This generation is probably the worst in gaming history

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pagio12000
pagio12000

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 pagio12000
Member since 2007 • 28 Posts

I will give some explanation why i beleve so.

1)We come to an era were the power of cpus-gpus can give us incretible number of options creating games.Even so we see that games are all feleling and playing tha same take for example that in the majority of games you are just SHOOTING things from terroriest to zombies carrying assault rifles!!!!!

2)Insted of trying to invent new gernes and of games we see gernes slowly disapear take for example platform games.What are your choises on platform games????.......Mario and......??????.Another example is rail shooters dont rush to answer i will not pay 60 usd-eur to play a game that last 1 hour becouse thats were the "evolving the gerne"comes in think about it.the dighners need only the half time yo make the visual matirial of a rail shooter that will give you many hours of lightgun action from making an fps.As for the programing AI for the modern fps games are real pain while in a rail shooter you need little to none AI programing.Even the survival horror gerne is fading away.Witch titles you will actualy label SURVIVAL horror????

3)Most of the best game franchises are becoming second rate games or changing gernes!!!!!!

I)Final fantasy i will not even try to compere the ps1 titles to ffxiii.I can still remember scenes-music-characters even dialogs from FFVII like they are in my monitor screen right now and last time i aplayed this game was 1999!!!!I played FFxiii some months ago and i dont remember a thing!!!!nothing!!!!!Like a borring advertisment playng on my tv while watching a movie.FFxii is a disgrace to the FF francise

II)Resident evil.While the francise sudenly change gernes from Survival horror to action game in RE 4 The point that turns to junk was RE 5.RE 5 was not even a good game.A stupid bot follow you all the game,the level desighn was linear,the enviroments were out of subject,and zombies shooting you with assault rifless.I gues the next game will be RE evil warfare or RE evil ops

III)Silent hill.While the francise try to stay on course the scew up.Why team silent droped the francise in the first place?You will see what i mean when you obzerve SH 2 and SH homecoming while the second was from technical point advanced SH 2 looks better.I think i dont need to talk about the atmosphere the enviroments or the music of SH homecoming

IV)Dragon quest.Is there a dragon quest for this generation?????Ohh yeal for the wii!!!!No coments there.....

V)Sonic.Do you guys love sonic??!!!! yeah me too,lets play sonic then!!!!!.......We cant becouse there is none sonic game worth playing(sonic colors was good though)

VI)Broken sword.hmmm....install dosbox or find a patch for Broken sword 3 to run on win 7.

VII)The j-rpg gerne oooo i live these.Anyone sugesting something???(dont say FFXIII becouse thats not an rpg its an insult)While some good jrpgs exists many dint amke it to the eu or even to the us even the ones that make it are like secrets you need to hear a whisper from a friend to learn about these games they are kept in the shadows.Lost odyssey was a masterpiece though and was created by MICROSOFT studios(a western studio)

VIII)Shenmue.While an incretible number of junk releasing every week shenmue 3 is not even planed for developing.

IX)Castlevania.I can steel remember the feelings playing Castlevania SOTN on ps1 or the enviroments of Castlevania legacy of darkness on n64 or the 2 great Castlevania games on ps2(the second was released on xbox too)And so we see now castlevania lords of shadow changing the francise from platform rpg to pure action.Castlevania lords of shadow is a great game but they give the castlevania name tha last moment it was not suposed to be a castlevania game they just continue the francise with a game they just like they not even think if the game feels like castlevania at all

X)A great number of other frinceses that we all miss.

4)Visuals above all.All games are eye candy while most of these is the only thing they offer.In many games the music is only there just becouse without it you will thing you presed the mute button on your tv set.I still listenthe ost from the old games FFVII-VIII,Silent hill,Shenmue(every track is a masterpiece)castlevania Mgs even the old sega arcade games had great scores.I can only bring 4 games in mind that have memorable ost Lost odyssey,Mgs 4,silent hill shatered memmories,assasins creed and some idividual tracks from action games most of them coming from hans zimmer.As for the gameplay all the new games feel the same with same goals and features.But the greatest loss is the scenario i can count the games witch actualy have ascenario to show in my fingers all the games have a basic scenario just to keep the game runing for a reason.Most modern game scenarios go like this start-end

I have mutch more to say but that will not be a post on a forum but a book so i will stop here with 2 questions

1)what the japanese developers doing these years?

2)We will ever play games like FFvii,Castlevania sotn,Shenmue,shining force,super mario 64,sonic 3,Silent hill 2,RE 1 etc??

From an old dog of video games.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

So basically you are saying how all games are the same these days and yet you want games to go back and be like the ones you remember playing. You jump from game to game and in the end do nothing to describe the current state of the industry. Your whole post is basically a list of games that you wish were still the standard or you wish they had not changed over the years. Developers adapt to what the people want. Just because on this forum there are people who fondly remember Baldurs Gate and consider it one of the best RPG's ever does not mean the majority has the same opinion. Games need to be accessible because the players are a more varied group these days.

Still if you like old games just play old games. There are still plenty platformers around both big budget and indie, but dont expect it to be a big genre. Just becouse Mario is still popular does not mean the demand for platformers is the same as it was 10 years ago.

I have no idea what you are trying to say about rail shooters...a niche genre that has been niche and always will be niche, and for fans of the genre a rail shooter being short in nothing new or surprising, its the way these games are.

RE is fine the way it is now, or actually it will be when the game finally gets the option to walk and shoot. Just because you thought that the cumbersome and clunky controls of the series prior to RE4 were good, does not make them so. IMO people are not tanks, so they should not move like tanks.

How can you even mention Dragon Quest in a post about the stale nature of this gen...DQ is a series that since its creation stayed the same. That is horrible and I prefer when devs experiment instead of make the same game over and over. I also dont get why you outright dismiss the Wii.

Shenmue was a critical success but it did not sell. End of the story. There are numerous games that have not turned into franchises because of poor sales.

If you want classic Castlevania get a DS theres plenty of them on it.

And thats all I will write becouse the grammar and spelling errors in the post hurt my brain.

Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts

So basically you are saying how all games are the same these days and yet you want games to go back and be like the ones you remember playing. You jump from game to game and in the end do nothing to describe the current state of the industry. Your whole post is basically a list of games that you wish were still the standard or you wish they had not changed over the years.rzepak

That's the vibe I was getting as well. The post starts off by saying developers aren't inventing new genres and games but then continues by naming all the old games that they've been making for the past 10-20 years and wishing they would make more of them.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
games are great now a days. i've never been so spoiled. so many amazing games coming out this year
Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#5 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts
There are certainly trends that are less than desirable (see every Call of Duty copy including Call of Duty) but other than that there's still plenty of great niche stuff. Platformers have been dying for years, the PS2 was pretty bare there as well, with the only real standouts being the Sly series (Jak and Ratchet are more combat than platformer).
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ_Lae"]There are certainly trends that are less than desirable (see every Call of Duty copy including Call of Duty) but other than that there's still plenty of great niche stuff. Platformers have been dying for years, the PS2 was pretty bare there as well, with the only real standouts being the Sly series (Jak and Ratchet are more combat than platformer).

platformers are still alive and well as arcade games though. we've had some great ones recently, braid, splosion man, super meat boy etc...
Avatar image for TF626
TF626

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TF626
Member since 2010 • 593 Posts

I'd have to agree with you on this. I haven't been all impressed with this generation with a few exceptions of course.

Avatar image for magnusm1
magnusm1

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 magnusm1
Member since 2009 • 918 Posts

What the first guy said^ (Not OT)

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25239 Posts

There are plenty of innovative new games this gen. If you cant find any I recommend you broaden your horizons, look for games in the indie game industry. Look for less high profile games, you will find plenty of experimental and ambitious games.

For that matter the worst gen is probably the first in my opinion.

Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

I have yet to find a game that i get addicted to this gen like the other gens. Thats really all i can say, gameplay has gotten more simplistic, which is definetly not worse in alot of cases, but some game genres didnt need to be made easier and now they bore me to tears.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts
1) Not the on PC. I think there were even less shooters this generation than previous ones while other genres flourished. 2) Not on the PC. There are more indie games than ever with more platforms giving people access to indie games. 3) Not on the PC. With the exception of X-COM and Fallout 3, thats not the case at all. 4) I simply disagree, but this point is very subjective. 1a) I dont care for Japanese developers. 2a) Who knows? Maybe you're just playing the wrong platform.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

*opens thread.sees rant.leaves*

Avatar image for ValHazzard
ValHazzard

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ValHazzard
Member since 2009 • 829 Posts

i'm happy with it ...

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I agree, worst games in this gen. The devs dont really use pc capabilities.
Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts

I disagree with every one of those points.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#16 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14489 Posts

I have zero interest in any of the franchises you listed. And if you're looking for new and innovative stuff, it exists. It's called xbox live arcade. Start using it. Although I could barely understand anything in that wall of text full of bad grammar.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

This gen is actually one of my favorite gens.

Theres basically been over 50 games I've enjoyed this gen, thats more than the last two gens combined.

Avatar image for BlackDevil99
BlackDevil99

2329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 BlackDevil99
Member since 2003 • 2329 Posts

*opens thread.sees rant.leaves*

seanmcloughlin
this, also Holy wall of text Batman!
Avatar image for istuffedsunny
istuffedsunny

6991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#19 istuffedsunny
Member since 2008 • 6991 Posts
I agree that console gaming is dying a quick and "epic" death. I've moved on to PC and handheld gaming, soon to be just PC because the 3DS is basically a PSP with 3D (ie crap). Used to be that all I needed was one console for some fun, now I barely have any with all three.
Avatar image for ImBananas
ImBananas

1793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 ImBananas
Member since 2009 • 1793 Posts

What game was EVER made that you could call Survival Horror? If it was truly survival, you'd have nothing and you'd have to work and find it, starting off with fighting dozens of incoming enemies with your FISTS. Then out of their bones you build a new weapon to fend them off, and after making a few more you storm a shack and get larger tools with literally HUNDREDS of enemies piling onto you, then an enemy starts up a TRACTOR and tries to kill you with it, and you have to dodge it, leaving him to actually kill the other enemies. Then while all that mayhem's going on, you go inside, get some more tools and fit them in your backpack, including a chainsaw, then you go out and slice them ALL in half. Then you have to go and save your neighbors, and eventually you go into a lab and kill some dude who's controlling all the zombies and spawning them wherever.

Speaking of survival, MGS3 was hardly survival! You had to kill some animals and occasionally find trees to hide in, if it was true survival, you'd have an open space, no parts, when enemy was alerted to your presence, the alarm would go off for ALL the soldiers, you have a compass and you have to get it out of your inventory when you want to use it, and you have to rely on your friends telling you where to go AND what direction it's in, and if you go the wrong way because of what position you're turned as the cutscene starts, TOO BAD. That's what it would be if it was PERFECT survival, but aren't both of these fun, despite not being true survival?

Avatar image for L3000
L3000

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 L3000
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Your topic is just pointless While I was reading it, I was just wondering where the hell were you going with it. There are many original games that came out during the last decade, like portal 1/2, assassins creed, mass effect, little big planet (which, in my opinion beats mario and sonic) and many others. If you like old arcade games then just buy a nintedo and enjoy yourself
Avatar image for L3000
L3000

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 L3000
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
You were right though when you wrote that there is much repitition in games today (Call Of Duty is a good example) and many games are copies of others, but that's the whole point of the industry: some creative developers create an original concept and others use it until some one comes up with a better one (like gears of war that lend it's concept to many other games). About these Japanese games, I meen come on, the games are a good example of repetition. Every game is complitly the same: you control a half naked underaged girl or a wierd looking guy wielding some complitly obsurde weapo.
Avatar image for Leaky_Taps_Man
Leaky_Taps_Man

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Leaky_Taps_Man
Member since 2010 • 319 Posts

I think just because we have a nostalgic view of past generations and the fact that this gen hasn't produced a generation-defining game (a la OOT or Mario 64) its easy to jump on the bandwagon and claim this gen has sucked. But it simply hasn't. The fact is we get a lot of superb games every year and to say the market is saturated with shooters is ludicrous - you can't be looking very hard if you think all games need a gun or a zombie to sell well.

The shift into mainstream online, achievements and superb arcade/indie titles has made this my favourite generation by some distance. The only thing I dislike is the lack of platformers.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#24 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

Take it to system Wars.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#25 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50050 Posts

I will give some explanation why i beleve so.

1)We come to an era were the power of cpus-gpus can give us incretible number of options creating games.Even so we see that games are all feleling and playing tha same take for example that in the majority of games you are just SHOOTING things from terroriest to zombies carrying assault rifles!!!!!

The majority of games do not follow that mentality--moreover, even the majority of shooters I do not believe follow that notion. While we do have quite a number of games that involve shooting terrorists, and/or zombies, I don't believe that's a reason to call the generation as being the worst in gaming history.

2)Insted of trying to invent new gernes and of games we see gernes slowly disapear take for example platform games.What are your choises on platform games????.......Mario and......??????.Another example is rail shooters dont rush to answer i will not pay 60 usd-eur to play a game that last 1 hour becouse thats were the "evolving the gerne"comes in think about it.the dighners need only the half time yo make the visual matirial of a rail shooter that will give you many hours of lightgun action from making an fps.As for the programing AI for the modern fps games are real pain while in a rail shooter you need little to none AI programing.Even the survival horror gerne is fading away.Witch titles you will actualy label SURVIVAL horror????

This generation we have seen a lot of "blurring" between the lines of genres. Is this game a RPG, or is it a shooter? Questions like that come up a lot, and also focus on other ordeals like is this an Action-Adventure game or not? This generation has seen a huge upsoar of flash-based, touch-based, and motion-based games so the creativity and originality has been seen across many venues. What are your choices for platform games? How about Super Meat Boy? Or LIMBO? Little Big Planet? Braid? Outland? And many more...

3)Most of the best game franchises are becoming second rate games or changing gernes!!!!!!

*games*

Are we going to ignore all the great new franchises, and new iterations of old franchises?

4)Visuals above all.All games are eye candy while most of these is the only thing they offer.In many games the music is only there just becouse without it you will thing you presed the mute button on your tv set.I still listenthe ost from the old games FFVII-VIII,Silent hill,Shenmue(every track is a masterpiece)castlevania Mgs even the old sega arcade games had great scores.I can only bring 4 games in mind that have memorable ost Lost odyssey,Mgs 4,silent hill shatered memmories,assasins creed and some idividual tracks from action games most of them coming from hans zimmer.As for the gameplay all the new games feel the same with same goals and features.But the greatest loss is the scenario i can count the games witch actualy have ascenario to show in my fingers all the games have a basic scenario just to keep the game runing for a reason.Most modern game scenarios go like this start-end

My favorite games this generation do not have very good graphics... In fact, the notion of all games being eye-candy, or "visuals" above all just seems so misguided in the grand context of this generation that to say such is just so very strange to me. Portal 2 for example is an amazing game that looks good in its own right, but what it excels in and what it's renowned for is nothing... absolutely nothing revolving around its graphics... Or take Demon's Souls, Super Mario Galaxy 2, or Mass Effect. Same logic applies.

pagio12000

My thoughts in red.

Avatar image for pagio12000
pagio12000

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 pagio12000
Member since 2007 • 28 Posts

I know about indie games i have alot by the way via steam.But the point is if the next gen continues the path this gen is going you will hardly see any games that are actualy diferent from eatch other

as for this gen i also love many games like Assasins creed "respect" Lost odysey MGS 4 castlevania lords of shadow silent hill shatered memories crysis call of duty and mutch more but i wasent impresed many times.

As for the developers as i say before insted of trying to improve theyr games (francises)they just switch to another gerne that they willl now it will sale without mutch effort.

Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#27 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

I think this is the best generation

Avatar image for caketoo
caketoo

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#28 caketoo
Member since 2005 • 1783 Posts

I agree with it being the worst. It has alot to do with the greed of the game companies as well. Games are released before they really should be cause they can always patch it later. Some issues cant be patched but that dosent stop them. Were given an option to buy extra content for a game on release day some of that content is even already on the disc. Most FPS have horrible cliche short single player modes and are really all about the MP community. Instead of getting more games like borderlands were you can do every mission in co-op, you get non stop MP games were all you do is deathmatch and capture the flag or capture the whatever.

My other gripe is the crappy consturcution of the consoles. Ive had just about every system from an nes to now and never had 1 system failure. This gen alone Ive had 7! 7 dead consoles in a span of a few years. Thats pathetic. I really have no consumer confidence anymore in the console makers and alot of the game companies themselves. Theres a few games i take interest in but have so far been pretty disappointed with how they turn out. Games are being made by Fortune 500 companies that need to turn a profit and make investors happy and perform well in the fiscal quarter. Games seem to sell more on the hype that surronds them than the actual substance the game itself carries. You dont need a good game if you have a game with a well known name attached to it.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46766 Posts
Well to each their own I guess. Personally though having been an avid gamer for 30+ years this has been my favourite generation so far and I'm enjoying gaming more then ever.
Avatar image for Mr_Pieman
Mr_Pieman

1466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Mr_Pieman
Member since 2009 • 1466 Posts
OT You're living in the past. Also, you said the majority of games feature zombies wielding assault rifles . You must have a small collection of games for that to feel like the majority. That also sounds like a badass game, which one is that?
Avatar image for lasseeb
lasseeb

1186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 lasseeb
Member since 2010 • 1186 Posts

I can see that you only made an account to post this.

Go outside and be social.

Avatar image for no_more_fayth
no_more_fayth

11928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 no_more_fayth
Member since 2010 • 11928 Posts

I can honestly say I've only loved a few games this generation. :(

Avatar image for Mr_Pieman
Mr_Pieman

1466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Mr_Pieman
Member since 2009 • 1466 Posts

I can see that you only made an account to post this.

Go outside and be social.

lasseeb
everyone starts somewhere
Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#34 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts
Lost Odyssey wasn't developed by Microsoft. It was developed by Mistwalker.
Avatar image for UntraceableHaze
UntraceableHaze

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 UntraceableHaze
Member since 2009 • 246 Posts

OP is just mad his mommy didn't buy him the latest and greatest. I mean I would be mad to If I was stuck with a garbage pc, then going on youtube and watching gameplay videos, then coming here telling everyone I have the latest and greatest, and my opinion is be all and end all. Well I'm on to you poorboy, actually a present day game system, (instead of your rusted out NES) play it for awhile, then come back and give an opinion. It will change drastically for the better.

Avatar image for deactivated-6009c39ba2f35
deactivated-6009c39ba2f35

20866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-6009c39ba2f35
Member since 2005 • 20866 Posts
Well there's definitely some gems out there. Dead Island for one. It's zombies yeah but first person melee only. But I think we could use RPGs this generation. At least good ones.
Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#37 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45418 Posts
pfft, I object, I'd say that 4th to 5th generation period where there were failures like the Neo Geo, 3DO, CD-i, Jaguar, 32X, Turbo Grafx, those were horrible days, some of these systems did have good games but they failed to capture larger audiences and get bigger support from publishers, today we have 3 big successful console makers each with lots of 3rd party games that are excellent and tons of competition between everyone, I like this generation, not arguing it's the best but it's far from worst
Avatar image for Mr_Pieman
Mr_Pieman

1466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Mr_Pieman
Member since 2009 • 1466 Posts

OP is just mad his mommy didn't buy him the latest and greatest. I mean I would be mad to If I was stuck with a garbage pc, then going on youtube and watching gameplay videos, then coming here telling everyone I have the latest and greatest, and my opinion is be all and end all. Well I'm on to you poorboy, actually a present day game system, (instead of your rusted out NES) play it for awhile, then come back and give an opinion. It will change drastically for the better.

UntraceableHaze

I disagree with OP, but I think you entirely missed the point. --> . I think you should actually take the opposite of your advise and pull out your rusty old nes and play some of the greats again. Or did your mommy never buy you one?

Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

Meh, giant wall of bad grammar text. None of your points hold water, this gen is just as good or better than last...

Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#40 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

You have to find the right games. If you want to play great games this generation play games that focus on a strong story and gameplay. Those examples would be the Uncharted Series, ME Series, Fallout 3, RDR, AC, Portal Series and a few others. There are good multiplayer games too, but you just got to pick the right one and IMO COD is not one of them, but that's me. But my point there is something out there for you to enjoy from this generation.

Avatar image for Shock_T
Shock_T

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Shock_T
Member since 2011 • 30 Posts
I don't agree with everything he says, but I have got to say this generation isn't the best. Every single FPS that comes out today is a lot like Call of Duty, except for Halo and Gears. Homefront is a lot like Call of Duty, Battlefield is a lot like Call of Duty, and each Call of Duty isn't much different from the last one, except for a few things here and there (I really like the emblem customization in Black Ops.) A lot of RPGs aren't that great either. I'm not talking about Mass Effect (haven't played it, but obviously, many people love it), but games like Fable, for example. I played Fable II and I enjoyed it, but it was a little short. Fable III was almost exactly like Fable II, and it was even shorter. I didn't enjoy it very much. At least I didn't pay for it; it was a Christmas gift. I don't enjoy Fallout that much either. The story moves along way too slow, and you always get stuck, so you have to travel around everywhere just to find something or someone to do even more side-quests. I do like FFXIII though. I believe it's a very underrated game. Amazing graphics (probably best on 360, or tied with Crysis 2), I like the story, and the battle system is really fun. Then again, I've always been a sucker for JRPGs like Final Fantasy (The games on the PS1 are some of my favorite games ever). And basically, there's just a lot of games that haven't gotten much of my attention except for a select few.
Avatar image for BoredGames
BoredGames

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 BoredGames
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts

I sort of agree with the OP, some more effort put into spelling and grammar would be great -what a difficult read. This generation's games are converging into some bland action hybrid standard, Final Fantasy died at FF13, we could forgive FF12 as a still enjoyable failure (by FF standards)but not this, while anything that bucks the trend is slammed as antiquated (Lost Odyssey for eg.). Mistwalker won't be releasing Last Story outside Japan, I guess they assume there isn't a market for it. Go figure.

Avatar image for SummerHillard
SummerHillard

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 SummerHillard
Member since 2011 • 414 Posts

Well to each their own I guess. Personally though having been an avid gamer for 30+ years this has been my favourite generation so far and I'm enjoying gaming more then ever.Archangel3371

Agreed. Not only are old franchises still active, but a good deal of enjoyable new ones have popped up.

The likes of Mass Effect, BioShock, Dead Space, Uncharted, Resistance, and plenty of others didn't even exist until this generation.

Just because certain franchises didn't deliver their strongest installments doesn't mean jack about what they will put out in the near FUTURE.

And BTW, the main reasons why games like Final Fantasy XIII, Resident Evil 5, and Devil May Cry 4 did have not have nearly as strong of a reception as their predecessors ... is because it was nearly IMPOSSIBLE to TOP what their predecessors had done. Even as a PS2 game, after being ported to the Wii, Resident Evil 4 is one of the console's absolute strongest titles (although that probably speaks more towards the lack of anything-worth-a-crap in the Wii's library, save for Nintendo's first-party franchises). And Final Fantasy XII? I don't understand how anyone could complain about what was nothing short of the ULTIMATE RPG experience on the PS2. FFVIII I hated so much, I never even finished. I spent three hours a day, six days a week, and over two MONTHS playing in Final Fantasy XII's immersive world and story. There was nowhere to go but down after that. You honestly expect every series to keep topping itself with each new installment?

And it's funny how the OP only mentions the "bad" stuff and fails to point out the contradicting evidence. The Metal Gear series delivered what was its ultimate installment to date, with gameplay, graphics, and an epic conclusion of a storyline absolutely eclipsing anything that came before.

And as for Silent Hill and Sonic? Well, those two franchises rarely put out installments that are well-received by critics in the first place.

Also, Castlevania: Lords of Shadow is one of the highest-rated CONSOLE installments of the series to date. That means, aside from the DS games, it ranks pretty high on the list. It got a better reception than Lament of Innocence, so what else do you expect? And while it's true that the platformer genre has taken a hit, with Super Mario Galaxy (the highest-rated game of this generation thus far), the return of Donkey Kong Country, and the incomparable Ratchet & Clank series in full force, I don't see what the problem is.

I also find it funny how the OP failed to mention how Street Fighter IV has become possibly the most critically acclaimed fighting game of all time. All reasons why this generation far from "sucks."

Add to that list the innovative titles of Heavy Rain and the upcoming L.A. Noire ... and the argument is won.

And exactly how is Dragon Quest X being on the Wii an argument towards why this GENERATION of gaming is bad?



The absolute ONLY thing that I am crabby about is that fact that Kingdom Hearts has not yet tested the waters of this seventh generation yet ... all in due time, I suppose.



Avatar image for BoredGames
BoredGames

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 BoredGames
Member since 2009 • 103 Posts

[QUOTE="Archangel3371"] And Final Fantasy XII? I don't understand how anyone could complain about what was nothing short of the ULTIMATE RPG experience on the PS2. FFVIII I hated so much, I never even finished. I spent three hours a day, six days a week, and over two MONTHS playing in Final Fantasy XII's immersive world and story. There was nowhere to go but down after that. You honestly expect every series to keep topping itself with each new installment?

SummerHillard

the story and characters were sub-standard in FF12.

Avatar image for no_more_fayth
no_more_fayth

11928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 no_more_fayth
Member since 2010 • 11928 Posts

the story and characters were sub-standard in FF12.

BoredGames

I honestly didn't care if any of the characters died.

Avatar image for SummerHillard
SummerHillard

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 SummerHillard
Member since 2011 • 414 Posts

Yeah, I was bummed about the lack of diversity in the characters and the fact that there were only six party members in the BEGINNING ... but that also allowed for closer development of the characters. They grew on me. Whereas in FFVII, with nine party members, some of which didn't even appear until the second half of the game, it was just completely unbalanced (like the game, have NEVER loved it).

And honestly, those things ended up being insignificant to me. The fact that FFXII is the only installment to date (at least in the main series) that features seamless transition from exploration to battle (as well as all three party members appearing on the screen and being controllable in the field)... is exactly why it is my favorite title in the series.

That's the main thing that did piss me off about FFXIII ... I didn't care so much that it was "linear," but I was absolutely pissed after finding out that they got rid of the Active Dimension Battle system that garnered FFXII so much praise. And the six-party, all-humanoid party was definitely harder to swallow a second time around.

But then again, it could be much worse. You could be playing FFXIV ...

Avatar image for Blaze787
Blaze787

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Blaze787
Member since 2007 • 535 Posts

You say that this generation is probably the worst in gaming history, but it's interesting to note that every single game mentioned in your post is Japanese. Yes, Japanese games haven't evolved as well as their Western counterparts. In general, they tend to be overly tedious and way too restrictive.

Before anyone accuses me of bias, realize that I'm a person who's somewhat fond of Japanese culture, grew up watching anime, and playing mostly Japanese games. Not everyone's going to agree, but these days, games made by Western developers are, for the most part, better designed. The Mass Effect series is the best I've played in a long time.

Avatar image for TSNAKE617
TSNAKE617

5494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 TSNAKE617
Member since 2008 • 5494 Posts

Buying a DS would give you some good Final Fantasy, Castlevania, and Dragon Quest games... Also, why don't you try some fresh games like Demon's Souls, which resurrected my faith in games becoming better and better over time.

Avatar image for Katonymous
Katonymous

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Katonymous
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
There have been some really great games this gen, but for the most part I agree with you. This can all be blamed on gaming moving into the mainstream which can also be blamed on consoles, and before you yell at me, I love my consoles just as much as my PC. The masses want games they can just pick up and play, games that don't require them think that much because they don't want to be reminded of how stupid they are. They want games with short 5 to 7 hour singleplayer because thats all they can wrap they're head around. The publishers don't want to fund new innovative ideas because thats not where the money is, the money is in call of duty clone #483, sandbox game #361 and so on. So that is what they will fund. Were doomed to see bland generic recyclings of games that were once good, with a few great games thrown into the mix, you just have to accept it. It's the same with music, movies, and tv, it's the bland generic crap that makes the money, because thats what the moronic masses want.
Avatar image for RandoIph
RandoIph

2041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#50 RandoIph
Member since 2010 • 2041 Posts

You say that this generation is probably the worst in gaming history, but it's interesting to note that every single game mentioned in your post is Japanese. Yes, Japanese games haven't evolved as well as their Western counterparts. In general, they tend to be overly tedious and way too restrictive.

Before anyone accuses me of bias, realize that I'm a person who's somewhat fond of Japanese culture, grew up watching anime, and playing mostly Japanese games. Not everyone's going to agree, but these days, games made by Western developers are, for the most part, better designed. The Mass Effect series is the best I've played in a long time.

Blaze787
For all of the hype on the internet forums, I haven't found a shred of truth to these claims. Mass Effect is boring, Oblivion was a massive step down from Morrowind, and Dragon Age is just plain awful.