The way i see it, if someone argues that something I like (like a game) isn't good, in order to agree with that person, or accept them, I would first have to accept that my liking was misplaced, and that I had made a mistake. Admitting that a game is as bad as someone says it to be would mean that all the time spent playing that game would have been wasted. And if that game has become as a part of you as a human ("yeah, I love MGS!"--or "playing Age of Empires was really something, wasn't it?") it becomes harder to admit such a loss.
If I've spent lots of time playing it, I know I'll get pretty upset about it in an argument unless I rationalize it somehow, even partially. But some people don't like to compromise, and if that's the case, i don't think it's particularly useful to continue arguing at all..
To paraphrase:
Because by saying the game you like sucks, the troll implies you suck for playing it. People get mad, trolls laugh, rinse and repeat
Black_Knight_00
Log in to comment