Gametrailers E3 awards, Resident Evil 5 wins everything.

IGN did their awards too. Oddly, Spore beat out Fallout 3 for best PC game, but Fallout 3 won best of the show (along with best console game). Huh? Does that make sense to anyone else?argianas

i understood their love for Spore, but giving Fallout 3 best console game hurts my head.I pretty much agreed with the rest of the picks, and even when I didnt I understood the reasoning behind it. (Gears Of War 2 winning best graphics, Spore winning three different categories, Mirror's edge winning Best Action etc. )

[QUOTE="S0lidSnake"]

Best of Show - Resident Evil 5

Best third Person Shooter - Resident Evil 5

Best Playstation 3 game- Resident Evil 5

Best Xbox 360 game - Resident Evil 5

Best everything - Resident Ev...

link.

dvader654

Gametrailers knows their stuff. That is my pick, RE5 had an amazing show. Bring it on.

Dvader we all knew your picks before you even replied...Spore is going to blow everything out of the water, except for maybe LBP, thats how I see it.

yay for user created content in games. I hope we can make an RPG or a simulation game in LBP...

[QUOTE="dvader654"][QUOTE="S0lidSnake"]

Best of Show - Resident Evil 5

Best third Person Shooter - Resident Evil 5

Best Playstation 3 game- Resident Evil 5

Best Xbox 360 game - Resident Evil 5

Best everything - Resident Ev...

link.

HiResDes

Gametrailers knows their stuff. That is my pick, RE5 had an amazing show. Bring it on.

Dvader we all knew your picks before you even replied...Spore is going to blow everything out of the water, except for maybe LBP, thats how I see it.

I think we knew his best of E3 picks before E3 even started. :P

i dont think that i would consider spore or LBP games of show, considering they were games of last show or two ago. IMO NOTHING stole the show. there was some interesting stuff but nothing like when say spore or LBP were first shown. nothing had a major impact. RE5 was shown before E3, if it hadnt been shown until then i could see.. so yeah, in my opinion nothing blew me away. RE5 may really be the game of the show, but that isn't saying much, all considered. $.02OneWingedAngeI

IMHO shows are about showing people stuff they haven't seen before (no point in having a show if one is going roll out familiar footage) but not necessarily surprises. LBP was my personal favorite of the show, but one could make a strong case for RE5, and considering all of the really high quality games shown, that is high praise.

[QUOTE="OneWingedAngeI"]i dont think that i would consider spore or LBP games of show, considering they were games of last show or two ago. IMO NOTHING stole the show. there was some interesting stuff but nothing like when say spore or LBP were first shown. nothing had a major impact. RE5 was shown before E3, if it hadnt been shown until then i could see.. so yeah, in my opinion nothing blew me away. RE5 may really be the game of the show, but that isn't saying much, all considered. $.02CarnageHeart

IMHO shows are about showing people stuff they haven't seen before (no point in having a show if one is going roll out familiar footage) but not necessarily surprises. LBP was my personal favorite of the show, but one could make a strong case for RE5, and considering all of the really high quality games shown, that is high praise.

Sony is supposedly going to have 12 announcement :shock: at Leipzig this year. So much new stuff, GC would be this year's E3. :D

As you probably know, One of the announcements is rumored to be the Uncharted sequel. We know the game has been in development since January and will most probably use the same game engine, which is why I was surprised to not see anything on the game at E3. Hopefully, a delayed announcement means that ND has been working hard on substantial new additions (a la Gears Of War 2) like online co-op. :)

P.S ND made the first Uncharted from scratch in two years. The sequel shouldnt take more than a year and half.

[QUOTE="OneWingedAngeI"]a fair opinion. i would say that RE5 had a good showing. i agree that the games we saw were filled with many of good quality, i guess i am just too used to a show stopper and thats why i am left feeling underwhelmed. i do know that expectation is a little unrealistic though, which is why i made sure to say in my opinion a couple times. i totally understand if other people feel differently.dvader654

I am with Carnage, i think there was a hige list of high quality games shown. I look at the list of games I want to play this fall and its way too long. The thing is was there really anything we have not seen before, not really. Thats probably why some feel so down on E3 cause there were no surprises, nothing that really pushes the boundaries of gaming. Still plenty of quality games shown.

Believe!

[QUOTE="OneWingedAngeI"]a fair opinion. i would say that RE5 had a good showing. i agree that the games we saw were filled with many of good quality, i guess i am just too used to a show stopper and thats why i am left feeling underwhelmed. i do know that expectation is a little unrealistic though, which is why i made sure to say in my opinion a couple times. i totally understand if other people feel differently.dvader654

I am with Carnage, i think there was a hige list of high quality games shown. I look at the list of games I want to play this fall and its way too long. The thing is was there really anything we have not seen before, not really. Thats probably why some feel so down on E3 cause there were no surprises, nothing that really pushes the boundaries of gaming. Still plenty of quality games shown.

no dont get me wrong, i do not think that the games at e3 sucked or anything. i thought there was good stuff but most of what i saw was known titles and there just wasnt a show stealer. not to mention the whole thing being toned down. its just adjustment for me personally. E3 used to be really spectacular. not that i blame the organizers at all, they were not getting their money's worth out of the investment.

Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.MarcusAntonius

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"] Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.rragnaar

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

Its not like I'm anti-Sony or anything, but what really tightens my jaws is the short memories gamers seem to have. What? A third-rate developer puts out some flashy videos that were proceeded a year back by a fake trailer and now Guerrilla Games is an elite developer and suddenly KZ2 is a highly anticipated follow up? What a load of horse ****. Dennis Dyack only wishes he could fleece gamers like that. KZ2 may actually turn out well, it might not, but one thing is true, Guerrilla deserves the detriment of the doubt until they prove themselves otherwise.

The first Resistance was an average game at best, but R2 sure has more of a leg to stand on that KZ2.

[QUOTE="rragnaar"]

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"] Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.MarcusAntonius

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

Its not like I'm anti-Sony or anything, but what really tightens my jaws is the short memories gamers seem to have. What? A third-rate developer puts out some flashy videos that were proceeded a year back by a fake trailer and now Guerrilla Games is an elite developer and suddenly KZ2 is a highly anticipated follow up? What a load of horse ****. Dennis Dyack only wishes he could fleece gamers like that. KZ2 may actually turn out well, it might not, but one thing is true, Guerrilla deserves the detriment of the doubt until they prove themselves otherwise.

The first Resistance was an average game at best, but R2 sure has more of a leg to stand on that KZ2.

While I agree that Killzon was crap, I've actually been impressed by the gameplay videos I've seen from KZ2. It might end up being nothing more than a graphics showpiece, and that will be disappointing, but I like what I've seen so far from the actual game.

I have a feeling that if the game turns out good it will have more to do with Sony throwing money and programmers at it than any inherent skill on Guerilla's part. Sony knows they screwed up at E3 05, and I suspect they know that KZ2 has to be good or else. Or else what, you ask? I don't know, but it won't be pretty.

Rigged.. PS3 had a way better conference, what a joke.amekhov

Other than Sony all but losing their identity sure, they were tops all right. After all, the X360 all but officially being the new home to the RPG genre is just so minor you know.

[QUOTE="rragnaar"]

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"] Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.MarcusAntonius

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

Its not like I'm anti-Sony or anything, but what really tightens my jaws is the short memories gamers seem to have. What? A third-rate developer puts out some flashy videos that were proceeded a year back by a fake trailer and now Guerrilla Games is an elite developer and suddenly KZ2 is a highly anticipated follow up? What a load of horse ****. Dennis Dyack only wishes he could fleece gamers like that. KZ2 may actually turn out well, it might not, but one thing is true, Guerrilla deserves the detriment of the doubt until they prove themselves otherwise.

The first Resistance was an average game at best, but R2 sure has more of a leg to stand on that KZ2.

Like I said before, Liberation wasn't an fps, but it was a quality shooter with strong gameplay/level design. Its quality gameplay puts it above Dennis Dyack's last three games (since Kain, its all been downhill and I speak as a onetime fan who actually bought a GC because of Eternal Darkness). Last but not least, Guerilla's been offering hands-on for KZ2, so people are hardly relying of CG.

The first Killzone was sewage as was Nam 67 (which hit a few months before on the Xbox and confirmed in my mind that KZ1 would be sewage) but Guerilla has improved since those games. Whether or not KZ2 will be the best or among the best in a hypercompetitive market remains to be seen, but I've little doubt it will be a quality game.

[QUOTE="rragnaar"]

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"] Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.MarcusAntonius

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

Its not like I'm anti-Sony or anything, but what really tightens my jaws is the short memories gamers seem to have. What? A third-rate developer puts out some flashy videos that were proceeded a year back by a fake trailer and now Guerrilla Games is an elite developer and suddenly KZ2 is a highly anticipated follow up? What a load of horse ****. Dennis Dyack only wishes he could fleece gamers like that. KZ2 may actually turn out well, it might not, but one thing is true, Guerrilla deserves the detriment of the doubt until they prove themselves otherwise.

The first Resistance was an average game at best, but R2 sure has more of a leg to stand on that KZ2.

So you played KZ1 and Nam 67, good, talk about how bad they were all you want. But you havent played R2 and KZ2 while Gametrailers have. it doesnt matter how bad Gurreilla's last games were because people have PLAYED the new one and it's impressed them. You haven't, you've just seen videos and played the original. Forgive me for thinking that sequels can be an improvement over the original. :|

Now with R2, it did have an unimpressive showing, but like with Heavy Rain, RE5, Fallout 3 etc. more R2 stuff was shown behind closed doors and THAT convinced them R2 was the best FPS at E3. Again we didnt see it, but that's why the reporters were there.

i wont dismiss KZ2 but i kind of agree with marcus in that we shouldn't be giving someone who flopped so miserably before the benefit of the doubt. if the game is awesome i will be pleasantly surprised. i wont get excited for killzone and then want to vomit yet again.

on the other hand i really dont think sony has lost their identity at all. look at where the 360 was at the same amount of time after its release. it's an odd transition for everyone with the loss of 3rd party exclusives driving the platforms.

microsoft is just throwing money at everyone. sony needs to step up its first and second party offerings in a hurry in order to keep up. the good thing out of these power shifts is that they result in more heated competition.

Its gametrailers they are good for videos and nothing else they are too much of a console heavy site and the community aren't well as civil as us here on gamespot.

When they have these awards they are to predicable and aren't very into new ideas as they like old annoying franchises and that Screwattack who are also annoying Aging console playing loud mouth frat boys who don't know how to grow proper facial hair as they grew that mustache wrong they just made a weird handlebar than the one they wanted. They are like the fox news of the gaming industry

They don't seem to play games more than once since they bad mouth any pc game or any game that dosen't have multilayer they think Brits and anyone from any country in Europe like they could find where any of those country are even if they had stereotypes of the world atlus are all morons and anti-American, because we aren't American and don't want any American culture taking over our own like eating sausage wrapped in a chocolate chip pancakes, suing each other over the littlest thing and shooting each other sorry i may have wondered off the pint but Gametrailers seem like that to me as if they are ill educated people that gives America a bad name..

I apologise if i may have wondered off the point or offended anyone with the remarks i may have made i know not all Americans are all fat, lazy and stupid gunnuts thats just a stereotype and few have made for you as you have for us but it gets under my skin in the way they let their community get away with some of thing they say.

i wont dismiss KZ2 but i kind of agree with marcus in that we shouldn't be giving someone who flopped so miserably before the benefit of the doubt. if the game is awesome i will be pleasantly surprised. i wont get excited for killzone and then want to vomit yet again.

on the other hand i really dont think sony has lost their identity at all. look at where the 360 was at the same amount of time after its release. it's an odd transition for everyone with the loss of 3rd party exclusives driving the platforms.

microsoft is just throwing money at everyone. sony needs to step up its first and second party offerings in a hurry in order to keep up. the good thing out of these power shifts is that they result in more heated competition.

OneWingedAngeI

Well, they did play it right, and if it played great, I dont think you should dismiss a game because of the past iterations, thats not fair to the developers. They are not giving it GOTY, they are saying it had the best w/e it got at the show. Every game should be looked at seperately and without prejudice.

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"][QUOTE="rragnaar"]

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"] Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.S0lidSnake

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

Its not like I'm anti-Sony or anything, but what really tightens my jaws is the short memories gamers seem to have. What? A third-rate developer puts out some flashy videos that were proceeded a year back by a fake trailer and now Guerrilla Games is an elite developer and suddenly KZ2 is a highly anticipated follow up? What a load of horse ****. Dennis Dyack only wishes he could fleece gamers like that. KZ2 may actually turn out well, it might not, but one thing is true, Guerrilla deserves the detriment of the doubt until they prove themselves otherwise.

The first Resistance was an average game at best, but R2 sure has more of a leg to stand on that KZ2.

So you played KZ1 and Nam 67, good, talk about how bad they were all you want. But you havent played R2 and KZ2 while Gametrailers have. it doesnt matter how bad Gurreilla's last games were because people have PLAYED the new one and it's impressed them. You haven't, you've just seen videos and played the original. Forgive me for thinking that sequels can be an improvement over the original. :|

Now with R2, it did have an unimpressive showing, but like with Heavy Rain, RE5, Fallout 3 etc. more R2 stuff was shown behind closed doors and THAT convinced them R2 was the best FPS at E3. Again we didnt see it, but that's why the reporters were there.

There goes my point, you missed it. Reread my post and you just might catch on.

[QUOTE="S0lidSnake"][QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"][QUOTE="rragnaar"]

[QUOTE="MarcusAntonius"] Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible.MarcusAntonius

I thought Killzone Liberation was far from terrible, so what's your number?:P

Kidding. I see your point though. The first Killzone wasn't that good, so I understand why people are skeptical, and Resistance 2 had a lousy showing at E3.

Its not like I'm anti-Sony or anything, but what really tightens my jaws is the short memories gamers seem to have. What? A third-rate developer puts out some flashy videos that were proceeded a year back by a fake trailer and now Guerrilla Games is an elite developer and suddenly KZ2 is a highly anticipated follow up? What a load of horse ****. Dennis Dyack only wishes he could fleece gamers like that. KZ2 may actually turn out well, it might not, but one thing is true, Guerrilla deserves the detriment of the doubt until they prove themselves otherwise.

The first Resistance was an average game at best, but R2 sure has more of a leg to stand on that KZ2.

So you played KZ1 and Nam 67, good, talk about how bad they were all you want. But you havent played R2 and KZ2 while Gametrailers have. it doesnt matter how bad Gurreilla's last games were because people have PLAYED the new one and it's impressed them. You haven't, you've just seen videos and played the original. Forgive me for thinking that sequels can be an improvement over the original. :|

Now with R2, it did have an unimpressive showing, but like with Heavy Rain, RE5, Fallout 3 etc. more R2 stuff was shown behind closed doors and THAT convinced them R2 was the best FPS at E3. Again we didnt see it, but that's why the reporters were there.

There goes my point, you missed it. Reread my post and you just might catch on.

My post was more in response to what you wrote earlier :

"The FPS list was clearly put together by a rabid Sony fanboy. Killzone 2 and Resistance 2 over Project Origin? What a joke. Call me when Guerilla puts out a game that isn't terrible. They don't even compare to Monolith."

I think they nominated Project Origin for best FPS, they just happened to enjoy R2 more.

Killzone 2 won the award for Best Graphics, and I dont know about you but us "gamers" are just as skeptical about the gameplay, it's the graphics we're going nuts over. The art style, animation, the lighting, the character models and the blur effect make the more CG like than any-other game out there. Crysis Warhead might be the best looking game at E3, but nothing looks like Killzone 2. Still, and you can choose to not believe me, but us Killzone 2 fans do have reservations about the gameplay and that's why we dissect each and every single vid looking at AI routines, level design and whatnot. No one is sold over Killzone 2 yet, we're just amazed at how good it looks. and so is gametrailers.

[QUOTE="OneWingedAngeI"]

i wont dismiss KZ2 but i kind of agree with marcus in that we shouldn't be giving someone who flopped so miserably before the benefit of the doubt. if the game is awesome i will be pleasantly surprised. i wont get excited for killzone and then want to vomit yet again.

on the other hand i really dont think sony has lost their identity at all. look at where the 360 was at the same amount of time after its release. it's an odd transition for everyone with the loss of 3rd party exclusives driving the platforms.

microsoft is just throwing money at everyone. sony needs to step up its first and second party offerings in a hurry in order to keep up. the good thing out of these power shifts is that they result in more heated competition.

F1Lengend

Well, they did play it right, and if it played great, I dont think you should dismiss a game because of the past iterations, thats not fair to the developers. They are not giving it GOTY, they are saying it had the best w/e it got at the show. Every game should be looked at seperately and without prejudice.

im not dismissing it, i just wont give it a real opinion until either i play it, or i hear enough user impressions. i wont get excited about it basically.