Are the Gamecube Wii-makes good news for us?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bucktooth_tuba
Bucktooth_tuba

1179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Bucktooth_tuba
Member since 2006 • 1179 Posts

I've heard some people complaining about the gamecube to wii remakes, saying that they wish Nintendo was working on better new games. Nintendo IS working on some new games, but that's not what I'm here to discuss.

This re-releases could be a way for Nintendo to get the so-called "casual gamers" hooked on Nintendo's franchises, the good games. Then when new games like Pikmin 3 come out, these same people will be more likely to buy them.

This, combined with the failure in sales of Wii Music, could mean that Nintendo might start giving us more "core" games. Notnecessarily overly hard games, but well-developed games like Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 3, Super Smash Bros Brawl, ect.

But...that could just be me being overly hopeful. What do you guys think/hope?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
I don't care what they remake, I just want a sequel to F-Zero GX.
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts

i think wii music itself was a good enough of a reason for them to start making core games.

and for the wii-makes, i dont really get the point.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

It means they've given up on the Wii

Nintendo themselves said that these games were remade because the original ones sold poorly
They sold poorly because no one wanted them, if they were wanted they would have been purchased

Nintendo has finally sunk as low as Capcom and other companies not willing to try on the Wii anymore knowing that someone is going to buy anything and if you can fool enough people you can cover your previous losses.

The day these retreads were announced it was a very dark day for any Wii user.

Avatar image for Raiko101
Raiko101

3339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Raiko101
Member since 2005 • 3339 Posts

The Wii-makes are worth it simply because so many gamers missed out on some classic GameCube titles. They're worth it to me as i'll eventually be able to play Metroid Prime 1 & 2 with the same controls as the third. It also gives Nintendo the opportunity to adjust and make small improvements to any games that require it.

I don't see how these Wii-makes could annoy anyone as its unlikely this is effecting the development of future 1st party titles. It really doesn't take a great deal of people to make small adjustments to a game.

Avatar image for UNHOLY_basic
UNHOLY_basic

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 UNHOLY_basic
Member since 2008 • 790 Posts
I don't care what they remake, I just want a sequel to F-Zero GX.siLVURcross
i agree with this. f-zero was extremely under rated
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

I don't see how these Wii-makes could annoy anyone as its unlikely this is effecting the development of future 1st party titles. It really doesn't take a great deal of people to make small adjustments to a game.

Raiko101

Number of first party games available in the first quarter of 2009?

Zero

Don't think for a second that this cash in doesn't mess with other games.

Avatar image for slimdave21
slimdave21

2646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 slimdave21
Member since 2003 • 2646 Posts
The only Wii-make I'm getting is Metroid Prime 2: Echos. It's the only one in the Prime series I never beat.
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"]I don't care what they remake, I just want a sequel to F-Zero GX.UNHOLY_basic
i agree with this. f-zero was extremely under rated

true, i think this game is far better racing game than mario kart, and sometimes even better game than brawl (most likely since i have played it just way too much), yet when my friends come over they only play brawl
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#10 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42242 Posts

It means they've given up on the Wii

Nintendo themselves said that these games were remade because the original ones sold poorly
They sold poorly because no one wanted them, if they were wanted they would have been purchased

Nintendo has finally sunk as low as Capcom and other companies not willing to try on the Wii anymore knowing that someone is going to buy anything and if you can fool enough people you can cover your previous losses.

The day these retreads were announced it was a very dark day for any Wii user.

Jaysonguy
That is a mighty fluppin lie. Look how well Resident Evil 4 Gamecube sold. Don't tell me RE4 was ported on the Wii for that nonsense you brought up.
Avatar image for alexh_99
alexh_99

5378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 alexh_99
Member since 2007 • 5378 Posts
Im happy with it. I never had a gamecube, so now i can get Pikmin 1, and 2 and metroid 1, and 2
Avatar image for slimdave21
slimdave21

2646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 slimdave21
Member since 2003 • 2646 Posts

[QUOTE="UNHOLY_basic"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"]I don't care what they remake, I just want a sequel to F-Zero GX.funsohng
i agree with this. f-zero was extremely under rated

true, i think this game is far better racing game than mario kart, and sometimes even better game than brawl (most likely since i have played it just way too much), yet when my friends come over they only play brawl

F-Zero GX with it's 60fps was so fast it would give me a headache whenever I would start playing it...

Awesome game though, deserves a sequel.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

It means they've given up on the Wii

Nintendo themselves said that these games were remade because the original ones sold poorly
They sold poorly because no one wanted them, if they were wanted they would have been purchased

Nintendo has finally sunk as low as Capcom and other companies not willing to try on the Wii anymore knowing that someone is going to buy anything and if you can fool enough people you can cover your previous losses.

The day these retreads were announced it was a very dark day for any Wii user.

nintendoboy16

That is a mighty fluppin lie. Look how well Resident Evil 4 Gamecube sold. Don't tell me RE4 was ported on the Wii for that nonsense you brought up.

No, it's fact, if you researched better you'd know it too

Capcom released RE4 on the Wii because they were caught without software for the Wii at launch. They quickly put together RE4 and it turned out well. From that point on we were promised new titles like Umbrella Chronicles. The port was going to be a one time thing

Until they saw how much that old retread was selling. Then we saw things like REZero on the Wii, and Okami was pulled out of mothballs, and soon Dead Rising will soon be on the Wii in all it's hacked and watered down glory.

Nintendo saw the same thing. They didn't make enough money on these Gamecube titles the first time around because the Gamecube was one of the worst consoles ever made that almost closed Nintendo. No one bought the titles and Nintendo didn't meet the numbers they expected. So what do they do?

They sell the games on the Wii but add motion controls that were never designed for the games in the first place.

They've given up. They understand that when you have such a large install base it doesn't matter what game you make, it just matters that it gets out to market. Even lukewarm sales for these ports mean that Nintendo will be in the black instead of in the red like they were last gen.

Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts
[QUOTE="Bucktooth_tuba"]

I've heard some people complaining about the gamecube to wii remakes, saying that they wish Nintendo was working on better new games. Nintendo IS working on some new games, but that's not what I'm here to discuss.

This re-releases could be a way for Nintendo to get the so-called "casual gamers" hooked on Nintendo's franchises, the good games. Then when new games like Pikmin 3 come out, these same people will be more likely to buy them.

This, combined with the failure in sales of Wii Music, could mean that Nintendo might start giving us more "core" games. Notnecessarily overly hard games, but well-developed games like Mario Galaxy, Metroid Prime 3, Super Smash Bros Brawl, ect.

But...that could just be me being overly hopeful. What do you guys think/hope?

They are releasing these ports because they know that most Wii owners did not own the GC. Therefore, these people will not have a problem buying an "old" game for $30. The games will sell and Nintendo will make near 100% profit. Nintendo has followed this business model for the last 15 years. They try to get you to buy the same thing multiple times.
Avatar image for phantomxz
phantomxz

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 phantomxz
Member since 2009 • 90 Posts

in some ways I don't care to much

but when I find it hard to find a game that I'm pretty sure I might like it sometimes is hard for me to find 1 (only games like sonic, mario, ect..)

so I kinda wish they'd make new games but right now I don't care to much

and to poster above:I do not believe that game cube was one of the worst (then again its the only consele I have besides xbox. Wii, nitendo 64)

I actually wish they'd have more games for game cube (Wii is the only system I have that I can probaly get a new game for)

though untill I actually start getting new games I don't care to much

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#16 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42242 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

It means they've given up on the Wii

Nintendo themselves said that these games were remade because the original ones sold poorly
They sold poorly because no one wanted them, if they were wanted they would have been purchased

Nintendo has finally sunk as low as Capcom and other companies not willing to try on the Wii anymore knowing that someone is going to buy anything and if you can fool enough people you can cover your previous losses.

The day these retreads were announced it was a very dark day for any Wii user.

Jaysonguy

That is a mighty fluppin lie. Look how well Resident Evil 4 Gamecube sold. Don't tell me RE4 was ported on the Wii for that nonsense you brought up.

No, it's fact, if you researched better you'd know it too

Capcom released RE4 on the Wii because they were caught without software for the Wii at launch. They quickly put together RE4 and it turned out well. From that point on we were promised new titles like Umbrella Chronicles. The port was going to be a one time thing

Until they saw how much that old retread was selling. Then we saw things like REZero on the Wii, and Okami was pulled out of mothballs, and soon Dead Rising will soon be on the Wii in all it's hacked and watered down glory.

Nintendo saw the same thing. They didn't make enough money on these Gamecube titles the first time around because the Gamecube was one of the worst consoles ever made that almost closed Nintendo. No one bought the titles and Nintendo didn't meet the numbers they expected. So what do they do?

They sell the games on the Wii but add motion controls that were never designed for the games in the first place.

They've given up. They understand that when you have such a large install base it doesn't matter what game you make, it just matters that it gets out to market. Even lukewarm sales for these ports mean that Nintendo will be in the black instead of in the red like they were last gen.

I know the GC didn't do so well last gen, but do you have proof of everything else?

Avatar image for Darkmagcite
Darkmagcite

460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Darkmagcite
Member since 2008 • 460 Posts
I don't have a problem with Wii makes, I mean, I think they should only run for 20.00 or something, rather than 40.00 (is that what they sell for), but yes, I do agree that it could be a good opportunity to get casual gamers hooked and immersed more into the hardcore market and problem boost their sales overall. Regardless, I think it is a way for Nintendo to make more sales in an interest market strategy -- I would still prefer more hardcore games nothing less.
Avatar image for Raiko101
Raiko101

3339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Raiko101
Member since 2005 • 3339 Posts
[QUOTE="Raiko101"]

I don't see how these Wii-makes could annoy anyone as its unlikely this is effecting the development of future 1st party titles. It really doesn't take a great deal of people to make small adjustments to a game.

Jaysonguy

Number of first party games available in the first quarter of 2009?

Zero

Don't think for a second that this cash in doesn't mess with other games.

That means nothing. Last year developers were complaining that Nintendo developed titles were dominating software sales. You could say that Nintendo has left a window open for 3rd party developers. I don't think that's the case, but considering how big a company Nintendo is, I highly doubt the whole company is focused on revamping GameCube titles. As I said, such a job would require very small development teams as they're simply adjusting fully built games.
Avatar image for dragonball3900
dragonball3900

8511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 dragonball3900
Member since 2005 • 8511 Posts

Number of first party games available in the first quarter of 2009?

Zero

Jaysonguy
It's 3, and WiiWare would count as well right? That just makes it higher. You have to take in the numbers for the DS and WiiWare as well, or else you are scewing what Nintendo is actually producing.

Don't think for a second that this cash in doesn't mess with other games.

Jaysonguy

I dunno, it seems like this could go either way. I believe Nintendo realized that they weren't going to have a Wii game for Quarter 1(and quite possibly Quarter 2) in the US, and rather then let it go by the wayside they figured out a different route(Wiimakes). Would you rather Nintendo had nothing at all the first 2 quarters? That seems much more like "giving up" on the Wii if you ask me. And rather then saying "Yeah, we messed up, we didn't plan correctly for our releases and so had to make some Wiimakes", they say "We didn't think these games reached their (selling) potential, and so we are re-releasing them". Of course that's all speculation(though well looked through), but so is your statement that the Wiimakes are affecting other games.

Now about your other comment that the Gamecube nearly killed Nintendo...show me a new article that says this, show me something from a Nintendo financial report that shows them on a steady decline towards bankruptcy. I would love to read through it, because I was always lead to believe Nintendo churned a profit off the Gamecube. And when you throw in the handhelds(which you forgot in your other post so...) I would think Nintendo was well on their feet during that era. I don't know the numbers, but I would think the GBA and prior handhelds would be able to support Nintendo for many a year. Show me an article or something for this though, I would really love to read through it.

(This isn't directed at you Jasonguy, just everyone in general).

When you look at the games recently released by Nintendo & Friends(2nd Party) you will see something a tad bit odd. Large studios haven't been putting out games in a while.

  • Camelot(making Nintendo games for 9 years now, known for Golden Sun) hasn't put out a game in 2 years. They weren't shut down as far as I can tell, we would have heard of something like that, so what happened?
  • Intelligent Systems(Fire Emblem, Paper Mario, Warioware, Advanced Wars) These guys have the capacity to work on multiple projects at once, which has been shown in the past. Yet they have no new games announced and their last game came out in August of 08? That can't be right, but we know for a fact these guys still exist...so where are thier games? They aren't just sitting in an office somewhere are they?
  • Retro Studios(Metroid Prime) We know they had some issues with some large figureheads leaving, but we heard about those in the news tickers, so we would have also heard of a complete shut down of the studio. They have nothing announced after nearly a year and a 1/2 of dormancy...they aren't just sitting around playing poker in the office are they?
  • NST(nothing particularly note-worthy) Haven't put out a game in 2 years. They were slated to do HAMMER, but we all know where that went. The studio itself wasn't shuttered with it's lost project though....so what have they been doing.
  • SPD(Help with anything that isn't EAD, Battalion Wars and Metroid Prime help) These guys are interesting, because they work on so many different things within their system. They help out with all sorts of games and channels(all Wii channels have gone through them at some point). And what appears to be their latest assignment was the DR. Mario RX for WiiWare. That was 9 or so months ago.

And then take a look at what Nintendo has announced. Another Code, Mario and Luigi 3, Sin and Punishment 2, Wii Sports Resort, Punch-Out!!...2 of those are in house developments from EAD and Alphadream, while the others don't affect the workforce that Nintendo employs at all. They have a few other games announced(Pikmin 3, Zelda and such), but that leaves you with a lot of empty space and that doesn't include what I listed up their.

So where did Nintendo go? They didn't just vanish, and they surely didn't shutter everything up their when they are making a profit...so perhaps their games are indeed coming, leaving us with Wiimakes to ease the wait? I dunno, but that is a lot of lousy workers if I am wrong.