My PWR Week 7 (not official rankings)

Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#1 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts

Top 10:

1.
New Orleans Saints (5-0)

Wow. I was actually thinking that the Giants were going to beat the Saints in a close one. However, the Saints absolutely wrecked them. I never would've saw that coming. Brees is phenomonal, the running game has been its best in a long time, the offensive line has done a great job, the receivers produce and the defence has improved vastly so far. Unless they fall for the #1 Home Field Advantage Curse (which I hope is broken this year), they should be headed for Miami.

2.
Indianapolis Colts (5-0)

Normally, I wouldn't have taken the Colts down because of their bye. If the Saints/Giants game was close, they'd still be on top. Hopefully Manning has the best season of his careers and butts heads with the Saints come Febuary.

3.
Minnesota Vikings (6-0)

"OMG FAVRE IS BACK OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG FAVRE FAVRE FAVRE FAVRE OMG OMG FAVRE BRETT FAVRE OMG OMG OMG BRADY OMG FAVRE FAVRE FAVRE OMG OMG FAVRE OMG," any analyst who likes Favre.

4.
Denver Broncos (6-0)

I hate these guys so much. I hate them. However, they are an absolutely great team. Josh McDaniels and Mike Nolan have changed this defence so much, Orton has actually done a great job, the running game is dynamic and they're going everything well. Right now, I am projecting three people here to win awards after the season: Offensive Rookie of the Year, Monero, Defensive Player of the Year: Elvis Dumervil, Coach of the Year: Josh McDaniels.

5.
New York Giants (5-1)

I was so glad that the Bills game was a 4:00 game. I have to watch them every week except when they (happily) blackout the game. I was grateful to actually watch two football teams battle it out, except it was lopsided. I'm not worried about the Giants just yet though. Arizona may be in for a world of hurt next week.

6.
New England Patriots (4-2)

LOLfest, ROFLCOPTER, Funfest, Bloodening..... there are so many ways to describe Brady's and the Patriots comedic win over the Titans. All of the emberassments will be posted for the Titans spot. I'll just say I had no problem with New England running up the score. Their offence hasn't found its rhythm until now, and it may have had been a better idea to keep them out there (and make history).

7.
Atlanta Falcons (4-1)

I have actually been quite surprised with the Falcons so far. I thought they were overrated because their defence was so horrible, but the defence has actually improved this year. Matt Ryan is helping them win games and is a future superstar. Whats even more shocking is that Ryan has lost one game at home in his career: Week 12 against the Denver Broncos last year in a 24-20 game.

8.
Cincinnati Bengals (4-2)

I'm not thinking of them negatively just yet. It was off a very emotional victory against the Ravens, in a less meaningful, non-divisional game against an inferior opponent. I'm not surprised that they lost. However, Pass Rusher Anwaan Otom is gone for the season, and Defensive Tackle Domata Peko may be out for a few weeks. They were injury rattled last year on defence (and still finished 12th), so they can still make a postseason performance. They also perform best when doubted on.

9.
Pittsburgh Steelers (4-2)

They haven't beaten anyone great yet and lost against their two best opponents (Chicago and Cinncinati), but they're still winning games.

I'll use this space to complain about Norv Turner. He really pisses me off. We really could've won against Denver. Honestly, on a 3rd and goal, he takes Sproles and runs him up the middle, and (obviously) fails. LT was having a great game: either give the ball to him, dump it off to Sproles, or pass to Gates (yahoo was being retarded on me and failed to start Rivers and Jackson on my team. FAIL!). Then, later in the game, when Sheffler scored his touchdown, he clearly had only one foot inb-bounds, yet he didn't challenge it and was in his own little world, standing there motionless. What a dumbass. We also got screwed on the Challenge he did make, when Stokley scored his TD, Cromartie touched him on the 1-yard line. The Broncos should've gotten the ball on the 1-yard line, yet the officials who were horrible all night and making phantom plays all game long, screwed the Chargers over.

However, that doesn't change the fact that Turner is to dumb to be an NFL head coach. "Well, I motivate them when they're almost out of it." If we had a good head coach who knew how important the offensive line was, didn't get rid of Lorenzo Neal, knew dept on the defensive line is important and actually signed free agents not named Drew Bennett, then we wouldn't have to be motivated by you, because we'd lock up a playoff spot by then anyways.

10.
Chicago Bears (3-2)

They aren't exactly 10th place material, but with the Ravens and Jets collapsing, the Eagles losing to the Raiders, and Rodgers not having an offensive line, I settled for 10th place for the Bears.

Bottom 10:

23.
Carolina Panthers (2-3)

They're going no where after two straight victories against the Deadskins and the Bucs in which they almost lost both. Delhomme has thrown 4 TDs and 10 INTs so far this year, so he still sucks. Panthers won't do well this year, and even if they do beat the Bills this week, they're not moving out of the bottom 10.

24.
Buffalo Bills (2-4)

Doesn't seem right for them to be this high, right? With Dick "Pull" Jauron coaching and now Ryan Fitzpatrick's spagetti arm throwing the ball, this team is bad, even coming off a boring win against a Sanchez-lead Jets. If Sanchez didn't debacle his team so much and throw five interceptions, the Jets would've won with Jones having a monster game.

25.
Detriot Lions (1-5)

Despite what the scoreboard says, it wasn't exactly the greatest win for the Packers. They never lose to the Lions at home, Rodgers still doesn't have an offensive line (5 sacks today, 25 on the season), and Calvin Johnson was down for the Lions and so was Stafford. Also, Culpepper went down and Drew Stanton went in unprepared. The Packer made quite a few mental mistakes as well during the game. Thats why they're not in the top 10.

26.
Oakland Raiders (2-4)

They won and they're ranked higher than they should be (since all of the other teams suck so much), so I'll rant about different teams here that aren't in the top or bottom 10.

The Ravens and Jets have been in free-fall mode, but for different reasons. The Ravens defence has seen its best days, they can't stop the pass. Their defence, really, is average at best, even with future Hall of Famers Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. Sanchez threw five picks against the Bills, which is really sad, and hasn't played well at all. Actually, outside of the Titans game, he really hasn't done anything, really.

The Cardinals are really starting to improve. If Warner can stay healthy, they get the opposing QB pressured, and establish a run game, this team may take the NFC West back. Their main competition is the 49ers, and the Seahawks, whom they just raped. Just like what Emmitt Smith said a couple of years ago, the NFC West has got to be the weakest ........CONFERENCES...... in the NFC. Those weren't the exact words, but he called the NFC West one of the weakest conferences in the NFC.

I'll never buy into the Cowboys all season. They're a team with a great offence and horrible defence. Enough said. Plus, saying Romo isn't clutch is an understatement, and Wade Phillips is the coach.

27.
Cleveland Browns (1-5)

They suck, and since they're so many bad teams this year, they're higher than they'd normally be. Eric Vagina is a horrible coach, and the Browns will never get anywhere until he's fired, and even then, its still unlikely, given he's made some horrible trades lately. Treating Kellen Winslow and Braylon Edwards like they're nothing and shipping them off doesn't really help these abysmal QBs. If your trying to develop a good QB and you trade away all of their targets, they're going to do worse. Nice philosiphy, Eric Vagina.

28.
Kansas City Chiefs (1-5)

YAY!!! We've lost three times by double digits, one of the single digit losses was against the Raiders, and sure our QB can't throw deep and gets sacked every other play, but we beat the powerhouse Deadskins!!!! YAY!!!!

29.
Washington Deadskins (2-4)

They are an embarrasment. They've given four teams their first win of the season, their two wins have come against opponents with a combined 0-12 record (by 5 points), and now Zorny (which sounds like Horny), has been stripped of calling offensive plays.

Emmitt's Analysis: "Deadskins not too good team. There is no way they should allow the Chiefs to be them the way that they did. Campbell bench for Collins in centre game. They score 6 point against Chiefs, who score 13 points and 13 higher than....than...then 6, so losted. Them neededed to play gooder for bottom half of game. They probably won't make playoff. If they want ...do.... do....to do wells, they has to be patience."

30.
Tampa Bay Buccanneers (0-6)

My list of the worst owners in the NFL: William Clay Ford, Al Davis, Daniel Snyder and Malcolm Glazer. This team absolutely sucks. Its fascinating that they're not the worst team of the year so far.

31.
St. Louis Hams (0-6)

The Hams almost won, but only because the Jaguars made so many costly mistakes. They were still dominated in that game. They're still a joke. Don't think anything positive about them, except that Steven Jackson is sick and so are their jerseys.

32.
Tennessee Titans (0-6)

Some LOLworthy notes from their game:

1. They got absolutely debacled in the snow. They're the first team since I started following football to give up 59 points in a game. I THINK that there was a 58 point performance by the Browns a couple of years before I started to watch football, but I don't know. Whats worse is that the Patriots scored no forth quarter points because for some reason they got benched. If I was the Patriots, I'd let my offence go into rhythm some more (which they hadn't all season) and put up 60+ and 73+ (for the record). Screw if its running up the score, its fun.

2. Brady threw five touchdown passes in the Second Quarter, a new NFL record. He threw six in the game altogether, three going to Moss (on my FF team), Welker and Faulk (also on my team). Now, if yahoo didn't **** me over and let me have played Faulk, Rivers, Jackson, Shockey and Boone, I may have gotten my first win of the season.

3. Read this: Vince Young attempted 2 passes that were both incomplete, yet he lead the Titans in yardage. In fact, in the nfl.com gamecentre, he is the only one listed for passing (if the stats aren't fully looked at).

4. How did this happen, you might ask? Well, Collins completed 2 passes. Yeah..... two. How did he stil throw for less yards than Young? He threw for......get this...... -7 yards. WOW!!!!! Someone likes to throw backwards to players who keep running backwards. I didn't see Nate Washington's whopping -22 yard play, but its still emberrasing not to have had made up for it.

5. Their secondary was absolutely brutal. Apparently, the Titans believe that if you don't cover the likes of Moss, Welker etc, who are catching passes from Brady, in the snow, you'll have fascinating results. And boy, did they succeed.

6. In a nutshell, here was their strategy: throw inaccurate passes backwards, don't complete any passes forwards, don't cover Moss and Welker, and hope that the snow magically gives the Patriots the swine flu.

They're horrible. As Emmitt Smith or Keyshawn Johnson would've probably said about their performance. "They play not to wel... good against Pats."

The Rest:
11. Ravens
12. Packers
13. Cards
14. 49ers
15. Texans
16. Chargers
17. Dolphins
18. Eagles
19. Jets
20. Seahawks
21. Cowboys
22. Jagars

Avatar image for wallymartin
wallymartin

12165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 wallymartin
Member since 2004 • 12165 Posts
Cowboys too low. I know you don't believe in them, but the fact is that they have a winning record right now and so should be a little closer to the middle. No lower than 18 I would say, if you want to stick to keeping them low. 16 would be more appropriate.
Avatar image for Blazer88
Blazer88

2066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#3 Blazer88
Member since 2004 • 2066 Posts

Just a quick note. Brady was actually benched after only one series in 3rd quarter.

The whole running up the score thing is from whiners and haters around the league. Last checked this is football and real game for that matter. The Titans players are played losts of money to score thier own points and stop the other team from doing the same.

People should be more mad at Titans for being quitters, especially thier fans, because I think it is pretty clear that that team, or at least most of its players didn't even try to play. I mean the dudes didn't even get a field goal. Terrible.

Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts
meh titans arent the worst team IMO
Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts

Um, why do you hate Denver?

Avatar image for tmblackmaster
tmblackmaster

4553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 tmblackmaster
Member since 2003 • 4553 Posts

Um, why do you hate Denver?

rockguy92

B/c he is a chargers fan, need I say more

Avatar image for Bobbles
Bobbles

11678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Bobbles
Member since 2003 • 11678 Posts
Dallas @ 21, below teams with losing records? Lol. Dolphins, Seahawks, Texans, and Chargers all head of them? Gtfo. The Egals just lost to the Raiders.... Dallas has lost to teams with a 11-1 combined record.
Avatar image for JackBurton
JackBurton

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#8 JackBurton
Member since 2002 • 3808 Posts
^ Dallas' three wins: Bucs (0-6), Panthers (2-3) and Chiefs (1-5).
Avatar image for garey017
garey017

1725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 299

User Lists: 0

#9 garey017
Member since 2006 • 1725 Posts

Your commentary on the Titans is lol-worthy.

The Pats did the right thing by putting in their backups. No use risking injuries to your primaries when you're playing what looked like a high school team. I doubt the Titans would have been responsible for dishing out any injuries, but it was snowy, so Brady might have slipped and fell and hurt himself.

Avatar image for Mister__Awesome
Mister__Awesome

2439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Mister__Awesome
Member since 2009 • 2439 Posts

Dallas @ 21, below teams with losing records? Lol. Dolphins, Seahawks, Texans, and Chargers all head of them? Gtfo. The Egals just lost to the Raiders.... Dallas has lost to teams with a 11-1 combined record.Bobbles
^ Dallas' three wins: Bucs (0-6), Panthers (2-3) and Chiefs (1-5). JackBurton

Wow, get owned. How can you possibly even imagine that the Cowboys are legit if they can only beat teams like those and lose bad to the others. Maybe if Romo doesn't look horrible against NYG or if DAL needs OT to beat KC and etc.

This is the NFL you don't get rewarded for losses. Lol :P

Anyways, Titans #32 and STL #31? Bold statement there, but somehow i agree with it, at least STL has come close to winning more than one game unlike TEN.

Avatar image for Bobbles
Bobbles

11678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Bobbles
Member since 2003 • 11678 Posts

[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Dallas @ 21, below teams with losing records? Lol. Dolphins, Seahawks, Texans, and Chargers all head of them? Gtfo. The Egals just lost to the Raiders.... Dallas has lost to teams with a 11-1 combined record.Mister__Awesome

^ Dallas' three wins: Bucs (0-6), Panthers (2-3) and Chiefs (1-5). JackBurton

Wow, get owned. How can you possibly even imagine that the Cowboys are legit if they can only beat teams like those and lose bad to the others. Maybe if Romo doesn't look horrible against NYG or if DAL needs OT to beat KC and etc.

This is the NFL you don't get rewarded for losses. Lol :P

Anyways, Titans #32 and STL #31? Bold statement there, but somehow i agree with it, at least STL has come close to winning more than one game unlike TEN.

Who said the Cowboys are legit?No one, how about reading what I said dipstick. What are your thoughts on the Egals? Their wins are against garbage teams as well and they lost to Oakland. So if you have Philly above Dallas, then you're logic is flawed. Obviously in the NFL you don't get rewarded for wins either according to you.
Avatar image for Bobbles
Bobbles

11678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Bobbles
Member since 2003 • 11678 Posts
^ Dallas' three wins: Bucs (0-6), Panthers (2-3) and Chiefs (1-5). JackBurton
And the Dolphins, Hawks, Chargers, and Egals had impressive wins?
Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#13 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts

Dallas @ 21, below teams with losing records? Lol. Dolphins, Seahawks, Texans, and Chargers all head of them? Gtfo. The Egals just lost to the Raiders.... Dallas has lost to teams with a 11-1 combined record.Bobbles

The Cowboys defence is terrible. Get over it. Other than D-Ware, they have no one. Teams like that are always overrated as hell, and considering that they're one of the biggest market teams in the NFL, that makes them a thousand times overrated. As for the teams they've beaten, they've won 3 games combined, the Panthers (who beat the skins and bucs) and Chiefs (against the Skins). They didn't dominate any of those joke teams either: they allowed 450 yards to the BUCS, beat the Panthers on 21-14 and were behind at halftime and took until overtime to beat the Chiefs. They looked competitive in the games they did lose in, but we all know what Romo's like, and they coughed up leads in both of those games.

Also, here are reasons why they're lower than the teams you listed:

Dolphins- They're one of the more underrated teams in the NFL. They're riding a two game winning streak after going 0-3 (and were surprisingly competitive in them all) , and the Pennington injury is actually very good for them: Chad Henne's arm is a thousand times stronger than Pennington's allowing them to spread their offence more than they could before alonside with their dominant run game in Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams (who have both rushed 5+ yards per carry). And their rush defence has done very well this year. Passing offence, not so much, but they've also played three of the best QB's in Ryan, Manning and Rivers.

Seahawks- They're also underrated, even after that loss to the Cards (also underrated). Mistakes cost them 10 points against the Cards, their defence has only had one really bad outing against the Colts, and their team is going to get a boost with Hasselbeck back.

Texans- They're another good offence/horrible defence team, but their offence is far better than Dallas'. Schuab is surprising 2nd in the league with passing yard (though Manning will take that back eventually), and Kubiak cost them two games in which he for some reason called Chris Brown to do 4th down carries deep into the endzone (against the Jaguars and Arizona, the latter having an improving defence). Also, they shut down Benson (who was 1st in the league in rushing yards, playing against the Ravens, Steelers and Packers), and Andre Johnson became the 1st receiver this year to outplay Bengals star CB Leon Hall all year.

Chargers- I can see your arguement here. They are pretty much the same team, San Diego has a very bad defence along with a good offence. However, Rivers is a much better QB than Romo hands down, you can come up with any argument you want but you won't win, and Turner has weighed us down, like see me rant about how much he sucks. Wade Phillips also sucks, so they're about even in coaching, except Turner doesn't choke going late into the season.

Eagles- They lost because Reid for some reason called 53 pass plays when McNabb was getting no protection due to poor pass protection and the fact that he thinks you can call 4 timeouts in a half (along with thinking games can't end in ties). Fix up that gameplan, they beat the Raiders. Westbrook is very capable of leading this offence. This is also an Eagles situation we've seen before: the public bets against them and they always peform their best with their backs against the wall. See last year: they tie the Bengals (who had one win going into that game), McNabb is benched against the Ravens, everyone thinks they suck, and they miraculouly appear in the postseason, including when they debacled the Cowboys 44-6 in a fight for the 6th seed. The Cowboys are the opposite going down the stretch of the season. Going down the course of the season will all odds against you, I'd take McNabb/Reid over Romo/Phillips.

Avatar image for Bobbles
Bobbles

11678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Bobbles
Member since 2003 • 11678 Posts
Nice, I see you make excuses for other teams. I can say the same about Dallas in the NYG and Denver game, "Had Dallas ran the ball the whole time they win both games". Too bad that's not how it works, Philly lost to Oakland.. you make a big deal out of Dallas barely beating the Chiefs, but they still won! Philly loses to a garbage team and it's no big deal becaue the playcalling sucked, just like Dallas in both their losses. Nice double standard. Oh and I didn't realize rankings this year had anything to do with last year or the year before, but alright. Oh and where is all this "Dallas sucks, get over it. Dallas isn't legit come on now" coming from anyway? Who said any of that? All I said was Dallas should be above a few teams and should be ranked around 15-16th, never knew that meant they were an elite team.
Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#15 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts

Nice, I see you make excuses for other teams. I can say the same about Dallas in the NYG and Denver game, "Had Dallas ran the ball the whole time they win both games". Too bad that's not how it works, Philly lost to Oakland.. you make a big deal out of Dallas barely beating the Chiefs, but they still won! Philly loses to a garbage team and it's no big deal becaue the playcalling sucked, just like Dallas in both their losses. Nice double standard. Oh and I didn't realize rankings this year had anything to do with last year or the year before, but alright. Oh and where is all this "Dallas sucks, get over it. Dallas isn't legit come on now" coming from anyway? Who said any of that? All I said was Dallas should be above a few teams and should be ranked around 15-16th, never knew that meant they were an elite team.Bobbles

Where did I say that? If you mean to Romo choking and Eagles pulling through when everyone's against them, it happens a lot and shouldn't be ignored. I said "Dallas sucks, get over it" because this arguement is unneccessary because your fighting to have them ranked 15-16th, which is pretty sad. Honestly, I may have overreacted a bit, but why are you starting arguements with everyone to defend a team because they're a few slots lower than they should be. I may have contradicted myself with Reid's horrible playcalling, but at least their defence held up in that game, and give a few weeks, they're competitive again. They have dominated in games against in games this year though, but I felt like I slipped them enough with their loss against the Raiders.

I may have been wrong with having them below the Eagles, but get over it.

Avatar image for Bobbles
Bobbles

11678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Bobbles
Member since 2003 • 11678 Posts

[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Nice, I see you make excuses for other teams. I can say the same about Dallas in the NYG and Denver game, "Had Dallas ran the ball the whole time they win both games". Too bad that's not how it works, Philly lost to Oakland.. you make a big deal out of Dallas barely beating the Chiefs, but they still won! Philly loses to a garbage team and it's no big deal becaue the playcalling sucked, just like Dallas in both their losses. Nice double standard. Oh and I didn't realize rankings this year had anything to do with last year or the year before, but alright. Oh and where is all this "Dallas sucks, get over it. Dallas isn't legit come on now" coming from anyway? Who said any of that? All I said was Dallas should be above a few teams and should be ranked around 15-16th, never knew that meant they were an elite team.Goliath_unit

Where did I say that? If you mean to Romo choking and Eagles pulling through when everyone's against them, it happens a lot and shouldn't be ignored. I said "Dallas sucks, get over it" because this arguement is unneccessary because your fighting to have them ranked 15-16th, which is pretty sad. Honestly, I may have overreacted a bit, but why are you starting arguements with everyone to defend a team because they're a few slots lower than they should be. I may have contradicted myself with Reid's horrible playcalling, but at least their defence held up in that game, and give a few weeks, they're competitive again. They have dominated in games against in games this year though, but I felt like I slipped them enough with their loss against the Raiders.

I may have been wrong with having them below the Eagles, but get over it.

What happened to all business about, "it's my opinion so get over it!"? I guess I can't come and give an opinion on your rankings without you having a fit. Why am I arguing with everyone? All 3 of you responded to me, so I responded back, "get over it!".
Avatar image for garey017
garey017

1725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 299

User Lists: 0

#17 garey017
Member since 2006 • 1725 Posts
The Steelers should be ranked 8th, not 9th. And I will fight you to the death to prove it.
Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#18 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts
[QUOTE="Goliath_unit"]

[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Nice, I see you make excuses for other teams. I can say the same about Dallas in the NYG and Denver game, "Had Dallas ran the ball the whole time they win both games". Too bad that's not how it works, Philly lost to Oakland.. you make a big deal out of Dallas barely beating the Chiefs, but they still won! Philly loses to a garbage team and it's no big deal becaue the playcalling sucked, just like Dallas in both their losses. Nice double standard. Oh and I didn't realize rankings this year had anything to do with last year or the year before, but alright. Oh and where is all this "Dallas sucks, get over it. Dallas isn't legit come on now" coming from anyway? Who said any of that? All I said was Dallas should be above a few teams and should be ranked around 15-16th, never knew that meant they were an elite team.Bobbles

Where did I say that? If you mean to Romo choking and Eagles pulling through when everyone's against them, it happens a lot and shouldn't be ignored. I said "Dallas sucks, get over it" because this arguement is unneccessary because your fighting to have them ranked 15-16th, which is pretty sad. Honestly, I may have overreacted a bit, but why are you starting arguements with everyone to defend a team because they're a few slots lower than they should be. I may have contradicted myself with Reid's horrible playcalling, but at least their defence held up in that game, and give a few weeks, they're competitive again. They have dominated in games against in games this year though, but I felt like I slipped them enough with their loss against the Raiders.

I may have been wrong with having them below the Eagles, but get over it.

What happened to all business about, "it's my opinion so get over it!"? I guess I can't come and give an opinion on your rankings without you having a fit. Why am I arguing with everyone? All 3 of you responded to me, so I responded back, "get over it!".

I won't care if its civilized. See Wally's post. I personally disagreed with his post, but I didn't mind it. I also overreacted with "Dallas sucks, get over it", but I'll admit I was wrong and I'll apologize for it.

Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#19 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts

The Steelers should be ranked 8th, not 9th. And I will fight you to the death to prove it.garey017

I'll accept your arguement.

Also, when you said my commentary on the Titans was lol-worthy, it was in a good way, right? :D

Avatar image for Bobbles
Bobbles

11678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bobbles
Member since 2003 • 11678 Posts

I won't care if its civilized. See Wally's post. I personally disagreed with his post, but I didn't mind it. I also overreacted with "Dallas sucks, get over it", but I'll admit I was wrong and I'll apologize for it.

Goliath_unit

"why the hell are the redskins not in the bottom 10? I'd take the Chargers, Seahawks, Fins, Panthers, Cards, Jags and Texans over them."

Similar to what I posted. You rag on HT about his rankings, actually everyone does, so we can't rag on you? If you want to defend yourself(which you did), all the power to you. HT gets it alot worse than you do.

Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#21 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts
[QUOTE="Goliath_unit"]

I won't care if its civilized. See Wally's post. I personally disagreed with his post, but I didn't mind it. I also overreacted with "Dallas sucks, get over it", but I'll admit I was wrong and I'll apologize for it.

Bobbles

"why the hell are the redskins not in the bottom 10? I'd take the Chargers, Seahawks, Fins, Panthers, Cards, Jags and Texans over them."

Similar to what I posted. You rag on HT about his rankings, actually everyone does, so we can't rag on you? If you want to defend yourself(which you did), all the power to you. HT gets it alot worse than you do.

I'll also apologize to HT for some of the disagreements I've made in the past, and I won't do it again. In fact, I do feel sorried now for the heat HTs taken, but I just wanted to back up my argument, but at least I've apologized for my actions. Its just that I'm new at this, and this really is the first time someone really has given me a response like that. You just don't know how to react.

Avatar image for Mister__Awesome
Mister__Awesome

2439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 Mister__Awesome
Member since 2009 • 2439 Posts
[QUOTE="Mister__Awesome"]

[QUOTE="Bobbles"]Dallas @ 21, below teams with losing records? Lol. Dolphins, Seahawks, Texans, and Chargers all head of them? Gtfo. The Egals just lost to the Raiders.... Dallas has lost to teams with a 11-1 combined record.Bobbles

^ Dallas' three wins: Bucs (0-6), Panthers (2-3) and Chiefs (1-5). JackBurton

Wow, get owned. How can you possibly even imagine that the Cowboys are legit if they can only beat teams like those and lose bad to the others. Maybe if Romo doesn't look horrible against NYG or if DAL needs OT to beat KC and etc.

This is the NFL you don't get rewarded for losses. Lol :P

Anyways, Titans #32 and STL #31? Bold statement there, but somehow i agree with it, at least STL has come close to winning more than one game unlike TEN.

Who said the Cowboys are legit?No one, how about reading what I said dipstick. What are your thoughts on the Egals? Their wins are against garbage teams as well and they lost to Oakland. So if you have Philly above Dallas, then you're logic is flawed. Obviously in the NFL you don't get rewarded for wins either according to you.

Um? If it were up to me the *Eagles* wouldn't be high because a.) they lost to the Raiders b.) They have had the easiest scheduale so far with the exception of facing NO. 

And thing is with Dallas they aren't looking pretty and Power Rankings are about impressing like the dreaded BCS. All I am saying is if you are going to lose don't lose ugly or you will be @ 21 crying about the *Eagles* being ahead.

 I'd have Philly over DAL but barely if it were up to me.

Avatar image for garey017
garey017

1725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 299

User Lists: 0

#23 garey017
Member since 2006 • 1725 Posts
Wally should seriously consider using your rankings instead. People seem to think they're better, and you manage to get them up more than 2 days before the f'ing games.
Avatar image for Goliath_unit
Goliath_unit

3930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 71

User Lists: 0

#24 Goliath_unit
Member since 2006 • 3930 Posts
As great as that would be, I don't want to feel like the b**** who took away HT's job. I do this because A) its fun, and B) I want people to see my opinions. Its HT's job and will always be HT's job. I even hope that my rankings help him make his, and hopefully people will respect him more.