Does Zelda have a timeline?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts

This is bugging me, I used to think that every Zelda game was a stand alone game, but then I got in an argument with a friend and he tried to explain it to me and it just didn`t make any sense. So does the Legand of Zelda series have a timeline?

Avatar image for l8bitz
l8bitz

3251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 l8bitz
Member since 2004 • 3251 Posts
The said that minish cap is the first game in the time line, so it must have a time line.
Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts
The said that minish cap is the first game in the time line, so it must have a time line.l8bitz
If it does then it`s confusing!
Avatar image for l8bitz
l8bitz

3251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 l8bitz
Member since 2004 • 3251 Posts

[QUOTE="l8bitz"]The said that minish cap is the first game in the time line, so it must have a time line.viva_havarte
If it does then it`s confusing!

I wouldn't doubt it... try going to gametrailers.com and looking for there Zelda Timeline video. They give there complex theory on the whole thing.

Edit:check it out

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#5 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
Yes, there is a timeline, and you can find ways to connect every game. The timeline's never been revealed (and it might never be), but I can make a good guess (and so can many others).
Avatar image for Triforceunison
Triforceunison

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Triforceunison
Member since 2006 • 29 Posts

Nintendo hasnt released an official timeline, but gametrailers has a pretty convincing timeline theory.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/15194.html

Avatar image for bunchofpixels
bunchofpixels

7049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 bunchofpixels
Member since 2003 • 7049 Posts
It seems to me like each Link is a different person but the story isnt deep enough to where it matters.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#8 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
I wouldn't go by the gametrailers theory, it's junk. LA is the known sequel to LttP, it doesn't come after MM.... and there are more problems other than that.
Avatar image for bowden911
bowden911

450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bowden911
Member since 2007 • 450 Posts

Sure does. But only nintendo knows what it is.

Avatar image for dinofan01
dinofan01

1697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 dinofan01
Member since 2007 • 1697 Posts
technically no timeline. but people have many theories trying to expain it. i dont care really the games are always great
Avatar image for yodariquo
yodariquo

6631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#11 yodariquo
Member since 2005 • 6631 Posts
I think you're deluding yourself if you think Nintendo is actually keeping some sort of a big lore book with the timing of every event of every Zelda game. They make a game and say what's convenient for the game, nothing more. If it works out to some general order, sobeit.
Avatar image for mariomusicmaker
mariomusicmaker

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 mariomusicmaker
Member since 2006 • 1426 Posts
If it dose have a time line then we could expect a tie togather game as the last of the sieries :D kinda like starwars 3 type of thing. i would love to play a game like that but at the same time when and if zelda dose have a beginning and end i think i will cry. i spent the last 17 years of my life playing zelda and waiting for the next one :P
Avatar image for ShadowLaguna
ShadowLaguna

897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#14 ShadowLaguna
Member since 2006 • 897 Posts
Sorta.They say The Wind Waker is set 100 years after Ocarina of Time while Majora's Mask is set several months after OoT. And we all know where PH comes.
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
some people hope it has, and some stories do, but not all.
Avatar image for Yarcofin
Yarcofin

3396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#16 Yarcofin
Member since 2006 • 3396 Posts

Nintendo has not blatently said the timeline, therefore one does not exist. Zelda is not real-life so it exists only as portrayed by Nintendo.

The way that it was explained to me is that in each game, Link is a different person in a whole alternate dimension and time, but the "prophecized hero" is the same soul that gets "reincarnated" into each of the characters, ie. why they all have the same birthmarks and whatnot, but they are not the same person. This also goes for Zelda, Ganon, and all recurring characters being teh same "spiritual entity" but not the samephysical person.

There are timelines WITHIN games , ie. Link growing up in OOT, but not throughout the entires eries.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

Sure does. But only nintendo knows what it is.

bowden911

nope, not even Nintendo.

Avatar image for Tonindo
Tonindo

563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Tonindo
Member since 2006 • 563 Posts
There is no timeline. Some of the games connect to eachother, but there is no actual timeline. Everybody who has played a few Zeldas should know that.
Avatar image for salty5674
salty5674

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 salty5674
Member since 2006 • 927 Posts
i dont think minish cap was the first. it does have a timeline but i forget. All I acn remember is Ocarina of time then Twilight Princess then i think Wind Waker but im not sure about that
Avatar image for Thiago26792
Thiago26792

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Thiago26792
Member since 2007 • 11059 Posts
It must have, but is a very confusing one. I hope that Miyamoto publishes a book about that. It will be awesome.
Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts
Sorta.They say The Wind Waker is set 100 years after Ocarina of Time while Majora's Mask is set several months after OoT. And we all know where PH comes.ShadowLaguna
yes, but they also say that TP was set at the same time WW was but TP is in a parallel universe and this universe was made after the ending of OoT, but not the ending that we know it, confusing huh?
Avatar image for maclotr
maclotr

6282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 maclotr
Member since 2003 • 6282 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowLaguna"]Sorta.They say The Wind Waker is set 100 years after Ocarina of Time while Majora's Mask is set several months after OoT. And we all know where PH comes.viva_havarte
yes, but they also say that TP was set at the same time WW was but TP is in a parallel universe and this universe was made after the ending of OoT, but not the ending that we know it, confusing huh?

No, no they didn't. TP is 100 years after OoT. WW is HUNDREDS of years after TWW, which was originally poorly translated into 100 years. They're at separate times.

I like GameTrailer's split timeline theory alot. It has a few holes, but for the most part, that's what I believe.

Avatar image for Arc2012
Arc2012

1535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Arc2012
Member since 2007 • 1535 Posts
I contend that only the Zelda games made after OoT fall into any timeline. They seem to make some sense and fit nicely, except TP, there's something wrong with that. Perhaps it's explained in a future release.
Avatar image for toadster101
toadster101

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#25 toadster101
Member since 2006 • 12622 Posts
Yep.
Avatar image for lucky326
lucky326

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 lucky326
Member since 2006 • 3799 Posts
I believe Game Trailers theroy into the timeline along with a few of my own additions/changes. Btw WW is either 100 or 1000 years after OOT cant remember and TP is around 60 years after OOT and I personally believe that fits into timeline A.
Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts

[QUOTE="viva_havarte"][QUOTE="ShadowLaguna"]Sorta.They say The Wind Waker is set 100 years after Ocarina of Time while Majora's Mask is set several months after OoT. And we all know where PH comes.maclotr

yes, but they also say that TP was set at the same time WW was but TP is in a parallel universe and this universe was made after the ending of OoT, but not the ending that we know it, confusing huh?

No, no they didn't. TP is 100 years after OoT. WW is HUNDREDS of years after TWW, which was originally poorly translated into 100 years. They're at separate times.

I like GameTrailer's split timeline theory alot. It has a few holes, but for the most part, that's what I believe.

this Wikipedia article can try to explain it, scroll down to the Chronology
Avatar image for andrew_lynch
andrew_lynch

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 andrew_lynch
Member since 2004 • 111 Posts

Didn't read everything, so I'm not sure if this has been posted.

THIS IS FROM WIKIPEDIA.

The creators maintain that the series has a set timeline, but due to the poor translation protocols in the 1990s, and debate over what counts as "canonical" material, the available information continues to be disputed. Eiji Aonuma has since promised he will do his best to patch it all up, and reveal the timeline someday, and Miyamoto stated in a 2003 interview that there is a master document containing the timeline. Eiji Aonuma has also stated in a July 2007 video interview that there is such a document on his PC, and that this document is considered confidential. According to this interview, development of a Zelda title can commence without the team knowing in advance where exactly the title will fit into the timeline; but by the time the title is finished, its placement in the timeline will be determined. However, this document has not been seen publicly, and there is little other proof of its existence.

Avatar image for xxxBravo_3xxx
xxxBravo_3xxx

469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 xxxBravo_3xxx
Member since 2006 • 469 Posts
if u google it i'm sure you'll find it, and i agree its confusing
Avatar image for Arc2012
Arc2012

1535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Arc2012
Member since 2007 • 1535 Posts

I believe Game Trailers theroy into the timeline along with a few of my own additions/changes. Btw WW is either 100 or 1000 years after OOT cant remember and TP is around 60 years after OOT and I personally believe that fits into timeline A.lucky326

What's timline A? Young Link at the end of Oot? If so, it doesn't fit. Ganondorf has the triforce of power in TP but he wouldn't have it in Young Link's timeline. If it's Adult Link's timeline it still doesn't make sense that he sees Link but never says anything like "Hey remember when I swore vengence upon your predessor's decendents? Well, guess what? You're dead."

Thus my confusion with TP.

Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts

Didn't read everything, so I'm not sure if this has been posted.

THIS IS FROM WIKIPEDIA.

The creators maintain that the series has a set timeline, but due to the poor translation protocols in the 1990s, and debate over what counts as "canonical" material, the available information continues to be disputed. Eiji Aonumahas since promised he will do his best to patch it all up, and reveal the timeline someday, and Miyamoto stated in a 2003 interview that there is a master document containing the timeline. Eiji Aonuma has also stated in a July 2007 video interview that there is such a document on his PC, and that this document is considered confidential. According to this interview, development of a Zelda title can commence without the team knowing in advance where exactly the title will fit into the timeline; but by the time the title is finished, its placement in the timeline will be determined. However, this document has not been seen publicly, and there is little other proof of its existence.

andrew_lynch
Maybe the next zelda game will tie all the other games together and make this whole split timeline theory make sense
Avatar image for PainGivingLink
PainGivingLink

1316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 PainGivingLink
Member since 2006 • 1316 Posts

Well, the game has some sort of a time line. But nothing has been organized yet. It has been said that Phantom Hourglass is the sequel to Wind Waker.

I think that Wind Waker & Phantom Hourglass are protrayed in the future, and thus being another series.

Then comes Minish Cap, and then either Ocarina of Time, Majoras Mask, ALTTP, LoZ, or Twilight Princess carries on.

I'm thinking that, not all games are connected. But they are all categorized in different series. Right now, I see 2-3 series.

It's very hard to depict whether which games come first or not, but there has to be some sort of timeline.

Maybe the Zelda franchise will unfold this question as we go on.

Avatar image for joelion456
joelion456

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 joelion456
Member since 2007 • 104 Posts
there probaly is but i honestly dont care
Avatar image for nakasa5
nakasa5

1429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34 nakasa5
Member since 2005 • 1429 Posts

yes and no. Some of the gamesexplicit hints to thestory line. We know OoT comes before MM. There are hints that TP comes hundreds of years after MM and OoT. Of course, WW is supposed to take place a REALLY long time after OoT, and then PH is a direct sequel to that.

Basically it goes- OoT, MM, TP, WW, PH.

Other games, like LttP, really don't fit in with the above mentioned games. Fans like to make it fit nicely, but those games were never really intended to fit in with a big picture of Hyrule and the adventures fo recent games. There may be two storylines, but that is another post entirely!

Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts
Supposedly,there is a timeline,but we have no idea what the order is,besides a few key games.Nintendo might know what the timeline for Zelda is,if it even exists.
Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts

Well, the game has some sort of a time line. But nothing has been organized yet. It has been said that Phantom Hourglass is the sequel to Wind Waker.

I think that Wind Waker & Phantom Hourglass are protrayed in the future, and thus being another series.

Then comes Minish Cap, and then either Ocarina of Time, Majoras Mask, ALTTP, LoZ, or Twilight Princess carries on.

I'm thinking that, not all games are connected. But they are all categorized in different series. Right now, I see 2-3 series.

It's very hard to depict whether which games come first or not, but there has to be some sort of timeline.

Maybe the Zelda franchise will unfold this question as we go on.

PainGivingLink
Agred, but what if the next zelda game would connect the two timelines or something like that, that would be awsome
Avatar image for pigfish2
pigfish2

3819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#37 pigfish2
Member since 2004 • 3819 Posts
gametrailers.com made a video timeline and that had minish cap first and twi parallel timelines
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#38 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts

[QUOTE="lucky326"]I believe Game Trailers theroy into the timeline along with a few of my own additions/changes. Btw WW is either 100 or 1000 years after OOT cant remember and TP is around 60 years after OOT and I personally believe that fits into timeline A.Arc2012

What's timline A? Young Link at the end of Oot? If so, it doesn't fit. Ganondorf has the triforce of power in TP but he wouldn't have it in Young Link's timeline. If it's Adult Link's timeline it still doesn't make sense that he sees Link but never says anything like "Hey remember when I swore vengence upon your predessor's decendents? Well, guess what? You're dead."

Thus my confusion with TP.

It fits with young Link's timeline. When the sages attempted to execute him in TP, the triforce of power just comes to him somehow.

Avatar image for hathejoker
hathejoker

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 hathejoker
Member since 2007 • 173 Posts

I thought Twilight took after WW. It makes sense; Tetra and Link eventually find a new Hyrule. Centuries later Link defeats Ganon in new Hyrule and Ganon's piece of the triforce disappears from his hand. Knowing this Link and Zelda have no reason to wield the triforce pieces so they contain it. Link decides to check on the pieces one day. This event gives way to Zelda Oracle of ages.

My theory about Hyrule B

Avatar image for shroomario
shroomario

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 shroomario
Member since 2006 • 409 Posts
no way
Avatar image for The_Gr8_Leon
The_Gr8_Leon

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 The_Gr8_Leon
Member since 2007 • 267 Posts
I always thought that when Link completes an adventure, they erase his memory and send him on a new one. And change his appearance.
Avatar image for viva_havarte
viva_havarte

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 viva_havarte
Member since 2007 • 312 Posts
I just found this, looks pritty interesting
Avatar image for nakasa5
nakasa5

1429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 nakasa5
Member since 2005 • 1429 Posts

I thought Twilight took after WW. It makes sense; Tetra and Link eventually find a new Hyrule. Centuries later Link defeats Ganon in new Hyrule and Ganon's piece of the triforce disappears from his hand. Knowing this Link and Zelda have no reason to wield the triforce pieces so they contain it. Link decides to check on the pieces one day. This event gives way to Zelda Oracle of ages.

My theory about Hyrule B

hathejoker

TP has to happen before WW, b/c the OoT Hyrule is under water. Spolier- In TP Link find the ruins to the Temple of Time, which is under water in WW.