Girl Shot Herself Because She Thought Gun Was Wiimote

  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#51 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] I highly doubt that weak story will hold up in court. Logically, it shouldn't. Loaded handgun with safety off out where a 3-year-old can get it. Handguns are quite heavy and pulling the trigger is more difficult than you'd think (for a 3-year-old). Her mom was in the room with her.. watching this unfold? 3-year-old girl is playing SHOOTING game on the Wii, points gun at herself, shoots herself. Motive? Parents can sue Nintendo for a lot of money. Though I'd have to see the actual handgun (is that it in the second post of the thread?) before really jumping to a conclusion.GamerForca
ehh... no offense but a lot of what your saying couldnt hold either. its all just specualtion. even if they THOUGHT they might have a case with nintendo, there is no way they could EVER have even the slimmest chance of sucess, so that throws out the motive. there is also the part where the daughter DIES. the ends dont exactly justify the means, in any regard. also, that plastic shell (the one in the other post that looked like a gun) wasn't made by nintendo, so theres that.

Speculation? I thought it was their story? Oops, my mistake. And actually, the motive isn't thrown out because if they THOUGHT they had a case, then I don't see why they wouldn't go through with it assuming they're just bad people. Also, the father is her stepfather, not her biological father.

speculation = theories not based on facts ( the whole having a case with nintendo, assuming the handgun was heavy, which i know i said too but jayson later clarified, nobody said the girl was playing a game), that wasn't their story, it was your story. I don't see the relevance of saying stepfather as opposed to biological, its all the same in this instance, not that i even mentioned the father...
Avatar image for Kojo222
Kojo222

1301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Kojo222
Member since 2005 • 1301 Posts
Definitely foul-play. A 3 year old girl isn't strong enough to pull the trigger of a gun.
Avatar image for Pixel-Perfect
Pixel-Perfect

5778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#53 Pixel-Perfect
Member since 2009 • 5778 Posts

Stupid, stupid parents.

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#54 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] ehh... no offense but a lot of what your saying couldnt hold either. its all just specualtion. even if they THOUGHT they might have a case with nintendo, there is no way they could EVER have even the slimmest chance of sucess, so that throws out the motive. there is also the part where the daughter DIES. the ends dont exactly justify the means, in any regard. also, that plastic shell (the one in the other post that looked like a gun) wasn't made by nintendo, so theres that. garrett_duffman
Speculation? I thought it was their story? Oops, my mistake. And actually, the motive isn't thrown out because if they THOUGHT they had a case, then I don't see why they wouldn't go through with it assuming they're just bad people. Also, the father is her stepfather, not her biological father.

speculation = theories not based on facts ( the whole having a case with nintendo, assuming the handgun was heavy, which i know i said too but jayson later clarified, nobody said the girl was playing a game), that wasn't their story, it was your story. I don't see the relevance of saying stepfather as opposed to biological, its all the same in this instance, not that i even mentioned the father...

Ok, I was hasty in stating that she was playing a game. My other points still hold. You said my points can't hold up in court because they're speculation (speculation can be theories based on inconclusive facts, in other words, we have some facts, but not all) . That's not necessarily true. It's called circumstantial evidence. But they would need to prove that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger on a gun. I don't see how a 3-year-old could since handgun triggers are fairly "heavy". However, they probably wouldn't be able to prove that absolutely. That said, it's still enough to convince me of foul play.
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#55 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] Speculation? I thought it was their story? Oops, my mistake. And actually, the motive isn't thrown out because if they THOUGHT they had a case, then I don't see why they wouldn't go through with it assuming they're just bad people. Also, the father is her stepfather, not her biological father.GamerForca
speculation = theories not based on facts ( the whole having a case with nintendo, assuming the handgun was heavy, which i know i said too but jayson later clarified, nobody said the girl was playing a game), that wasn't their story, it was your story. I don't see the relevance of saying stepfather as opposed to biological, its all the same in this instance, not that i even mentioned the father...

Ok, I was hasty in stating that she was playing a game. My other points still hold. You said my points can't hold up in court because they're speculation (speculation can be theories based on inconclusive facts, in other words, we have some facts, but not all) . That's not necessarily true. It's called circumstantial evidence. But they would need to prove that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger on a gun. I don't see how a 3-year-old could since handgun triggers are fairly "heavy". However, they probably wouldn't be able to prove that absolutely. That said, it's still enough to convince me of foul play.

they would have to prove that their daughter could pull the trigger, not just any 3 year old girl. until anyone knows more about the girl, the parents can claim that she was strong enough and nobody could find any non-speculative reasoning to not believe them. I too think it was foul play, but I don't see a conviction right now, at least not for murder, not with the information we've been given.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#56 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] speculation = theories not based on facts ( the whole having a case with nintendo, assuming the handgun was heavy, which i know i said too but jayson later clarified, nobody said the girl was playing a game), that wasn't their story, it was your story. I don't see the relevance of saying stepfather as opposed to biological, its all the same in this instance, not that i even mentioned the father... garrett_duffman
Ok, I was hasty in stating that she was playing a game. My other points still hold. You said my points can't hold up in court because they're speculation (speculation can be theories based on inconclusive facts, in other words, we have some facts, but not all) . That's not necessarily true. It's called circumstantial evidence. But they would need to prove that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger on a gun. I don't see how a 3-year-old could since handgun triggers are fairly "heavy". However, they probably wouldn't be able to prove that absolutely. That said, it's still enough to convince me of foul play.

they would have to prove that their daughter could pull the trigger, not just any 3 year old girl. until anyone knows more about the girl, the parents can claim that she was strong enough and nobody could find any non-speculative reasoning to not believe them. I too think it was foul play, but I don't see a conviction right now, at least not for murder, not with the information we've been given.

Actually, if it could be proven that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger, then that could/should be enough. Would depend on the jury though (OJ Simpson case comes to mind). And yes, for a real conviction, we'd have to see all the evidence, assuming there is more. But like I said, it still screams foul play to me.
Avatar image for Michael0134567
Michael0134567

28651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#57 Michael0134567
Member since 2008 • 28651 Posts

That is absolutely terrible and what a bad stepfather! He better go to jail!

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#58 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] Ok, I was hasty in stating that she was playing a game. My other points still hold. You said my points can't hold up in court because they're speculation (speculation can be theories based on inconclusive facts, in other words, we have some facts, but not all) . That's not necessarily true. It's called circumstantial evidence. But they would need to prove that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger on a gun. I don't see how a 3-year-old could since handgun triggers are fairly "heavy". However, they probably wouldn't be able to prove that absolutely. That said, it's still enough to convince me of foul play.GamerForca
they would have to prove that their daughter could pull the trigger, not just any 3 year old girl. until anyone knows more about the girl, the parents can claim that she was strong enough and nobody could find any non-speculative reasoning to not believe them. I too think it was foul play, but I don't see a conviction right now, at least not for murder, not with the information we've been given.

Actually, if it could be proven that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger, then that could/should be enough. Would depend on the jury though (OJ Simpson case comes to mind). And yes, for a real conviction, we'd have to see all the evidence, assuming there is more. But like I said, it still screams foul play to me.

we don't know enough about the girl to classify her as an average 3 year old girl, her parents could state that she, as an individual, could pull the trigger with her thumbs combined to shoot herself in the stomach.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#59 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] they would have to prove that their daughter could pull the trigger, not just any 3 year old girl. until anyone knows more about the girl, the parents can claim that she was strong enough and nobody could find any non-speculative reasoning to not believe them. I too think it was foul play, but I don't see a conviction right now, at least not for murder, not with the information we've been given. garrett_duffman
Actually, if it could be proven that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger, then that could/should be enough. Would depend on the jury though (OJ Simpson case comes to mind). And yes, for a real conviction, we'd have to see all the evidence, assuming there is more. But like I said, it still screams foul play to me.

we don't know enough about the girl to classify her as an average 3 year old girl, her parents could state that she, as an individual, could pull the trigger with her thumbs combined to shoot herself in the stomach.

If a study is performed showing that 3-years-olds can't pull a handgun trigger, then that is circumstantial evidence. If that is combined with more circumstantial evidence (more than is available to us), then we could see a conviction. I'm not saying that there is currently enough evidence, just that some of the evidence is credible.
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#60 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] Actually, if it could be proven that a 3-year-old could not possibly pull the trigger, then that could/should be enough. Would depend on the jury though (OJ Simpson case comes to mind). And yes, for a real conviction, we'd have to see all the evidence, assuming there is more. But like I said, it still screams foul play to me.GamerForca
we don't know enough about the girl to classify her as an average 3 year old girl, her parents could state that she, as an individual, could pull the trigger with her thumbs combined to shoot herself in the stomach.

If a study is performed showing that 3-years-olds can't pull a handgun trigger, then that is circumstantial evidence. If that is combined with more circumstantial evidence (more than is available to us), then we could see a conviction. I'm not saying that there is currently enough evidence, just that some of the evidence is credible.

...which assumptions about the strength of 3 year olds and motives of the parents are not
Avatar image for kenakuma
kenakuma

3462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 kenakuma
Member since 2007 • 3462 Posts

Its the parents fault 100%

There just bad, negligent parents!

If not a gun it would have been something else.

Maybe see would have been run over crossing the street because her parents werent holding her hand and keeping an eye on her.

Maybe she would have drowned in a swimming pool/lake because they also werent paying attention.

She could have been abducted at a store if they left her alone for a minute.

She could have suffocated in a car if they left her in there to long.

ect, ect, ect

Point is its the parents fault and they will pay in the inevitable investigation, nintendo has nothing to worry about.

Now that I think about it, the fact they would try and profit of there daughters death by trying to blame/sue a multimillion dollar company is pretty sick/sad :?

Avatar image for Sontifx
Sontifx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Sontifx
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
What was a gun doing in the reach of a 3 year old is what I'm more concerned about.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#63 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] we don't know enough about the girl to classify her as an average 3 year old girl, her parents could state that she, as an individual, could pull the trigger with her thumbs combined to shoot herself in the stomach. garrett_duffman
If a study is performed showing that 3-years-olds can't pull a handgun trigger, then that is circumstantial evidence. If that is combined with more circumstantial evidence (more than is available to us), then we could see a conviction. I'm not saying that there is currently enough evidence, just that some of the evidence is credible.

...which assumptions about the strength of 3 year olds and motives of the parents are not

It's not an assumption if a study backs it. And if the parents try to sue Nintendo, then that's not an assumption either. Or they could just be crazy and wanted to kill the kid. It's not like parents have never tried to kill their kids before. But again, there's not enough evidence for a conviction with the information available, I'm not pretending that there is. But my supposition remains unchanged.
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#64 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] If a study is performed showing that 3-years-olds can't pull a handgun trigger, then that is circumstantial evidence. If that is combined with more circumstantial evidence (more than is available to us), then we could see a conviction. I'm not saying that there is currently enough evidence, just that some of the evidence is credible. GamerForca
...which assumptions about the strength of 3 year olds and motives of the parents are not

It's not an assumption if a study backs it. And if the parents try to sue Nintendo, then that's not an assumption either. Or they could just be crazy and wanted to kill the kid. It's not like parents have never tried to kill their kids before. But again, there's not enough evidence for a conviction with the information available, I'm not pretending that there is. But my supposition remains unchanged.

A statistic is not a fact. if the parents can prove the study wrong, then the study was pointless, because the child could have pulled the trigger.
Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#65 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

I thinking pulling the trigger wouldn't be too hard for a child, it is just the combination of taking it off safety and firing. I am just pointing out the insane amount of neglect on the parents. Leaving a loaded weapon in the house,in an area that the child can get into, and on top of that to leave it off of safety. I wouldn't even feal comfortable doing that combination without having children, or any of those things combined. Maybe the black wiimote will be pulled, lol. If anyone takes their case serious will also award them with some four leaf clovers or something insane.

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#66 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] ...which assumptions about the strength of 3 year olds and motives of the parents are not garrett_duffman
It's not an assumption if a study backs it. And if the parents try to sue Nintendo, then that's not an assumption either. Or they could just be crazy and wanted to kill the kid. It's not like parents have never tried to kill their kids before. But again, there's not enough evidence for a conviction with the information available, I'm not pretending that there is. But my supposition remains unchanged.

A statistic is not a fact. if the parents can prove the study wrong, then the study was pointless, because the child could have pulled the trigger.

Circumstantial evidence doesn't have to be proven without doubt by itself. It corroborates with other pieces of circumstantial evidence. So, yes, there needs to be more information available to us before jumping to conclusions.
Avatar image for umcommon
umcommon

2503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 umcommon
Member since 2007 • 2503 Posts
What kind of parent leaves a LOADED handgun within the reach of a child?
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

seriously..

so they put a REAL gun on the table, next to a 3 YEAR old . WTF

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
was she playing persona 3 on wii or something?
Avatar image for Wikipedian
Wikipedian

1100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 Wikipedian
Member since 2007 • 1100 Posts

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]

THIS is why girls aren't gamers... all joking aside, thats truly terrible... but lets break this down Pheonix Wright style. [QUOTE="Foxnews"]WTVF-TV in Nashville quoted Wilson County Sheriff Terry Ashe, who said the 3-year-old girl picked up her stepfather's .380 caliber pistol and shot herself in the stomach Sunday night. Ashe said the girl's mother was in the same room and the stepfather was asleep when it happened. The mother told investigators her daughter could have thought the gun was a controller for a Nintendo Wii. The stepfather told deputies he got out the gun because he heard a prowler, then left it on a living room end table. The child died at a hospital. Her name wasn't immediately released.Crisis_Eye

So the stepdad hears a Prowler... takes out the gun... put it in a place where a 3 year old could reach it (which isnt THAT easy to do...they arent exactly tall) then goes to sleep? is that bull or what?

Second, the mom was in the same room as the 3 year old... yet did nothing to prevent it? maybe it was the MOM who was stupid enough to mistake the gun for a wii remote? and why wouldnt they release the name? and the duaghter supposedly shot HERSELF in the stomache? I don't know about you, but pointing a gun at your stomach and pulling the trigger would NOT be that easy of a task for a 3 year old, who would not quite have the motor skills for the twisting and turning and strategic pulling of triggers. I truly think that the parents are playing stupid to cover their tracks.

Phoenix Wright style?! Hahah! You made my day! However, yes, it is very tragic that the 3 year old died. HOwever, I also see a contradiciton here. "So the mother says because they're so similar the daughter grabbed the gun and then because of all the games where you point the Wiimote at your stomach she blew a hole in herself." I only know of ONE Wii game where you point the Wii Remote KIND OF at your stomach, and that's WarioWare, the Samurai position. I doubt a 3 year old would know how to use the gun as well. Even if it is as simple as pulling the trigger.. I think the parents are hiding something.

OBJECTION!

That dosen't rule out the possibility that the three year old did not know that the gun was loaded and unsafe.

Toddlers have insatible curiosity. There is no proof that she knew the difference and how the gun worked.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#71 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="Crisis_Eye"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] So the stepdad hears a Prowler... takes out the gun... put it in a place where a 3 year old could reach it (which isnt THAT easy to do...they arent exactly tall) then goes to sleep? is that bull or what?

Second, the mom was in the same room as the 3 year old... yet did nothing to prevent it? maybe it was the MOM who was stupid enough to mistake the gun for a wii remote? and why wouldnt they release the name? and the duaghter supposedly shot HERSELF in the stomache? I don't know about you, but pointing a gun at your stomach and pulling the trigger would NOT be that easy of a task for a 3 year old, who would not quite have the motor skills for the twisting and turning and strategic pulling of triggers. I truly think that the parents are playing stupid to cover their tracks.

Wikipedian

Phoenix Wright style?! Hahah! You made my day! However, yes, it is very tragic that the 3 year old died. HOwever, I also see a contradiciton here. "So the mother says because they're so similar the daughter grabbed the gun and then because of all the games where you point the Wiimote at your stomach she blew a hole in herself." I only know of ONE Wii game where you point the Wii Remote KIND OF at your stomach, and that's WarioWare, the Samurai position. I doubt a 3 year old would know how to use the gun as well. Even if it is as simple as pulling the trigger.. I think the parents are hiding something.

OBJECTION!

That dosen't rule out the possibility that the three year old did not know that the gun was loaded and unsafe.

Toddlers have insatible curiosity. There is no proof that she knew the difference and how the gun worked.

HOLD IT! Regardless of the toddler's curiosity, the miter was in the room at the time of the shot. The mother should have known the difference between the gun and the controller!
Avatar image for Wikipedian
Wikipedian

1100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 Wikipedian
Member since 2007 • 1100 Posts

[QUOTE="Wikipedian"]

[QUOTE="Crisis_Eye"] Phoenix Wright style?! Hahah! You made my day! However, yes, it is very tragic that the 3 year old died. HOwever, I also see a contradiciton here. "So the mother says because they're so similar the daughter grabbed the gun and then because of all the games where you point the Wiimote at your stomach she blew a hole in herself." I only know of ONE Wii game where you point the Wii Remote KIND OF at your stomach, and that's WarioWare, the Samurai position. I doubt a 3 year old would know how to use the gun as well. Even if it is as simple as pulling the trigger.. I think the parents are hiding something.garrett_duffman

OBJECTION!

That dosen't rule out the possibility that the three year old did not know that the gun was loaded and unsafe.

Toddlers have insatible curiosity. There is no proof that she knew the difference and how the gun worked.

HOLD IT! Regardless of the toddler's curiosity, the miter was in the room at the time of the shot. The mother should have known the difference between the gun and the controller!

Exactly, there is no proof that the toddler mistook the gun for the controller. Thus, that opens up the possibility that the mother was using the Wiimote as a scapegoat to blame for her negilgence

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#73 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

you know. Now that I think about it.

I don't know what's scarier. The fact that the Girl Died or the Fact that The Wii Gun looks real.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#74 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="Wikipedian"]

OBJECTION!

That dosen't rule out the possibility that the three year old did not know that the gun was loaded and unsafe.

Toddlers have insatible curiosity. There is no proof that she knew the difference and how the gun worked.

Wikipedian

HOLD IT! Regardless of the toddler's curiosity, the miter was in the room at the time of the shot. The mother should have known the difference between the gun and the controller!

Exactly, there is no proof that the toddler mistook the gun for the controller. Thus, that opens up the possibility that the mother was using the Wiimote as a scapegoat to blame for her negilgence

uh... welcome to my deduction on page 1?
Avatar image for bobcheeseball
bobcheeseball

9315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 bobcheeseball
Member since 2007 • 9315 Posts

This is horrible :(

It was obviously bad parenting, I can't say whether or not the parents actually killed their own child... its too horrible of a though to bear of people who are actually evil enough to do that.

Avatar image for CHEEZUMS
CHEEZUMS

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 CHEEZUMS
Member since 2003 • 35 Posts

It's too bad she also didn't confuse her parents for raving rabbids.

Avatar image for teknic1200
teknic1200

3191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 teknic1200
Member since 2007 • 3191 Posts
there was no "prowler" that's a typical made up story from a thug. homeboy carries and just left the dang gun on the table because he does not have any brains in his head.
Avatar image for PsYcHo_BrOwNiE
PsYcHo_BrOwNiE

5059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#78 PsYcHo_BrOwNiE
Member since 2009 • 5059 Posts
Saw this on the news
Avatar image for awssk8er716
awssk8er716

8485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#79 awssk8er716
Member since 2005 • 8485 Posts

Too be honest, the world is probably better off without her if she did that.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#80 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

Too be honest, the world is probably better off without her if she did that.

awssk8er716
... she was 3 years old!
Avatar image for kenakuma
kenakuma

3462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 kenakuma
Member since 2007 • 3462 Posts

[QUOTE="awssk8er716"]

Too be honest, the world is probably better off without her if she did that.

garrett_duffman

... she was 3 years old!

I doubt he read the post and as a consiqence didn't really mean/understand what he said...

Avatar image for Omzzz
Omzzz

1440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Omzzz
Member since 2010 • 1440 Posts
Really sad... The parents are totally to blame for this. I find it amusing that they are actually trying to justify how all this happened...
Avatar image for aransom
aransom

7408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 aransom
Member since 2002 • 7408 Posts

I hate this kind of story. First, it's tragic that a little girl is dead. Second, instances like this, where people abuse their freedom, are always used as excuses to limit everyone's freedom.

Avatar image for Superzone
Superzone

3733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#84 Superzone
Member since 2004 • 3733 Posts

Gotta love bad parenting :D

It's terrible that a little girl died because her dumbass parents left a loaded gun out for her to grab. That's terrible parenting at it's finest. And I'm sure they'll sue Nintendo because of course it was Nintendo's fault..........

People's intelligence needs to be tested before they are allowed to have children. Seriously.

Avatar image for NightTerrorX99
NightTerrorX99

2399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 NightTerrorX99
Member since 2008 • 2399 Posts
So she pointed at the "supposed wiimote" at herself. That right there is a giant hole in the story. 1. You don't point the wiimote at yourself to play the game. 2. Where the hell was the safety? 3. The average three year old is not coordinated enough to hold the gun steady and blow her stomach out. Probably the head, but not the stomach. 4. Gun on the table IN PLAIN, NON-RESTRICTED SIGHT. Why?
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#86 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="NightTerrorX99"]So she pointed at the "supposed wiimote" at herself. That right there is a giant hole in the story. 1. You don't point the wiimote at yourself to play the game. 2. Where the hell was the safety? 3. The average three year old is not coordinated enough to hold the gun steady and blow her stomach out. Probably the head, but not the stomach. 4. Gun on the table IN PLAIN, NON-RESTRICTED SIGHT. Why?

read the thread, i've covered it, along with other people
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

I read the article hoping that it ended with something like, "the child is in critical but stable condition"...but no...she died. That makes me really sad. Poor girl.

Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#88 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts
Crazy theory time. :P The parents are fighting, right? So it's getting violent and the mom pulls out the gun on the dad. She threatens him and he backs off and goes off to bed. The child, in the room at the time, asks her mom what happened. The mom won't tell her. The girl keeps bothering her and bothering her until the mom goes to chastise her and accidentally shoots her in the stomach with the gun in her hand. She didn't mean to do it so she blames it on the Wii and they make up a story to avoid trouble. Or, I'm just thinking too hard at 12:30 in the morning and I should shut up. :P Sad, sad story though, no matter what really happened.
Avatar image for chefstubbies
chefstubbies

2583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#89 chefstubbies
Member since 2007 • 2583 Posts

Ok, now here's something interesting

Girl sees gun and shoots herself in the stomach. Considering she was 3 I'm surprised she even made it to the hospital without her insides spilling out

Just for reference

This is a Wiimote

This is a gun

So the mother says because they're so similar the daughter grabbed the gun and then because of all the games where you point the Wiimote at your stomach she blew a hole in herself.

HERE IS THE STORY OF WHICH THIS THREAD IS ABOUT

Jaysonguy

How could this happen?!

...oh, Nashville. LOL

Seriously though, what kind of father leaves a loaded handgun in front of a 3 year old and then thinks "what better time to take a nap?"

Blame the dumb hick father, don't scapegoat the closest gaming console. What is it with people refusing to take responsibility for their own actions?

Avatar image for Koleo
Koleo

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Koleo
Member since 2008 • 97 Posts
This is very bad parenting, i hope the girl did not die but i place the blame solely on the parents. They shouldn't care for that child imo.
Avatar image for redlightstudios
redlightstudios

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 redlightstudios
Member since 2010 • 570 Posts

soon..... Wii remotes with come with parental advisery labels on all packaging because of this.

"PARENTAL ADVISERY, WII REMOTE MAY RESEMBLE A FIREARM. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN"

truely a sad and unfortunate event this is.