used would have bought new had they had the option.

I can't. The main thing here I'm actually against is this mentality that buying used games is fine but piracy is compeletly awful. I really want to get rid of this. I think alot of pirates will actually end up paying for a product if they like it. Because they know that taking something of value without paying for it is kind of greedy. Where as when people buy used games they think oh I bought the game so know I don't owe them anything.

Avatar image for Invisible_Kid2
Invisible_Kid2

6330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#195 Invisible_Kid2
Member since 2003 • 6330 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="dkdk999"]It loses them money. MirkoS77

Prove the person buying used would have bought new had they had the option.

If people did not have the option to buy used, I guarantee you there would be many more new sales.

That's like saying "If people did not have the option to buy Pepsi, Coke would have more sales". It's creating a monopoly somewhat. Didnt' The Justice Department stop T-Mobile Mobile and ATT from merging because it would give consumers less options? Same goes here. If they get rid of used games, prices can be jacked up and they can get lazier in making new content. If they can sell a game for $70-$75 and there's no used market to compete with, then they'll do it. They can get lazier with their content because if the 2012 version is better than the 2014 version and every version after that (hypothetically if used games are abolished in 2012, and this is set in the future) they don't have to knock the price down. They can still be selling the 2012 version for $60-$70.

Avatar image for Invisible_Kid2
Invisible_Kid2

6330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#196 Invisible_Kid2
Member since 2003 • 6330 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAd8ElGvobg&feature=feedu

L1 games/Muzz giving his views on Arkham City.

I'm watching Boomzies #17http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZwwJDzkFrI

They bring up a good idea on how Gamestop could help give devs money and not completely screw gamers over on online pass. GS buys online pass/codes for titles. When you buy the game used, you can either buy it online for $10 or through GS for $5. Or pro-rate online pass. If a game is now $30 new, or $20-$25 used, make the online pass reflect the current price. They said 10% and I agree. If you buy a used game for $55, then the pass would be $5.50. You buy it used for $20, online pass would be $2.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] That copy of the game was already paid for. That money already went to the developer. The developer/publisher shouldn't care what people do with it after that first purchase.187umKILLAH

They should care. It loses them money. The same thing with pirating. The goal is for everyone who plays the game to contribute.

They're just being greedy & only doing this stuff because they can force this on people thanks to gaming now being online, it loses them money? They already made their money on the initial sale, they have no right to stick their nose into the second hand sale, thats up to the consumer to decide what to do with their purchased item. Most people who sell their games end up putting that money towards purchasing a new game anyway! No other industry double dips into second hand sales of its product like these greedy pigs do, this if anything encourages pirating.

It baffles me that some gamers are that thick they actually support this nonsense, these actions benefit ONLY the game companies & everything negative is put on the gaming community. It negatively affects the second hand sales market, the rental market and offline gamers too, imagine buying Batman AC only to find you have to go online or miss out on 10% of the game - considering 69.8% of the world does not have net access I'd say thats a lot of annoyed gamers. 18.5 million xbox users miss out on that 10% by default as they are not online. The devs/pubs should not care about the second hand sale as they've already made their money, they're just being greedy. Hell game sales generate more money annually than movies, but hey go do as your told & line their pockets & be a good mindless slave while I go get a copy of this game online for free as Batman AC has already been cracked lol.. serves them right too.

Exactly. And look, what's this? There's a complete edition of L.A. Noire coming out, with all DLC included! Wonderful!

Link.

This is why I hesitate to buy games when they first come out. Because publishers/developers purposefully take content out of the original versions & sell them as DLC to see what they get away with, then make another version of the same game for retail, & include the DLC along with it!

Just like with these games:

Resident Evil 5: Gold Edition.
Fallout 3: Game of the Year Edition.
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion: Game of the Year Edition.
Grand Theft Auto 4: Lost & Damned (on a disc).
Red Dead Redemption: Game of the Year Edition.

I can go on & on. Now you see why I constantly say that practices like DLC are bad for gaming & are a complete scam to milk more people out of money, & why I don't buy DLC for any game being out. Everyone needs to wake up & stop supporting such practices like DRM, DLC, Online passes/Season passes, etc. If more & more people were to stop supporting these practices, then the publishers/developers will stop doing it!


We need to send a message to these publishers/developers about it. They cater to us, we don't cater to them.

Avatar image for _Tobli_
_Tobli_

5733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 _Tobli_
Member since 2007 • 5733 Posts

This is why I hesitate to buy games when they first come out. Because publishers/developers purposefully take content out of the original versions & sell them as DLC to see what they get away with, then make another version of the same game for retail, & include the DLC along with it!

Just like with these games:

Resident Evil 5: Gold Edition.
Fallout 3: Game of the Year Edition.
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion: Game of the Year Edition.
Grand Theft Auto 4: Lost & Damned (on a disc).
Red Dead Redemption: Game of the Year Edition.

I can go on & on. Now you see why I constantly say that practices like DLC are bad for gaming & are a complete scam to milk more people out of money, & why I don't buy DLC for any game being out. Everyone needs to wake up & stop supporting such practices like DRM, DLC, Online passes/Season passes, etc. If more & more people were to stop supporting these practices, then the publishers/developers will stop doing it!

garland51

Anti DLC people take the content removal thing way out of proportion. how is it a scam?

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

They're just being greedy *snip*187umKILLAH

Wouldn't you call GameStop greedy when almost 50% of their profits are derived from the sale of used games?