[QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"]
[QUOTE="Khadaj32"]
I agree, which is exactly why you need to read up on everything else they've added, and take into account developing costs and hardware costs.
1kryptic
Ugh, the DSi and XL are price dropping soon
OK
You realise, in 2007 the 8GB iPod Touch sold for $300 even though it only cost $149 to make an individual iPod Touch 8GB back in 2007? So you guys are saying, something with Multi-Touch, 400Mhz+ CPU, 128MB RAM, 100Mhz GPU, 3.5inch 480x320 Glass LCD Screen, Wireless B/G, 8GB flash storagecost only $149 in 2007, in two thousand and seven!
And you guys think Nintendo is going to top this?
43DS doesn't have Multi-Touchsince its using a stylus. 3DS probably won't have 8GB internal storage, probably 2GB if we're lucky. The 3DS doesn't have Glass screens to my knowledge, the 3DS doesn't look like its rocking 128MB System RAM, but i don't know. Honestly with the graphics of Kid Icarus, and RE:R, the 3DS may be using a nice ARM CPU around 400-600Mhz but thats not very expensive
Trust me fellas, Nintendo will sell this thing at $199, and i bet they'll be making a 20%-30% profit off every unit sold for that price.
I mean really, $300? More than the Wii ever WAS? Ever?
For 10 year old GameCube tech?
Hey the GBA used SNES-like tech, did it ever cost as much as the SNES in its prime? And the DS used N64-Like tech did it ever cost nearly as much as the N64 did?
Just coz you're wowed by the 3DS, doesn't mean its actually anywhere near Cutting edge tech. Facts are, its CPU/RAM, flash storage, Wireless, are all probably going to be below current industry standards by a bit, and be very affordable
Come On! This is Nintendo guys.
Link for the iPod proof
http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/12/19/isuppli-8gb-ipod-touch-costs-apple-15504
I agree 100%. He thinks the 3DS is some sort of genuis invention with cutting edge revolutionary technology. Nothing about the 3DS warrants a $300 pricetag, no matter how great you think it is. They can't get away with charging people $300 for this thing. That would be absurd.
Don't presume to know what I think. The 3DS isn't revolutionary, however, it is for mainstream. Instead of throwing random prices around for other hardware, let's remember some of the following.
Nintendo owns the handheld gaming market. If they charge $300 for the 3DS, they're gonna get it. You know it, they know it. However, Nintendo aren't douchebags. In my original post, I said $250-$300 was a fair estimate. I never said a static $300 would be definite, stop putting words in my mouth.
A lot fo you seem to be deftly aware of how a business is run, on how to maintain the industry with your products. Please, giv me an example of what your business is, as wel as your product. Oh right, you aren't successful businessman or industry analysts, your gamers with regular jobs, or are in school. Cut the crap. None of us, including myself, know exactly how much they'll charge until it's announced/leaked. However, let's look at the most obvious comparison.
DSi XL = $189. So, according to some of you, they're going to drop the XL's price by about $30-$50, so the 3DS can take over the ~$200 mark? Really? Even if the 3DS' technology isn't cutting edge against some electronics available, it is in handheld gaming, and it is certainly much more advanced than the Nintendo DSi XL. Yet you're all expecting them to sell it for pretty much the same price as the XL. Yes, that's what I call uninformed.
Log in to comment