This topic is locked from further discussion.
The XBOX had better graphics, no doubt about it, but the amount of quality games on the PS2 outnumber the amount on the original XBOX 5 to 1, if not 10 to 1. I love the original XBOX, but doesn't compete in quality, at least in terms of overall great games on each respective system.
There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research.I personally can't. While the Xbox was a fine system, its few great exclusives can't match the PS2's HUGE list of amazing content. Also, I like RPGs so its easy to see why I would prefer the PS2.
wiicube64
With the PS2 having slightly over 1000 or so more games, I do not see how you get 10 to one when most of the PS2 games that aren't bad when you keep digging through the library are usually shared with something else. Unless I am reading the game lists wrong. I will say the PS2 did become quite a seller, the First Playstation proved to be quite beneficial, in that as well as no real competition and DVD at launch,The XBOX had better graphics, no doubt about it, but the amount of quality games on the PS2 outnumber the amount on the original XBOX 5 to 1, if not 10 to 1. I love the original XBOX, but doesn't compete in quality, at least in terms of overall great games on each respective system.
Shenmue_Jehuty
[QUOTE="wiicube64"]There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research. There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me.I personally can't. While the Xbox was a fine system, its few great exclusives can't match the PS2's HUGE list of amazing content. Also, I like RPGs so its easy to see why I would prefer the PS2.
MicrosoftVP_Ted
[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"][QUOTE="wiicube64"]There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research. There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me. I would say they are pretty near eachother in the Rpgs department, PS2 lacks Wrpgs severely. Fable isn't really an exclusive.I personally can't. While the Xbox was a fine system, its few great exclusives can't match the PS2's HUGE list of amazing content. Also, I like RPGs so its easy to see why I would prefer the PS2.
wiicube64
[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"][QUOTE="wiicube64"]There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research. There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me.I personally can't. While the Xbox was a fine system, its few great exclusives can't match the PS2's HUGE list of amazing content. Also, I like RPGs so its easy to see why I would prefer the PS2.
wiicube64
Much better RPGS on the XBox, IMO. Action RPGS are much more fun than the now cliched JRPG genre, and the XBox was full of them:
Between all those action-RPGs, and other awesome exclusives like Halo 1 & 2, Ninja Gaiden, MechAssault 1 & 2, and Crimson Skies; it was my console of choice during that generation after the Dreamcast fizzled out. The XBox Live was LEAGUES ahead of the competion in the online department. And on top of all of that, XBox usually always had the best version of multiplatform games.
Nowdays, all the 6th generation systems are so cheap, that's it's worth owning them all. Because they all have great exclusives and libraries of games.
I like to envision the Xbox as the only quality entertainment interactive on the market the 6th generation of gaming consoles, and it is so. While not to far off from the PS2 library, would you agree that exclusives and shared with others, that the Xbox simply had more quality assured than the PS2? You can talk about quantity, however, tons of games in genres that the PS2 is not strong act are sub-par compared to the engaging experience on the Xbox other than japanese developed Action-Adventure and Role-playing titles, which at the time were all very similar and are not actually relevant.MicrosoftVP_Ted
Â
Not really, no.
While the PS2 has plenty of crap on offer, the good stuff will still outnumber those on XBox simply because of larger quantities overall.
And even though i haven't checked, i'm sure the XBox has its fair share of crap too. Probably with a similar ratio to PS2 just involving smaller numbers.
I don't understand why such a fuss is made over exclusives, i don't miss what i can't have. And those which are exclusive usually have something similar on the other system anyway.
Where the XBox beat the PS2 was in the graphics department.
[QUOTE="Shenmue_Jehuty"]With the PS2 having slightly over 1000 or so more games, I do not see how you get 10 to one when most of the PS2 games that aren't bad when you keep digging through the library are usually shared with something else. Unless I am reading the game lists wrong. I will say the PS2 did become quite a seller, the First Playstation proved to be quite beneficial, in that as well as no real competition and DVD at launch,The XBOX had better graphics, no doubt about it, but the amount of quality games on the PS2 outnumber the amount on the original XBOX 5 to 1, if not 10 to 1. I love the original XBOX, but doesn't compete in quality, at least in terms of overall great games on each respective system.
MicrosoftVP_Ted
I'm pretty sure you're the same guy who was banned about a month ago for making a similar argument (possibly Another48Hours) so I'm not going to get into with you. There are over 10,000 PS2 games released since it launched (look it up if you don't believe me), and even if you say only 500 are worth owning, it still dwarfs the XBOX in that department. I'm done with this thread now.
I'm pretty sure you're the same guy who was banned about a month ago for making a similar argument (possibly Another48Hours) so I'm not going to get into with you.
Shenmue_Jehuty
Isn't it sad that we have to screen like every new member to the Legacy Platforms forum now? 48 really screwed things up here.
[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"]I like to envision the Xbox as the only quality entertainment interactive on the market the 6th generation of gaming consoles, and it is so. While not to far off from the PS2 library, would you agree that exclusives and shared with others, that the Xbox simply had more quality assured than the PS2? You can talk about quantity, however, tons of games in genres that the PS2 is not strong act are sub-par compared to the engaging experience on the Xbox other than japanese developed Action-Adventure and Role-playing titles, which at the time were all very similar and are not actually relevant.BarbaricAvatar
Â
Not really, no.
While the PS2 has plenty of crap on offer, the good stuff will still outnumber those on XBox simply because of larger quantities overall.
And even though i haven't checked, i'm sure the XBox has its fair share of crap too. Probably with a similar ratio to PS2 just involving smaller numbers.
I don't understand why such a fuss is made over exclusives, i don't miss what i can't have. And those which are exclusive usually have something similar on the other system anyway.
Where the XBox beat the PS2 was in the graphics department.
That's not even close to how it works. Most of the PS2's highest rated games are chared witht he Xbox which usually runs better. Heck, the PS2's best selling game has more features (If I recall) and runs better, and looks better, and has a consistent frame rate.With the PS2 having slightly over 1000 or so more games, I do not see how you get 10 to one when most of the PS2 games that aren't bad when you keep digging through the library are usually shared with something else. Unless I am reading the game lists wrong. I will say the PS2 did become quite a seller, the First Playstation proved to be quite beneficial, in that as well as no real competition and DVD at launch,[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"][QUOTE="Shenmue_Jehuty"]
The XBOX had better graphics, no doubt about it, but the amount of quality games on the PS2 outnumber the amount on the original XBOX 5 to 1, if not 10 to 1. I love the original XBOX, but doesn't compete in quality, at least in terms of overall great games on each respective system.
Shenmue_Jehuty
I'm pretty sure you're the same guy who was banned about a month ago for making a similar argument (possibly Another48Hours) so I'm not going to get into with you. There are over 10,000 PS2 games released since it launched (look it up if you don't believe me), and even if you say only 500 are worth owning, it still dwarfs the XBOX in that department. I'm done with this thread now.
You do know that the 10,000 includes outer-language names, bundles, and some other things right? Realistically, yes the PS2 has over 2,000 or so games, and I never denied that it had the bigger library. I am asking if you would put the Xbox quality over the Xboxes quality, and I was addressing your 10-1 which makes no logical sense when a large portion of PS2 games formed from a random list will likely be shared on the Xbox. So thank you for answering the thread, your answer is no.[QUOTE="Shenmue_Jehuty"]
I'm pretty sure you're the same guy who was banned about a month ago for making a similar argument (possibly Another48Hours) so I'm not going to get into with you.
Emerald_Warrior
Isn't it sad that we have to screen like every new member to the Legacy Platforms forum now? 48 really screwed things up here.
It really is :/. I remember when Legacy Forum was relatively troll free and we all just discussed our love of gaming without idiots making ridiculous claims, arguments and the like. I wish GS could do more to just find out who Another48Hours is and ban his IP so we can all carry on again. He's probably some pathetic loser who rides his bike to the library for the soul purpose of creating troll accounts here in order to make himself feel less like a pathetic loser . . .
[QUOTE="Shenmue_Jehuty"][QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"] With the PS2 having slightly over 1000 or so more games, I do not see how you get 10 to one when most of the PS2 games that aren't bad when you keep digging through the library are usually shared with something else. Unless I am reading the game lists wrong. I will say the PS2 did become quite a seller, the First Playstation proved to be quite beneficial, in that as well as no real competition and DVD at launch,MicrosoftVP_Ted
I'm pretty sure you're the same guy who was banned about a month ago for making a similar argument (possibly Another48Hours) so I'm not going to get into with you. There are over 10,000 PS2 games released since it launched (look it up if you don't believe me), and even if you say only 500 are worth owning, it still dwarfs the XBOX in that department. I'm done with this thread now.
You do know that the 10,000 includes outer-language names, bundles, and some other things right? Realistically, yes the PS2 has over 2,000 or so games, and I never denied that it had the bigger library. I am asking if you would put the Xbox quality over the Xboxes quality, and I was addressing your 10-1 which makes no logical sense when a large portion of PS2 games formed from a random list will likely be shared on the Xbox. So thank you for answering the thread, your answer is no.Have your fun while it lasts, I just reported you :)
You do know that the 10,000 includes outer-language names, bundles, and some other things right? Realistically, yes the PS2 has over 2,000 or so games, and I never denied that it had the bigger library. I am asking if you would put the Xbox quality over the Xboxes quality, and I was addressing your 10-1 which makes no logical sense when a large portion of PS2 games formed from a random list will likely be shared on the Xbox. So thank you for answering the thread, your answer is no.[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"][QUOTE="Shenmue_Jehuty"]
I'm pretty sure you're the same guy who was banned about a month ago for making a similar argument (possibly Another48Hours) so I'm not going to get into with you. There are over 10,000 PS2 games released since it launched (look it up if you don't believe me), and even if you say only 500 are worth owning, it still dwarfs the XBOX in that department. I'm done with this thread now.
Shenmue_Jehuty
Have your fun while it lasts, I just reported you :)
You reported me for having an opinion?What are you talking about bro? Ps2 had both quality and quantity... Its for a reason why PS2 still sells as we speak ...AzatiSI wouldn't use a sell argument, but I will say that the PS2 was discontinued unless you know something I don't? I don't mind you liking the PS2 btw, I think the vibe of this thread got disrupted by Shenmue,
You're assuming that other people think Xbox has the "quality". I don't buy that assumption whatsoever. For me, PS2 is better both quantity and quality-wise.
Also, you don't get to decide what was relevant, and the JRPGs and action-adventure titles on the PS2 were not all similar, certainly not any more similar than any other genre.
I actually meant it to be saying "If you think the Xbox has quality over the PS2's quality" but I can only do so much with the title. I explain it a bit in the OP. Also at that time no other system had Final Fantasy, so your choice makes sense. I do always wonder how X would look with less jaggy Xbox hardware and less music compression.You're assuming that other people think Xbox has the "quality". I don't buy that assumption whatsoever. For me, PS2 is better both quantity and quality-wise.
GreySeal9
[QUOTE="Dudersaper"]I wouldn't put the XBOX's quality over PS2's quantity because it doesn't outweigh the quantity/quality of the PS2's library. Not to say the XBOX's library is poor, it's pretty great. Just depends on the genres you're looking for. But for the best experience, just get both.MicrosoftVP_TedI don't particularly think either console is really lacking in genres other than opposing Rpg departments don't you think? II do agree both is exponentially the best way. If you can find an Xbox for cheap online which is hard to do, PS2's seem cheaper. not that I care for the genre, but the Xbox isn't famous for its platformers
Personally, I think Xbox is the worst of the three by far. Don't get me wrong, it has good games, I just prefer the libraries of either the PS2 or Gamecube.
I should point out, however, that Xbox introduced one of my favorite game series: Ninja Gaiden. (It dubuted on the NES technically, but the Xbox rebooted it with a completely new style) I never played the Xbox version though. I only played Sigma on PS3. Mainly because I never had an Xbox. I now have a 360, and I have played some Xbox games with it's BC. But last Gen Xbox was the only way to play Ninja Gaiden. I never realised just how awesome that game is until this gen, lol.
I like to envision the Xbox as the only quality entertainment interactive on the market the 6th generation of gaming consoles, and it is so. While not to far off from the PS2 library, would you agree that exclusives and shared with others, that the Xbox simply had more quality assured than the PS2? You can talk about quantity, however, tons of games in genres that the PS2 is not strong act are sub-par compared to the engaging experience on the Xbox other than japanese developed Action-Adventure and Role-playing titles, which at the time were all very similar and are not actually relevant.MicrosoftVP_TedI'd have to disagree. Like most others, I'd have to say the PS2 was superior to the Xbox in both quality and quantity. The only other console back then that came close to the PS2 in quality was the Dreamcast before its demise.
And for your information, action-adventures and RPG's on the PS2 were extremely diverse and two of the best-selling genres at the time, so they were very "relevant" at the time.
Don't get me wrong. I loved the Xbox back then, and it was probably my second most used console of that generation, after the PS2. But the thing is that I most often used the Xbox as a media player, while most of the games I played on it were often just better-looking multi-plats also available on the PS2.
I like my Xbox over the PS2. Mostly, I just like the controller better to be honest and that is a huge thing for me. Sound is about the same and graphics are better on Xbox but I don't really care about graphics aside from how they affect gameplay. The controller is a much bigger difference. We can argue all day about more games, percentage of good games vs. bad and all that but as far as I'm concerned, either of these systems has enough great games to last me a decade so I'm not too worried about it.
I like to envision the Xbox as the only quality entertainment interactive on the market the 6th generation of gaming consoles, and it is so. While not to far off from the PS2 library, would you agree that exclusives and shared with others, that the Xbox simply had more quality assured than the PS2? You can talk about quantity, however, tons of games in genres that the PS2 is not strong act are sub-par compared to the engaging experience on the Xbox other than japanese developed Action-Adventure and Role-playing titles, which at the time were all very similar and are not actually relevant.MicrosoftVP_Ted
f*** no, I would never do that. I bought an xbox, loved it, supported it, bought xbox live, bought every AAA title, even some AA titles.Â
Can't top the ps2 library though, can't even touch it. Sony had soo many exclusive 1st party games and 3rd party games to ignore.
ps2 had too much high ranking quality games and obviously quantity of games. ps2 was a beast.Â
it's not a quality vs. quanity equation, as ps2 had both titles.
[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"]I like to envision the Xbox as the only quality entertainment interactive on the market the 6th generation of gaming consoles, and it is so. While not to far off from the PS2 library, would you agree that exclusives and shared with others, that the Xbox simply had more quality assured than the PS2? You can talk about quantity, however, tons of games in genres that the PS2 is not strong act are sub-par compared to the engaging experience on the Xbox other than japanese developed Action-Adventure and Role-playing titles, which at the time were all very similar and are not actually relevant.CaptainGamespot
f*** no, I would never do that. I bought an xbox, loved it, supported it, bought xbox live, bought every AAA title, even some AA titles.Â
Can't top the ps2 library though, can't even touch it. Sony had soo many exclusive 1st party games and 3rd party games to ignore.
ps2 had too much high ranking quality games and obviously quantity of games. ps2 was a beast.Â
it's not a quality vs. quanity equation, as ps2 had both titles.
I would disagree with a large first-party, that didn't really happen until this gen. Also, the thread title is a bit misleading I meant if you think the Xbox had quality would you put it over the PS2, there was just not enough space. Here is random comparison using Gamespot Comparison: PS2:775 A, AA, and AAA+ games. More than that under 5.0 Xbox:462 A, AA, and AAA+ games. Less than that under 5.0 Gamecube:256 A, AA, and AAA+ games. More than that under 5.0 Dreamcast::135 A, AA, and AAA+ games. More than that under 5.0There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me.[QUOTE="wiicube64"][QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"] There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research.Emerald_Warrior
Much better RPGS on the XBox, IMO. Action RPGS are much more fun than the now cliched JRPG genre, and the XBox was full of them:
Between all those action-RPGs, and other awesome exclusives like Halo 1 & 2, Ninja Gaiden, MechAssault 1 & 2, and Crimson Skies; it was my console of choice during that generation after the Dreamcast fizzled out. The XBox Live was LEAGUES ahead of the competion in the online department. And on top of all of that, XBox usually always had the best version of multiplatform games.
Nowdays, all the 6th generation systems are so cheap, that's it's worth owning them all. Because they all have great exclusives and libraries of games.
FINALLY someone mentioned Mechassault! Those games are the reason along with JSRF that I just recently purchased an xbox.[QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"][QUOTE="wiicube64"] There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me.Kaszilla
Much better RPGS on the XBox, IMO. Action RPGS are much more fun than the now cliched JRPG genre, and the XBox was full of them:
Between all those action-RPGs, and other awesome exclusives like Halo 1 & 2, Ninja Gaiden, MechAssault 1 & 2, and Crimson Skies; it was my console of choice during that generation after the Dreamcast fizzled out. The XBox Live was LEAGUES ahead of the competion in the online department. And on top of all of that, XBox usually always had the best version of multiplatform games.
Nowdays, all the 6th generation systems are so cheap, that's it's worth owning them all. Because they all have great exclusives and libraries of games.
FINALLY someone mentioned Mechassault! Those games are the reason along with JSRF that I just recently purchased an xbox.Oh yeah, some of the best games on the XBox.
The reason I purchased my XBox was Morrowind, by far. The game was absolutely stunning in all areas when it came out. And to a lesser degree, Halo also made me purchase it because it was a social event amongst me and my friends.
All the exlusives after that (such as MechAssault) I discovered.
Anything the Xbox had over the PS2 was better on the PC anyway. Halo 1, 2, Half-Life 2, most of them were more fun on the PC. The PS2 had more actual exclusives like Gran Turismo 3/4, Ratchet and Clank, the Katamari games, Ico, and many others. It's one of the few consoles that are worth owning for a serious PC gamer like me.CPX7700OMG the xbox actually has exclusives, why does everyone think it only has PC ports? I guess I'm one of the few that actually bought its great exclusives..
the only point I was proving is that the Xbox had more over all others except the PS2, but was the only one with less games rated under 5.0.MicrosoftVP_TedThat's exactly what I read, and it was exactly what I was replying to.
I'm just saying that the point you're trying to prove won't really make anybody re-think their opinions. Because it's obvious the PS2 is gonna have more games under 5.0 when it has much more games. The chances for below average games are higher the more games you have in a library. And still, that means little to nothing as long as the good games are good.
  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable FBPhotoZoom  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.it  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable FBPhotoZoom  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.itThat's exactly what I read, and it was exactly what I was replying to.[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"] the only point I was proving is that the Xbox had more over all others except the PS2, but was the only one with less games rated under 5.0.Dudersaper
I'm just saying that the point you're trying to prove won't really make anybody re-think their opinions. Because it's obvious the PS2 is gonna have more games under 5.0 when it has much more games. The chances for below average games are higher the more games you have in a library. And still, that means little to nothing as long as the good games are good.
  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable FBPhotoZoom  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.it  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable FBPhotoZoom  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.it Yeah, but then why does the Gamecube have half the Xbox library but the Xbox has more games but still has less 5.0 under games? But you are right, I enjoy some 5.0 games myself, which usually involve shooting games, not including TPS or FPS of course. I know I am not changing anyones minds, like my legendary 2600, the PS2 has been around for 3 generations and putting out games left and right, I can't deattache people from it, I am just saying people should give it a chance, stop ignoring it, and stop thinking the only game it has is Halo, with proof that it has more than Halo.[QUOTE="Dudersaper"]That's exactly what I read, and it was exactly what I was replying to.[QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"] the only point I was proving is that the Xbox had more over all others except the PS2, but was the only one with less games rated under 5.0.MicrosoftVP_Ted
I'm just saying that the point you're trying to prove won't really make anybody re-think their opinions. Because it's obvious the PS2 is gonna have more games under 5.0 when it has much more games. The chances for below average games are higher the more games you have in a library. And still, that means little to nothing as long as the good games are good.
  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable FBPhotoZoom  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.it  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable FBPhotoZoom  CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.it Yeah, but then why does the Gamecube have half the Xbox library but the Xbox has more games but still has less 5.0 under games? But you are right, I enjoy some 5.0 games myself, which usually involve shooting games, not including TPS or FPS of course. I know I am not changing anyones minds, like my legendary 2600, the PS2 has been around for 3 generations and putting out games left and right, I can't deattache people from it, I am just saying people should give it a chance, stop ignoring it, and stop thinking the only game it has is Halo, with proof that it has more than Halo. I never even played halo on the xbox and I still love it.I wouldn't, but I had a damn fine time LANing my Xbox's throughout my house to play HALO/Splinter Cell etc. I still own Steel Battalion. Dug every single exclusive I could get my hands on.
That said, I can't say those experiences could top the PS2's quantity or quality I got last gen. Even Sony's 1st party was amazing last gen from God of War to ICO to Jak to Sly Cooper to Champions of Norrath 1/2 to ATV offroad to Ratchet to Gran Turismo 3/4 to Primal to Mr. Mosquito to Ape Escape to Dark Cloud 1/2 to Rogue Galaxy to Shadow of the Colossus to Tourist Trophy to SOCOM to War of the Monsters to Singstar to MLB the Show to Twisted Metal Black and many more I'm just forgetting...it was a fantastic ride.
I'm being unfair to the 3rd party exclusives as well. From Tekken to DMC to Onimusha to Ace Combat to Final Fantasy to Castlevania : Lament of Innocence to Metal Gear Solid 3 to Okami to Maximo...it was amazing.
[QUOTE="wiicube64"]There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research.I personally can't. While the Xbox was a fine system, its few great exclusives can't match the PS2's HUGE list of amazing content. Also, I like RPGs so its easy to see why I would prefer the PS2.
MicrosoftVP_Ted
Your system war tactics can't fool me! :cool:
There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me.[QUOTE="wiicube64"][QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"] There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research.Emerald_Warrior
Much better RPGS on the XBox, IMO. Action RPGS are much more fun than the now cliched JRPG genre, and the XBox was full of them:
Between all those action-RPGs, and other awesome exclusives like Halo 1 & 2, Ninja Gaiden, MechAssault 1 & 2, and Crimson Skies; it was my console of choice during that generation after the Dreamcast fizzled out. The XBox Live was LEAGUES ahead of the competion in the online department. And on top of all of that, XBox usually always had the best version of multiplatform games.
Nowdays, all the 6th generation systems are so cheap, that's it's worth owning them all. Because they all have great exclusives and libraries of games.
i dont think a lot of those are exclusives. you can find a couple of those on the ps2.also gotta say, ps2 is not all about quantity...there was a lot of quality there.
There are RPGs on the Xbox but certainly not as many as there are on the PS2, especially when we're talking JRPGs. The only exclusives that ever interested me on the Xbox that come to mind immediately are Halo, Halo 2, Jet Set Radio 2, Voodoo Vince, Fable..and if I wanted to stretch it further I GUESS I could put KOTOR, and Morrowind. All I'm saying is that the system never interested me personally. The Gamecube and the PS2 both had better exclusive lineups for me.[QUOTE="wiicube64"][QUOTE="MicrosoftVP_Ted"] There are Rpgs on the Xbox, and few exclusives is a misinformation. I would suggest further research.Emerald_Warrior
Much better RPGS on the XBox, IMO. Action RPGS are much more fun than the now cliched JRPG genre, and the XBox was full of them:
Between all those action-RPGs, and other awesome exclusives like Halo 1 & 2, Ninja Gaiden, MechAssault 1 & 2, and Crimson Skies; it was my console of choice during that generation after the Dreamcast fizzled out. The XBox Live was LEAGUES ahead of the competion in the online department. And on top of all of that, XBox usually always had the best version of multiplatform games.
Nowdays, all the 6th generation systems are so cheap, that's it's worth owning them all. Because they all have great exclusives and libraries of games.
PS2 was the king of the Action RPG genre:
So yeah, I'd say the PS2 was superior to the Xbox when it came to nearly all sub-genres of RPG, whether action RPG, turn-based RPG, tactical RPG, etc. The only type of RPG the Xbox may have had an upper hand in was the "Computer RPG" (i.e. "Western RPG" as it known today).
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment