[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="GamerForca"] I highly doubt that weak story will hold up in court. Logically, it shouldn't. Loaded handgun with safety off out where a 3-year-old can get it. Handguns are quite heavy and pulling the trigger is more difficult than you'd think (for a 3-year-old). Her mom was in the room with her.. watching this unfold? 3-year-old girl is playing SHOOTING game on the Wii, points gun at herself, shoots herself. Motive? Parents can sue Nintendo for a lot of money. Though I'd have to see the actual handgun (is that it in the second post of the thread?) before really jumping to a conclusion.GamerForcaehh... no offense but a lot of what your saying couldnt hold either. its all just specualtion. even if they THOUGHT they might have a case with nintendo, there is no way they could EVER have even the slimmest chance of sucess, so that throws out the motive. there is also the part where the daughter DIES. the ends dont exactly justify the means, in any regard. also, that plastic shell (the one in the other post that looked like a gun) wasn't made by nintendo, so theres that. Speculation? I thought it was their story? Oops, my mistake. And actually, the motive isn't thrown out because if they THOUGHT they had a case, then I don't see why they wouldn't go through with it assuming they're just bad people. Also, the father is her stepfather, not her biological father. speculation = theories not based on facts ( the whole having a case with nintendo, assuming the handgun was heavy, which i know i said too but jayson later clarified, nobody said the girl was playing a game), that wasn't their story, it was your story. I don't see the relevance of saying stepfather as opposed to biological, its all the same in this instance, not that i even mentioned the father...
Log in to comment