I know Call of Duty's the bigger cash cow, but c'mon! Ubisoft needs better management than Activision.
Both have dirtbag upper tier employees, but, in my humble opinion, there is no real strategy to save Call of Duty other than "relieve" the ones at Activision. Assassins and hackers are way cooler than cosplayed Chad soldiers with big guns grinding endlessly.
My point being Assassin's Creed and Watch Dogs have more potential to be rebooted under new creators. CoD is just the same shooters. In the former two, you get to slit throats and hack tech centers.
Ubisoft was planning to make a AC equivalent of GTA Online, where you get to be your own assassin in the time period of your choice. Tbh, I don't see the House That Ancel F**ked Up lasting more than two more years.
And so what if Xbox is the brand best known for shooters? They haven't expanded their repertoire since, literally 6th Gen, when they came out with the first Xbox. There was a character action game for every taste back then. Times have changed.
So why did Spencer, in your opinion, do this? Was it solely cuz he only gives a s**t about franchises that make the most money? Or because Creed and Watch Dogs aren't seen as "real Xbox" titles?
Log in to comment