EA: No Wii U Titles in Development [Upd 2: LOL JOKES, WE ARE!]

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#1 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

From Kotaku.

"We have no games in development for the Wii U currently," company spokesperson Jeff Brown told Kotaku yesterday. He did not rule out the chances of EA developing for the Wii U again. EA publishes many of gaming's biggest franchises, including Madden, The Sims, and Battlefield.

The lack of Madden and FIFA is a big deal for Nintendo. As a consumer, I really don't care. I can only think of two titles from EA I've liked in the last 10 years.

Update 1:

I don't want to make this into a System Wars thread but I thought this was relevant. EA was at the Xbox One Presentation and stated they'd be supporting current generation platforms till 2017 at the least. That being said, I wonder now what the real motivation behind not supporting the Wii U (for sports titles at least) is. 

Update 2:

Turns out EA is making Wii U content ... 

Electronic Arts is developing games for the Wii U, but not as many as the company is developing for Sony and Microsoft's consoles, EA's chief financial officer Blake Jorgensen said today during the Stifel Nicolaus 2013 Internet, Media and Communications Conference.Polygon

"You know I will ultimately let consumers vote on PS vs. Xbox. You know I think Nintendo's business was more of an extension of their last console. We are building titles for the Nintendo consoles, but not anywhere near as many as we are for PS or Xbox. You know, what I think the consumer will find is a lot more powerful gameplay with the new boxes that are coming out, and a lot of excitement, but it will remain to be seen as to the services associated with those how the consumers decide which direction they want to go."

Um, stop trolling us? Please?

Avatar image for TxTech1923
TxTech1923

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TxTech1923
Member since 2013 • 662 Posts
AKA if sales pick up they'll go back to their "strong relationship with Nintendo" stance :P I don't care about Madden, but no NCAA 14 and up does bother me. I'm sure Nintendo is much more worried about it than most consumers though, that's a big money making gap to fill.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#3 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

AKA if sales pick up they'll go back to their "strong relationship with Nintendo" stance :P I don't care about Madden, but no NCAA 14 and up does bother me. I'm sure Nintendo is much more worried about it than most consumers though, that's a big money making gap to fill.TxTech1923

I think the biggest hit will be the lack of sports games for sure. Battlefield 4 and what not is not going to matter as much. It's just funny to see that EA is bailing out, while the other two big publishers have titles lined up for Wii U still. Activision has stuff like Call of Duty: Ghosts and Ubisoft has Splinter Cell: Blacklist, Rayman Legends, Assassin's Creed IV and Watch_Dogs.

Avatar image for TxTech1923
TxTech1923

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TxTech1923
Member since 2013 • 662 Posts

[QUOTE="TxTech1923"]AKA if sales pick up they'll go back to their "strong relationship with Nintendo" stance :P I don't care about Madden, but no NCAA 14 and up does bother me. I'm sure Nintendo is much more worried about it than most consumers though, that's a big money making gap to fill.Haziqonfire

I think the biggest hit will be the lack of sports games for sure. Battlefield 4 and what not is not going to matter as much. It's just funny to see that EA is bailing out, while the other two big publishers have titles lined up for Wii U still. Activision has stuff like Call of Duty: Ghosts and Ubisoft has Splinter Cell: Blacklist, Rayman Legends, Assassin's Creed IV and Watch_Dogs.

Activision and Ubi have had some pretty strong successes with Nintendo lately though. Almost all of the Wii COD's were million sellers (I think only MW3 didn't crack it), lead seller for Skylanders, Goldeneye did better than it did on the HD twins combined, and Ubi had good sales publishing some core cames with great sales in the dance stuff. EA on the other hand has watched sports game after sports game tank after experimenting with a bunch of different control options, and almost all their published stuff tanked :P I can kind of see where they're coming from, their only big sales success on the Wii was EA Sports Active, and the sequel bombed miserably.
Avatar image for Madmangamer364
Madmangamer364

3716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#5 Madmangamer364
Member since 2006 • 3716 Posts

"Might Support In The Future"

...not if the recent sales data has anything to say about it...

You know, I'm starting to feel that by E3, it may already be too late for Nintendo to inject life into this system. It sounds silly, given that it's only a handful of weeks away, plus the high-profile IPs that Nintendo are supposed to present. However, there's a ton of damage being done to the system's future, even as Nintendo positions itself to make a huge push, and that hole may be getting too deep for Mario and Co. to rope the system out of once they do show up.

EA's lack of support is HUGE, regardless of if anyone on this board is an EA fan or not. To top it off, you also have the likes of Take-Two that appear to be setting themselves up to do the same thing (no WWE 2K14, no 2K Sports Wii U announcements of any other sort, etc.). It all just seems like the beginning of a snowball effect that's eventually going to too big and going too fast for Nintendo to handle.

I HOPE I'm wrong about all of this, but... I just don't see it...

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#6 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

Activision and Ubi have had some pretty strong successes with Nintendo lately though. Almost all of the Wii COD's were million sellers (I think only MW3 didn't crack it), lead seller for Skylanders, Goldeneye did better than it did on the HD twins combined, and Ubi had good sales publishing some core cames with great sales in the dance stuff. EA on the other hand has watched sports game after sports game tank after experimenting with a bunch of different control options, and almost all their published stuff tanked :P I can kind of see where they're coming from, their only big sales success on the Wii was EA Sports Active, and the sequel bombed miserably.TxTech1923

Yeah but those games speak for themselves.

EA's Wii U support was Mass Effect 3 at launch. Hardly anyone is going to buy the third entry in that series on a new console without the first two. Then they announced the trilogy on PS3/360/PC for the same price as Mass Effect 3 on Wii U. The product was doomed from the start. Need for Speed: Most Wanted U, despite being a good game, came out 6 months later when most people who wanted it got it already and can get it for $29.99 compared to $59.99.

I'm starting to think sales of the Wii U has less to do with this. I mean sales only tappered off around February, and EA's output was basically done by then - they must have known for a while they weren't planning on supporting the Wii U long-term.

Avatar image for TxTech1923
TxTech1923

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TxTech1923
Member since 2013 • 662 Posts

[QUOTE="TxTech1923"]Activision and Ubi have had some pretty strong successes with Nintendo lately though. Almost all of the Wii COD's were million sellers (I think only MW3 didn't crack it), lead seller for Skylanders, Goldeneye did better than it did on the HD twins combined, and Ubi had good sales publishing some core cames with great sales in the dance stuff. EA on the other hand has watched sports game after sports game tank after experimenting with a bunch of different control options, and almost all their published stuff tanked :P I can kind of see where they're coming from, their only big sales success on the Wii was EA Sports Active, and the sequel bombed miserably.Haziqonfire

Yeah but those games speak for themselves.

EA's Wii U support was Mass Effect 3 at launch. Hardly anyone is going to buy the third entry in that series on a new console without the first two. Then they announced the trilogy on PS3/360/PC for the same price as Mass Effect 3 on Wii U. The product was doomed from the start. Need for Speed: Most Wanted U, despite being a good game, came out 6 months later when most people who wanted it got it already and can get it for $29.99 compared to $59.99.

I'm starting to think sales of the Wii U has less to do with this. I mean sales only tappered off around February, and EA's output was basically done by then - they must have known for a while they weren't planning on supporting the Wii U long-term.

EA did the exact same thing on the Wii though.. How many times did they release the Wii version later, OR in cases like Dead Space: Extraction where they actually give Wii owners a good game.. they send it out to die at market because they did ZERO advertising. Yeah a lot of it is their own fault, they never gave the systems the head on chance like Ubi and Activision have done, but I don't expect them to start now :P
Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

We should wait and see how the fall turns out for the system.  If companies keep bailing by 2014, then I will say Wii U is done for. 

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
F*** you EA
Avatar image for JuanGrande386
JuanGrande386

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 JuanGrande386
Member since 2003 • 1116 Posts

Last EA game I bought for a Nintendo system was whatever Madden launched with the Gamecube! I have a PC, Xbox, or Playstation for EA games.......if I actually want them.

Avatar image for bdmckinley
bdmckinley

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 bdmckinley
Member since 2004 • 817 Posts
Kinda pisses me off that I bought Mass Effect 3 and Most Wanted now. So much for voting with my wallet. Good luck getting the DLC for Most Wanted now.
Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#12 deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

Must've done really shit with Wii sales.  Only good games they had on Wii were the Boom Blox games and they sold like crap probably.

This doesn't matter to me that's for sure.

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts

Must've done really shit with Wii sales.  Only good games they had on Wii were the Boom Blox games and they sold like crap probably.

This doesn't matter to me that's for sure.

Chozofication
Oh Boom Blox. The only thing Spielberg has ever done that wasn't a rousing success. Fun game though.
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
F*** you EAOreoMilkshake
Why :? They are going to do what they feel will give them the most ROI (return on investment). It is not that they do not think they could make money with WiiU games, it is that they only have a limited amount of funds to invest, and they feel that the WiiU is not the best use of said funds. In other words, they feel that their investments will return better results if they are spent elsewhere. -for example, $100 invested with the WiiU might return $110...while $100 invested somewhere else might return $120...both are profitable, but one is more so Right or wrong, they are only doing what they are supposed to do (return maximum profit to their shareholders). You can debate what investment would return the most (though I doubt most of the users here are qualified to do so, myself included). But you shouldn't be mad b/c they are doing what they think is best for their business. On topic... This is a very bad sign IMO (for reasons mentioned above)
Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#15 superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

good thing I haven't bought nfsmwu. Then again haven't bought any EA games since BF3. :p

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#16 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
What a conundrum. Why support a console because it isn't selling with games that won't sell, but then again you won't make the games so that the console will sell...
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#17 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

In the same week that EA announced that they're not going to be supporting the Wii U, SEGA announces that they're making 3 exclusive Wii U Sonic titles and giving Nintendo publishing rights and Ubisoft reaffirms their faith in the Wii U.

As with any new console, it takes some time to grow an established base. Ubisoft has a varied and high-quality line-up for Wii U, with more big titles on the way including Rayman Legends, Watch Dogs, Assassin's Creed IV Black Flag and Splinter Cell Blacklist. We're confident that this will help in continuing to attract gamers to the Wii U system and that Nintendo will take steps to ensure that the Wii U is successful in the market.Ubisoft Rep

Link.

EA seems to have prematurely jumped the gun here. Everyone else can see that Nintendo's heavy titles aren't out yet and that's a big part of whether or not the Wii U will regain some momentum.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36210 Posts

Sucks for sales. Not for me, unless there will be another seriously awesome SSX game. Not sure about the last one, but SSX 3 is one of my favourite games ever.

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#19 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts
the gamecube did ok without many titles the n64 practcally lived on first and second party the wiiu is just having the same problem psp ps3 ds and 3ds had except it isnt bleeding money as bad as ps3
Avatar image for TxTech1923
TxTech1923

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 TxTech1923
Member since 2013 • 662 Posts

good thing I haven't bought nfsmwu. Then again haven't bought any EA games since BF3. :p

superbuuman
How dumb is this line of thinking, do you wonder why 3rd party support for Nintendo is poor..? They wont _____ so I'm not going to buy _____! Congratulations, you've reaffirmed why they aren't making any games for the console right now.
Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

[QUOTE="superbuuman"]

good thing I haven't bought nfsmwu. Then again haven't bought any EA games since BF3. :p

TxTech1923

How dumb is this line of thinking, do you wonder why 3rd party support for Nintendo is poor..? They wont _____ so I'm not going to buy _____! Congratulations, you've reaffirmed why they aren't making any games for the console right now.

I purposefully avoid EA too, they're just bad devs and even worse publishers, why support that with my money? Last EA game I bought was NFSMW on PC for like $10, and that felt like a total waste of money for the best version of the product.

Once EA releases some games worth owning and/or they actually stop being total tools then I'd probably pick up a game or two that deserved the purchase.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#22 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
[QUOTE="superbuuman"]

good thing I haven't bought nfsmwu. Then again haven't bought any EA games since BF3. :p

TxTech1923
How dumb is this line of thinking, do you wonder why 3rd party support for Nintendo is poor..? They wont _____ so I'm not going to buy _____! Congratulations, you've reaffirmed why they aren't making any games for the console right now.

Despite Need For Speed: Most Wanted U being a great game, it's kind of hard to keep supporting third parties if they're releasing ports on Nintendo consoles months later, or releasing poor ports. I mean I bought Black Ops II, Assassin's Creed III and Need for Speed: Most Wanted U on the Wii U, but it's a hard sell for stuff like Mass Effect 3 and Need for Speed: Most Wanted U.
Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts
No FIFA is TERRIBLE for the console.
Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#24 superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

[QUOTE="superbuuman"]

good thing I haven't bought nfsmwu. Then again haven't bought any EA games since BF3. :p

TxTech1923

How dumb is this line of thinking, do you wonder why 3rd party support for Nintendo is poor..? They wont _____ so I'm not going to buy _____! Congratulations, you've reaffirmed why they aren't making any games for the console right now.

Read the last line..haven't bought any EA games since BF3. ZombiU, Injustice, Lego City, Tekken Tag T2, Sonic ASRT & Ninja Gaiden 3: RE says Hi! :P

Also why would I want to support a company that would release ME3 for the WiiU @ $80 then release ME trilogy @$80 for the competitions?

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts

[QUOTE="TxTech1923"][QUOTE="superbuuman"]

good thing I haven't bought nfsmwu. Then again haven't bought any EA games since BF3. :p

superbuuman

How dumb is this line of thinking, do you wonder why 3rd party support for Nintendo is poor..? They wont _____ so I'm not going to buy _____! Congratulations, you've reaffirmed why they aren't making any games for the console right now.

Read the last line..haven't bought any EA games since BF3. ZombiU, Injustice, Lego City, Tekken Tag T2, Sonic ASRT & Ninja Gaiden 3: RE says Hi! :P

Also why would I want to support a company that would release ME3 for the WiiU @ $80 then release ME trilogy @$80 for the competitions?

You mean a company that had to re-work a ton of stuff, change the game to fit with the Wii U pad, and then port it over a good while after ME3 had already been released. That company? And when the sales were terrible they realized, hey, maybe it isn't worth the effort. The conformity and ignorant hate for EA is one of the stupidest things going on right now in gaming.
Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
[QUOTE="superbuuman"]

[QUOTE="TxTech1923"] How dumb is this line of thinking, do you wonder why 3rd party support for Nintendo is poor..? They wont _____ so I'm not going to buy _____! Congratulations, you've reaffirmed why they aren't making any games for the console right now.firefox59

Read the last line..haven't bought any EA games since BF3. ZombiU, Injustice, Lego City, Tekken Tag T2, Sonic ASRT & Ninja Gaiden 3: RE says Hi! :P

Also why would I want to support a company that would release ME3 for the WiiU @ $80 then release ME trilogy @$80 for the competitions?

You mean a company that had to re-work a ton of stuff, change the game to fit with the Wii U pad, and then port it over a good while after ME3 had already been released. That company? And when the sales were terrible they realized, hey, maybe it isn't worth the effort. The conformity and ignorant hate for EA is one of the stupidest things going on right now in gaming.

Not when it's the same price as the trilogy. Does that look valuable to you?
Avatar image for da_chub
da_chub

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#27 da_chub
Member since 2007 • 3140 Posts
It doesn't bother me since I just don't buy lots if games new by these 3rd party devs anyways. Ea is the Walmart if gaming and it is probably hurts Nintendos ego more then their wallet. I think next gen is going to change video games. Nintendo is true video gaming for everyone, hardcore and casual, old school. But ps and Xbox are becoming interactive movie games. And the difference between them is going to become more apparent when metroid and Zelda are the same awesome games they always have benn, just in hd. And then you have your QuickTime cgi amazing 1080 HD interactive movie game(and cod of course). And while Nintendo nickel and dimes fans by making us pay .30 for super metroid, ea will give you the game to play, but make you buy the guns and ammo with $$$$$$'
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#28 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

You mean a company that had to re-work a ton of stuff, change the game to fit with the Wii U pad, and then port it over a good while after ME3 had already been released. That company? And when the sales were terrible they realized, hey, maybe it isn't worth the effort. The conformity and ignorant hate for EA is one of the stupidest things going on right now in gaming.firefox59

It doesn't matter. EA likely knew very well ahead of time that the Mass Effect Trilogy was coming out. Why would you make Mass Effect 3 on the Wii U when the previous console didn't get the first two games, but then release the whole trilogy on the PC/PS3/360 for the same price? EA's killing it's own Wii U SKU.

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts

[QUOTE="firefox59"]You mean a company that had to re-work a ton of stuff, change the game to fit with the Wii U pad, and then port it over a good while after ME3 had already been released. That company? And when the sales were terrible they realized, hey, maybe it isn't worth the effort. The conformity and ignorant hate for EA is one of the stupidest things going on right now in gaming.Haziqonfire

It doesn't matter. EA likely knew very well ahead of time that the Mass Effect Trilogy was coming out. Why would you make Mass Effect 3 on the Wii U when the previous console didn't get the first two games, but then release the whole trilogy on the PC/PS3/360 for the same price? EA's killing it's own Wii U SKU.

Idk where you guys are getting that it was the same price. ME3 retailed for Wii U at $60 and its around $25-30 right now. Nobody bought ME3 for the Wii U so you really think EA is going to port over and adapt the entire trilogy for the Wii U and its pad. What you guys are saying doesn't make any sense. Now I am by no means saying that EA should abandon an entire console but when it comes to Mass Effect it's different. While I loved the first Mass Effect, the 2nd and 3rd ones (minus the ending) were generally preferred by the fan base. Also EA probably figured they should release the 3rd one on the Wii U cause it was the newest and had the greatest chance to sell on another console. This is also the reason they created the trilogy for 360/PS3, to get sales from people who hadn't purchased the games yet. I don't think you can just compare the price points and say it's unfair. Re-releasing games and porting/adapting games for another system is completely different.
Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#30 superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

[QUOTE="firefox59"]You mean a company that had to re-work a ton of stuff, change the game to fit with the Wii U pad, and then port it over a good while after ME3 had already been released. That company? And when the sales were terrible they realized, hey, maybe it isn't worth the effort. The conformity and ignorant hate for EA is one of the stupidest things going on right now in gaming.firefox59

It doesn't matter. EA likely knew very well ahead of time that the Mass Effect Trilogy was coming out. Why would you make Mass Effect 3 on the Wii U when the previous console didn't get the first two games, but then release the whole trilogy on the PC/PS3/360 for the same price? EA's killing it's own Wii U SKU.

Idk where you guys are getting that it was the same price. ME3 retailed for Wii U at $60 and its around $25-30 right now. Nobody bought ME3 for the Wii U so you really think EA is going to port over and adapt the entire trilogy for the Wii U and its pad. What you guys are saying doesn't make any sense. Now I am by no means saying that EA should abandon an entire console but when it comes to Mass Effect it's different. While I loved the first Mass Effect, the 2nd and 3rd ones (minus the ending) were generally preferred by the fan base. Also EA probably figured they should release the 3rd one on the Wii U cause it was the newest and had the greatest chance to sell on another console. This is also the reason they created the trilogy for 360/PS3, to get sales from people who hadn't purchased the games yet. I don't think you can just compare the price points and say it's unfair. Re-releasing games and porting/adapting games for another system is completely different.

http://www.jbhifionline.com.au/support.aspx?post=1&results=10&source=all&bnSearch=Go!&q=mass+effect+trilogy&submit=Go

http://www.jbhifionline.com.au/game/pre-order/mass-effect-3-special-edition-wii-u/668512

At them prices would you really get ME3 for Wii U over the trilogy pack for other system?...this is the price we're slug with here in Aust. 

Avatar image for MrSpieleMaster
MrSpieleMaster

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MrSpieleMaster
Member since 2013 • 89 Posts
Might support in the future? That's sad :(. Hope they will bring BF4 on it.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#32 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
[QUOTE="MrSpieleMaster"]Might support in the future? That's sad :(. Hope they will bring BF4 on it.

They'll bring over Battlefield 3: Enhanced Edition when Battlefield 4 is out instead.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#33 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

With EA showing off it's new engine there's no way we see the games in their current states.

Current gen consoles were having a tough time with things like crowds and stadiums filled with people, the Wii U isn't enough of a jump to change that.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#34 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
EA ditched Nintendo because they don't charge a fee to play used games. My new assumption after the Xbox reveal.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#35 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

EA Is Supporting Current Generation Until 2017, At Least

The only reason why I'm adding this to this thread is because I find it weird that EA is supporting current generation platforms for a long time, but has decided to ignore the Wii U. They claimed at first it was a technical limitation, then complained it was due to sales figures. I don't think either checks out, but I really would like to know why they're so bitter. At the very least, I'd expect Madden, FIFA, NBA, NHL to be supported on the platform. If they don't want to downport other titles for next-generation only, that's understandable.

Avatar image for Madmangamer364
Madmangamer364

3716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#36 Madmangamer364
Member since 2006 • 3716 Posts

EA Is Supporting Current Generation Until 2017, At Least

The only reason why I'm adding this to this thread is because I find it weird that EA is supporting current generation platforms for a long time, but has decided to ignore the Wii U. They claimed at first it was a technical limitation, then complained it was due to sales figures. I don't think either checks out, but I really would like to know why they're so bitter. At the very least, I'd expect Madden, FIFA, NBA, NHL to be supported on the platform. If they don't want to downport other titles for next-generation only, that's understandable.

Haziqonfire

I'm pretty sure EA is using the PS3/Xbox 360 as a safety net. Between the Wii U's historically bad start and the horrific Xbox One reveal, EA (and other third parties) are probably going to need platforms they feel confident in, especially if what we've already seen proves to be an omen for the upcoming platforms.

As far as the Wii U goes, it's just a dead-end for most games at the moment. While that could change in time, there isn't much of a reason to make a strong software push right now, given the total lack of impact the system has had. There's a chance EA could find its way back into the fold, but I can't say I blame them or anyone else for not having a lot of faith in the Wii U these days.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#37 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
@Madmangamer364, check the update in the OP. I am entirely confused. I don't even know now. What?
Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#38 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

Well, now I am not sure which EA guy I should trust.

I guess time will tell.

Avatar image for Madmangamer364
Madmangamer364

3716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#39 Madmangamer364
Member since 2006 • 3716 Posts

@Madmangamer364, check the update in the OP.

I am entirely confused. I don't even know now. What?Haziqonfire

...

LOLOLOLOLOLOL! :lol: Did the Xbox One reveal spook EA THAT much? :P

In all seriousness, though, I found part of the quote very telling.

"We are building titles for the Nintendo consoles, but not anywhere near as many as we are for PS or Xbox. You know, what I think the consumer will find is a lot more powerful gameplay with the new boxes that are coming out, and a lot of excitement, but it will remain to be seen as to the services associated with those how the consumers decide which direction they want to go."

EA's focus still appears to heavily on making sure the upcoming platforms are still getting the top-notch treatment. This was pretty obvious, even before EA "pulled" its Wii U support. Perhaps it's by reaction to various features (or "services") that have been announced for one of the upcoming platforms, it seems that EA has become aware that it's possible consumers will not be as accepting of what's to come as they had hoped. The quote implies some flexibility potential consumers may have in terms of which system to choose, but kinda in a cautious sense. In a way, it makes me wonder if there are more controversial things to be known about the two upcoming systems than what has already been announced.

On the plus side, at least we know EA's support for the Wii U isn't totally dead, although I still believe that there was damage done in EA's previous announcement that could resurface with other publishers later on. Too soon to tell for sure, though. Still, since we know that EA's offerings will probably be slim on the Wii U this year, how and where exactly will EA support resurface on the console? There's a clearer view now, but we're not out of the woods with this topic just yet. :P

Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#40 superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

wow the back pedalling has started already. :P

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Sounds like they're having a hard time figuring out which console to risk financial support on.
Avatar image for enrique_marrodz
enrique_marrodz

2107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#42 enrique_marrodz
Member since 2003 • 2107 Posts
I'm sure Nintendo is pretty concerned with this. I don't want nor like sports games but I acknowledge those are pretty heavy weights on this industry. From my part, I really missed a good racing game and NFSMWU has been great so that's what I may miss the most. In any case, I believe the disappointing sales are pretty much EA's fault as they are releasing too late, too few, and almost no original content for the Wii U. I'm sure there are big things at play behind the curtains, something the top execs from EA and Nintendo need to arrange. Let's see if they can find a solution and, first of all, prevent EA's personnel to stop bashing the Wii U and measure their words to keep this "strong" partnership going on.