[QUOTE="HandsomeDead"][QUOTE="Ash2X"][QUOTE="gamingqueen"][QUOTE="Ash2X"][QUOTE="HandsomeDead"][QUOTE="syztem"][QUOTE="gamingqueen"] [QUOTE="ArabianKnight14"]Why is my favorite MGS slammed by everyone,Sure Raiden was bad but that doesnt make one of the worst games ever,IMO its story was the best in the series and the gameplay was good.gamingqueen
Abad way to say I haven't played the game or understood a word in it is to say it sucked.
MGS2 storyline is the best in videogames history. It had many allusions and refrences to reality in a unique setting to not make it too close to the real thing or else it would be boring like moh games. This is called genius.
Calling MGS2 "genius" is like calling Tool and Radiohead "smart music". It's ham-fisted pretentious drivel, and Kojima is a hack.
Now, when you ignore the fact that MGS has always tried too hard to be taken seriously, and view it in a more cornball fashion, it does lighten the load a bit.
It's like Hideo's trying to be Tarantino or something. You actually rate Tarantino as a director and yet you slate Kojima. Interesting.
*rofl* Kojima and Tarantino are really pretty similar...both can make a good show but if it comes to make storys...at least ZoE and MGS 1 worked out...Tarantino,well,none of his Movies :roll:
To those who think MGS2 had any connection to reality:No there aren´t Vampires or people that can´t be hit.The Nukes existed not only in MGS and they existed looong before the Movies about them.If you live in a small grey room like Raiden does you just don´t live,that´s all.Even James Bond is more realistic.
It has too many connections to reality.
Where?The only things they used had been rumors or not really existing things.Exept the Nukes´s and some wise words here and there about them.Blacksite:Area 51 whould be realistic too...exept the aliens maybe,but the places maybe exist.True Crime SoLA too.Or Spider-Man...it´s in NY and the Twin Towers are missing.James Bond walks around existing places drives existing cars and still has no connection to reality.MGS2 was pure fiction.Nothing in this game exists.Maybe in Illuminati,but I didn´t read it,so I can´t say anything ´bout it for shure.Only really important thing is:Is the Storyline good?I say no.Why?Because they tried to cover a weak Storylinewith overcomplicated stuff(and a really good Show...almost worked out).FXII´s Storyline(?) died almost the same way.
MGS may be set in an alternate reality, but a lot of the stuff mentioned in the story rings true.
And, with MGS2, I never thought the story was over complicated. Granted ,the first time I played it through, I didn't really get it, but when replaying it, more and more made sense.
Thank you ;)
I'm not saying mgs2 storyline is based on a real story! I'm saying it makes most sense. It is by far the best story in a videogame ever! even better than many movies I've seen. Kojima did best when he made a videogame focusing heaveily on storyline without sacrificing the gameplay. I don't wanna change the sub here but governments do control people's minds and make choices for them. No one is free.
Play Second Sight...better Storyline,better Gameplay.
The Gameplayis a different thing,but MGS2 was very weak there too.It had been just minor stuff,but if I can shoot almost everyone from a distance they can´t see me it get´s boring after a few hours.It´s just good because of the surrounding stuff the rest is compared to MGS1 really really weak.And even that wasn´t really good without the show,but the Storyline was FAR better.At least in my opinion.
Log in to comment