Dimps making Sonic Unleased for Wii

[QUOTE="BrooklynHotBoy"][QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="metroidfood"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

This is not logical what you guys are saying

Just because the Sega Team CANT do it does not mean it cant be done.

Merely settling for less or the safe route is not my idea of sonic making a "comeback"

cafccc

It's not about settling for less. It's about having a development team that doesn't screw up every game they work on.

in that team and from what people are saying its gonna be a 2d game

doing another 2d game is not a "comeback"

no its just bad development

yea, this is pretty insulting. they kept telling us the main version is the wii version, come to find out the wii version will be mainly 2.5d. that sounds like a wiiware title to me. not something that belongs on the main console.

Ok, alot of you guys are just being idiots, the game hasnt came out yet!! Do you even see any videos or images for the Wii version? NO! All you've seen is possibly a paragraph or so, what can 1 paragraph prove? Not much really. And i agree with

"It's not about settling for less. It's about having a development team that doesn't screw up every game they work on", Sonic Team has not made a good game since SA, and SatSR was probally their best effort, but it still wasnt great. Now look at Dimps, DBZ Budokai 3, briliant game, much better then their first attempts, Dimps learns from their mistakes, it dosnt just improve graphics and keep mistakes in there, and then look at Sonic Rush, far superior to any Recent Sonic Team title, when i heard of Sonic Riders 2, i was not excited, not even anticipating anything, but when i heard of Sonic Rush Adventure, i was actually looking forward to a Sonic game. This is not saying that this version will automatically be best, but if i had to make a bet, Dimps would probally try harder. (plus Dimps has actually created games that have decent characters and not many lame new ones, yes you can point on cream but she was originally gonna be introduced in SH) . Just wait for some Wii screens before concluding anything

First of all theres no need to call me an idiot esp when you havent made a single point worth reading in that wall of text. Second of all I never made a conclusion, I said IF it is going to happen this way then it will be dissappointing. I never said Dimps cant do it good I said they usually do 2d Sonic and people are saying that this one will be 2d while the other versions are 3d. Another issue is that Sega said the Wii version was the main version but were seeing another team develop this game. Im pretty sure SOnic Team will be getting more attention and funding.

You guys are using backwards logic to the nth degree. just because Sonic hasnt been done right in 3d does not mean you just give up and say screw it lets just make a bunch of 2d games. It just wont be as significant because we have all seen excellent 2d Sonic games. Not to mention 2d has found better settings on handhelds and downloadable systems. You can spin this however you want but its looking like sega is doing what Activision and Ubisoft do with their Wii multiplat games.

For me, Sonic is and will still be better in 2D. I'd like to have a new Sonic with the 2D gameplay like the old times. 3D Sonic like Sonic Adventure on Dreamcast and Sonic Adventure 2 on GameCube were decent. After them, Sonic sucked. With the lost of Yuji Naka, Sonic Team really sucked. I never played on Sonic Rush on DS but from what I saw Sonic on DS is what it should be.

Count me in for Sonic Unleashed on Wii.

Dimps Games

From what I see this dev does not have a good track record, the only thing they seem to have going for them is SF4 and hardly any info has been released about that game either. edit: Sonic Rush is supposed to be a good game but I've never played it.

Why doesn't Sega just put all their resources towards making Sonic Wii-only. Wii is the only system it will sell on so why not make one good game that could go platinum rather than 4 mediocre games that will be thrown in the bargain bin in 6 months.

IMO, this is bad news.

What was so bad about Sonic Team? I love SA2. I thought SA1 was great. I thought Sonic Heroes, Shadow the Hedgehog, Sonic Riders, and Sonic and the Secret Rings were all good games.

I didn't like the 2-D Sonic games that much. I didn't like Sonic Rush at all. I never played Sonic Rush 2, but it looked pretty bad, IMO.

I guess I'll have to see how it all turns out. I may actually end up getting both the Wii and 360 verson of the game :o.

Dimps Games

From what I see this dev does not have a good track record, the only thing they seem to have going for them is SF4 and hardly any info has been released about that game either. edit: Sonic Rush is supposed to be a good game but I've never played it.

Why doesn't Sega just put all their resources towards making Sonic Wii-only. Wii is the only system it will sell on so why not make one good game that could go platinum rather than 4 mediocre games that will be thrown in the bargain bin in 6 months.

umcommon

Sonic Advance: 9.1

Sonic Advance 2: 9.0

Sonic Advance 3: 9.0

Sonic Rush: 9.0

All those were from the link you gave. I'd say this dev will be able to do a much better job than Sonic Team when it comes to making a Sonic Game. :)

@ Cyber- Sega gave the Wii the best dev team, plus given the sales of their previous Sonic games this gen there will be equal or possibly better funding. Also, no one said this was a 2D exclusive affair, there will be 3D platforming sections, but there's no point in having more 3D levels if the developer makes crappy games.

[QUOTE="umcommon"]

Dimps Games

From what I see this dev does not have a good track record, the only thing they seem to have going for them is SF4 and hardly any info has been released about that game either. edit: Sonic Rush is supposed to be a good game but I've never played it.

Why doesn't Sega just put all their resources towards making Sonic Wii-only. Wii is the only system it will sell on so why not make one good game that could go platinum rather than 4 mediocre games that will be thrown in the bargain bin in 6 months.

metroidfood

Sonic Advance: 9.1

Sonic Advance 2: 9.0

Sonic Advance 3: 9.0

Sonic Rush: 9.0

All those were from the link you gave. I'd say this dev will be able to do a much better job than Sonic Team when it comes to making a Sonic Game. :)

@ Cyber- Sega gave the Wii the best dev team, plus given the sales of their previous Sonic games this gen there will be equal or possibly better funding. Also, no one said this was a 2D exclusive affair, there will be 3D platforming sections, but there's no point in having more 3D levels if the developer makes crappy games.

[QUOTE="umcommon"]

Dimps Games

From what I see this dev does not have a good track record, the only thing they seem to have going for them is SF4 and hardly any info has been released about that game either. edit: Sonic Rush is supposed to be a good game but I've never played it.

Why doesn't Sega just put all their resources towards making Sonic Wii-only. Wii is the only system it will sell on so why not make one good game that could go platinum rather than 4 mediocre games that will be thrown in the bargain bin in 6 months.

metroidfood

Sonic Advance: 9.1

Sonic Advance 2: 9.0

Sonic Advance 3: 9.0

Sonic Rush: 9.0

All those were from the link you gave. I'd say this dev will be able to do a much better job than Sonic Team when it comes to making a Sonic Game. :)

@ Cyber- Sega gave the Wii the best dev team, plus given the sales of their previous Sonic games this gen there will be equal or possibly better funding. Also, no one said this was a 2D exclusive affair, there will be 3D platforming sections, but there's no point in having more 3D levels if the developer makes crappy games.

Those are all gameboy advanced games, I'm not even counting that since a Wii game is on a completely different level, nearly every game they made for an in home consol was bad.