They are just following the money. There more money lost by implementing it than there is to be gained, based onn their analysis. They didnt lose their rights or free speech. They simply arent choosing to do so in a controversial way. EA deciding to back down - willingly - is a sign of free speech as well.
They are just following the money. There more money lost by implementing it than there is to be gained, based onn their analysis. They didnt lose their rights or free speech. They simply arent choosing to do so in a controversial way. EA deciding to back down - willingly - is a sign of free speech as well.
XaosII
I know that they didn't lose their rights. But they're being treated as if they don't have any.
I know that they didn't lose their rights. But they're being treated as if they don't have any.
GodofGore22
But they do. And they can excersize that right. It just doesn't make financial sense to do so. EA is more disappointed about the "waste" of resources spent on developing the Taliban side given the outcome. The developers are probably more concerned about keeping their job and not having the game/contract shelved because of this.
Most gamers will probably be apathetic towards it. Im sorry to say, but you're preaching to an empty stadium.
I know that they didn't lose their rights. But they're being treated as if they don't have any.
XaosII
But they do. And they can excersize that right. It just doesn't make financial sense to do so. EA is more disappointed about the "waste" of resources spent on developing the Taliban side given the outcome. The developers are probably more concerned about keeping their job and not having the game/contract shelved because of this.
Most gamers will probably be apathetic towards it. Im sorry to say, but you're preaching to an empty stadium.
True. I'm sleep so I wrote a horrible post. I need to do this during the weekends. I like the saying though. "but you're preaching to an empty stadium." I'll use it one day
Log in to comment