Animal Crossing City Folk is the same game

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WhiteLion130
WhiteLion130

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 150

User Lists: 0

#51 WhiteLion130
Member since 2008 • 197 Posts

Sorry, you're confused.

If you've bothered to read any previews at all, you'd see there are many improvements over the previous versions.

Try doing a bit of research before you decide to post your next topic.

AlexSays

his/shes right

Avatar image for Sonick54
Sonick54

7947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 Sonick54
Member since 2005 • 7947 Posts

why are fans getting all raged at the TC for pointing out something like this? Seriously, it's like someone can't criticize one nitendo game without fans jumping on them :|

either way, i agree with TC.  City folk looks like a rehash. It's like all nintendo did was add wild world with the GC AC and came up with the wii version.

First off, the game was ORIGINALY for the n64. the graphics we're understandable for it's time. but now, it's just plain laziness.

I also agree with VGgobb. Those things aren't exactly what seperate it from it being different. New furniture, events we're expected. But they aren't drastic changes to set them apart.

Backup your claims alexsays. what seperates city folk from the previous two?

 

Avatar image for cloudff7tm
cloudff7tm

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 cloudff7tm
Member since 2006 • 3975 Posts

I agree with TC. I don't think it is necessarily the same game, but I think Nintendo could of did a better job with adding some new content.

It looks and feels like the GC version. I mean, there is no reason the graphics should still look like that. If I can think of some cool new ideas for the franchise, why can't Nintendo. It seems like one of those stupid Sims stuff packs.

 

 

Avatar image for spartan211
spartan211

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 spartan211
Member since 2006 • 109 Posts
It is most certainly not the same game , I will be standing in front of GameStop an hour from now waiting for the beauty that is Animal Crossing!!!!! Anyone else?
Avatar image for DSgamer64
DSgamer64

4449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#55 DSgamer64
Member since 2007 • 4449 Posts
No I have seen the game and read the previews. There is now a market place where you can get your hair done, miis, online with wii speak and im sure new events. None of these minor additions are enough to justify this game. The market place is just an expansion to the neighborhood. Wii speak is the best improvement but inst that good because if you dont know anyone to play with its useless. Miis arent important seeing as though every wii game just about has them. So you are still doing the same thing. Running erands, chopping trees, eating fruit and getting money. There isnt one new feature that just is truely amazing. Even the graphics are the same. If you cant see this then you're blind. Im sure its a good game because it is animal crossing but it is the samewiidog
:lol: Since when did the last Animal Crossing for the GC have online play?
Avatar image for evrdayblues
evrdayblues

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#56 evrdayblues
Member since 2005 • 512 Posts

The only thing that really bothers me about the game is that the one thing that's really getting attention (online play) seems to be useless and uninteresting. What exactly can you do in your town with your friends? I saw the marathon and all they were doing was running around town, and once in a while they would catch a fish or a butterfly. Is that all really so exiting? If you could actually play some other minigames together, something implemented by Nintendo, maybe it would be interesting. It just seems boring, I'm sorry...

I'm not hating on AC, I'm just sad that the developer hasn't tapped into 5% of the potential.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

The only thing that really bothers me about the game is that the one thing that's really getting attention (online play) seems to be useless and uninteresting. What exactly can you do in your town with your friends? I saw the marathon and all they were doing was running around town, and once in a while they would catch a fish or a butterfly. Is that all really so exiting? If you could actually play some other minigames together, something implemented by Nintendo, maybe it would be interesting. It just seems boring, I'm sorry...

I'm not hating on AC, I'm just sad that the developer hasn't tapped into 5% of the potential.

evrdayblues

Their are Fishing Tournaments and Bug Catching tournaments that you and your friends coulddo together. Also they have Holidays and Events that are exclusive to certain parts of the world and if you go to someone who lives in Korea's town you can go to an event that is exclusive to Korea. The same is for all around the world.

Edit* Also the reason they didn't go to the Tournament or anything is because Tournaments are only on certain days. Yesterday their was a fishing Tournament.

http://animal-crossing.com/cityfolk/calendar/

Avatar image for epic_pets
epic_pets

5598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 epic_pets
Member since 2008 • 5598 Posts
There is alot of new stuff.
Avatar image for toddH_basic
toddH_basic

469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 toddH_basic
Member since 2002 • 469 Posts

It is most certainly not the same game , I will be standing in front of GameStop an hour from now waiting for the beauty that is Animal Crossing!!!!! Anyone else?spartan211

Yes, me! And I'm glad to hear of your enthusiasm spartan 

Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#60 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts

There is a lot of new stuff. Even though the basic concept hasn't changed, I'm still getting it.

It may be almost the same game, with changes thrown in, but I don't care. What I really want is to start new. I mean, I worked hard on my first two towns, but I don't want to delete them, because I worked so hard on them and I can still use them. But the game loses some fun when you can buy anything without working for it, or there is nothing in your town you can improve on. My main reason for getting this game is to start off with a new town, where I have to work for my stuff, and enjoy that work. Thats what Animal Crossing is.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
To the complainers: 1) If you could add something to the game without drastically changing it, what would you add that would make it a justifiable purchase? 2) If the game does not appeal to then do not get it. Nobody is forcing you to buy it.
The only thing that really bothers me about the game is that the one thing that's really getting attention (online play) seems to be useless and uninteresting. What exactly can you do in your town with your friends?evrdayblues
You must have not had Wild World. I thought the same thing when Wild World came out, but ended up online every time I played it. You find stuff to do I guess. Hard to explain. :P
Avatar image for CanadianEh
CanadianEh

7173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 CanadianEh
Member since 2002 • 7173 Posts
I'm still getting it. Call me a sucker, but all I want to do is trade fruit with you poor saps.
Avatar image for JumpingRooftops
JumpingRooftops

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 JumpingRooftops
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I love the new Animal Crossing. It is what it is. If they would have made drastic changes, it wouldn't be as good. It really never gets boring for me, and I'm always excited for sequels.
Avatar image for klidron02
klidron02

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#64 klidron02
Member since 2008 • 454 Posts
That's like saying Sonic the Hedgehog (06) is the same game as Sonic the Hedgehog for the Genesis because they have a few similarities.
Avatar image for king23_
king23_

18169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#65 king23_
Member since 2007 • 18169 Posts
So you haven't even played the game, yet you're throwing out conclusions that it's not any different than other Animal Crossing games? Even if it didn't have many changes I wouldn't mind because City Folk will be the first AC game I'll play.
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts
to me, this game screams DS WW port with added city when the developer during E3 basically said he didnt have time to add things many wanted. You do the samethings over and over and like the DS version, this will also get extremely boring. WiiSpeak is ok but nothing special. A box that sits on top the tv while you hope your friend has the same to talk about what online?
Avatar image for -Oath
-Oath

8014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 -Oath
Member since 2008 • 8014 Posts
So far it has a very "Fresh" feel to it. Feels like Im actually playing a whole new game.
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts

[QUOTE="elbert_b_23"]what gets to me on how hard people are on with nintedo games, no one ever says thats the halo games are alike but with minor changes, or how the god of war games are the same but with minor changesAlexSays

It's no secret, people hate on Nintendo for ridiculous reasons. 

For what reason, I have no idea.

Microsoft could give Halo 3 new box art, change the name, release it tomorrow, and more people would complain about Animal Crossing not being completely different.

 

im not a Halo fan but since its brought up, if you were to play it, you would know its the gift that keeps on giving. Bungie just keeps on adding.

Avatar image for sman3579
sman3579

21174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#69 sman3579
Member since 2008 • 21174 Posts
If you ask me, ACCF plays pretty different then the GC one.
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts
[QUOTE="evrdayblues"]

The only thing that really bothers me about the game is that the one thing that's really getting attention (online play) seems to be useless and uninteresting. What exactly can you do in your town with your friends? I saw the marathon and all they were doing was running around town, and once in a while they would catch a fish or a butterfly. Is that all really so exiting? If you could actually play some other minigames together, something implemented by Nintendo, maybe it would be interesting. It just seems boring, I'm sorry...

I'm not hating on AC, I'm just sad that the developer hasn't tapped into 5% of the potential.

 

Nintendo_Ownes7

Their are Fishing Tournaments and Bug Catching tournaments that you and your friends coulddo together. Also they have Holidays and Events that are exclusive to certain parts of the world and if you go to someone who lives in Korea's town you can go to an event that is exclusive to Korea. The same is for all around the world.

Edit* Also the reason they didn't go to the Tournament or anything is because Tournaments are only on certain days. Yesterday their was a fishing Tournament.

http://animal-crossing.com/cityfolk/calendar/

 

you mean just like on the DS version where people will come to your town to just run around taking fruit and have a fish/bug contest with no purpose? But this time theres WiiSpeak so talking should heighten the amazement that is online play in this game, right? And about the whole Korea thing, dont you first have to add them to the friends list?

Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
AC has the exact same town and gameplay, why not have the game in a different town or in a new setting?
AlexSays

The towns randomly generate with different characters. They're not the same.

 

But the make-up of the towns are.:wink:

Avatar image for cloudff7tm
cloudff7tm

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 cloudff7tm
Member since 2006 • 3975 Posts

To the complainers: 1) If you could add something to the game without drastically changing it, what would you add that would make it a justifiable purchase? 2) If the game does not appeal to then do not get it. Nobody is forcing you to buy it. [QUOTE="evrdayblues"]The only thing that really bothers me about the game is that the one thing that's really getting attention (online play) seems to be useless and uninteresting. What exactly can you do in your town with your friends?ZumaJones07
You must have not had Wild World. I thought the same thing when Wild World came out, but ended up online every time I played it. You find stuff to do I guess. Hard to explain. :P

1) Ok, lets see. I would add some kind of character customization. I never liked how the games chose your character for you. Sometimes I would get a really ugly looking guy and I had to start over. I don't mean just changing the hair either.

Doing new things outside of your town, like going to your parents house, amusement parks, etc. It shouldn't just be about upgrading your house and collecting stuff. 

In online, instead of you visiting your friends towns, how about they can live in your town.

They could of had the city actually be the town instead of having a tiny city in your town. That would of made things feel different right there.

Things like this along with the new furniture, holidays, etc would of made it feel new.

2) The game does appeal to me. I just think Nintendo could of done a better job. I will still be getting it because I know I will have fun with it. Just not as much as I could of had.

 

 

 

Avatar image for wiidog
wiidog

600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#73 wiidog
Member since 2007 • 600 Posts
AC for the Wii is pretty much the same game. Of course it has the same core gameplay but it doesnt improve on anything from the DS version. It improves slightly from the gamecube version but it is pretty much identical to the ds version. IGN even said it. I know i own all of the AC games. AC is just like harvest moon the same game over and over again
Avatar image for superluigi96
superluigi96

504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#74 superluigi96
Member since 2007 • 504 Posts

Is that necessarily a bad thing?

Change for the sake of change is just unnecessary.  City Folk makes improvements where necessary (voice chat instead of endless stylus/pointer typing, ability to send mail to friends towns from yours) and adds more of the collectible items that make AC worth playing.

You can say that the graphics are the same, the gameplay is the same, and the characters are the same, but what if they weren't? What if they did with Animal Crossing what they did with Twilight Princess?  What if we turn those elephants and racoons and people into more realistic versions of themselves?  And let's give it a deep storyline, with plot twists and love triangles.  Ooh, and we should mix up the gameplay element by adding puzzles to advance the storyline.

Oh wait, this isn't Animal Crossing anymore, is it?

Avatar image for evrdayblues
evrdayblues

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#75 evrdayblues
Member since 2005 • 512 Posts

Is that necessarily a bad thing?

Change for the sake of change is just unnecessary. City Folk makes improvements where necessary (voice chat instead of endless stylus/pointer typing, ability to send mail to friends towns from yours) and adds more of the collectible items that make AC worth playing.

You can say that the graphics are the same, the gameplay is the same, and the characters are the same, but what if they weren't? What if they did with Animal Crossing what they did with Twilight Princess? What if we turn those elephants and racoons and people into more realistic versions of themselves? And let's give it a deep storyline, with plot twists and love triangles. Ooh, and we should mix up the gameplay element by adding puzzles to advance the storyline.

Oh wait, this isn't Animal Crossing anymore, is it?

superluigi96

Now you're just being ridiculous. Look at Mario 64 v.s. Mario Galaxy. They changed A LOT, but it's still a mario platformer, and it still appeals to the same people, in fact it appeals to just about everyone. The point is that you can change a game in a plethora of different ways without changing the core concept of it. So many people have written blogs about what they would like to see in a new AC. There is a clear demand, and incentive for change.