Your thoughts on Competitive Multiplayer

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hakumen21
Hakumen21

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Hakumen21
Member since 2013 • 359 Posts

I'd personally take good Co-Op over competitive multiplayer anyday.

 

Competitive multiplayer is just so damn frustrating and even stressful most of the times.

Some examples for me are;
Call of Duty and Battlefield games;

Every death is an aggravating "what the f*ck?" and "how the hell?" no matter what the circumstances.

League of Legends;

Frustratingly boring.

it is competitive to the point of boredom and frustrating aggravation.

 

I personally enjoy Borderlands 2 and other co-op games as they relieve stress rather than inducing stress.


What are your thoughts?

 

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts
It brings things out in me that I'm not terribly comfortable with. So I don't get involved in it.
Avatar image for Lulekani
Lulekani

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Lulekani
Member since 2012 • 2318 Posts
Its only Shooters that seem to have this problem and even then its limited to simple Deathmatch modes. I think competitive games should focus less on kill counts and more on some other types of objectives.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

I love competitive multiplayer but it's only fun when the games are balanced. I simply cannot get into BF3 because it feels unbalanced, it's too often the case that one team gets pushed to deploy and gets stuck there. Then, depending on which side you are on, you either die over and over or you sit back and pick people off. BOOORING. For some reason I found that BFBC2 did not have a big problem in this rehard and I enjoyed it A LOT more. Sad.

So yeah, balanced competitive multiplayer shooters are, imo, some of the best fun out there but it can be ruined easily if there is imbalance.

As for games like LoL, I do not play those. I can say however that GW2 PvP sucks. This was very disappointing to me because I loved playing high end HA and GvG in GW1. Unfortunately in GW2 PvP has been dumbed downed and made less intense. There was nothing as satisfying to me as playing ranger, spreading poison, rupting, and when called spiking someone down. Oh my, it brings back some good memories. There is nothing like that in GW2. 

Ultimately, what makes competitive multiplayer gaming of any sort fun is the ability to test your skill against other human players. AI is still nowhere good enough to challenge human players. Also, the greater the you can improve your skill in a game, the better. I don't mean leveling up either, I mean learning skills, strategies, and tactics. That's why GW has so much potential, it didn't focus on level or gear but rather on teamwork and individual ability. The greater your knowledge of skills, the greater your ability to position yourself effectively, the greater your team work together, the greater your chances of winning.

Uh, yeah well I could rant for a while but..

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts
The problem with online multiplayer is that it pushes people to play nothing else in order to dominate
Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#7 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

I don't usually like it, I prefer single player and co-op though. I'm not really a fan of FPS games which is what most people tend to play. I'm not competitive at all and never care about winning or losing, even though I usually am one of the best players in games if not the best I frequently upset the people I play with by not showing any kind of positive emotion when we win or sometimes just getting bored and barely trying. Not really any benefit to winning, I care more about a game working the way it should, I think the times I get most upset or emotional during a competitive game is when the game does something stupid, lags, etc and screws the other team over. 

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

I enjoy it in specific game types. COD games are fun to pick up and put down, and the level progression makes you feel like you're making some progress even when you aren't in SP. I like co-op games in principle, but I dislike what co-op has done to gaming in general. I used to wish that every game had co-op, but then I got my wish and the result was oversimplified interfaces, mandatory braindead AI parters when in SP, balance issues, a lack of ability to pause games in SP, etc.

Basically it turns games into Resident Evil 5.

I'll take a great, atmospheric, immersive, story-driven single player game over a multiplayer experience any day of the week.

-Byshop

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

I am a competitive person, so I can enjoy competitive gaming. When playing online I can get pretty pissed off but when playing locally at others I'm generally good at containing my feelings (now if only others could do the same...)

Avatar image for chicknfeet
chicknfeet

15630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 chicknfeet
Member since 2004 • 15630 Posts
I have fallen out of the mood for competitive multiplayer. Back when they used to have public arcades, I was more into it. There was a certain level of respect playing somebody competitively face-to-face. Now, with the anonymity of the internet, people just act like 9 year old dicks with no kind of respect for anybody. I can definitely do without that.
Avatar image for blueboxdoctor
blueboxdoctor

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 blueboxdoctor
Member since 2010 • 2549 Posts

I'm not opposed to competitive MP but anymore it seems every game has it.  I find myself just playing BF3 for an online shooter and Madden for online sports gaming (though, I will be adding the Vita Killzone for competitive MP when it comes out).  I don't really need to play deathmatch in every game that has a gun and I can't stand when obvious singleplayer games have trophies for the tacked on MP (i.e. Tomb Raider and Bioshock 2 just to name a couple).  Sometimes competitive online can be surprisingly fun such as Uncharted 2, but for the most part I find myself ignoring it in most games since it starts to get repetitive.

I have not gotten as much into co-op MP unless it's with people I know.  I'm hoping Killzone on the PS4 has co-op, KZ3 was fun playing through splitscreen.

But lately I've been playing mainly SP games with just BF3, Madden, and Soul Sacrifice for online play.

Avatar image for Spartan_N7
Spartan_N7

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Spartan_N7
Member since 2013 • 581 Posts
Its only Shooters that seem to have this problem and even then its limited to simple Deathmatch modes. I think competitive games should focus less on kill counts and more on some other types of objectives.Lulekani
Play Battlefield. I had a game earlier where I didnt get a single kill, died twice, and still had the most points at the end of the match. Anyway, the only competitive multiplayer game I play is Battlefield. Occasionally Ill pop in Call of Duty 4, but it's nothing but hackers anymore so I dont get much fun out of it.
Avatar image for Spartan_N7
Spartan_N7

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Spartan_N7
Member since 2013 • 581 Posts
I have fallen out of the mood for competitive multiplayer. Back when they used to have public arcades, I was more into it. There was a certain level of respect playing somebody competitively face-to-face. Now, with the anonymity of the internet, people just act like 9 year old dicks with no kind of respect for anybody. I can definitely do without that.chicknfeet
Which is exactly why I never use a mic, unless Im in party chat with friends lol
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
Unless they're taken too seriously, Such you someone going ballistic because they were shot one round or they lost a game, then I have no issues with it.
Avatar image for Shame-usBlackley
Shame-usBlackley

18266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 Shame-usBlackley
Member since 2002 • 18266 Posts

It's been overplayed. It was once really good, but they've just mashed it everyone's face so hard and stuck it in so many games it has no business being in that I just really don't give a flying fvck about it anymore. The way I see it, there are about four or five interesting multiplayer modes, and as such, I only really need one or two games with those modes to fill that niche for an entire generation. I say go with an uber-popular game like Gears or Halo; one that is still going to have a community in six months unlike 98% of every other multiplayer community. Beyond that, I have no idea why anyone would continue to buy online multiplayer games when the only differences are the settings and size of the community. I mean, how many King of the Hill, CTF, Team Battle, and Versus does anyone need? I just can't imagine anyone playing the fvck out of King of the Hill in Halo and then jumping into another game's KOTH mode and being blown away -- I just can't.

Beyond that, these games will eventually be unplayable once the servers are shut down, which means they have a finite shelf life anyway (and that's assuming they even have a decent community beyond a few months from launch, which most don't) and will eventually be a complete waste of money. Someone buying a shlt ton of multiplayer games reminds me of someone hoarding food; buying carts and carts and carts full of it, but by the time this person goes to eat most of it, it's all rotten. 

Avatar image for Jackc8
Jackc8

8515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#16 Jackc8
Member since 2007 • 8515 Posts

I have zero interest in it.  Considering what the audience for those games is like, I'd compare it to working at a daycare center and not getting paid for it.  You just do the exact same thing on the exact same maps over and over (until they come out with more maps you can buy) and whoever can stand the tedium the longest gets the highest kill/death ratio.

Avatar image for Lulekani
Lulekani

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Lulekani
Member since 2012 • 2318 Posts
[QUOTE="Lulekani"]Its only Shooters that seem to have this problem and even then its limited to simple Deathmatch modes. I think competitive games should focus less on kill counts and more on some other types of objectives.Spartan_N7
Play Battlefield. I had a game earlier where I didnt get a single kill, died twice, and still had the most points at the end of the match. Anyway, the only competitive multiplayer game I play is Battlefield. Occasionally Ill pop in Call of Duty 4, but it's nothing but hackers anymore so I dont get much fun out of it.

I really need to get around to playing BF3's Multiplayer.
Avatar image for Darkeroid2212
Darkeroid2212

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Darkeroid2212
Member since 2012 • 293 Posts

I can't really enjoy multiplayer to it's fullest because I have a very crappy 1Mbps internet connection which gives less than 1Mbps most of the time. Plus I have over 300 ping on most servers.

Avatar image for gpuFX16
gpuFX16

1296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 gpuFX16
Member since 2006 • 1296 Posts

I gave up on it a while back. I used to play a fair amount of FPS multiplayer, and my skill level was such that at least I was'nt getting totally obliterated within the first few seconds of a match. But after a few years of playing, fatigue started to set in. I was playing the same modes across more than one game. Everything felt stale, and the behavior of the online community certainly did'nt help either.  I'm not competitive either, so all of this combined to stop me from playing vs multiplayer at all.

Only sort of multiplayer interaction I choose these days is some co-op in Dark Souls/Borderlands, and on a few rare occasions, I'll boot up Dirt 3 for some rally stages. 

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 Archangel3371  Online
Member since 2004 • 46852 Posts
I love it and I really like how more devs are implementing it into so many of their games. I'll always play it for at least a little bit in every game I purchase.
Avatar image for CUDGEdave
CUDGEdave

2597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 CUDGEdave
Member since 2010 • 2597 Posts

I used to love the Rainbow 6 co op modes, Seems you don't get those in games anymore.

Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#22 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

I used to love the Rainbow 6 co op modes, Seems you don't get those in games anymore.

CUDGEdave
I really enjoyed those and the co-op modes in Ghost Recon (not the new one) even more. Those were the last console games I played where people actually worked together and seemed to attempt to communicate well.
Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#23 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts
To be honest i prefer singleplayer. For me it depends on the game, but i rarely play either co op or multiplayer to be honest
Avatar image for SoNin360
SoNin360

7175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 328

User Lists: 3

#24 SoNin360
Member since 2008 • 7175 Posts
I was hooked on it for a few years... Call of Duty and Battlefield mostly. It was very fun when it was pretty much new to me, then it became constantly frustrating to the point where I dropped it almost completely. I don't even care too much for co-op. I'll take playing single player games over anything. Plus, I play more games this way, whereas I would waste a bunch of time shooting people on the same maps over and over while leveling up and everything.
Avatar image for lensflare15
lensflare15

6652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 lensflare15
Member since 2010 • 6652 Posts

I generally avoid it, but there have been a few online games that I've enjoyed and been very active in.

Avatar image for Metamania
Metamania

12035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#26 Metamania
Member since 2002 • 12035 Posts

If I were to to chose between co-op and comp, I'd go with co-op. Several reasons why.

-Online lag. You really can't have a good, straight match without lag getting in the way. Because of that, gamers can use lag to their advantage and get you killed in places that you would think you would be safe in or it would make you jump from one spot to the next and then you'd end up dying. That's not cool at all.

-People are cheap, ridiculous, and pathetic. A lot of them, especially the MW community, love to Halo jump and tube the hell out of people to win. Then there's camping, a strategy that I find to be incredibly ridiculous and uncalled for.

-Co-op just seems a lot more fun to me and more relaxing, even though I do have times when some things in the game don't work out right and I get mad. Hell, who doesnt? Still, it's more enjoyable than competitive.

Avatar image for keech
keech

1451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 keech
Member since 2003 • 1451 Posts

Overall I do prefer co-op of competitive.

 

That's not to say I don't like competitive games, but they have to be balanced.  The problem is a lot of online games are "balanced" to cater to players who just aren't very good.  Creating some pretty terrible oversights that can easily be exploited.

 

I personally prefer fighting games as far as competitive gaming goes.  The fact that It's just you and one other person, no random factors outside of your control, appeals to me.  In a well made and balanced fighter, the better player wins, simple as that.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
TBH I don't play competitive multiplayer. I sometimes play co op but not often. I like just disappearing into a game by myself and forgetting the world.
Avatar image for LASer354
LASer354

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 LASer354
Member since 2013 • 319 Posts

Love it, but I'm a bit too competitive.

Avatar image for Yama
Yama

34159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Yama
Member since 2002 • 34159 Posts

As a competitive player I enjoy it. Depending on the game, it's like chess with faster reflexes and proper execution. I have a healthy competitive spirit, so I enjoy learning and developing very much.

Avatar image for Deadpool-n
Deadpool-n

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Deadpool-n
Member since 2012 • 489 Posts

I like it all. I love co op in the right game, and multiplayer is great because it adds to the replay. If a game doesn't have multiplayer I usually stop playing it after I beat it.

Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

Prefer competitive to co-op. Been playing League for 3 years now off and on. Every match is pretty much a learning experience and the majority of my best gaming moments this gen have stemmed from competitive multiplayer. Skype + friends + 5 man troll teams is too good.

Avatar image for Gallowhand
Gallowhand

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 9

#33 Gallowhand
Member since 2013 • 697 Posts

I don't mind playing some co-op campaigns, but I gave up on competitive multiplayer years ago.  It just doesn't appeal to me any more.

Avatar image for Spartan_N7
Spartan_N7

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Spartan_N7
Member since 2013 • 581 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartan_N7"][QUOTE="Lulekani"]Its only Shooters that seem to have this problem and even then its limited to simple Deathmatch modes. I think competitive games should focus less on kill counts and more on some other types of objectives.Lulekani
Play Battlefield. I had a game earlier where I didnt get a single kill, died twice, and still had the most points at the end of the match. Anyway, the only competitive multiplayer game I play is Battlefield. Occasionally Ill pop in Call of Duty 4, but it's nothing but hackers anymore so I dont get much fun out of it.

I really need to get around to playing BF3's Multiplayer.

It's incredible. I'll take Battlefield 3 over Halo or Call of Duty any day.
Avatar image for Goyoshi12
Goyoshi12

9687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#35 Goyoshi12
Member since 2009 • 9687 Posts

I've had fun playing them.

Avatar image for Deadpool-n
Deadpool-n

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Deadpool-n
Member since 2012 • 489 Posts

[QUOTE="Lulekani"][QUOTE="Spartan_N7"] Play Battlefield. I had a game earlier where I didnt get a single kill, died twice, and still had the most points at the end of the match. Anyway, the only competitive multiplayer game I play is Battlefield. Occasionally Ill pop in Call of Duty 4, but it's nothing but hackers anymore so I dont get much fun out of it. Spartan_N7
I really need to get around to playing BF3's Multiplayer.

It's incredible. I'll take Battlefield 3 over Halo or Call of Duty any day.

Agreed. Battlefield 3 is definitely the best shooter.

Avatar image for _Dez_
_Dez_

2398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 _Dez_
Member since 2006 • 2398 Posts

I enjoy competitive games to a certain extent. Every time I see other people play, it looks exciting, fun, and fast paced Then I get around to playing it, and I can't do any of the things I see other people do. I usually come around back to Halo every now and then, because it's the only multiplayer that I can actually play decently. Everything plateau's after a while and I find myself a little too frustrated to enjoy myself, which defeats the purpose of why I play games in the first place. I keep the competitive stuff to a minimum right now. Co-op, on the other hand, is something I prefer much more.

 

Avatar image for Yama
Yama

34159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Yama
Member since 2002 • 34159 Posts

It's incredible. I'll take Battlefield 3 over Halo or Call of Duty any day. Spartan_N7

I wouldn't put CoD and Halo in the same sentence though. At high level one requires a five (soon to be four) shot precision weapon with proper set ups and such versus pray and spray. I feel you though in regards to BF, it's golden.