[QUOTE="CarnageHeart"]
[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]
Lame.
Guess that means Microsoft doesn't want my money, since I refuse to buy a Kinect. I'm seriously considering selling my 360 and using the cash to get a PS3 and use that for the remainder of the generation. Only problem is, Sony is so hell-bent on trying to beat Microsoft that they're apt to come out and say "HAY GUYZ, 2011 iz all about MOVE!1"
Guess this could just be the generational passing of the torch, but I can't recall another company flat out stating that they were going to favor one type of gamer over another. Regardless, I've spent an average of about a grand on 360 games each year since launch. If they want to go after another market, they can knock themselves right the f*** out.
Shame-usBlackley
I suspect most of the games you are buying are third party and I don't see whythird parties would be affected by MS's new direction. Also, its worth bearing in mind that like Nintendo this gen, while MS might cease developing new IP, they will almost certainlycontinue supporting popular franchises like Gears, Halo and Fable. In short, I believe that there will be a lot of good stuff out there for you to play in 2011 and 2012.
Actually, Microsoft has spent tons of money via partnerships and 3rd party relations this generation. Just look at the exclusives (some of them timed, some not), and it's not as cut and dried. More importantly, if we look at MS' money pool as a pie that must be divied up, if a larger chunk of the pie goes to Kinect, then that share has to come from somewhere, and that is the core gaming budget.
What if Sony had just phoned it in during the PS2 era and said "Hey, we have Gran Turismo and Ico and so on, let's just keep pumping out sequels to those games and focus on Eyetoy." That would have sucked. We'd have never been able to experience important games like God of War and Shadow of the Colossus. It's not just Gears and Halo and Fable the way I see it. I EXPECT those titles, but I also expect Microsoft to be working on the Next Big Thing as well, and if they are set on making the Next Big Thing into a Kinect game.... well, then they don't want my money. I'm actually very interested to see how this all pans out, truth be told. I personally believe that my value as a consumer for outweighs that of some shmuck (or ten shmucks) who only buys a game a year. Maybe Microsoft can cultivate the casual shmuck into someone who buys as much as I do, but I doubt it. Which means they're being f****** stupid.
What I'm saying is that for Microsoft to shun an established fount of money like the core gamer who buys games every single month, in favor of a much more finicky one with very little history or longevity, is straight-up f***** in the head. My grandmother owns a Wii and has bought exactly ZERO games for it. She has the copy of Wii Sports that came with it, and right now, has no plans to ever buy another. It is, to her, a Wii Sports machine. A good portion of motion gamers are this way.... and that's what baffles me about MS' decision to not just support, but shift, development resources and attention towards Kinect.
Its important to remember that while core gamers buy more games than casual gamers, the gap isn't as vast as the buying habits of guys like you and me (who buy at least a game a month) would indicate. The X360 has the highest attach ratio this gen and last I heard it was only 8.9, which means that most core gamers average roughly 2 games a year (less, because the average is thrown by guys like you).
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/29249/NPD_Microsoft_Attach_Rate_Hits_89_PS3_Supply_Improving.php
*Shrugs* Most console developers prefer making core games and bitter experience with the Wii has taught most publishers that they have no idea of how to reach casuals so as long as core gamers continue to buy games, I don't believe we will suffer from a shortage of great games to play.
Log in to comment