Are they even trying with graphics???

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MrVigeant
MrVigeant

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MrVigeant
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
So far I love my Wii and greatly enjoyed every game I've played soo far and my family loves it also. But I've noticed that Zelda TP for the Wii has the same graphics as the gamecubes...The godfather has the same graphics as the ps2 version...Sonic looks alright...Super Paper Mario looks like subpar gamecube graphics...and Madden looks like ps2 graphics even though it's the best football game I've ever played! I don't care all that much about graphics but I was lead to believe that it was an enhanced gamecube and even stronger than the xbox. I know it takes years before you reach full potential but when are the games going to start looking somewhat next gen??
Avatar image for Guckyy
Guckyy

1227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Guckyy
Member since 2007 • 1227 Posts
No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.
Avatar image for clarkeyboy21
clarkeyboy21

702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 clarkeyboy21
Member since 2006 • 702 Posts

from the looks of it,m NO! :@

Avatar image for JustWiicredible
JustWiicredible

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 JustWiicredible
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts
Graphics make movies not games! I don't mind that a game is not in super dooper High def so long as it's fun to play!
Avatar image for Dark_Link142
Dark_Link142

6726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 Dark_Link142
Member since 2004 • 6726 Posts

Zelda TP is a GC game ported to the Wii.

Godfather is also a port with upgraded controls and minor graphical brushups.

Yeah Sonic's one of the first groundup Wii games so it has good graphics.

Super Paper Mario is also a GC port brought to the Wii with some controller upgrades.

Madden is a port with upgraded controls.

So there you go. Those games you mentioned apart from Sonic are ALL ports. We will soon see good graphics. And I thought these threads died a while ago.

Avatar image for Turtodile
Turtodile

462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Turtodile
Member since 2003 • 462 Posts

Graphics make movies not games! I don't mind that a game is not in super dooper High def so long as it's fun to play!JustWiicredible

I agree with you 100% Nintendo games are about gameplay, not graphics. Im tired of people making topics like this over and over again.

Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#7 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts
Doesn't seem like they're really trying, which is a bit of a shame. Graphics aren't everything, but neither is gameplay.
Avatar image for sodafountan
sodafountan

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 sodafountan
Member since 2006 • 551 Posts
i think nintendos trying.... and once ps2 dies and developers will stop porting crappy titles from ps2 to the wii, then the 3rd parties are gonna start to make better looking games
Avatar image for bigredman3000
bigredman3000

1935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bigredman3000
Member since 2006 • 1935 Posts

Graphics make movies not games! I don't mind that a game is not in super dooper High def so long as it's fun to play!JustWiicredible

True 

Avatar image for NazzyQ
NazzyQ

1153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 NazzyQ
Member since 2005 • 1153 Posts

Two things:

I think people need to realise that solid gameplay is what ultimately makes a great game, not graphics.

However, if people say graphics aren't important, then they need to wake up. If graphics didn't matter at all, we'd still be playing the 8-bit atari

 

Avatar image for frodnekcod
frodnekcod

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#11 frodnekcod
Member since 2006 • 488 Posts

No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.Guckyy

this is wii forums, check system wars, and also, they couldve if they wanted to, its not like there was anything stopping them, they just decided to not make so much of an upgrade

Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#12 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Guckyy"]No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.frodnekcod

this is wii forums, check system wars, and also, they couldve if they wanted to, its not like there was anything stopping them, they just decided to not make so much of an upgrade

Well that's not really System Wars material since he's only stating the obvious. But I'm glad Nintendo decided to do something different, having three high-powered and high-priced consoles would be a bit too much. Although a high-powered Wii with Wiimote would be pretty darn cool!

Also, Nintendo didn't really have a choice on the matter. They knew if they were going to compete with Sony and MS on their terms, they'd get their asses handed to them, like so many times before. So the Big N saw the only way to break the cycle was to do something different from the competitors. 

Avatar image for frodnekcod
frodnekcod

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#14 frodnekcod
Member since 2006 • 488 Posts
[QUOTE="frodnekcod"]

[QUOTE="Guckyy"]No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.monco59

this is wii forums, check system wars, and also, they couldve if they wanted to, its not like there was anything stopping them, they just decided to not make so much of an upgrade

Well that's not really System Wars material since he's only stating the obvious. But I'm glad Nintendo decided to do something different, having three high-powered and high-priced consoles would be a bit too much. Although a high-powered Wii with Wiimote would be pretty darn cool!

Also, Nintendo didn't really have a choice on the matter. They knew if they were going to compete with Sony and MS on their terms, they'd get their asses handed to them, like so many times before. So the Big N saw the only way to break the cycle was to do something different from the competitors. 

ya but he said they "gave up" because" they couldnt beat x36 and ps3 graphics" which is untrue, they couldve if they really wanted to

Avatar image for Dax207983
Dax207983

648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Dax207983
Member since 2005 • 648 Posts
Wait for Super Mario Galaxy.
Avatar image for fitootif
fitootif

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 fitootif
Member since 2005 • 883 Posts
[QUOTE="monco59"][QUOTE="frodnekcod"]

[QUOTE="Guckyy"]No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.frodnekcod

this is wii forums, check system wars, and also, they couldve if they wanted to, its not like there was anything stopping them, they just decided to not make so much of an upgrade 

Well that's not really System Wars material since he's only stating the obvious. But I'm glad Nintendo decided to do something different, having three high-powered and high-priced consoles would be a bit too much. Although a high-powered Wii with Wiimote would be pretty darn cool!

Also, Nintendo didn't really have a choice on the matter. They knew if they were going to compete with Sony and MS on their terms, they'd get their asses handed to them, like so many times before. So the Big N saw the only way to break the cycle was to do something different from the competitors.

ya but he said they "gave up" because" they couldnt beat x36 and ps3 graphics" which is untrue, they couldve if they really wanted to

it would have been very easy for nintendo to have the same grafx lik the PS3 but look at the prce of the PS3, imagine that with motion sensing. Prices would have been extremely high.

Now about the Wii grafx thing, first of all look at SMG and SSBB to see you are completely wrong, the problem here is that many of the Wii game are ports. Also how do you compare SPM with good grafx, it is a 2D game its like comparing a Castlevania game (DS ones) with the Resident Evil (also for DS) those are different styles. Also look at SSBM it doesn't have the best grafx and it is an extremely good game (if not the best, at least for me) also look at the SNES games, they didn't have great grafx and still were a hell of a lot fun  

Avatar image for zachdragon
zachdragon

1707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#17 zachdragon
Member since 2005 • 1707 Posts
How is SPM a port its not out for GC I mean come on oh and Sonic is supposed to have the best graphics seen on the Wii the critics said 

Zelda TP is a GC game ported to the Wii.

Godfather is also a port with upgraded controls and minor graphical brushups.

Yeah Sonic's one of the first groundup Wii games so it has good graphics.

Super Paper Mario is also a GC port brought to the Wii with some controller upgrades.

Madden is a port with upgraded controls.

So there you go. Those games you mentioned apart from Sonic are ALL ports. We will soon see good graphics. And I thought these threads died a while ago.

Dark_Link142
Avatar image for spendinbig
spendinbig

698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 spendinbig
Member since 2004 • 698 Posts
3rd party devs are just taking advanage of the game drought, maybe after the big 3 come out they will stop making ported crap. Right now they can cause there is nothing to set the bar.
Avatar image for Cloudlionheart0
Cloudlionheart0

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Cloudlionheart0
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

Yes they are trying, you are simply playing port like it was already stated.

 

If Nintendo wasnt gonna try with the graphics, they would have made the Wii a Gamecube add-on, not a whole new console.

 

And anyway, you should know by now that the first generation of games on a new console are always slightly disapointing in the gfx side except for a few, the first games out usually didnt had enough time to properly use the dev kit to make a game with OMIGAZ GFX that takes full use of the console...

 

(look back at super smash bros melee back then, look at Zelda TPP to see the difference betwen early game on a console and late game, or hell, compare SSBM and SSBB to see the gap and realize they do try) 

Avatar image for FFXIsAstyanax
FFXIsAstyanax

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 FFXIsAstyanax
Member since 2003 • 974 Posts
How is SPM a port its not out for GC I mean come on zachdragon


port == A game that was originally designed for another system. So if SPM was designed to come out for the GCN and instead appears on the Wii, it's a port - regardless of its appearance on the console.


For those who fear that Nintendo's not going to push the Wii with their own games, boot up some of their previous titles. My recommendation is Legend of Zelda for the NES. Find a spot on the far-west of the map, perhaps near Death Mountain. Try fighting there and I guarantee your framerate will drop. It's not because the NES was weak back then, it was because Nintendo pushed the hardware to its limits. Nintendo's been pushing the capabilities of each system since the days of the NES, and I don't expect anything less from them with the Wii.
Avatar image for waza000
waza000

1906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 waza000
Member since 2005 • 1906 Posts

look at metroid and smash, they will have the best graphics yet on the wii

the wii RIGHT NOW .. can easily make the graphics of the last best Gcube games
so with time, developpers will know the console and surpass the cube/ps2  and probably surpass the xbox graphics

Avatar image for jorgeluisbl
jorgeluisbl

1479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jorgeluisbl
Member since 2005 • 1479 Posts
Nintendo could have made the Wii as powerful as the PS3, but look at the price...
Avatar image for FFXIsAstyanax
FFXIsAstyanax

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 FFXIsAstyanax
Member since 2003 • 974 Posts
Nintendo could have made the Wii as powerful as the PS3, but look at the price... jorgeluisbl


Yeah, there's no justification for that size a price tag. I don't care if it plays Blu-Ray, makes coffee, or raises Abe Lincoln from the dead - there's only so much people are willing to play a game. At least there should be, or this is a generation of fools.
Avatar image for violentken88
violentken88

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 violentken88
Member since 2005 • 717 Posts

So far I love my Wii and greatly enjoyed every game I've played soo far and my family loves it also. But I've noticed that Zelda TP for the Wii has the same graphics as the gamecubes...The godfather has the same graphics as the ps2 version...Sonic looks alright...Super Paper Mario looks like subpar gamecube graphics...and Madden looks like ps2 graphics even though it's the best football game I've ever played! I don't care all that much about graphics but I was lead to believe that it was an enhanced gamecube and even stronger than the xbox. I know it takes years before you reach full potential but when are the games going to start looking somewhat next gen??MrVigeant

 

People like you remind me why I started to lose my passion for games. Its nice for a game to look good but really its about the gameplay. When gaming started to get more popular gamers that are shallow always complain about the graphics. Who cares if it looks like gears of wars as long as it plays good its ok with me. 

Avatar image for the_leet_kid
the_leet_kid

9951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 the_leet_kid
Member since 2005 • 9951 Posts
[QUOTE="frodnekcod"]

[QUOTE="Guckyy"]No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.monco59

this is wii forums, check system wars, and also, they couldve if they wanted to, its not like there was anything stopping them, they just decided to not make so much of an upgrade

Well that's not really System Wars material since he's only stating the obvious. But I'm glad Nintendo decided to do something different, having three high-powered and high-priced consoles would be a bit too much. Although a high-powered Wii with Wiimote would be pretty darn cool!

Also, Nintendo didn't really have a choice on the matter. They knew if they were going to compete with Sony and MS on their terms, they'd get their asses handed to them, like so many times before. So the Big N saw the only way to break the cycle was to do something different from the competitors. 

Since when does "once" qualify as "so many times"?

Avatar image for ColonelWilks
ColonelWilks

3149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ColonelWilks
Member since 2005 • 3149 Posts
Nintendo left out great graphics this gen because, like the DS, they wanted a fun system that was dirt-cheap to produce.  Unfortunately, i have yet to see much fun. I fiddled with Wii Sports a bit, beat Zelda, and am still waiting.
Avatar image for MrVigeant
MrVigeant

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 MrVigeant
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Lose your passion for games? Didn't I say that I loved the Wii and all I really was asking is how powerful the Wii is!! I don't know why people act all offended when I just mention that the graphics look exactly the same as the gamecubes because it does. I just want to know how much more powerful the Wii is because you might say graphics don't matter, but they do help.
Avatar image for violentken88
violentken88

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 violentken88
Member since 2005 • 717 Posts

Lose your passion for games? Didn't I say that I loved the Wii and all I really was asking is how powerful the Wii is!! I don't know why people act all offended when I just mention that the graphics look exactly the same as the gamecubes because it does. I just want to know how much more powerful the Wii is because you might say graphics don't matter, but they do help.MrVigeant

Let's just say they look good enough. But the games you did mention were all ports. Really look at Super Smash Bros. and Metroid Prime 3 (even though there still using the same enigine from the other 2) and tell me if you don't think those look good. Dont worry we will (hopefully) see something this year at E3 that will show some of Wii's true potential in terms of graphics. Remember when they first showed games like Metroid Prime and Resident Evil 4 they looked amazing at the time. I used to work at Gamestop and hated how people didnt like the Wii because of the graphics but never actually played one. It just like rap music were people are shallow and dont actually spend there time trying to find something good instead of trying to fit in with the mainstream crap.

Avatar image for ColonelWilks
ColonelWilks

3149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 ColonelWilks
Member since 2005 • 3149 Posts

[QUOTE="MrVigeant"]Lose your passion for games? Didn't I say that I loved the Wii and all I really was asking is how powerful the Wii is!! I don't know why people act all offended when I just mention that the graphics look exactly the same as the gamecubes because it does. I just want to know how much more powerful the Wii is because you might say graphics don't matter, but they do help.violentken88

Let's just say they look good enough. But the games you did mention were all ports. Really look at Super Smash Bros. and Metroid Prime 3 (even though there still using the same enigine from the other 2) and tell me if you don't think those look good. Dont worry we will (hopefully) see something this year at E3 that will show some of Wii's true potential in terms of graphics. Remember when they first showed games like Metroid Prime and Resident Evil 4 they looked amazing at the time. I used to work at Gamestop and hated how people didnt like the Wii because of the graphics but never actually played one. It just like rap music were people are shallow and dont actually spend there time trying to find something good instead of trying to fit in with the mainstream crap.

If E3 was still around, that is.

Avatar image for hazuki
hazuki

3959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 hazuki
Member since 2003 • 3959 Posts
If you ask me, as long as a game has clean graphics and aren't jaggied messes like final fantasy 12, I'm perfectly happy. Twilight princess had a great of jaggies itself, but they were pretty hidden I thought.
Avatar image for monco59
monco59

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#31 monco59
Member since 2007 • 2473 Posts
[QUOTE="monco59"][QUOTE="frodnekcod"]

[QUOTE="Guckyy"]No, Nintindo gave up because they knew they coundn't beat the 360's and ps3's graphics.the_leet_kid

this is wii forums, check system wars, and also, they couldve if they wanted to, its not like there was anything stopping them, they just decided to not make so much of an upgrade

Well that's not really System Wars material since he's only stating the obvious. But I'm glad Nintendo decided to do something different, having three high-powered and high-priced consoles would be a bit too much. Although a high-powered Wii with Wiimote would be pretty darn cool!

Also, Nintendo didn't really have a choice on the matter. They knew if they were going to compete with Sony and MS on their terms, they'd get their asses handed to them, like so many times before. So the Big N saw the only way to break the cycle was to do something different from the competitors.

Since when does "once" qualify as "so many times"?

"Once"? On the contrary, the Wii is the first truly successful console from Nintendo since the SNES. 

Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#32 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

Twilight Princess has the same graphics on both the GC and on the Wii because the game was developed for the GC so Nintendo didn't have time to make any improvements if they were to release it together with the Wii.

Super Paper Mario doesn't have subpar GC's graphics, it obviously doesn't use half of the Wii's hardware, but it is not that bad.

Let's not forget that we are still on the first generation of games for the Wii. I think the next releases will change that a little bit.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ead18461c800
deactivated-5ead18461c800

478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-5ead18461c800
Member since 2007 • 478 Posts

"Once"? On the contrary, the Wii is the first truly successful console from Nintendo since the SNES. 

monco59

Nintendo DS.

And didn't the GBA do all right too?

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
I think down the line we are going to see some great looking stuff. Right now i'm happy with my wii and I beat the 9 games I own. I just cant wait for E3 to see all the great games coming to wii. I'm also liking how FFCC:CB is coming. Have any of you seen the trailer? Also this is why I think just owning one system is not a good idea. I like a little taste from everything.
Avatar image for Pangster007
Pangster007

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#35 Pangster007
Member since 2004 • 4426 Posts
At the moment, learning how to implement motion controls effectively is a priority over graphics. That, and they want to capitalise on the early success/growth of the wii's userbase.
Avatar image for FFXIsAstyanax
FFXIsAstyanax

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 FFXIsAstyanax
Member since 2003 • 974 Posts
Also this is why I think just owning one system is not a good idea. I like a little taste from everything.finalfantasy94


At the prices they're asking these days, I'm not surprised at the number of single-console gamers. Yeah, I have the money to get all three, but I see no reason to buy a 360 or PS3 at their prices. I don't care how powerful they are, it's still a gaming system.

Game choice has a good deal to do with it as well. My tastes, for example, led me to the Wii. When I saw the 360 carrying mostly FPSs, I decided to pass on it. The PS3 I like for MGS and FF, but two games can't justify buying any console. I know I'll at least get my money's worth out of Nintendo's 1st party games, and hopefully it'll gain good 3rd party support to last through its lifetime.
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]Also this is why I think just owning one system is not a good idea. I like a little taste from everything.FFXIsAstyanax


At the prices they're asking these days, I'm not surprised at the number of single-console gamers. Yeah, I have the money to get all three, but I see no reason to buy a 360 or PS3 at their prices. I don't care how powerful they are, it's still a gaming system.

Game choice has a good deal to do with it as well. My tastes, for example, led me to the Wii. When I saw the 360 carrying mostly FPSs, I decided to pass on it. The PS3 I like for MGS and FF, but two games can't justify buying any console. I know I'll at least get my money's worth out of Nintendo's 1st party games, and hopefully it'll gain good 3rd party support to last through its lifetime.

Yea I know the prices are well...... crazy. I went with Nintendo because I alwayd buy the next gen nintendo system first before anything. Yea I know 360 looks like FPS nation I mean after all its made in america and thats what it seems what all american wants, but it has some titles that are pretty darn good that arent FPS or 3rdPS that cach my intrest. The PS3 and Wii I think are going to have the more varity of games then 360.

P.S. I'm American and live in NEW YORK. Just incase if people think i'm trying to diss americans.

Avatar image for MrVigeant
MrVigeant

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 MrVigeant
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
What does being from New York have to do with anything?
Avatar image for chris3116
chris3116

12174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 chris3116
Member since 2003 • 12174 Posts

What does being from New York have to do with anything? MrVigeant

He said he's American and that American gamers want more FPS and online gaming. Read my sig. He proves my point.

Avatar image for born2runak
born2runak

414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 born2runak
Member since 2004 • 414 Posts

Doesn't seem like they're really trying, which is a bit of a shame. Graphics aren't everything, but neither is gameplay.monco59

Thank You, these fanboys just don't wanna hear it. Somone needs to really put the pressure on for some good looking games. Crappy ports aint gonna cut it.

Avatar image for T3h1337Pwnz
T3h1337Pwnz

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 T3h1337Pwnz
Member since 2007 • 770 Posts

stop posting these thread

no nintendo isnt trying at all they think the everyone is gonna love the wii becuase of its supaa kewllZ controller

nintendo is trying to make the system appeal to casual gamers not hardcore gamers

EDIT: and nintendo's gameplay is getting duller so i mean, noone can even say gameplay makes up for graphics

Avatar image for stkr
stkr

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#42 stkr
Member since 2006 • 6118 Posts

stop posting these thread

no nintendo isnt trying at all they think the everyone is gonna love the wii becuase of its supaa kewllZ controller

nintendo is trying to make the system appeal to casual gamers not hardcore gamers

EDIT: and nintendo's gameplay is getting duller so i mean, noone can even say gameplay makes up for graphics

T3h1337Pwnz

They're trying to appeal to the hardcore gamers and open up a market for those who are casuals. I wouldn't blame everything on Nintendo, either. A lot of the games out for Wii weren't even created by Nintendo developers so you can't blame them for the visuals of the games. Twilight Princess was a port from the Gamecube.

Avatar image for T3h1337Pwnz
T3h1337Pwnz

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 T3h1337Pwnz
Member since 2007 • 770 Posts
[QUOTE="T3h1337Pwnz"]

stop posting these thread

no nintendo isnt trying at all they think the everyone is gonna love the wii becuase of its supaa kewllZ controller

nintendo is trying to make the system appeal to casual gamers not hardcore gamers

EDIT: and nintendo's gameplay is getting duller so i mean, noone can even say gameplay makes up for graphics

stkr

They're trying to appeal to the hardcore gamers and open up a market for those who are casuals. I wouldn't blame everything on Nintendo, either. A lot of the games out for Wii weren't even created by Nintendo developers so you can't blame them for the visuals of the games. Twilight Princess was a port from the Gamecube.

i mean im still a definate sheep but i mean i seriously dont think the wii has any real potential now. i kno some of the 3rd party devolopers are making the wii look really bad but i mean nintendo has to take some of the blame.

Avatar image for stkr
stkr

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#44 stkr
Member since 2006 • 6118 Posts
[QUOTE="stkr"][QUOTE="T3h1337Pwnz"]

stop posting these thread

no nintendo isnt trying at all they think the everyone is gonna love the wii becuase of its supaa kewllZ controller

nintendo is trying to make the system appeal to casual gamers not hardcore gamers

EDIT: and nintendo's gameplay is getting duller so i mean, noone can even say gameplay makes up for graphics

T3h1337Pwnz

They're trying to appeal to the hardcore gamers and open up a market for those who are casuals. I wouldn't blame everything on Nintendo, either. A lot of the games out for Wii weren't even created by Nintendo developers so you can't blame them for the visuals of the games. Twilight Princess was a port from the Gamecube.

i mean im still a definate sheep but i mean i seriously dont think the wii has any real potential now. i kno some of the 3rd party devolopers are making the wii look really bad but i mean nintendo has to take some of the blame.

You shouldn't be a sheep. :lol: All those names mean is that you're biased beyone reason. Anyway, the Wii definitely has potential. We haven't even seen the best of the best. People are talking about the Wii and PS3 as if this generation has already passed. The PS3 and Wii have both only been out for a few months. There's no way to know what their real potential is until they've been out for at least a year or more. The third party developers aren't making the Wii look bad either. IMO, the only thing that is going against the Wii is all of the ports it seems to be getting. Third party devs are doing a much better job this round thanks to Nintendo finally attempting to open up.

Avatar image for kboy23
kboy23

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 kboy23
Member since 2006 • 321 Posts
they could make a 8 bit mario game and i would still buy it , if its fun its good , graphc are only something you look at from your own perspective.
Avatar image for IronManPP6
IronManPP6

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 IronManPP6
Member since 2006 • 360 Posts
people need to understand that graphics are important, would you want to play Metroid prime 3 with 16 bit graphics? I hope not
Avatar image for vnc20100
vnc20100

1685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 vnc20100
Member since 2007 • 1685 Posts

here and here

 

Some companies are trying, good games with good graphics are coming

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

Graphics make movies not games! I don't mind that a game is not in super dooper High def so long as it's fun to play!JustWiicredible

Then don't buy a High-Def TV, just have a normal TV and play in standard definition if it scares you. You'd still get amazing graphics and great, fun gameplay. I love my Wii but I can't wait to finally get my hands on a Mass Effect machine. 

Avatar image for HaloRules
HaloRules

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 HaloRules
Member since 2005 • 128 Posts
It kinda makes me mad how the dont really try and make good graphics not that I care but they are just being lazy now after seeing spiderman 3's graphics which were almost as bad as N64 graphics and I liked TP graphics and that was the full power of the GC not Wii, they could make it better they just dont take the time, but look at Metroid prime 3 which will most likely have the best wii graphics to date.
Avatar image for thegame27_basic
thegame27_basic

1980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 thegame27_basic
Member since 2002 • 1980 Posts

here and here

 

Some companies are trying, good games with good graphics are coming

vnc20100

 

I think Final Fantasy:CC is the best looking game going to be out on the wii.  I think that game looks phenomenal.  The first one never interested me so I never picked it up, but this one looks really good.  It is a definate buy for me.Â