I don't understand the R&C review...

It says it is bad because it is more of the same. Yet Halo 3 was basically Halo 1 and 2, yet that was somehow the best game ever made.

I don't understand. How can one game get ripped on for more of the same and another not even mentioned.

It says it is bad because it is more of the same. Yet Halo 3 was basically Halo 1 and 2, yet that was somehow the best game ever made.

I don't understand. How can one game get ripped on for more of the same and another not even mentioned.

Wasdie

Halo 3 had the forge system, you can record videos but apart from that it seems to be the same game.

Like I said, I have not played either so I can't really give a good opinion on the matter. But I have noticed things like this in other games, where something is a problem for one game but okay when another game does it.

It says it is bad because it is more of the same. Yet Halo 3 was basically Halo 1 and 2, yet that was somehow the best game ever made.

I don't understand. How can one game get ripped on for more of the same and another not even mentioned.

Wasdie

i can't be bothered to type all that out again :|

Glitchspot

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

It says it is bad because it is more of the same. Yet Halo 3 was basically Halo 1 and 2, yet that was somehow the best game ever made.

I don't understand. How can one game get ripped on for more of the same and another not even mentioned.

PelekotansDream

Halo 3 had the forge system, you can record videos but apart from that it seems to be the same game.

Like I said, I have not played either so I can't really give a good opinion on the matter. But I have noticed things like this in other games, where something is a problem for one game but okay when another game does it.

There are better examples than Halo though. What about God Of War II, that was essentially God Of War I, yet it managed to recieve very high scores across the board.

Because its not on the MS platform.Heil68

That, or GS just loves shooters.

Because its not on the MS platform.Heil68

You can't be serious.:roll:

Please don't bring that "GS is biased" crap in here. I see far too much of it already in SW.

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Because its not on the MS platform.The_Game21x

You can't be serious.:roll:

Please don't bring that "GS is biased" crap in here. I see far too much of it already in SW.

I think he was beign sarcastic.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Because its not on the MS platform.jechtshot78

You can't be serious.:roll:

Please don't bring that "GS is biased" crap in here. I see far too much of it already in SW.

I think he was beign sarcastic.

Theres more AAA for the PS3 on gamespot than on the gamerankings.

That's not why it scored poorly. That isn't even in the 'bad' section. I don't think the criticism that it's too much like its predecessors is ever mentioned in the review.

It scored poorly because, in the reviewer's opinion, the gameplay and pacing was worse than its predecessors, and the story was bad.