Do You Think Nintendo Should Delve Into The FPS Genre?

  • 84 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

A third person shooter would be more Nintendo's approach.

Avatar image for Arbiterisl33t69
Arbiterisl33t69

2542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 Arbiterisl33t69
Member since 2009 • 2542 Posts
Probably, but I don't really see the controls working as well as FPS for a 3PS
Avatar image for MathMattS
MathMattS

4012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#53 MathMattS
Member since 2009 • 4012 Posts

As Nintendo is known for its family-friendly gaming, it would be pretty cool if they could make a bloodless FPS.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

No.Im tired of FPS..nintendo stick to what they do best..If you want FPS buy a 360 or Ps3 lolFoxi911

You mean get a gaming PC :D

Avatar image for xX-Pure-Xx
xX-Pure-Xx

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 xX-Pure-Xx
Member since 2009 • 201 Posts
Metroid Prime Hunters Wii. There you go.
Avatar image for vdastampede
vdastampede

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 vdastampede
Member since 2003 • 807 Posts

You know, the gaming world has had enough FPSs. But for some reason, I think if Nintendo were to make it, it would just seem...different and not have as much of a repetitive feel to them.

Avatar image for CanadianEh
CanadianEh

7173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 CanadianEh
Member since 2002 • 7173 Posts

it baffles me they havn't got an arcady shooter with shells, goombas, princesses shooting each other etc. It really does baffle me.rgame1
If done in a cutesy, whimsical manner (you know, like how Nintendo general does it), then yes, it also baffles me.

As for one of those hardcore "LOOK AT ALL THE BLOOD THAT CAME OUT OF THAT GUY'S HEAD WHOA" FPSers that plague the game industry, well, I think that'll be pretty neat too, in a bizarre anti-Nintendo kind of way. I just can't see that happening unless a Western developer, like maybe a Retro Studios (cough), takes up the reins.

Avatar image for Shadowtails9000
Shadowtails9000

509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#58 Shadowtails9000
Member since 2009 • 509 Posts

... Well Nintendo seems to be trying to sorta reach out to the FPS audience; allowing that new Dead Space game, even if it is not so much an FPS than a rail shooter on steroids... All the same, Mario always made excellent spin-offs; I think 'Super Mario Shotgun' would be an awesome FPS... But seriously; I'll stick to PC for FPS gaming, the Wii does pretty good, but the only types of games I care about graphics are FPS' as the graphics are the biggest draws to those sorts of games to me. I'd play it; and say 'Halo had better graphics; why play this last-gen graphic'd game when I can play an authentic last-gen game with superior gameplay. No offense; but if I had to choose between playing Halo1 or 2 and 'The Conduit'; I'd pick Halo. Now if a company dedicated itself into making an AUTHENTIC FPS title with all the works; I may change my mind, but I don't see that day coming anytime soon. Though I might try out Call of Duty and see if I can prove myself wrong one day.

Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts

Yes, Yes, Yes.

I can't wait to see what other people say about the subject of the OP

Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts

maybe a new IP or Star Fox as a TPS battlefield/warhawk kinda of game

Avatar image for randomwiiplayer
randomwiiplayer

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 randomwiiplayer
Member since 2009 • 1804 Posts

They should pick up where Free Radical left off for Star Wars Battlefront 3!!! How awesome would that be? Extremely unlikely :(. I wish they would just to make all of those 360 and ps3 fanboys mad lol.

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#62 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

giest is fps so they already have, goldeneye and perfect dark were , ,

and they were made by rare/nintendo so ya i dont think i care, timesplitters 3 is still fun enough and is better believe it or not , then most average fpses today you dont even see map makers in todays fpses suprisingly enough , nor the quntity of content even though these disc hold more or the same if they stop oworrying about how realistic these fpses look then maybe wed have this gens equivalent of timesplitters pd or goldeneye , ,

Avatar image for CanadianEh
CanadianEh

7173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#63 CanadianEh
Member since 2002 • 7173 Posts

giest is fps so they already have, goldeneye and perfect dark were , ,

and they were made by rare/nintendo so ya i dont think i care, timesplitters 3 is still fun enough and is better believe it or not , then most average fpses today you dont even see map makers in todays fpses suprisingly enough , nor the quntity of content even though these disc hold more or the same if they stop oworrying about how realistic these fpses look then maybe wed have this gens equivalent of timesplitters pd or goldeneye , ,

mariokart64fan
Geist? Ha, that game sucked. And it wasn't even made by Nintendo, it was made by N-Space. I can't believe I own that game. And I don't think Perfect Dark and Goldeneye count, since I assume we're talking about Nintendo developed games and not just Nintendo published games. And I don't understand the point of throwing Time Splitters in there. Sure, great games, but it's not really a Nintendo property (I guess it's Crytek property now, who knows?)
Avatar image for FFCYAN
FFCYAN

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 FFCYAN
Member since 2005 • 4969 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]I never played Geist so I don't know how it turned out.Haziqonfire

You should see if you can find it. I thought it was great.

I've seen it around for like $9 or $5.. but I always thought it got REALLY bad scores so I never thought of picking it up - then today I looked at reviews and they were pretty positive :? So, I dont know why I was being dumb when I was younger lol.

I have it and I think it was better than I expected. The shooting portions are not that great, but it has a cool aspect where you're jumping out of living things like objects, people and animals. That alone was worth playing it.

Avatar image for mouthforbathory
mouthforbathory

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#65 mouthforbathory
Member since 2006 • 2114 Posts

Assuming it was unique, I'd have no qualm against it. I don't think they'd ever develope one since it's not Nintendo's image. Metroid Prime 1/2/3 is the closest thing to an FPS Nintendo will directly support probably. It's all fantasy violence, no swearing, no blood, nothing too hardcore. However you don't need blood to make a hardcore FPS, take for instance: Battlefield 2. A game like Team Fortress 2 (without the blood and guts) would seem to be right up Nintendo's alley. While Nintendo has the creativity to create something unique, I think it should be left up the third party developers, though I would support a Wii-make of Geist (though yes, it was only published by them, not developed). Geist was interesting in idea, but heavily flawed in execution.

Avatar image for littleyoungster
littleyoungster

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 littleyoungster
Member since 2009 • 65 Posts

No, but they should make other 1st-person games, like 1st-Person-Sword Fighting with the WiiMotionPlus. After playing Wii Sports Resort, I can see how this kind of genre can be the next best thing since FPSs since it's very easy to control. Maybe Nintendo can work with Lucas Arts to give us that kind of game with Lightsabres.

We already have way too many FPSs, and they're all getting boring. The Conduit and Metroid Prime Trilogy is all the Wii needs for FPSs.

DS_Lightning21

they r making Red Steel 2 and they did make wii sports

Avatar image for littleyoungster
littleyoungster

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 littleyoungster
Member since 2009 • 65 Posts

I really think THEYshould make one

Avatar image for Zeus-Guy
Zeus-Guy

728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Zeus-Guy
Member since 2004 • 728 Posts
No, because when the Wii actually get a FPS, people would likely complain that its got last-gen graphics and that its generic. After all, isn't that what happened with The Conduit?
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#69 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

No, because when the Wii actually get a FPS, people would likely complain that its got last-gen graphics and that its generic. After all, isn't that what happened with The Conduit?Zeus-Guy

I think that had more to do with the fact that it had an incredibly poorly utilized graphics engine and was generic. :P

Avatar image for wiidskirby
wiidskirby

1317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 wiidskirby
Member since 2008 • 1317 Posts

Not unless it's a Star Fox one (which would need to have much more Arwing time than on-foot time).

Avatar image for DeadEndPanda
DeadEndPanda

2358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 DeadEndPanda
Member since 2008 • 2358 Posts

The way you said generic made them seem bad, they're not similar at all besides both of them being FPS. I haven't played Killzone but I've seen videos and it looks nothing like Halo, and Halo was and never will be gray to begin with, it's one of the only FPS that actually uses colors. Imagine that. So, Halo 1 was released 2001, Halo 2 in 2004/5, and 3 in 2007, ODST in 2009 and Reach will be out in 2010 (Not counting Halo Wars) and Reach will be the last Halo made by Bungie, anyway, the release dates aren't really that close to each other besides ODST and Reach. ODST was in production by the time Halo 3 was released, so about 2 years seems allright.Arbiterisl33t69

i think you got me wrong here, you where speaking of "generic save the princess story" and i said that generic shooters come out every week, while zelda and mario on the other hand take their time, the fact that halo and killzone do the same as all other FPS, while mario and zelda do what they have always done, but there are less mario or zelda clones then halo clones.

nintendo isnt doing something diffrent and new this gen, its just that nintendo is doing the same they have been doing always,

its only that others go with whats popular atm, and thats FPS.

after owning a ps2 last gen i missed the days with N64, thats why i went this way

Avatar image for DeadEndPanda
DeadEndPanda

2358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 DeadEndPanda
Member since 2008 • 2358 Posts

Assuming it was unique, I'd have no qualm against it. I don't think they'd ever develope one since it's not Nintendo's image. Metroid Prime 1/2/3 is the closest thing to an FPS Nintendo will directly support probably. It's all fantasy violence, no swearing, no blood, nothing too hardcore. However you don't need blood to make a hardcore FPS, take for instance: Battlefield 2. A game like Team Fortress 2 (without the blood and guts) would seem to be right up Nintendo's alley. While Nintendo has the creativity to create something unique, I think it should be left up the third party developers, though I would support a Wii-make of Geist (though yes, it was only published by them, not developed). Geist was interesting in idea, but heavily flawed in execution.

mouthforbathory

seems to me like your confusing mature and hardcore, but ya

Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts
Definitely. Nintendo needs to bring a Mario FPS to the Wii with all the Mario craziness.
Avatar image for Zeus-Guy
Zeus-Guy

728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Zeus-Guy
Member since 2004 • 728 Posts

I think that had more to do with the fact that it had an incredibly poorly utilized graphics engine and was generic. :PGabuEx

What makes The Conduit generic compared to other FPS?

Definitely. Nintendo needs to bring a Mario FPS to the Wii with all the Mario craziness.psychobrew

Didn't they do that with Yoshi's Safari?

Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]Definitely. Nintendo needs to bring a Mario FPS to the Wii with all the Mario craziness.Zeus-Guy

Didn't they do that with Yoshi's Safari?

No. Yoshi's Safari was more like a driving game anyway. I'm talking about mixing Battlefield or COD multiplayer with Mario characters and the craziness they bring (bombs and grenades that shrink or slow your opponents, make you grow in to a giant, or make you super fast, etc).

Avatar image for Thiago26792
Thiago26792

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Thiago26792
Member since 2007 • 11059 Posts

Yes, but it won't happen.

Avatar image for jettpack
jettpack

3192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#77 jettpack
Member since 2009 • 3192 Posts

giest is fps so they already have, goldeneye and perfect dark were , ,

and they were made by rare/nintendo so ya i dont think i care, timesplitters 3 is still fun enough and is better believe it or not , then most average fpses today you dont even see map makers in todays fpses suprisingly enough , nor the quntity of content even though these disc hold more or the same if they stop oworrying about how realistic these fpses look then maybe wed have this gens equivalent of timesplitters pd or goldeneye , ,

mariokart64fan

idk, i was never that impressed with what rare has done. other than perfect dark and golden eye. But now Rare has gone down hill. i dont think they have had a AAA release in like 10 years.

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts
Definitely. Nintendo needs to bring a Mario FPS to the Wii with all the Mario craziness.psychobrew
meh, that sounds like a terrible idea. I think Nintendo should leave the FPS genre to developers who live on beating that dead horse, Nintendo should stick to keeping platformers and action adventure titles relevant, there are barely any left in the sea of shooters and action games that are basically shooters.
Avatar image for littleyoungster
littleyoungster

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 littleyoungster
Member since 2009 • 65 Posts

No, because when the Wii actually get a FPS, people would likely complain that its got last-gen graphics and that its generic. After all, isn't that what happened with The Conduit?Zeus-Guy

Well don't you remember Super Mario Galaxy that game had pretty good graphics. If Nintendo puts alot of effort into a game they can make good graphics for Wii. The Conduit wasnt good cuz they didnt put effort into it and it wasnt entirely made by Nintendo.

Avatar image for littleyoungster
littleyoungster

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 littleyoungster
Member since 2009 • 65 Posts

[QUOTE="psychobrew"]Definitely. Nintendo needs to bring a Mario FPS to the Wii with all the Mario craziness.Sepewrath
meh, that sounds like a terrible idea. I think Nintendo should leave the FPS genre to developers who live on beating that dead horse, Nintendo should stick to keeping platformers and action adventure titles relevant, there are barely any left in the sea of shooters and action games that are basically shooters.

I dont think they should cuz mario doesnt suit FPS

Avatar image for sman3579
sman3579

21174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#81 sman3579
Member since 2008 • 21174 Posts

I cant see Nintendo making a FPS at all.

Avatar image for Zeus-Guy
Zeus-Guy

728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Zeus-Guy
Member since 2004 • 728 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeus-Guy"]No, because when the Wii actually get a FPS, people would likely complain that its got last-gen graphics and that its generic. After all, isn't that what happened with The Conduit?littleyoungster

Well don't you remember Super Mario Galaxy that game had pretty good graphics. If Nintendo puts alot of effort into a game they can make good graphics for Wii. The Conduit wasnt good cuz they didnt put effort into it and it wasnt entirely made by Nintendo.

I haven't forgotten about the graphics in Super Mario Galaxy; the problem is people criticize the Wii's graphics just because they're not on the same level as the other consoles.
Avatar image for violentken88
violentken88

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 violentken88
Member since 2005 • 717 Posts

I think they can do more with the Geist formula they had goin with N-Space. From what I remember they were collaberating on it or something.

Avatar image for Crazyguy105
Crazyguy105

9513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#84 Crazyguy105
Member since 2009 • 9513 Posts

I want Kirby Wii first. :x