Poll Is Gamespot as relevant as it once was? (79 votes)
Let's wind the clock back 7-10 years ago; that time-frame, and how relevant Game-Spot was in the Gaming world, compared to now.
Is Game-Spot as relevant as it once was?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Let's wind the clock back 7-10 years ago; that time-frame, and how relevant Game-Spot was in the Gaming world, compared to now.
Is Game-Spot as relevant as it once was?
Gamespot is the joke of gaming sites, they decided to go for bait click articles and reviews with joke reviewers like tom mcshea and carolyn that had to push her feminism and pro lgbt agenda in everything. They aren't here anymore but the damage is done.
I can't believe people are still on the Carolyn thing. It was a legit criticism at a game that is lauded as being satirical. So when it does satire poorly, it's important to point out.
and i can't believe there are people that still defend her bs, for example giving gone home a 9.5, and indie 2h game with hardly any gameplay just because it was a lesbian story, and there are other examples, gta v was just the higher profile game. And yes, i do find highly moronic to focus solely on feminism when the game is a satire about everything, males on the game are also portrayed as garbage yet you don't see her even mention it, because it's not man or woman, is everything that is portrayed as a satire.
The thing is that there are efforts to make the player sympathize with at least Franklin and Michael to a certain extent. They all get a lot of development while most of the women are insufferable bitches. And the fact that the game doesn't do satire very well doesn't help matters. So it's a completely legitimate criticism to say that its portrayal of women is problematic. There was maybe one female in the game who wasn't annoying and I can't even remember her name right now. And as far as Gone Home goes, I haven't played it myself, but she thought that the game achieved what it set out to do very well. They're two very different games with different goals. I personally agree that giving a two hour game with little actual gameplay a 9.5 is silly, but I also found Journey to be visually interesting and nothing more.
gta v on ign was reviewed by a woman and she didn't find it offensive because she had the maturity to understand the whole game as satire, now if it was only gta v i would say, ok she find it offensive, let's move on, but i remember reading several articles and reviews made by her where she made a big point of her feminism bullshit, to the point i stopped bothering reading anything by her. I say political point of views have no place in game reviews, even then if someone makes a mistake once in a while it's ok, but to try and make it a big deal in everything, no, just no.
So I'm just wondering, because a female reviewer of GTAV didn't say anything about it, that makes it true? Especially considering she works in a male dominated industry?
Yes it makes it true, because i also played it, and i understood also it was a satire, only overzealous dumb feminists would whine about it and then ignore the 99% else that is offensive. If you find the portrayal of women offensive but ignore everything else you are just a hypocrite in my books, the kind that takes something out of context to prove a point.
@AFBrat77: Exactly. Greg Kasavin was a legend. When he left (and Jeff was fired) everything went straight to hell. The personalities and quality of writing from the 90's to mid 2000's was great. None of the guys who supplanted them were as good. Chris, Tom, Sean, Maxwell, Carolyn, etc., never had the same synergy. Remember Rich Gallup? Best host ever. I used to watch 'On the Spot' every week just for the banter and entertainment --even if they were just showing some crap game. It was fun to watch. I liked how review headlines for games used to be on the main page, along with the score and reviewers name. I liked how easy it was to contact fellow members and friends. I liked the "Ask Gamespot" thread in the forums, and being able to communicate directly with the staff. Greg Kasavin actually pm'ed me in response to a few questions I had in the past. You don't have any of that now. Kevin Van Ord is the only good reviewer left. This site is certainly dying. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if CBS decides to shutter it and move the few good people (Kevin, Danny) over to Giant Bomb. Everyone responsible for the site redesign should definitely be fired.
IGN is obviously the biggest with Kotaku coming in a second place. Everyone else are irrelevant since these days is all about youtubers. And the reason IGN is so big is because they branched to movies, comics, electronics and so on. Meanwhile Kotaku are big because people fall for their incessant click-bait and made-up rumors. The real heroes of game journalism are the relatively new small sites like Dualshockers. Which forums like Neogaf ironically hate because of their rumors whilst having Kotaku on a pedestal.
I thought GameSpot was bigger than Kotaku?
IGN is obviously the biggest with Kotaku coming in a second place. Everyone else are irrelevant since these days is all about youtubers. And the reason IGN is so big is because they branched to movies, comics, electronics and so on. Meanwhile Kotaku are big because people fall for their incessant click-bait and made-up rumors. The real heroes of game journalism are the relatively new small sites like Dualshockers. Which forums like Neogaf ironically hate because of their rumors whilst having Kotaku on a pedestal.
I thought GameSpot was bigger than Kotaku?
IGN is the biggest and then comes Gamespot, i believe polygon is third
IGN is obviously the biggest with Kotaku coming in a second place. Everyone else are irrelevant since these days is all about youtubers. And the reason IGN is so big is because they branched to movies, comics, electronics and so on. Meanwhile Kotaku are big because people fall for their incessant click-bait and made-up rumors. The real heroes of game journalism are the relatively new small sites like Dualshockers. Which forums like Neogaf ironically hate because of their rumors whilst having Kotaku on a pedestal.
I thought GameSpot was bigger than Kotaku?
The old GS maybe, but this newer version is all but a ghost town on most of the forums.
At least Gamespot still sticks to its namesake, and reports mostly about games. IGN is mixes in far too much comic culture, comic movie culture, movie culture, HBO content, Hollywood gossip and so on. If Gamespot started doing that, then I would say that's it's less relevant, but until then I will say that it's relevance is steady.
Everyone responsible for the site redesign should definitely be fired.
This. They broke something that didn't need to be fixed (or however that saying goes). Redesign was/is awful and so many great features and user created content just disappeared. The forums and community here used to be pretty interesting but now seemingly have devolved into some clown posting about how much he hates Dark Souls in every single forum topic anyone creates. I still come here every now and then but I don't interact really at all with the community here anymore. I still enjoy Kevin's reviews but this site isn't the one-stop shop it used to be for me, gaming content wise. It's a shame.
Ya who ever managed the redesign of the site needs to be fired. Any coders still working on the text section of the forum and it's options like link, img, video also need to be fired as they keep going updating them to non functioning versions or change them outright to something that just doesn't work.
Essentially. Who ever the **** they hired to manage and create/do their website is horrible at what they do and needs to be fired.
Reminds me so much of gametrailers.com. Had an awesome site with a huge forum, then they hired someone to redo their site. Took everything everyone loved about it away, and changed it to something that barely functioned and a shadow of it's former self in capability and user demand. Losing almost all it's community in the process Exact shit is happening here. I'd laugh my ass off if it was the same company hired to do the gametrailers redesign as the gamespot.
IGN is obviously the biggest with Kotaku coming in a second place. Everyone else are irrelevant since these days is all about youtubers. And the reason IGN is so big is because they branched to movies, comics, electronics and so on. Meanwhile Kotaku are big because people fall for their incessant click-bait and made-up rumors. The real heroes of game journalism are the relatively new small sites like Dualshockers. Which forums like Neogaf ironically hate because of their rumors whilst having Kotaku on a pedestal.
I thought GameSpot was bigger than Kotaku?
No, Kotaku is much bigger than Gamespot.
Also no Ride polygon is not 3rd in anything, Polygon is nr. 2032 where IGN is ranked among the top 280 sites globally Kotaku and Gamespot is top 1000.
Polygon is also mostly known in the us where there is a bigger market for that kind of liberal minded propaganda. And to the few europeans who for some strange reasons think Gamersgate is interesting.
@Jacanuk: Can you provide evidence that Kotaku is bigger than GS?
Note: I'm not denying what you say. I'm just curious. Thanks.
@Jacanuk: Can you provide evidence that Kotaku is bigger than GS?
Note: I'm not denying what you say. I'm just curious. Thanks.
Sure
Gamespot.com - Global Rank 869 - Rank in United States465
From Alexa Website rankings. and its based on webtraffic from unique visitors.
Oh, and just for laughs
Polygon - Global Rank 2,032 Rank in United States852
And IGN Global Rank 274 Rank in United States115
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment