This topic is locked from further discussion.
I really didn't like Revenant Wings that much. The game really had no strategy at all, just moving your entire army to attack the enemy as they come to you. Not really all that engaging. It's story is fantastic though, even if you didn't play FF12 (I didn't).
FFTA2 is pretty good. It's length alone makes it worth it's purchase, and if you enjoyed FFTA, you'll love the fixes (mostly the easier law system). The main story isn't that great, but some of the side stories are definitely worth it.
I'd pick FFTA2 over Revenant Wings, but that's just me. And for future reference, there is a sticky for these questions.
Have only played the 3 Castlevanias on the DS - I want a good turn-based fighting/strategy game.techronin
I can't believe you have only picked up the Castlevanias! There are so many great games on the DS!
Anyways, if it comes down to FFTA2 or Revenent Wings, I would advise FFTA2! It's a pretty good game and a solid strategy game! Much more strategy and depth than Revenant Wings! Honestly though, I would suggest Luminous Arc 2 and 1 if you got into 2. Luminous Arc has a better story and I found it to be far more entertaining, even though A2 is a good game. You should pick up Luminous Arc 2 and than consider A2, imo. Good Luck!
I really didn't like Revenant Wings that much. The game really had no strategy at all, just moving your entire army to attack the enemy as they come to you. Not really all that engaging. It's story is fantastic though, even if you didn't play FF12 (I didn't).
FFTA2 is pretty good. It's length alone makes it worth it's purchase, and if you enjoyed FFTA, you'll love the fixes (mostly the easier law system). The main story isn't that great, but some of the side stories are definitely worth it.
I'd pick FFTA2 over Revenant Wings, but that's just me. And for future reference, there is a sticky for these questions.
nintendofreak_2
Its too short (I think so anyway). Since it's the only one I've played of the two, I'm choosing that. It's a great sequel to the original for the GBA.
Only if you do the required missions.Its too short (I think so anyway). Since it's the only one I've played of the two, I'm choosing that. It's a great sequel to the original for the GBA.
Me2nice
Nai disagree with everyone. FFTA2 had crap story unlike its predecessor, graphics are exactly the same on the ds as it was on gba, the battles are really long and u only get 30 ap per side quest which is very little. So you end up playing a long time with little reward, crappy story, and graphics which are the same.blazian88The battles ussualy take a few minutes if you have a good party.
And no, they don't look the same. :|
[QUOTE="Me2nice"]Only if you do the required missions.Its too short (I think so anyway). Since it's the only one I've played of the two, I'm choosing that. It's a great sequel to the original for the GBA.
nintendofreak_2
I did most of the side-quests too.
Nai disagree with everyone. FFTA2 had crap story unlike its predecessor, graphics are exactly the same on the ds as it was on gba, the battles are really long and u only get 30 ap per side quest which is very little. So you end up playing a long time with little reward, crappy story, and graphics which are the same.blazian88The battles ussualy take a few minutes if you have a good party. FFTA had a crap (although better) storyline too (It would've been better if one of the bullies ruled Ivalice with an iron fidt and the hero had to tke him AND return home.
And no, they don't look the same. :|
It's DS vs. GBA, what'd you expect?
[QUOTE="Me2nice"]Only if you do the required missions.Its too short (I think so anyway). Since it's the only one I've played of the two, I'm choosing that. It's a great sequel to the original for the GBA.
nintendofreak_2
Nai disagree with everyone. FFTA2 had crap story unlike its predecessor, graphics are exactly the same on the ds as it was on gba, the battles are really long and u only get 30 ap per side quest which is very little. So you end up playing a long time with little reward, crappy story, and graphics which are the same.blazian88The battles ussualy take a few minutes if you have a good party.
And no, they don't look the same. :|
The sprites are similar, so I can see where he's coming from. The spells and backgrounds in A2 look far superior though.
Disgaea is easily the winner here IMO. Sadly not many have played it :( Disgaea is faster paced with a superior score, more customizable and has a humurous original story and likeable characters. Its only fault is the game's ugliness; sprites and backgrounds alike are extremely blurry.
Tactics A2's battles can get tedious (you barely get rewarded for a lot of the battles, despite them lasting often times up to half an hour) and it has a terrible, sickeningly awful story. Good presentation values though, so if that's your thing A2 won't disappoint. Plus it has 50 something ****s, although Disgaea is equally customizable.
Revenant Wings' battles are short and never get tedious. The problem with the gameplay is that it's just bland RTS with no strategy involved and the controls aren't as good as they could be, even restricted by DS hardware. Graphics are great and music is compelling, although the same can't be said of the plot. If you want an RTS, just go for Lock's Quest/Ninjatown/Robocalypse.
None of them are necessarily bad games, but Disgaea is just much more rewarding in my opinion.
Doing 200 missions has to take at least 60-80 hours. That is in no way short.I did most of the side-quests too.
Me2nice
portable disgaea games have been such a letdown the psp and ds one are just ports of the ps2 one it sucks
but the game is really good it doesnt deserve a million ports though
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment