Most memorable piece of crap you've owned.

  • 105 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Second_Rook
Second_Rook

3680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#101 Second_Rook
Member since 2007 • 3680 Posts
[QUOTE="Second_Rook"][QUOTE="savebattery"] I would much, much rather play Pong than Resident Evil 5.savebattery
Yeah, I kind of figured that. Have at 'er bud.

Resident Evil 5 is a bad game, through and through, For all its modern technology it still falls short in terms of gameplay. The enemy AI is terrible, the game is unplayable without a second human (because your ally AI is awful too), the storyline was bad, and it doesn't know what genre it belongs in. If you're going to make it a third person shooter, fine. Just let me walk and shoot at the same time. If you're going to make it a survival horror, that's good too. But actually include survival horror elements and not just fake it. Not to mention the fact that they charged extra for cooperative mutliplayer. Resident Evil 4 was a masterpiece. Resident Evil 5 was a deformed younger cousin.

Yes I've heard a few of those gripes. They are not without merit, but I never play the game alone, so Shiva's stupidity (the most glaring weakness) wasn't a big deal to me. Charged extra for co-op? I was not aware of that, I payed regular retail price and am able to access all features of the game.
Avatar image for Beard_
Beard_

1066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Beard_
Member since 2010 • 1066 Posts

Either Blasto for the PS or Hydlide for the NES.

Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts
[QUOTE="Second_Rook"][QUOTE="savebattery"] I would much, much rather play Pong than Resident Evil 5.savebattery
Yeah, I kind of figured that. Have at 'er bud.

Resident Evil 5 is a bad game, through and through, For all its modern technology it still falls short in terms of gameplay. The enemy AI is terrible, the game is unplayable without a second human (because your ally AI is awful too), the storyline was bad, and it doesn't know what genre it belongs in. If you're going to make it a third person shooter, fine. Just let me walk and shoot at the same time. If you're going to make it a survival horror, that's good too. But actually include survival horror elements and not just fake it. Not to mention the fact that they charged extra for cooperative mutliplayer. Resident Evil 4 was a masterpiece. Resident Evil 5 was a deformed younger cousin.

They charged for versus mode which is fail anyway, co op was free at launch and still is... i wouldn't call it a bad game but it didn't live up to my expectations either.
Avatar image for CooperThief
CooperThief

648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#104 CooperThief
Member since 2009 • 648 Posts

Mario is missing (nes),boring game.

tequilero

oh no......

Avatar image for AverageGamer99
AverageGamer99

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#105 AverageGamer99
Member since 2010 • 177 Posts

NBA the Life version 2, the one with Kobe on it? I expected something way different in the life game mode though it was alright. On the other modes it was pretty pathatic. I mean no charges, barely any fouls, Shot system sucked, dribbles didn't really help dunks were crummy but unrealistic,Season was purely thrown together and couldn't do much.

It was 20 bucks for PS2 but it was never worth it.

Avatar image for Deku7
Deku7

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Deku7
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I'd have to say, Spyro: Enter the Dragonfly. I love the Spyro series, but that game was just awfully bad. Completely messed with all my memories of the amazing PS1 games.