metroid prime 3 trilogy should contain online multiplayer, who agrees with me?

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pyro767
Pyro767

2305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 Pyro767
Member since 2009 • 2305 Posts

[QUOTE="ANewGoldenAge"]

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

Its not a FPS.

Its like me asking for the next zelda to have 32 player death match with bow and arrows.

Rocky32189

Metroid prime is a first person shooter. How is it not?

It's not a traditional FPS. It's primarily an adventure game.

So that's the excuse for not making online? There's a perfectly good opportunity for Nintendo to make some online, people have been complaining about the need for better online offered by Nintendo, now that this possibility comes up it's a stupid idea?

Avatar image for awssk8er716
awssk8er716

8485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 awssk8er716
Member since 2005 • 8485 Posts

[QUOTE="AlexSays"]I'd rather devs not waste any more time with a compilation of old games.Jaysonguy

I agree with this statement

I agree with this statement.

Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts

this great Wii online FPS you're craving is coming out June 23rd. I mean 13 modes, new and old types, Wii Speak, original IP wii built from ground up yet we're all ignoring it.

It could work, but these are cheap cash ins for the most part it seems, i''ll pick up the trilogy as i haven't finished MP and haven't played MP2 but beat MP3.

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts

I wish it does, but its confirmed in IGN that it doesn't. My, my, we sure do have people who don't socialise (the ones who think that its a bad idea to add multiplayer for metroid)

Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"] And here's the best part. If Nintendo does include multiplayer in a Metroid game you do not have to play it and stick with your "it's a single player experience" while others enjoy it. clicketyclick
They will respond, "but by designing a multiplayer part, they'll be taking away resources from the development of a single-player campaign. Single-player will be shorter or not have as much work done on it so they can focus on multiplayer." They will also say, "designing a multiplayer part means they'll have to change the entire single-player experience because as it is, the single-player experience isn't suited to multiplayer since it has serious balance issues because Samus is way more powerful than any characters in single player."

Both sound like pretty valid arguments to me.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#56 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
Maybe but they're not going to add it.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#57 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

So that's the excuse for not making online? There's a perfectly good opportunity for Nintendo to make some online, people have been complaining about the need for better online offered by Nintendo, now that this possibility comes up it's a stupid idea?

Pyro767

You want to know what Metroid would be like with Multiplayer, go play Hunters - yeah, it was a lovely game.

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts

[QUOTE="Pyro767"]

So that's the excuse for not making online? There's a perfectly good opportunity for Nintendo to make some online, people have been complaining about the need for better online offered by Nintendo, now that this possibility comes up it's a stupid idea?

Haziqonfire

You want to know what Metroid would be like with Multiplayer, go play Hunters - yeah, it was a lovely game.

Thats why it got great scores. No need for acting emo about the whole multiplayer feature. You're not gonna die if it gets multiplayer.
Avatar image for diamonddigger87
diamonddigger87

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 diamonddigger87
Member since 2007 • 63 Posts

no

Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts

[QUOTE="Rocky32189"]

[QUOTE="ANewGoldenAge"]

Metroid prime is a first person shooter. How is it not?

Pyro767

It's not a traditional FPS. It's primarily an adventure game.

So that's the excuse for not making online? There's a perfectly good opportunity for Nintendo to make some online, people have been complaining about the need for better online offered by Nintendo, now that this possibility comes up it's a stupid idea?

Yes, that is an excuse because the game is not suited for multiplayer. Have you ever played the multi in Metroid Prime 2? It was awful. If they add online to a Metroid game they will be taking away from it's strengths (single player) to enhance something that is terrible. Some games should remain single player only and Metroid is one of them.
Avatar image for TheColbert
TheColbert

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 TheColbert
Member since 2008 • 3846 Posts
I never played MP2(Have both the others though) so I am not sure how the multiplayer really was. I know IGN said it has improved with the Wii controls but seems like people are not saying it deserves an online mode. I though MPH was a good game. I played the multiplayer quite a bit but then the game was designed more so for Multiplayer than single while the console have been all single.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#62 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

Thats why it got great scores. No need for acting emo about the whole multiplayer feature. You're not gonna die if it gets multiplayer.Pices

it was one of the lowest reviewed Metroid games to come out.

It wasn't amazing. The only reason it scored well because yes, multiplayer was done well - but the "metroid" part of the game didn't exist.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
Yes, that is an excuse because the game is not suited for multiplayer. Have you ever played the multi in Metroid Prime 2? It was awful. If they add online to a Metroid game they will be taking away from it's strengths (single player) to enhance something that is terrible. Some games should remain single player only and Metroid is one of them.Rocky32189
Great. More opinions. I have played MP2 and you know what, even though I liked MP1 better I still enjoyed playing it. MP2 is a much bigger game so how was adding multiplayer bad for it? And another thing, I liked playing MP2's multiplayer to kill some time so how come your logic comes off as true and others' false? And to add to all that. How come MP1 has overall better scores than Corruption even though both contain only single player campaigns? Did Nintendo waste resources developing the whole voucher system or something? Adding multiplayer is not as bad as some of you think. Get over it.
Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts
it was one of the lowest reviewed Metroid games to come out.Haziqonfire
That doesn't mean anything! :lol: I can say, it's the 5th-best-rated Metroid game, and the 3rd best had local multiplayer that could easily be put online. Since you admit that the multiplayer of Hunters was "done well", here's an idea that might make your head asplode: try imagining Hunters multiplayer - bear with me - attached to Corruption's single-player. :o
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#65 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]it was one of the lowest reviewed Metroid games to come out.clicketyclick
That doesn't mean anything! :lol: I can say, it's the 5th-best-rated Metroid game, and the 3rd best had local multiplayer that could easily be put online. Since you admit that the multiplayer of Hunters was "done well", here's an idea that might make your head asplode: try imagining Hunters multiplayer - bear with me - attached to Corruption's single-player. :o

It was well done. Still doesn't mean I liked it, it felt out of place in the Metroid universe.

Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts

[QUOTE="clicketyclick"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]it was one of the lowest reviewed Metroid games to come out.Haziqonfire

That doesn't mean anything! :lol: I can say, it's the 5th-best-rated Metroid game, and the 3rd best had local multiplayer that could easily be put online. Since you admit that the multiplayer of Hunters was "done well", here's an idea that might make your head asplode: try imagining Hunters multiplayer - bear with me - attached to Corruption's single-player. :o

It was well done. Still doesn't mean I liked it, it felt out of place in the Metroid universe.

You don't have to play it. You can stick to Corruption single-player, while others finish Corruption single-player and then move on to Hunters multiplayer. How bout that? Will Hunters multiplayer that you dislike ruin Corruption single-player just because they happen to be on the same disk? Will its mere presence make your single-player experience less meaningful?

Avatar image for Pyro767
Pyro767

2305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#67 Pyro767
Member since 2009 • 2305 Posts
[QUOTE="Pyro767"]

[QUOTE="Rocky32189"] It's not a traditional FPS. It's primarily an adventure game.

Rocky32189

So that's the excuse for not making online? There's a perfectly good opportunity for Nintendo to make some online, people have been complaining about the need for better online offered by Nintendo, now that this possibility comes up it's a stupid idea?

Yes, that is an excuse because the game is not suited for multiplayer. Have you ever played the multi in Metroid Prime 2? It was awful. If they add online to a Metroid game they will be taking away from it's strengths (single player) to enhance something that is terrible. Some games should remain single player only and Metroid is one of them.

Actually, I have played the multiplayer in Metroid Prime 2, and I very much enjoyed myself. Get some friends over by the old cube and it's a riot man, a total riot. In fact, MP2 has some really good multiplayer if you ask me.
Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

[QUOTE="clicketyclick"] That doesn't mean anything! :lol: I can say, it's the 5th-best-rated Metroid game, and the 3rd best had local multiplayer that could easily be put online. Since you admit that the multiplayer of Hunters was "done well", here's an idea that might make your head asplode: try imagining Hunters multiplayer - bear with me - attached to Corruption's single-player. :oclicketyclick

It was well done. Still doesn't mean I liked it, it felt out of place in the Metroid universe.

You don't have to play it. You can stick to Corruption single-player, while others finish Corruption single-player and then move on to Hunters multiplayer. How bout that? Will Hunters multiplayer that you dislike ruin Corruption single-player just because they happen to be on the same disk? Will its mere presence make your single-player experience less meaningful?

I know you were expecting this response but... Developers don't have unlimited resources. Time spent on multiplayer is time not being dedicated to what has made Metroid a great franchise for the past 20 years, single player.
Avatar image for Shidira
Shidira

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 Shidira
Member since 2006 • 943 Posts

I don't think MP3 should be online. I think the development team should focus mainly on an actual storyline that's good and try and work on controls, camera, graphics, etc to make an awesome game. Metroid wouldn't make a very good online FPS in my opinion.

"It's something we talked about early on, but we only have so many resources. We opted to devote those resources to making a better single-player experience." - Michael Kelbeugh

An interview with this man in GamePro. Online play, while fun in it's own right, seems to interfere with a lot of solo stuff and myself and many others hate that. There are a lot of people who play single player and would rather see it kept that way. Some games are made for online, such as Halo, Call of Duty, and such, but Metroid shouldn't be one of those.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
Developers don't have unlimited resources. Time spent on multiplayer is time not being dedicated to what has made Metroid a great franchise for the past 20 years, single player.Rocky32189
But according to you, Nintendo is "one of the richest companies in the industry at the moment. Listening to their fans in this case won't bring them down." I kinda took this out of context, but I am referring to the amount of money you said they had. Money = resources. Lots of money = ample resources. With Nintendo's stance, they could take as long as they wanted on a game and give us a fully developed single player campaign AND a multiplayer component. :)
Avatar image for Hardc0reGam3r
Hardc0reGam3r

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Hardc0reGam3r
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
A lot of ppl wants multiplayer but nintendo would never add it. Its just like the RE5 4 wii idea, 384632984623846 ppl want it but it will never happend. BTW,i'm new in forums,this is my first post :)
Avatar image for Pyro767
Pyro767

2305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#72 Pyro767
Member since 2009 • 2305 Posts
[QUOTE="clicketyclick"]

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

It was well done. Still doesn't mean I liked it, it felt out of place in the Metroid universe.

Rocky32189

You don't have to play it. You can stick to Corruption single-player, while others finish Corruption single-player and then move on to Hunters multiplayer. How bout that? Will Hunters multiplayer that you dislike ruin Corruption single-player just because they happen to be on the same disk? Will its mere presence make your single-player experience less meaningful?

I know you were expecting this response but... Developers don't have unlimited resources. Time spent on multiplayer is time not being dedicated to what has made Metroid a great franchise for the past 20 years, single player.

Well, I guess you haven't realized this, but they don't NEED to spend time on the single player, they just need to change the control scheme and a few text instructions on how to use stuff. They have all the time they need to work on multiplayer.
Avatar image for deactivated-57a6678fd5daf
deactivated-57a6678fd5daf

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-57a6678fd5daf
Member since 2007 • 26 Posts

Quantum of Solace is an awesome online FPS for Wii!!!

Avatar image for deactivated-57a6678fd5daf
deactivated-57a6678fd5daf

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-57a6678fd5daf
Member since 2007 • 26 Posts
Its just too bad, the wii doesnt have an outstanding online FPS game like killzone or gears, and i think metroid is their only chance to do that, oh well.scratch-o-hey
Quantum of Solace is an awesome online FPS for Wii!!!
Avatar image for Thiago26792
Thiago26792

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Thiago26792
Member since 2007 • 11059 Posts
No. Metroid is a single player adventure game. If you want an online FPS buy Call of Duty or wait for the Conduit.Rocky32189
This ^
I'd rather devs not waste any more time with a compilation of old games.AlexSays
And this too ^
Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts
[QUOTE="clicketyclick"]

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

It was well done. Still doesn't mean I liked it, it felt out of place in the Metroid universe.

Rocky32189

You don't have to play it. You can stick to Corruption single-player, while others finish Corruption single-player and then move on to Hunters multiplayer. How bout that? Will Hunters multiplayer that you dislike ruin Corruption single-player just because they happen to be on the same disk? Will its mere presence make your single-player experience less meaningful?

I know you were expecting this response but... Developers don't have unlimited resources. Time spent on multiplayer is time not being dedicated to what has made Metroid a great franchise for the past 20 years, single player.

And since you know I was expecting that response, you know that I have an answer prepared. Nintendo isn't just any developer. They can afford limitless budgets to their games. Not only are they far more successful than any developer or publisher currently in existence, but games on their platform cost far less to develop. Nintendo can afford to have, say, Retro Studios (Texas) work on the single-player and Nintendo Software Technology (Washington) work on multiplayer. When the publisher you're talking about is as wealthy as Nintendo, you can't talk about development resources for a single project as finite and severely limited. Nintendo could quite literally give their development studios blank cheques. Oh, and maybe Metroid's single-player has made it great in the past, but its single-player is dated. There, I said it!
Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts
This just reminds me of Star Fox Adventures. It was such a beautiful game, but these "hardcore" SF fans were bashing it because of it's departure from traditional Star Fox Arwing battles.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#78 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Oh God, please, no. Metroid Prime was a breath of fresh air. The entire reason why I liked it was because it was so diametrically opposed to most other FPSes. The entire charm of the whole thing was the loneliness, the exploration, the fact that it wasn't just Samus mowing down hordes of aliens. Metroid Prime is Metroid Prime-caliber; it does not need to be (game X)-caliber.

The sooner the craze ends of "EVERY GAME MUST HAVE ONLINE MULTIPLAYER", the better.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts

Oh God, please, no. Metroid Prime was a breath of fresh air. The entire reason why I liked it was because it was so diametrically opposed to most other FPSes. The entire charm of the whole thing was the loneliness, the exploration, the fact that it wasn't just Samus mowing down hordes of aliens. Metroid Prime is Metroid Prime-caliber; it does not need to be (game X)-caliber.

The sooner the craze ends of "EVERY GAME MUST HAVE ONLINE MULTIPLAYER", the better.

GabuEx
Okay, but what if, hypothetically, every new Metroid game that came out, regardless of it's genre (2D, Pinball, FPS, FPA, etc), had a Hunters style multiplayer mode tacked on to it? Just tacked on. Would that ruin the single player experience for you?
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#80 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]

It wouldn't.

But then again not every game needs a multiplayer mode. BioShock and Prime are two examples of games that don't really need any.

The way most games are headed its like multiplayer is a must and single player games don't seem to matter anymore - as long as they have a multiplayer mode in them, then and only then people are satisfied.

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts

I agree with you but I realize that it most likely isn't going to happen (Though I would buy it in a heartbeat if it did).

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#82 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Okay, but what if, hypothetically, every new Metroid game that came out, regardless of it's genre (2D, Pinball, FPS, FPA, etc), had a Hunters style multiplayer mode tacked on to it? Just tacked on. Would that ruin the single player experience for you?ZumaJones07

Here's the thing: Metroid has always been about the atmosphere, the exploration,about seeing alien worlds through the eyes of Samus. The combat is purposely over quick (save for boss fights), because blasting the crap out of bad guys is not the driving source of entertainment from the game. The very core essence of Metroid is diametrically opposed from the combat-centric experience inherent in any multiplayer deathmatch mode, which is just about killing all the other guys, without any puzzle-solving, without any atmosphere, without anything really Metroid.

The multiplayer in Metroid Prime 2 felt like an afterthought, and that to me was a good thing, because it meant that the multiplayer was made to fit Metroid, not the other way around. To do the other way around gets you a game like Hunters, that is practically a Metroid game in name only, with little resemblance to what makes Metroid what it is. And that is precisely what I worry so much about: that if so many people clamor after a Metroid game with multiplayer that it is decided to make a Metroid game in which the multiplayer is actually a big consideration that affects other design decisions in the game, then I see no way that that would not detract from the ultimate Metroid essence contained within the game.

Sure, you could just tack on a multiplayer mode that's a total afterthought like in Metroid Prime 2 and have that, but why? Why Metroid? There are so many other games that offer multiplayer deathmatch and other multiplayer modes - why not play them if multiplayer is what you're after? Why not just leave Metroid alone and keep multiplayer in games built and designed to accomodate more integrated multiplayer? Why must every single game have multiplayer?

Avatar image for Pyro767
Pyro767

2305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#83 Pyro767
Member since 2009 • 2305 Posts

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Okay, but what if, hypothetically, every new Metroid game that came out, regardless of it's genre (2D, Pinball, FPS, FPA, etc), had a Hunters style multiplayer mode tacked on to it? Just tacked on. Would that ruin the single player experience for you?GabuEx

Here's the thing: Metroid has always been about the atmosphere, the exploration,about seeing alien worlds through the eyes of Samus. The combat is purposely over quick (save for boss fights), because blasting the crap out of bad guys is not the driving source of entertainment from the game. The very core essence of Metroid is diametrically opposed from the combat-centric experience inherent in any multiplayer deathmatch mode, which is just about killing all the other guys, without any puzzle-solving, without any atmosphere, without anything really Metroid.

The multiplayer in Metroid Prime 2 felt like an afterthought, and that to me was a good thing, because it meant that the multiplayer was made to fit Metroid, not the other way around. To do the other way around gets you a game like Hunters, that is practically a Metroid game in name only, with little resemblance to what makes Metroid what it is. And that is precisely what I worry so much about: that if so many people clamor after a Metroid game with multiplayer that it is decided to make a Metroid game in which the multiplayer is actually a big consideration that affects other design decisions in the game, then I see no way that that would not detract from the ultimate Metroid essence contained within the game.

Sure, you could just tack on a multiplayer mode that's a total afterthought like in Metroid Prime 2 and have that, but why? Why Metroid? There are so many other games that offer multiplayer deathmatch and other multiplayer modes - why not play them if multiplayer is what you're after? Why not just leave Metroid alone and keep multiplayer in games built and designed to accomodate more integrated multiplayer? Why must every single game have multiplayer?

You are right when you say that atmosphere is the driving source, but I find that I also enjoy myself when blasting through hordes of pirates in the combat challenges. And if there is multiplayer added and you don't like it, just ignore it, it's not like the game will go "YOU HAVE NOT PLAYED ONLINE IN A WEEK. BEFORE YOU PLAY SINGLE PLAYER AGAIN, PLEASE PLAY -10- ONLINE MATCHES. YOU WILL THEN UNLOCK SINGLE PLAYER MODE." And like I have said, Metroid Prime Trilogy will require almost no work on the single player mode, it's just rearranging control schemes and then slapping them together. If they love us, maybe they will do some graphical work. I mean MAYBE. Therefore, why not add in some multiplayer? You can't be in atmosphere mode all the time, sometimes a little competition is fun too. And the multiplayer CAN be separate from the single player, we don't have to have them intertwine like you suggest. And why would we put multiplayer on Metroid? Same reason we put it on Mario Kart Wii, Super Smash Bros Brawl, Halo, Gears of War, Pokemon, most computer games, ect ect ect. It's because it's FUN. Like I've been saying: Multiplayer can be an OPTIONAL thing. Metroid is a good candidate for multiplayer, and I say that if I can have fun that way, have at. If single player is what you are after, why not go play something like Zelda, Mario, Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy? Why must every single game be exactly how you want it to be?
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#84 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

You are right when you say that atmosphere is the driving source, but I find that I also enjoy myself when blasting through hordes of pirates in the combat challenges. And if there is multiplayer added and you don't like it, just ignore it, it's not like the game will go "YOU HAVE NOT PLAYED ONLINE IN A WEEK. BEFORE YOU PLAY SINGLE PLAYER AGAIN, PLEASE PLAY -10- ONLINE MATCHES. YOU WILL THEN UNLOCK SINGLE PLAYER MODE." And like I have said, Metroid Prime Trilogy will require almost no work on the single player mode, it's just rearranging control schemes and then slapping them together. If they love us, maybe they will do some graphical work. I mean MAYBE. Therefore, why not add in some multiplayer? You can't be in atmosphere mode all the time, sometimes a little competition is fun too. And the multiplayer CAN be separate from the single player, we don't have to have them intertwine like you suggest. And why would we put multiplayer on Metroid? Same reason we put it on Mario Kart Wii, Super Smash Bros Brawl, Halo, Gears of War, Pokemon, most computer games, ect ect ect. It's because it's FUN. Like I've been saying: Multiplayer can be an OPTIONAL thing. Metroid is a good candidate for multiplayer, and I say that if I can have fun that way, have at. If single player is what you are after, why not go play something like Zelda, Mario, Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy? Why must every single game be exactly how you want it to be?Pyro767

What I really, really don't want is for multiplayer to be a central enough consideration in a Metroid game such that choices are made that impact the single-player experience based on what would make multiplayer better. There are a million FPSes out there of which multiplayer is a big part. I don't want Metroid to become one of them because then it would fundamentally no longer be Metroid; it would be that much closer to just another FPS on the pile.

If people want to just have a multiplayer mode like the one in Metroid Prime 2 added, fine, be my guest, but I really don't see why someone would turn to Metroid of all games for multiplayer when there are so many other FPSesfor which multiplayer is a much larger and thus more integral consideration.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#85 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

I don't see why it's so important... I mean these games are single player games, not multiplayer. Everything doesn't need multiplayer to be good.

Avatar image for Pyro767
Pyro767

2305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#86 Pyro767
Member since 2009 • 2305 Posts

[QUOTE="Pyro767"]You are right when you say that atmosphere is the driving source, but I find that I also enjoy myself when blasting through hordes of pirates in the combat challenges. And if there is multiplayer added and you don't like it, just ignore it, it's not like the game will go "YOU HAVE NOT PLAYED ONLINE IN A WEEK. BEFORE YOU PLAY SINGLE PLAYER AGAIN, PLEASE PLAY -10- ONLINE MATCHES. YOU WILL THEN UNLOCK SINGLE PLAYER MODE." And like I have said, Metroid Prime Trilogy will require almost no work on the single player mode, it's just rearranging control schemes and then slapping them together. If they love us, maybe they will do some graphical work. I mean MAYBE. Therefore, why not add in some multiplayer? You can't be in atmosphere mode all the time, sometimes a little competition is fun too. And the multiplayer CAN be separate from the single player, we don't have to have them intertwine like you suggest. And why would we put multiplayer on Metroid? Same reason we put it on Mario Kart Wii, Super Smash Bros Brawl, Halo, Gears of War, Pokemon, most computer games, ect ect ect. It's because it's FUN. Like I've been saying: Multiplayer can be an OPTIONAL thing. Metroid is a good candidate for multiplayer, and I say that if I can have fun that way, have at. If single player is what you are after, why not go play something like Zelda, Mario, Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy? Why must every single game be exactly how you want it to be?GabuEx

What I really, really don't want is for multiplayer to be a central enough consideration in a Metroid game such that choices are made that impact the single-player experience based on what would make multiplayer better. There are a million FPSes out there of which multiplayer is a big part. I don't want Metroid to become one of them because then it would fundamentally no longer be Metroid; it would be that much closer to just another FPS on the pile.

If people want to just have a multiplayer mode like the one in Metroid Prime 2 added, fine, be my guest, but I really don't see why someone would turn to Metroid of all games for multiplayer when there are so many other FPSesfor which multiplayer is a much larger and thus more integral consideration.

Well I never suggested that they base single player on multiplayer. In fact, I don't think that would be possible with this game, the single player is already established.
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
What I'm really trying to get across is that things change and just because someone does not like it or does not think it will work is no excuse to explore other options. Multiplayer games are appearing more and more and people clamor for them because they can be fun. Super Mario 64 was a fine game on its own, but now there is a multiplayer mode on the DS version. New WiiWare games more often than not, feature a multiplayer mode in them. In my case as well as others, multiplayer modes make me come back for more. And believe me, I get what all of you are saying about Metroid's atmosphere and all that jazz, but Nintendo tried a multiplayer approach for two of the games and people liked it. If a mass majority of people like something it's wise to market to those people and not hold back just because it's different. Grand Theft Auto, Resident Evil, Mario, Zelda, and Animal Crossing among other games are all examples of games that started out solo and changed into something else for the better. All of these are usually top-notch games so what would make you think the Metroid franchise would fail? Because it would be like other FPS's? Maybe. But that's where experimentation comes in.
Avatar image for MadSavage22
MadSavage22

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 MadSavage22
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

OK online for this game would have been awesome but its not like this isnt a deal and a half. Not to mention they also added to rewards to this game so u can unlock a bunch of new and interesting extras. As for Metroid not belonging online thats completely absurd, think about it like this. A new Metroid game with online co-op. With Hunters and Corruption they introduced many other characters, it can be done. Now as for a death match I dont know about that one. I guess it all depends on how you view Metroid, for me I would love it, others would hate it. As far as we have heard we wont be getting anymore FP Metroids so I think this thread is rather useless but oh well.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#89 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Well I never suggested that they base single player on multiplayer. In fact, I don't think that would be possible with this game, the single player is already established.Pyro767

I know, I'm talking more in terms of the general idea of Metroid with multiplayer, not specifically of adding multiplayer to Metroid Prime Trilogy.

What I'm really trying to get across is that things change and just because someone does not like it or does not think it will work is no excuse to explore other options. Multiplayer games are appearing more and more and people clamor for them because they can be fun. Super Mario 64 was a fine game on its own, but now there is a multiplayer mode on the DS version. New WiiWare games more often than not, feature a multiplayer mode in them. In my case as well as others, multiplayer modes make me come back for more. And believe me, I get what all of you are saying about Metroid's atmosphere and all that jazz, but Nintendo tried a multiplayer approach for two of the games and people liked it. If a mass majority of people like something it's wise to market to those people and not hold back just because it's different. Grand Theft Auto, Resident Evil, Mario, Zelda, and Animal Crossing among other games are all examples of games that started out solo and changed into something else for the better. All of these are usually top-notch games so what would make you think the Metroid franchise would fail? Because it would be like other FPS's? Maybe. But that's where experimentation comes in.ZumaJones07

All I am saying is what I said above: I do not want, under any circumstances, for there to be choices made that make multiplayer better in a Metroid game at the expense of single-player. Metroid's core appeal is the experience ofexplorationanddiscovery as Samus on an alien world, and that, to me, is an absolute #1top priority to be preserved at all costs.If a multiplayer mode can be added that does not in any way detract from the core single-player experience, then have at it; I have no problem with that at all.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
If a multiplayer mode can be added that does not in any way detract from the core single-player experience, then have at it; I have no problem with that at all.GabuEx
Good, we're in the same boat... err ship. :) It's just that there are people who are strictly against multiplayer for no reason at all and I just wanted to know why. The topic creator is asking for new multiplayer content added to an already made series of games and people are just being stubborn by saying no.