Don't ask me how I found this video or what compromised me to watch it all the way through, but I kinda thought a Pokemon game that enhanced on this formula would actually be pretty cool. I honestly hope NO MORE POKEMON are created. There is already like 500 and I bet the could still make the games interesting without making new monsters.
"Good" pokemon games will always be on the handhelds. If they ever make a new pokemon I hope they do the following 1. No more new pokemon! I do not want to catch them all because they're too many! And some of them you can't even get! 2. Good online. D/P sucked because you needed friend codes
Sorry to say it isn't going to happen. Red, blue, gold and silver were good. After that there was so many pokemon you couldn't possibly win. I caught them all on blue and red And I got close on gold (My cousin borrowed silver and never gave it back.) My thoughts are the only way there will be another decent pokemon is if they cut out all the extra pokemon and just keep it to a low number. Also if they make a decent online (like almost everyoneelse said.)
They don't make good Pokemon games because they know the horrible ones sell just as well. They use this same thought process with the Mario Party games.
Don't ask me how I found this video or what compromised me to watch it all the way through, but I kinda thought a Pokemon game that enhanced on this formula would actually be pretty cool. I honestly hope NO MORE POKEMON are created. There is already like 500 and I bet the could still make the games interesting without making new monsters.ZumaJones07
wow that video kinda made me less excited for that type of game
Don't ask me how I found this video or what compromised me to watch it all the way through, but I kinda thought a Pokemon game that enhanced on this formula would actually be pretty cool. I honestly hope NO MORE POKEMON are created. There is already like 500 and I bet the could still make the games interesting without making new monsters.ZumaJones07
What formula? Going around seemenly getting all pokemons without even attacking them?
Anyway,Pokemon's games sucks...they where good back when the formula was fresh,but now? Repetitive failure
[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Don't ask me how I found this video or what compromised me to watch it all the way through, but I kinda thought a Pokemon game that enhanced on this formula would actually be pretty cool. I honestly hope NO MORE POKEMON are created. There is already like 500 and I bet the could still make the games interesting without making new monsters.Androu1
What formula? Going around seemenly getting all pokemons without even attacking them?
Anyway,Pokemon's games sucks...they where good back when the formula was fresh,but now? Repetitive failure
maybe you just outgrew it and it doesnt appeal to you anymore
They need a traditional Pokemon game in 3D. They can pump out fifty new Pokes or something, release Pokemon Alabaster for Wii and allow connectivity to Diamond and Pearl. I'm sold already.
imagine a mario game running around fields encountering pokemon, catching them, battling gyms and junk. thats my idea of a good pokemon, not where you steal it and at one point there is nothing left to do when you finish it but do nothing. honestly, i dont think it will happen. sometimes it feels like the best games, that would be a great, common, easy to think of idea, will not be made. maybe on another planet such good things are made.
If youever make a good pokemon Wii game what controller would you use anyways I can't see sum1 playing with the mote and chuck. I personally like the portable ones as well because they stick with the traditional pokemon game type. It may get old, but Nintendo has that saying "If its not broken why change it" They do it with Mario, Zelda and Metroid so why not all the way with Pokemon.
Log in to comment