Medal of Honor: To Be the Taliban or Not

  • 84 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#51 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

I really don't care. You can play as terrorists in scrappy clothes in other games, EA is just naming them.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Sure, first thing i will do is go in mp as a taliban and kill Us soldiers ......HAR HAR HAR HAR.
Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
i always tend to play as a Taliban in the multiplayer. They've got better weapons.
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
I do find it kinda laughable. There are several games where you, in multiplayer, can be on the "terrorist" team. But as soon as that "terrorist" team is named Taliban, then everything is wrong. As for that " On but I don't want to shoot on US troops" comments, I bet that goes right out the window when you play multiplayer in a WW2 themed game and you're on the Axis team.
Avatar image for Ish_basic
Ish_basic

5051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Ish_basic
Member since 2002 • 5051 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

[QUOTE="reason58"] Are you arguing that the Taliban are completely wrong in wanting the United States to stop interfering with Middle Eastern governments? Or are you arguing that the US has not, in fact, ever interfered with those governments?shadow13702

The Taliban telling the US to stop interfering in Middle Eastern government is like Hitler telling the US to stop interfering in European government. Read the article at the link I just posted. You might learn something.

And why should the U.S interfer with the Middle east? (other than Palestine ofc). You kept stating that the Taliban is evil but if the U.S didn't do anything there wouldn't be a problem at all. And Btw wouldn't it save more life than it cause if we ignore the middle east? If nuking Japan was nesscary then shouldn't ignoring it be nesscary as well?

(Btw I live in the U.S so hope this doesn't make me sound anti patriot)

We've been involved in middle eastern politics long before current events became current events. But it's not just us; It's the entirety of western civilization. The very country of Iraq was created by the British at the behest of the League of Nations. And in hindsight that was a terrible idea...they were just kind of parceling off land without respect to who lived there and ended up lumping together a bunch of people that hate each other. The only person that was ever able to control that region was Saddam - the British were never able to. Why we thought we would be, i don't know.

While the reasons for our involvement over there have changed over the years, lately it's mostly about our energy dependence and how much oil that region has that for the past 50 or 60 years has led to foreign policy designed to prop up whoever happened to be in power in the countries of this region. And these guys we've been supporting are in many cases little better than feudal lords. Now we've got a lot of western operated businesses with western employees living in those regions securing oil for our future (just look at the Saudi Arabia little league team in the World Series - all Americans). We're involved in this region until we find a better way to meet our energy needs, and saying that we should just ignore what goes on in the area is naive.

The Taliban on the otherhand - that's purely about 9/11, not because they're bad people or because of energy concerns. We let bad things happen all the time in various nations across the world. We don't crush evil when it rears its head, we typicallyonly crush evil when it looks in our direction. The Taliban are thoroughly unlikeable people with what are quite simply inferior values (and if you think that's arrogant, tell me how a civilization that treats its women the way they do is any way equal to our own). When the Taliban came to power, they went around destroying all the Buddha statues with tanks - who does that? What did Buddhists ever do to anyone else other than set their own selves on fire? That being said - I don't really have any issue playing as the Taliban in MoH, because it's only multiplayer - there is no reality or context in mp. Like the OP said, it's just red vs blue. Had no problem killing US troops as Russians in BC2, either. Didn't even think about it that way, really.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#56 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I hope you're not trying to suggest that the Taliban actually has its own legitimate points. The Taliban is pure evil.

Metal_Mario99


"Evil" is entirely subjective. I don't agree with what they are doing, or the methods they are using to achieve their goals... but they are part of the conflict, and should be depicted non-biased manner.

And this is just like the situation with World War II. Not all German soldiers were Nazis, many disagreed with Hitler's political regime, and were only fighting against the Allies because they were defending their country. The majority of these Taliban fighters are just puppets for those doing all the talking. They are being brainwashed into doing these awful things, so the higher ups don't have to. If anything, they are victims as well, and are being demonized for the actions of their superiors.

I don't see what is inherently "wrong" with depicting the conflict how it actually exists. You never gave one reason as to why you think it is.

Avatar image for acsam12304
acsam12304

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57 acsam12304
Member since 2005 • 3387 Posts

i got a chance to play ont eh Beta. i was on both sides. doesnt matter what side you are at the end you are playing to win the round.

people always want to have a shot in the media and get there 15 min of fame

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

And this is just like the situation with World War II. Not all German soldiers were Nazis, many disagreed with Hitler's political regime, and were only fighting against the Allies because they were defending their country. The majority of these Taliban fighters are just puppets for those doing all the talking. They are being brainwashed into doing these awful things, so the higher ups don't have to. If anything, they are victims as well, and are being demonized for the actions of their superiors.foxhound_fox

Hey, if thinking of our enemies as victims helps you sleep better at night, who am I to burst your bubble?

Avatar image for acsam12304
acsam12304

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 acsam12304
Member since 2005 • 3387 Posts

people that are saying thi is not a good game because you play as the enemy.

uhh yeah theres A LOT of soldiers that want to play this game and they went to right over the past years

Avatar image for FeedOnATreeFrog
FeedOnATreeFrog

792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 FeedOnATreeFrog
Member since 2009 • 792 Posts

dog eat dog world.


US wants Oil.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#61 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Hey, if thinking of our enemies as victims helps you sleep better at night, who am I to burst your bubble?

Metal_Mario99


I guess you also think the death penalty is the greatest thing to ever grace the "justice" system and don't believe in second chances or mental illness?

You still haven't answered my question... why do you think its inherently "wrong" to depict both sides of the conflict?

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#62 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

"Good" and "evil" are subjective terms deeply rooted in christianity, and they have little to no value in a rational context. In short: if you have personal problems with playing as the Taliban that's perfectly fine and you can avoid the game at will, but to say this should be banned or boycotted because it is 'wrong' or 'evil' is a completely laughable stance.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#64 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45477 Posts
Nazi's were worse and nobody ever complains these days when you can play them in video games.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#65 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

What I find disturbing is that you (and others like you) seem to believe that the Taliban and their ilk actually have a legitimate stance. If this wwere the 1930s, you'd be among those defending Hitler After all, it's ignorant and narrow-minded to assume that someone is wrong just because they're doing evil things that are diametrically opposed to your values system, right? Hitler was only trying to do what he thought was best for his country, right?
Metal_Mario99


What makes it illegitimate... because you say so? From their perspective, what they are doing is right, and what we are doing is wrong.

But we might as well end it right here, because I'm not about to bother debating with a nihilist who puts words like "justice" and "wrong" in quotation marks.

Oh, and by the way, the Taliban jerks off to the death penalty like it's a porno.

Metal_Mario99


Funny... I highly value human life and many things that would contradict nihilism at its core. But then again, you don't seem to understand the concept of moral relativism and subjective perspective (or nihilism for that matter), so I'll just you alone now.

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

you don't seem to understand the concept of moral relativismfoxhound_fox

I have a set of morals, and an understanding of the difference between right and wrong. Something that you and your kind lack.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#67 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I have a set of morals, and an understanding of the difference between right and wrong. Something that you and your kind lack.

Metal_Mario99


But that set of morals is not absolute or objective. Go ahead, try and prove they are objective. You still haven't answered my question either...

What about depicting both sides of the conflict equally is inherently "wrong."

And "your kind" is borderline insulting. What are you trying to imply by that?

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

And "your kind" is borderline insulting. What are you trying to imply by that?

foxhound_fox

I thought you said you were finished here.

And I'm implying that you're so enslaved to the whole "nobody's right, everybody's wrong" way of thinking that you wouldn't recognize an evil man if he looked you in the eye and bit your nose off. Moral relativism is what leads to tolerance of immoral acts. Oh, well, the Arabs have a different culture than we do. Who are we to say they're evil just because they behead women for showing their faces in public? After all, we used to have slavery, so we're just as bad, right?

Avatar image for reason58
reason58

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 reason58
Member since 2003 • 355 Posts

His point is that, had you been born 50 years earlier then what you call "absolute" good and evil would be different. Sure, the extremes are easy to get agreement on, such as stoning women to death for showing their face in public. For most of the rest, however, you only hold the opinion you do because of where and when you were born.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#70 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

And I'm implying that you're so enslaved to the whole "nobody's right, everybody's wrong" way of thinking that you wouldn't recognize an evil man if he looked you in the eye and bit your nose off. Moral relativism is what leads to tolerance of immoral acts. Oh, well, the Arabs have a different culture than we do. Who are we to say they're evil just because they behead women for showing their faces in public? After all, we used to have slavery, so we're just as bad, right?

Metal_Mario99


I lol'd. Actually, my stance is "nobody is wrong, everybody is right." But then again, I didn't think you'd notice that given your complete misunderstanding not only of moral relativism, but nihilism.

Moral relativism is what keeps us moral. It allows us to tolerate one another's points of views. The reason why the Taliban are doing these things is because they think their moral positions are objective and absolute, and can't accept that other people might have a different perspective than them. That's the reason why so many people on this planet fight wars... its because they can't accept another person's point of view, and feel defending their position with their life is a must.

I never said they weren't doing bad things (show me where I did; all I ever said is that the lower ones doing the bad things are merely puppets of their masters, being brainwashed into doing these things), you are just completely misrepresenting my arguments and creating massive strawmans. On top of that, you have avoided my question about five times now...

What is inherently wrong with depicting both sides of the conflict on an equal basis? Also, what makes morality objective or absolute? Can you prove that absolutely evil and absolutely good actions truly exist? Answer me these questions and I will concede... but since you clearly have no interest in that, and are merely trying to egg me on into an ad hominem debate with strawmans galore, I don't expect you to ever answer them.

Avatar image for Metal_Mario99
Metal_Mario99

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Metal_Mario99
Member since 2005 • 1426 Posts

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]And I'm implying that you're so enslaved to the whole "nobody's right, everybody's wrong" way of thinking that you wouldn't recognize an evil man if he looked you in the eye and bit your nose off. Moral relativism is what leads to tolerance of immoral acts. Oh, well, the Arabs have a different culture than we do. Who are we to say they're evil just because they behead women for showing their faces in public? After all, we used to have slavery, so we're just as bad, right?

foxhound_fox


I lol'd. Actually, my stance is "nobody is wrong, everybody is right." But then again, I didn't think you'd notice that given your complete misunderstanding not only of moral relativism, but nihilism.

Moral relativism is what keeps us moral. It allows us to tolerate one another's points of views. The reason why the Taliban are doing these things is because they think their moral positions are objective and absolute, and can't accept that other people might have a different perspective than them. That's the reason why so many people on this planet fight wars... its because they can't accept another person's point of view, and feel defending their position with their life is a must.

I never said they weren't doing bad things (show me where I did; all I ever said is that the lower ones doing the bad things are merely puppets of their masters, being brainwashed into doing these things), you are just completely misrepresenting my arguments and creating massive strawmans. On top of that, you have avoided my question about five times now...

What is inherently wrong with depicting both sides of the conflict on an equal basis? Also, what makes morality objective or absolute? Can you prove that absolutely evil and absolutely good actions truly exist? Answer me these questions and I will concede... but since you clearly have no interest in that, and are merely trying to egg me on into an ad hominem debate with strawmans galore, I don't expect you to ever answer them.

1. "Nobody is wrong, everybody is right" is exactly the kind of ignorant blindness that I'm talking about. You don't acknowledge that there's any difference between right and wrong. To you, everybody's right, no matter what they do. Morality is just a matter of opinion. The Holocaust wasn't wrong, the 9/11 attacks weren't wrong, oppressive dictatorship isn't wrong.

2. Moral relativism doesn't keep us moral. It degrades our sense of right and wrong. You're a perfect example, as your embrace of moral relativism seems to have completely eroded any distinction between right and wrong in your mind. If there's no such thing as right or wrong, where does the line get drawn? Cannibalism? Genocide? Rape and murder? Everybody's got a different point of view, right? How much atrocity and abomination are we expected to tolerate?

3. Never mind you're making a wide, sweeping assumption that every Muslim who does a bad thing is a victim of brainwashing. Let's just focus on the fact that you seem to acknowledge, at least, that what the Taliban does is bad. If you didn't think so, you wouldn't be rushing to defend the people it uses.

4. I already answered your damn question when I said that the notion that the Taliban even has a legitimate "side" is abominable. Representation of the Taliban's sick, sadistic, insane "side" of this conflict is about as necessary as representation for Hitler's side of WWII.

5. God is what makes morality absolute. But, since you're clearly an atheist, I don't expect you to be able to comprehend that.

Avatar image for reason58
reason58

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 reason58
Member since 2003 • 355 Posts

5. God is what makes morality absolute. But, since you're clearly an atheist, I don't expect you to be able to comprehend that.

Metal_Mario99

Aaaaand there it is. I was waiting for this. By "god", of course, you mean a book written by humans.

You know, "their" god makes their morals absolute too. Interesting how that works, huh?

Avatar image for Ravirr
Ravirr

7931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#73 Ravirr
Member since 2004 • 7931 Posts

Lol foxfound just got trolled

Avatar image for EvilTaru
EvilTaru

58395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 EvilTaru
Member since 2002 • 58395 Posts

I guess I could play as a Taliban as long as I can team kill everyone on my Taliban team then commit suicide every single game.

Avatar image for face_ripper
face_ripper

968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 face_ripper
Member since 2010 • 968 Posts
[QUOTE="reason58"]

[QUOTE="Metal_Mario99"]

I hope you're not trying to suggest that the Taliban actually has its own legitimate points. The Taliban is pure evil.

You think the United States is 100% "correct" and the Taliban is 100% wrong, eh?

That's what ot seems like, I belive Taliban is 100% right, i'd love to play as Taliban to defend my home against the invaders. P.S: Yes the invaders are the USA...
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#76 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

1. "Nobody is wrong, everybody is right" is exactly the kind of ignorant blindness that I'm talking about. You don't acknowledge that there's any difference between right and wrong. To you, everybody's right, no matter what they do. Morality is just a matter of opinion. The Holocaust wasn't wrong, the 9/11 attacks weren't wrong, oppressive dictatorship isn't wrong.

2. Moral relativism doesn't keep us moral. It degrades our sense of right and wrong. You're a perfect example, as your embrace of moral relativism seems to have completely eroded any distinction between right and wrong in your mind. If there's no such thing as right or wrong, where does the line get drawn? Cannibalism? Genocide? Rape and murder? Everybody's got a different point of view, right? How much atrocity and abomination are we expected to tolerate?

3. Never mind you're making a wide, sweeping assumption that every Muslim who does a bad thing is a victim of brainwashing. Let's just focus on the fact that you seem to acknowledge, at least, that what the Taliban does is bad. If you didn't think so, you wouldn't be rushing to defend the people it uses.

4. I already answered your damn question when I said that the notion that the Taliban even has a legitimate "side" is abominable. Representation of the Taliban's sick, sadistic, insane "side" of this conflict is about as necessary as representation for Hitler's side of WWII.

5. God is what makes morality absolute. But, since you're clearly an atheist, I don't expect you to be able to comprehend that.

Metal_Mario99


1. No need for ad hominem attacks here. This is a debate, not a shouting match. And you, once again, seem to completely misunderstand my position and that of moral relativism. I never said those things. Strawman.

2. Strawman. We have inherent rights, such as the right to life and liberty. If something someone does infringes upon those rights, I have the right to defend them and myself, or have someone defend them for me (such as the police, or law system). I don't infringe on the rights of others out of respect for THEIR rights to life and liberty. Again, you fail.

3. Prove they aren't all victims of brainwashing. Prove anyone who does something "bad" isn't a victim of a mental illness.

4. That wasn't the question. What. Is. Inherently. Wrong. About. Depicting. Both. Sides. Of. The. Conflict. Equally. This is the last time I ask the question, as you seem completely uninterested in friendly debate and merely want to exercise your superiority complex over others.

5. Define God. Prove morality is absolute. Prove God exists. I can comprehend God and the idea of him making morality absolute. I'm becoming a religious studies professor and I spend my spare time reading religious texts out of personal interest and have spent the last decade of my life in search of "the truth" (whatever it may be)... but that doesn't mean morality IS absolute.

All I really have to say now is... "prove it." All of it. Prove it all before you post again. Because if you can't, we'll just be circling around to the same points we already covered.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Our children should be taught to support our troops and that the enemy should be killed

MathMattS

So...children should be taught government propaganda in video games designed by private companies...?

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="shadow13702"]

[QUOTE="Vader993"]

no one is evil,its all about point of view,in reality there nothing more than brainwashed zealots

Metal_Mario99

This is what happens when you watch the news or listen to the press to much :P Just because Bush or someone says the Taliban is evil it doesn't mean they are. Learn to think for yourself

And in what way do you believe the Taliban isn't evil? I'm still waiting to hear that from you nihilistic "moral relativists".

Pure evil is non-existant.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#79 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

[QUOTE="MathMattS"]

Our children should be taught to support our troops and that the enemy should be killed

Pixel-Pirate

So...children should be taught government propaganda in video games designed by private companies...?


Not only that, but propaganda that demonizes the enemy to the point where whatever the government says becomes gospel?

Avatar image for JW-toch
JW-toch

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 JW-toch
Member since 2008 • 344 Posts

This is so hypocrite. You can kill and drive over hundreds of pedestrians in games like GTA IV, and kill loads of innocent people in the singleplayer of Modern Warfare 2 and those games are less controversial than having the option to play as the taliban in Medal of Honor?

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#81 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Why is it okay to kill US Cops but not US soldiers in games?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#82 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Why is it okay to kill US Cops but not US soldiers in games?

Pixel-Pirate


Probably because "cops are bad and always corrupt." Soldiers are "fighting for freedom and never do wrong."

Avatar image for Solid_Snake325
Solid_Snake325

6091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#83 Solid_Snake325
Member since 2006 • 6091 Posts
You can be terrorists in COD online and kill US soldiers. I have no problem doing that so I'd have no problem doing it in MOH.
Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#84 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

i'm picking the game and i can't wait for the single player.