I prefer the look of the original as it's not so small and weightless, but it is tray-loading as opposed to top loading with the slim, so is there any difference in performance/reliability? Thanks
This topic is locked from further discussion.
overall, the slim is the better model, its quieter, more readily available (in good condition or new), and has far, far less hardware issues then the original models (which were known for having various issues reading discs.
My fat PS2 died on me, due to a failure regarding the optical drive. The Slim works just fine and it's very reliable. The one thing I don't like about it though is the way you insert discs. Feels like you are going to break the DVD every time. The fat one of course has the ability to install a hard dive and other stuff. Don't want to go too far considering the fact that you can get moderated for talking about certain things. But overall I would recommend the Slim.
The Slim, it use less power, it is more quiet, more liable. I went though three PS2 phats because of DRE.
Slim is better because its easier to clean loads faster, doesnt waste as much electricity, can be ran in any region because the box thing converts to 8.7v from any outlet rated from 100v to 240 with the 50/60Hz so no worries of damage, the old slims get hot but not hot enough to worry but the newer slims 79xxxx and 91xxxx cool better, can do 1080i and it has 5 more MHz than the fat. you can put a HDD to it by solder (only 71xxxx model) but risk killing it. you can use a mem card mod but i dont know if there is one.
Also, isn't it the case that if you want to play Japanese games, you can use a swap disc with the Slim, but have to physically take the console apart and mod it with the Original?lynxedany slim above 75xxxx cant be modded and you dont use the original at all to mod it
There was a higher chance of the lens acting up in the original than the PS2 slimI think that the original is better. With the slim there is a risk with the lens.
oscar_mateo
Almost everything had a higher failure rate in the slim. Plus a disc drive that has to open. Eventually that motor in that drive will break, it's just the way it goes. Anytime you can get something with less moving parts go for that.billyd5301dude the fat has 3 more moving parts than slim and the slim is more reliable. just because its small doesnt mean it fails easier
Almost everything had a higher failure rate in the slim. Plus a disc drive that has to open. Eventually that motor in that drive will break, it's just the way it goes. Anytime you can get something with less moving parts go for that.billyd5301If that is the case how come I went through three PS2 phats and I'm still using the same slim since it's lunch?
If that is the case how come I went through three PS2 phats and I'm still using the same slim since it's lunch?maybe he hasnt used a slim before[QUOTE="billyd5301"]Almost everything had a higher failure rate in the slim. Plus a disc drive that has to open. Eventually that motor in that drive will break, it's just the way it goes. Anytime you can get something with less moving parts go for that.jasonharris48
[QUOTE="jasonharris48"]If that is the case how come I went through three PS2 phats and I'm still using the same slim since it's lunch?maybe he hasnt used a slim before I guess[QUOTE="billyd5301"]Almost everything had a higher failure rate in the slim. Plus a disc drive that has to open. Eventually that motor in that drive will break, it's just the way it goes. Anytime you can get something with less moving parts go for that.bigM10231
If that is the case how come I went through three PS2 phats and I'm still using the same slim since it's lunch? Come on now, I meant "almost everything has a higher failure rate in the original". I know it was a typo, but does the slim have a disc drive with a motor that opens it? The slim obviously has less moving parts.[QUOTE="billyd5301"]Almost everything had a higher failure rate in the slim. Plus a disc drive that has to open. Eventually that motor in that drive will break, it's just the way it goes. Anytime you can get something with less moving parts go for that.jasonharris48
[QUOTE="lynxed"]Also, isn't it the case that if you want to play Japanese games, you can use a swap disc with the Slim, but have to physically take the console apart and mod it with the Original?bigM10231any slim above 75xxxx cant be modded and you dont use the original at all to mod it ...what? I don't think I get it. Mind explaining further?
any slim above 75xxxx cant be modded and you dont use the original at all to mod it ...what? I don't think I get it. Mind explaining further?the mods dont use the original ps2 parts to work. you can however put a special chip in the fat for certain things[QUOTE="bigM10231"][QUOTE="lynxed"]Also, isn't it the case that if you want to play Japanese games, you can use a swap disc with the Slim, but have to physically take the console apart and mod it with the Original?lynxed
[QUOTE="jasonharris48"]If that is the case how come I went through three PS2 phats and I'm still using the same slim since it's lunch? Come on now, I meant "almost everything has a higher failure rate in the original". I know it was a typo, but does the slim have a disc drive with a motor that opens it? The slim obviously has less moving parts.make sure you dont put typos next time[QUOTE="billyd5301"]Almost everything had a higher failure rate in the slim. Plus a disc drive that has to open. Eventually that motor in that drive will break, it's just the way it goes. Anytime you can get something with less moving parts go for that.billyd5301
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment