Longetivity > Most things in a game?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Matthew_han
Matthew_han

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Matthew_han
Member since 2006 • 303 Posts
As you know most people these days aren't filthy rich. We have limited money, and within this limited amount of money, we have an even more limited amount of money to buy video games. Therefore, longetivity can be EXTREMELY important for certain people, such as me. Would you rather take more polished graphics/gameplay or anything else over longetivity? For me, not really. Even if the game is amazingly polished, such as mario galaxy, in the end you are getting about 20 hours of gameplay for over 50 bucks. Most likely, you will not be playing that game again or you will not be spending a lot of time with it later on, so that polished graphics/gameplay goes to a waste (kinda). However, take a game like Brawl. It may not have the-as-polished graphics as Mario Galaxy, but the longetivity is nearly ENDLESS. You are getting over a 1000 hour of smacking gameplay that is oh-so-great for 50 bucks!! What do you guys think?
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

I think that you're supposed to finish a game and move on

That's why they keep on making new games

Replayability only goes so far. There's only so many times a person can wash, rinse, repeat.

Gaming is an expensive habit, if you really want to get everything you want out of it you need to be willing to pick up new titles all the time.

Avatar image for Matthew_han
Matthew_han

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Matthew_han
Member since 2006 • 303 Posts

I think that you're supposed to finish a game and move on

That's why they keep on making new games

Replayability only goes so far. There's only so many times a person can wash, rinse, repeat.

Gaming is an expensive habit, if you really want to get everything you want out of it you need to be willing to pick up new titles all the time.

Jaysonguy

True, true. You do have to move on to newer games, that's why they make new entries in series. But it would be better if the game have good replay value to save money; i mean most games these day aren't even 5 hours long! (even more amazing since LostWinds, great game btw, is nearly about the same scale while it is only 10 bucks -.-) It just goes to show how cheap developers are becoming these days.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

I think that you're supposed to finish a game and move on

That's why they keep on making new games

Replayability only goes so far. There's only so many times a person can wash, rinse, repeat.

Gaming is an expensive habit, if you really want to get everything you want out of it you need to be willing to pick up new titles all the time.

Matthew_han

True, true. You do have to move on to newer games, that's why they make new entries in series. But it would be better if the game have good replay value to save money; i mean most games these day aren't even 5 hours long! (even more amazing since LostWinds, great game btw, is nearly about the same scale while it is only 10 bucks -.-) It just goes to show how cheap developers are becoming these days.

Ehhh I don't know, I got over 30 hours of gaming in Final Fantasy from the WiiWare service and that was 29 bucks.

I spent two weeks playing Spider Man Friend or Foe in between other titles. If I didn't it would have been over in under ten hours maybe?

I don't want a lot of games that I have to spend forever on. There's too many other games coming up. I don't pay money for the length of games I pay them for their entertainment value. I can have great fun with a 50 dollar game that only lasts 5 hours and never finish a 20 dollar one that's got 30 hours.

There's just too many game options these days to be bogged down with one title.

Avatar image for Matthew_han
Matthew_han

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Matthew_han
Member since 2006 • 303 Posts
[QUOTE="Matthew_han"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

I think that you're supposed to finish a game and move on

That's why they keep on making new games

Replayability only goes so far. There's only so many times a person can wash, rinse, repeat.

Gaming is an expensive habit, if you really want to get everything you want out of it you need to be willing to pick up new titles all the time.

Jaysonguy

True, true. You do have to move on to newer games, that's why they make new entries in series. But it would be better if the game have good replay value to save money; i mean most games these day aren't even 5 hours long! (even more amazing since LostWinds, great game btw, is nearly about the same scale while it is only 10 bucks -.-) It just goes to show how cheap developers are becoming these days.

Ehhh I don't know, I got over 30 hours of gaming in Final Fantasy from the WiiWare service and that was 29 bucks.

I spent two weeks playing Spider Man Friend or Foe in between other titles. If I didn't it would have been over in under ten hours maybe?

I don't want a lot of games that I have to spend forever on. There's too many other games coming up. I don't pay money for the length of games I pay them for their entertainment value. I can have great fun with a 50 dollar game that only lasts 5 hours and never finish a 20 dollar one that's got 30 hours.

There's just too many game options these days to be bogged down with one title.

Just asking, but what do you do with short, yet awesome games when you are done with them? So far, I kept them to show off my collection :) But i dunt know if i should trade them in :(

Avatar image for doctores143
doctores143

3016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#6 doctores143
Member since 2007 • 3016 Posts
Some games are just greater than other games. Thats why smash bros is the best series, because people like them.
Avatar image for Picklechugger
Picklechugger

1465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Picklechugger
Member since 2004 • 1465 Posts
I've found that the best games for me are ones that can be taken in short doses. I'm becoming more and more busy, so being able to sit down for 10 minutes and get a star or two in Galaxy will keep me coming back, while a large adventure will probably be put off. I think Longetivity is pretty important, and by that I mean a game needs to be fun to play, so even if I've beaten it I will come back, and the controls need to be good. If the gameplay and controls aren't good then I feel cheated, and it's hard to prove to everyone that I own at video games :P. My favorite games right now are Contra 3 and Super Mario Galaxy for these reasons.
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
I want a game that'll last. I've bought and played short games they're worth the buy at a cheaper price. For me i currently don't have a job so cash is tight i want something that'll be worth the money. If it's short but cheap i'll get it but if it's short but normal priced i doubt it.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="Matthew_han"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

I think that you're supposed to finish a game and move on

That's why they keep on making new games

Replayability only goes so far. There's only so many times a person can wash, rinse, repeat.

Gaming is an expensive habit, if you really want to get everything you want out of it you need to be willing to pick up new titles all the time.

Matthew_han

True, true. You do have to move on to newer games, that's why they make new entries in series. But it would be better if the game have good replay value to save money; i mean most games these day aren't even 5 hours long! (even more amazing since LostWinds, great game btw, is nearly about the same scale while it is only 10 bucks -.-) It just goes to show how cheap developers are becoming these days.

Ehhh I don't know, I got over 30 hours of gaming in Final Fantasy from the WiiWare service and that was 29 bucks.

I spent two weeks playing Spider Man Friend or Foe in between other titles. If I didn't it would have been over in under ten hours maybe?

I don't want a lot of games that I have to spend forever on. There's too many other games coming up. I don't pay money for the length of games I pay them for their entertainment value. I can have great fun with a 50 dollar game that only lasts 5 hours and never finish a 20 dollar one that's got 30 hours.

There's just too many game options these days to be bogged down with one title.

Just asking, but what do you do with short, yet awesome games when you are done with them? So far, I kept them to show off my collection :) But i dunt know if i should trade them in :(

It all depends on the person I guess.

For me short games can be replayed sometimes. Even down to just replaying a level that was your favorite.

Longer games are great but they don't have that "Oh I just want to play this one level" feel to them that often. It's more like you take it all in then you either leave it forever or you take it all in again.

Avatar image for johnnyv2003
johnnyv2003

13762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 johnnyv2003
Member since 2003 • 13762 Posts
while longevity is important, it's not nearly as important as gameplay, story, graphics, or characters.....having "replay value" to me is like getting something extra, depending on the game.... my favorite games of all time aren't necessarily games that i go back through and play all the time....but it's the experiences that they bring that make them great, not the amount of hours that go into them.
Avatar image for Omatron
Omatron

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Omatron
Member since 2004 • 120 Posts
i love replayability and a game that truly poses long term fun will seem like a dream come true to those who love that type of game but no matter the longevity, time isnt kind to any kind of gaming, eventually something wil come out that plays/looks better, lasts longer, or is more replayable then anything else. i think that dead rising is a testament to longevity, but in a few years, some games will have similar ideas and more things to do and then what?
Avatar image for TDLlama
TDLlama

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 TDLlama
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts

I can't count the number of times I beat Zelda: OoT and Earthbound, two games that aren't exactly short. If a game is really good, sometimes you'll want to play through the game a 2nd, 3rd or 10th time.

A game like Brawl is a special case since it's about the multiplayer, not the single player experience. I'm sure Mario Galaxy will see the light of day yet again... Hell I'm on my way to beating Metroid Prime for the 2nd or 3rd time now.

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#13 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
i dont think its gunna matter how long a game is if it sucks
Avatar image for IronManRhino
IronManRhino

2135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 IronManRhino
Member since 2005 • 2135 Posts
I picked the I like cheese option....>_>....
Avatar image for Mike1978Smith
Mike1978Smith

2012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Mike1978Smith
Member since 2005 • 2012 Posts

For me the most important factor is how fun it is. If a game is really fun, then I'll most likely replay it a couple times. Take Super Metroid. I still run through that game every now and then.

I think game play is much more important than replay value. Take Lostwinds, for example. It's a very short game, but the game play is outstanding. I'll take that over high graphics, long story, but drab game play any day.

Avatar image for Lord_Omikron666
Lord_Omikron666

4838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Lord_Omikron666
Member since 2007 • 4838 Posts
I pay my $50 worth for games for the entertainment of the game and sometimes that game might not last that long, I play it, beat it, then haven't played it since, but I guess that's how you get around playing the games you want. Replayability can only go so far in some games.