StarFox64

Wrong forum for this game? I dunno

On topic: Star Fox 64 (or Lylat Wars) was awesome. I used to play Lylat Wars all the time.

everyone_Olimar

Indeed. You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it........now!

[QUOTE="_Olimar"]everyoneJarlaxle0204

Indeed. You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it........now!

Amen to that!

[QUOTE="Jarlaxle0204"]

[QUOTE="_Olimar"]everyonedylandude392

Indeed. You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it........now!

Amen to that!

[QUOTE="dylandude392"][QUOTE="Jarlaxle0204"]

[QUOTE="_Olimar"]everyoneSciFiCat

Indeed. You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it........now!

Amen to that!

I do take a small issue with the claim of Star Fox Adventures as an example of Nintendo outsourcing the franchise. Technically true, yes. However, I think Rare got a lot of undue criticism about the game with respect to the Star Fox universe. A lot of people don't realize that Star Fox Adventures was simply an action adventure game they were working on called Dinosuar Planet and Nintendo forced them to shoehorn in a Star Fox theme in order to give the game more appeal.

It was never meant to be considered a Star Fox game by developers and I always thought it was unfair how people criticized Rare for making a Star Fox game that was so deviated from the true fundamentals of the series. Just throwing that out there.

But yes, Nintendo really needs to stop toying around with the franchise if they care at all about it because the more they do so, the more tarnished and weakened its reputation/appeal gets. Like you said, I guess they really don't care too much about it.

[QUOTE="Jarlaxle0204"]

[QUOTE="_Olimar"]everyonedylandude392

Indeed. You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it........now!

Amen to that!

Just kill that damn. . .frog.:evil:

I do take a small issue with the claim of Star Fox Adventures as an example of Nintendo outsourcing the franchise. Technically true, yes. However, I think Rare got a lot of undue criticism about the game with respect to the Star Fox universe. A lot of people don't realize that Star Fox Adventures was simply an action adventure game they were working on called Dinosuar Planet and Nintendo forced them to shoehorn in a Star Fox theme in order to give the game more appeal.

It was never meant to be considered a Star Fox game by developers and I always thought it was unfair how people criticized Rare for making a Star Fox game that was so deviated from the true fundamentals of the series. Just throwing that out there.

But yes, Nintendo really needs to stop toying around with the franchise if they care at all about it because the more they do so, the more tarnished and weakened its reputation/appeal gets. Like you said, I guess they really don't care too much about it.VMan

[QUOTE="_Olimar"]everyoneJarlaxle0204

Indeed. You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it........now!

When was starfox hardcore? You can beat it and see the ending credits/boss in 30 minutes. Its got replay value in the form of a high score challenge (which is about as casual as you get) to open up a few new stages. But thats like 2 hours for 100% completion. How is that hardcore? I know its retro/legacy and it is indeed a fun game that i'd love to see a sequel to, but how is it hardcore?

You'd think that Nintendo would one day get with it and just release a REAL sequel. Guess what Nintendo? We want our Starfox in the air. We want it on rails. And we want multiple different pathways through it. Screw the casual game market. Get on it..now!Jarlaxle0204

That may be your opinion, but not everyone's. To say "Screw the casual market" is offensive.

I, for one, found SFA to be a very enjoyable game. The graphics and sound were nice and I found the gameplay to be a lot of fun. I wouldn't mind seeing a next-gen StarFox game that implemented innovative styles of combat on land and air. As long as the game offers decent voice-acting this time, multiple paths and at least 20 hours of gameplay value.

but in SFA Slippy voice is screwed upLandmaster227

Slippy is a **** anyway. He just needs to die already, that annoying little frog bastard.

[QUOTE="Landmaster227"]but in SFA Slippy voice is screwed upMasterKingMP

Slippy is a **** anyway. He just needs to die already, that annoying little frog bastard.

Yeah, lol. Slippy is a loser. I don't know how he gets to pilot an aircraft. He's always getting shot down. I'd rather have a team 3 than a team of 4 with Slippy. You could easily get all the medals if you didn't have to worry about saving his butt.

Is having Q Games make a game considered outsourcing, given that key members there worked at Argonaut and thus played a large part of making Star Fox and Star Fox 2? Command was actually something of a new vision of Star Fox 2.