Halo Wars: are you surprised by gamespot's review?

  • 108 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#101 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

Am I surprised? Yes. Do I think the reviewer wrote a fair review? No.

Metacritic - 82 (as you can see, Gamespot gave it the lowest score so far.)

xsubtownerx
Someone has to get the lowest score, GS just so happens to be the one to get it for this game. I don't get the whole "this was an unfair review because it wasn't up there with the rest of them" argument either. I mean, what's the point in having reviews from multiple sources if they are all going to be the same?
Avatar image for EmptySki
EmptySki

3743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#102 EmptySki
Member since 2004 • 3743 Posts
I thought the controls for Halo Wars was actually pretty good for a home console RTS, but the game seemed shallow. I don't think I will buy the game.
Avatar image for wizdom
wizdom

10111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#103 wizdom
Member since 2003 • 10111 Posts
I personally didn't expect it to score above a 8, Shocked? A little, especially after reading the review of the game which hammers it for not being as complex as something in the PC strategy world (This wouldn't work on console), I find the review to be a little to harsh overall, but ohh well..
Avatar image for silentmage_245
silentmage_245

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 silentmage_245
Member since 2008 • 378 Posts
Yes I am surprised! What's wrong Ensemble? Maybe the news of the closure struck Ensemble to make bad games...
Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#105 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]

Am I surprised? Yes. Do I think the reviewer wrote a fair review? No.

Metacritic - 82 (as you can see, Gamespot gave it the lowest score so far.)

smokeydabear076
Someone has to get the lowest score, GS just so happens to be the one to get it for this game. I don't get the whole "this was an unfair review because it wasn't up there with the rest of them" argument either. I mean, what's the point in having reviews from multiple sources if they are all going to be the same?

His review states the pros and cons that all the other reviewers gave. Why did he score it so low? He doesn't mention exactly what he's comparing Halo Wars to, which leaves his review very questionable. How did he come up with a "6.5" score? I mean that score is way bellow the average that you can't help but wonder what he was basing him self on. Being bellow average is one thing, but being well bellow average is another..
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"]

Am I surprised? Yes. Do I think the reviewer wrote a fair review? No.

Metacritic - 82 (as you can see, Gamespot gave it the lowest score so far.)

xsubtownerx
Someone has to get the lowest score, GS just so happens to be the one to get it for this game. I don't get the whole "this was an unfair review because it wasn't up there with the rest of them" argument either. I mean, what's the point in having reviews from multiple sources if they are all going to be the same?

His review states the pros and cons that all the other reviewers gave. Why did he score it so low? He doesn't mention exactly what he's comparing Halo Wars to, which leaves his review very questionable. How did he come up with a "6.5" score? I mean that score is way bellow the average that you can't help but wonder what he was basing him self on. Being bellow average is one thing, but being well bellow average is another..

Maybe he thought the pros and cons of the game made it mediocre instead of "great" like the other reviewers.
Avatar image for HiResDes
HiResDes

5919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 HiResDes
Member since 2004 • 5919 Posts
[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]Someone has to get the lowest score, GS just so happens to be the one to get it for this game. I don't get the whole "this was an unfair review because it wasn't up there with the rest of them" argument either. I mean, what's the point in having reviews from multiple sources if they are all going to be the same?smokeydabear076
His review states the pros and cons that all the other reviewers gave. Why did he score it so low? He doesn't mention exactly what he's comparing Halo Wars to, which leaves his review very questionable. How did he come up with a "6.5" score? I mean that score is way bellow the average that you can't help but wonder what he was basing him self on. Being bellow average is one thing, but being well bellow average is another..

Maybe he thought the pros and cons of the game made it mediocre instead of "great" like the other reviewers.

Bingo!

Avatar image for GwannaSauna
GwannaSauna

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 GwannaSauna
Member since 2008 • 583 Posts
I just saw the score. I think it got what it deserved. Back when I actually liked Halo, I thought Halo Wars wasn't a bad idea, but now I know that the Halo series has no spot in the RTS genre. Plus it was on a console. Had they moved (ported) it to PC, I think it would've gotten a higher score.