BWii Multiplayer

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for WiiRokkz
WiiRokkz

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 WiiRokkz
Member since 2007 • 148 Posts
ok so im about to go buy this game but am unsure about the multiplayer??? is it only online or like split screen
Avatar image for Satanshelper
Satanshelper

2812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Satanshelper
Member since 2006 • 2812 Posts
Only online unfortunately, but still worth the money
Avatar image for WiiRokkz
WiiRokkz

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 WiiRokkz
Member since 2007 • 148 Posts
oh all right thanks
Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#4 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
it has 3 online modes witch i love them all. co op ,assault and skirmsh. the game is 1v1 online but its pretty cool . the battles can get big . i love bwii i would get it
Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#5 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
whats ur friend code u want to play bwii when u get it?
Avatar image for NeoJix
NeoJix

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 NeoJix
Member since 2007 • 36 Posts
It is starting to show Wii is a viable online gaming console. I did not like the fact that they waited this long. I would have liked to see Call Of Duty 3 or others online. But i am sure wii will pick it up but BWii looks fun.
Avatar image for Storebror89
Storebror89

735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Storebror89
Member since 2005 • 735 Posts
But the lack of voice chat makes it sad. I hope some developer makes it possible to chat with the use of usb-keyboards or something like that.
Avatar image for OldSkoolGamer04
OldSkoolGamer04

1616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 OldSkoolGamer04
Member since 2004 • 1616 Posts
The online portion could have used a better setup: voice chat, more stat tracking, leaderboards, these kinds of things. That said, it is a lot of fun to play and adds a lot of replayability to the game, which is why I'm getting it for Christmas.
Avatar image for Moridin18
Moridin18

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Moridin18
Member since 2007 • 203 Posts

Yeah the developers could have also not been lying chumps and inform people that the LAN mode they had earlier was removed so If you can't get highspeed part of the game is missing. And my deposit from the store to reserve the game may not be able to be refunded to me and the only GD MOFO reason I preordered the game was because it was suppose to have LAN. A companies literal lies should not cost someone 35$. And i hvae a friend and brother in law that was getting it for lan matches.(I hope they did not put a deposit on the game like i did and get raped by the store and Kuju)

If you not going to have the feature and every preview on earth mentioned LAN then you need to make it your business to let it be know that it would not be in the final verison. I swear I will never get one game from those sorry britishdevelopers. Kuju or whatever the lying company name is.

Of course one can tell this has really, really , really angered me. I am so broke grad school is killing me and that 35 means ALOT to me. Of course not getting my deposit back not that great either, but if the developers would have be honest and told Just one of the numerous sites that did previews that lan would not be in it. BUt no.

WTH is up with removing a feature that they already put in it?

It is almost like they don't want LAN to be on Wii, and the system could be the best console ever to use this feature.

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.
Avatar image for Moridin18
Moridin18

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Moridin18
Member since 2007 • 203 Posts

They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Duckman5

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Moridin18

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Link please.

Avatar image for bankey1443
bankey1443

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 bankey1443
Member since 2007 • 101 Posts

Yeah the developers could have also not been lying chumps and inform people that the LAN mode they had earlier was removed so If you can't get highspeed part of the game is missing. And my deposit from the store to reserve the game may not be able to be refunded to me and the only GD MOFO reason I preordered the game was because it was suppose to have LAN. A companies literal lies should not cost someone 35$. And i hvae a friend and brother in law that was getting it for lan matches.(I hope they did not put a deposit on the game like i did and get raped by the store and Kuju)

If you not going to have the feature and every preview on earth mentioned LAN then you need to make it your business to let it be know that it would not be in the final verison. I swear I will never get one game from those sorry britishdevelopers. Kuju or whatever the lying company name is.

Of course one can tell this has really, really , really angered me. I am so broke grad school is killing me and that 35 means ALOT to me. Of course not getting my deposit back not that great either, but if the developers would have be honest and told Just one of the numerous sites that did previews that lan would not be in it. BUt no.

WTH is up with removing a feature that they already put in it?

It is almost like they don't want LAN to be on Wii, and the system could be the best console ever to use this feature.

Moridin18

your broke, yet you buy a wii?

Avatar image for mattbrw08
mattbrw08

771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 mattbrw08
Member since 2004 • 771 Posts
I wouldnt get it. Its only like a 10 hour game. Just rent it for a week.
Avatar image for Moridin18
Moridin18

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Moridin18
Member since 2007 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="Moridin18"]

Yeah the developers could have also not been lying chumps and inform people that the LAN mode they had earlier was removed so If you can't get highspeed part of the game is missing. And my deposit from the store to reserve the game may not be able to be refunded to me and the only GD MOFO reason I preordered the game was because it was suppose to have LAN. A companies literal lies should not cost someone 35$. And i hvae a friend and brother in law that was getting it for lan matches.(I hope they did not put a deposit on the game like i did and get raped by the store and Kuju)

If you not going to have the feature and every preview on earth mentioned LAN then you need to make it your business to let it be know that it would not be in the final verison. I swear I will never get one game from those sorry britishdevelopers. Kuju or whatever the lying company name is.

Of course one can tell this has really, really , really angered me. I am so broke grad school is killing me and that 35 means ALOT to me. Of course not getting my deposit back not that great either, but if the developers would have be honest and told Just one of the numerous sites that did previews that lan would not be in it. BUt no.

WTH is up with removing a feature that they already put in it?

It is almost like they don't want LAN to be on Wii, and the system could be the best console ever to use this feature.

bankey1443

your broke, yet you buy a wii?

It was given to me on my birthday early this year. Earlier I was not strapped for cash but this semester I do not have a GA and I cannot get a job that can revolve around the hours of my classes and lab rotations.

Many games I will miss this season because of how broke I am. Graduate school is not cheap.

Avatar image for ljlrj
ljlrj

14800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#16 ljlrj
Member since 2007 • 14800 Posts

I wouldnt get it. Its only like a 10 hour game. Just rent it for a week.mattbrw08

10 hours u serious

Avatar image for Moridin18
Moridin18

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Moridin18
Member since 2007 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="Moridin18"]

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Duckman5

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Link please.

FOr what?

You show me a site that the developers said that LAN would not be in it. Every fan-site I saw mentioned LAN play. The preview from major sites ( IGN and gamespot) mentioned LAN if my memory serves me correct. Both of the sites have had people on their message-boards question the exclusion of LAN. WIthour notice. Kuju reads stuff to they not? Did they not notice a thread on this site (or ign) talking about the game? If so then they did read the previews on sites(or at least watching the Internet about the buzz about their game)and they should have notice the constant mention of LAN. This I think is indisputable.

I give you this. They did not literally lie. But......come on if they watch it that close then they should have noticed the constant talk in endless previews and fansites of the LAN mode.

I love advanced wars and Battalion Wars but in no way on this earth am I going to pay full price for a game that has a feature ripped out of it with no explanation.(come on Kuju LIE to me at least give me a reason, even if not rational, for this last second removal)

I can play advanced war games on GBA on lan, but on a system with built in WIif I can't. That is jacked up and if one says it is not, I must tell that person....

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
[QUOTE="Duckman5"][QUOTE="Moridin18"]

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Moridin18

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Link please.

FOr what?

You show me a site that the developers said that LAN would not be in it. Every fan-site I saw mentioned LAN play. The preview from major sites ( IGN and gamespot) mentioned LAN if my memory serves me correct. Both of the sites have had people on their message-boards question the exclusion of LAN. WIthour notice. Kuju reads stuff to they not? Did they not notice a thread on this site (or ign) talking about the game? If so then they did read the previews on sites(or at least watching the Internet about the buzz about their game)and they should have notice the constant mention of LAN. This I think is indisputable.

I give you this. They did not literally lie. But......come on if they watch it that close then they should have noticed the constant talk in endless previews and fansites of the LAN mode.

I love advanced wars and Battalion Wars but in no way on this earth am I going to pay full price for a game that has a feature ripped out of it with no explanation.(come on Kuju LIE to me at least give me a reason, even if not rational, for this last second removal)

I can play advanced war games on GBA on lan, but on a system with built in WIif I can't. That is jacked up and if one says it is not, I must tell that person....

They never confirmed it, theat's my exact point. Everything else was just speculation. You can't provide a link so your argument is invalid.

Avatar image for Nintendoes
Nintendoes

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Nintendoes
Member since 2007 • 638 Posts
[QUOTE="Moridin18"][QUOTE="Duckman5"][QUOTE="Moridin18"]

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Duckman5

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Link please.

FOr what?

You show me a site that the developers said that LAN would not be in it. Every fan-site I saw mentioned LAN play. The preview from major sites ( IGN and gamespot) mentioned LAN if my memory serves me correct. Both of the sites have had people on their message-boards question the exclusion of LAN. WIthour notice. Kuju reads stuff to they not? Did they not notice a thread on this site (or ign) talking about the game? If so then they did read the previews on sites(or at least watching the Internet about the buzz about their game)and they should have notice the constant mention of LAN. This I think is indisputable.

I give you this. They did not literally lie. But......come on if they watch it that close then they should have noticed the constant talk in endless previews and fansites of the LAN mode.

I love advanced wars and Battalion Wars but in no way on this earth am I going to pay full price for a game that has a feature ripped out of it with no explanation.(come on Kuju LIE to me at least give me a reason, even if not rational, for this last second removal)

I can play advanced war games on GBA on lan, but on a system with built in WIif I can't. That is jacked up and if one says it is not, I must tell that person....

They never confirmed it, theat's my exact point. Everything else was just speculation. You can't provide a link so your argument is invalid.

Duckman has a point. You can't remove something that was never there to begin with.

Avatar image for Moridin18
Moridin18

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Moridin18
Member since 2007 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="Duckman5"][QUOTE="Moridin18"][QUOTE="Duckman5"][QUOTE="Moridin18"]

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Nintendoes

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Link please.

FOr what?

You show me a site that the developers said that LAN would not be in it. Every fan-site I saw mentioned LAN play. The preview from major sites ( IGN and gamespot) mentioned LAN if my memory serves me correct. Both of the sites have had people on their message-boards question the exclusion of LAN. WIthour notice. Kuju reads stuff to they not? Did they not notice a thread on this site (or ign) talking about the game? If so then they did read the previews on sites(or at least watching the Internet about the buzz about their game)and they should have notice the constant mention of LAN. This I think is indisputable.

I give you this. They did not literally lie. But......come on if they watch it that close then they should have noticed the constant talk in endless previews and fansites of the LAN mode.

I love advanced wars and Battalion Wars but in no way on this earth am I going to pay full price for a game that has a feature ripped out of it with no explanation.(come on Kuju LIE to me at least give me a reason, even if not rational, for this last second removal)

I can play advanced war games on GBA on lan, but on a system with built in WIif I can't. That is jacked up and if one says it is not, I must tell that person....

They never confirmed it, theat's my exact point. Everything else was just speculation. You can't provide a link so your argument is invalid.

Duckman has a point. You can't remove something that was never there to begin with.

Never there? So all the previews never existed?

They never denied it did they? What EXACT point could you have if the information was never clear. So your staement about "exact" is irrelavent. IF you actually cared about exact you would not be havin this conversation. The response that you reply to already talks about the absolute of the situation(or rather the abstract) SO for you (or Nintendoes) to ask me to provide a link about a basic "sense"(or apparently deduced from the facts given)that multiple sites and fansites info played out time again and again(I am not the only one on this site to question this or on IGN) is questionable to me.

Points of reason do not revole around "links". AFter all the term 'debate' never was used until the internet was used, or am I crazy?. OF course the arguement I put fortth "always" revolved around one "link" .

NOt the total sense of info about the game befoer it was released. SUrely not.

If a company watches threads on internet boards?(or do you dispute this fact?, or did they not respond to a thread on this site?? Surely they read previews like they did the thread.) IF i am not crazy every preview I remeber talked about LAN when they mentioned multiplayer? IF not provide me a "link", sense that is the true measure of right and wrong to you.

You cannot dismiss the fact that almost every preview and every fansite talked about a LAN mode(link the preview on IGN if it makes you feel better) http://wii.ign.com/articles/727/727651p1.html

But the "link" i show demonstrates the info out on a major site that they never dismissed. And do not for one second tell me that they don't watch what goes on the internet.

"Duckman has a point. You can't remove something that was never there to begin with."

You statement is broken, the game was demoed in LAN(regardless of the details it was LAN because it was not on the internet. But if you knew the difference between Wan and Lan we would not be having this conversation) SO it was there to begin with because if it did not have LAN they could have never demoed it. SO show me a demo that was online? A link?

Avatar image for Nintendoes
Nintendoes

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Nintendoes
Member since 2007 • 638 Posts

Never there? So all the previews never existed?

They never denied it did they? What EXACT point could you have if the information was never clear. So your staement about "exact" is irrelavent. IF you actually cared about exact you would not be havin this conversation. The response that you reply to already talks about the absolute of the situation(or rather the abstract) SO for you (or Nintendoes) to ask me to provide a link about a basic "sense"(or apparently deduced from the facts given)that multiple sites and fansites info played out time again and again(I am not the only one on this site to question this or on IGN) is questionable to me.

Points of reason do not revole around "links". AFter all the term 'debate' never was used until the internet was used, or am I crazy?. OF course the arguement I put fortth "always" revolved around one "link" .

NOt the total sense of info about the game befoer it was released. SUrely not.

If a company watches threads on internet boards?(or do you dispute this fact?, or did they not respond to a thread on this site?? Surely they read previews like they did the thread.) IF i am not crazy every preview I remeber talked about LAN when they mentioned multiplayer? IF not provide me a "link", sense that is the true measure of right and wrong to you.

You cannot dismiss the fact that almost every preview and every fansite talked about a LAN mode(link the preview on IGN if it makes you feel better) http://wii.ign.com/articles/727/727651p1.html

But the "link" i show demonstrates the info out on a major site that they never dismissed. And do not for one second tell me that they don't watch what goes on the internet.

"Duckman has a point. You can't remove something that was never there to begin with."

You statement is broken, the game was demoed in LAN(regardless of the details it was LAN because it was not on the internet. But if you knew the difference between Wan and Lan we would not be having this conversation) SO it was there to begin with because if it did not have LAN they could have never demoed it. SO show me a demo that was online? A link?

Moridin18

Not broken, simply, you never provided a source for your statements and now you have. You've given adequate evidence to show that Battalion Wars II at some point had LAN multiplayer and your complaints are justified

Avatar image for -Despacio-
-Despacio-

1881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 -Despacio-
Member since 2002 • 1881 Posts

Couldn't you just have returned the game wherever you pre-ordered it at after you fully purchased it?

Next time don't pre-order a game. Sorry about your siutation though. There's always eBay.